JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/14", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Economics", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1402", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Applied Economics", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1403", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Econometrics", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Attitude to Health", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Choice Behavior", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Consumer Behavior", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Costs and Cost Analysis", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Health Services Research", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Humans", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Models, Econometric", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Patient Satisfaction", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Policy Making", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Business School (Economics) and Institute of Health and Society, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.1006.7", 
          "name": [
            "Business School (Economics) and Institute of Health and Society, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Lancsar", 
        "givenName": "Emily", 
        "id": "sg:person.01160254015.44", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01160254015.44"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Centre for the Study of Choice, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.117476.2", 
          "name": [
            "Centre for the Study of Choice, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Louviere", 
        "givenName": "Jordan", 
        "id": "sg:person.0614632213.48", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0614632213.48"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.2165/00019053-200624090-00004", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1048633528", 
          "https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200624090-00004"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10198-005-0304-3", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1040241029", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-005-0304-3"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00181-006-0052-y", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1025334447", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-006-0052-y"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1023/a:1020258402210", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029893562", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020258402210"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1023/a:1009405608702", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1034275493", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009405608702"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10198-004-0241-6", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029354104", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-004-0241-6"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2008-08", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2008-08-01", 
    "description": "Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are regularly used in health economics to elicit preferences for healthcare products and programmes. There is growing recognition that DCEs can provide more than information on preferences and, in particular, they have the potential to contribute more directly to outcome measurement for use in economic evaluation. Almost uniquely, DCEs could potentially contribute to outcome measurement for use in both cost-benefit and cost-utility analysis.Within this expanding remit, our intention is to provide a resource for current practitioners as well as those considering undertaking a DCE, using DCE results in a policy/commercial context, or reviewing a DCE. We present the fundamental principles and theory underlying DCEs. To aid in undertaking and assessing the quality of DCEs, we discuss the process of carrying out a choice study and have developed a checklist covering conceptualizing the choice process, selecting attributes and levels, experimental design, questionnaire design, pilot testing, sampling and sample size, data collection, coding of data, econometric analysis, validity, interpretation and welfare and policy analysis.In this fast-moving area, a number of issues remain on the research frontier. We therefore outline potentially fruitful areas for future research associated both with DCEs in general, and with health applications specifically, paying attention to how the results of DCEs can be used in economic evaluation. We also discuss emerging research trends.We conclude that if appropriately designed, implemented, analysed and interpreted, DCEs offer several advantages in the health sector, the most important of which is that they provide rich data sources for economic evaluation and decision making, allowing investigation of many types of questions, some of which otherwise would be intractable analytically. Thus, they offer viable alternatives and complements to existing methods of valuation and preference elicitation.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1102812", 
        "issn": [
          "1170-7690", 
          "1179-2027"
        ], 
        "name": "PharmacoEconomics", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "8", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "26"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "discrete choice experiment", 
      "economic evaluation", 
      "choice experiment", 
      "methods of valuation", 
      "cost-utility analysis", 
      "econometric analysis", 
      "DCE results", 
      "elicit preferences", 
      "health economics", 
      "policy analysis", 
      "choice process", 
      "choice studies", 
      "preference elicitation", 
      "health sector", 
      "preferences", 
      "number of issues", 
      "decision making", 
      "economics", 
      "fruitful area", 
      "valuation", 
      "rich data source", 
      "welfare", 
      "sector", 
      "healthcare decisions", 
      "questionnaire design", 
      "data sources", 
      "types of questions", 
      "research frontiers", 
      "decisions", 
      "frontier", 
      "future research", 
      "making", 
      "resources", 
      "undertaking", 
      "attributes", 
      "analysis", 
      "healthcare products", 
      "remit", 
      "issues", 
      "theory", 
      "questions", 
      "current practitioners", 
      "trends", 
      "context", 
      "fundamental principles", 
      "viable alternative", 
      "complement", 
      "sample size", 
      "commercial context", 
      "alternative", 
      "elicitation", 
      "products", 
      "results", 
      "attention", 
      "research", 
      "data", 
      "program", 
      "data collection", 
      "information", 
      "intention", 
      "levels", 
      "quality", 
      "area", 
      "practitioners", 
      "advantages", 
      "evaluation", 
      "research trends", 
      "experimental design", 
      "source", 
      "principles", 
      "use", 
      "size", 
      "process", 
      "interpretation", 
      "validity", 
      "types", 
      "number", 
      "study", 
      "design", 
      "method", 
      "experiments", 
      "collection", 
      "potential", 
      "applications", 
      "investigation", 
      "sampling", 
      "testing", 
      "recognition", 
      "measurements", 
      "health applications", 
      "covering", 
      "pilot testing"
    ], 
    "name": "Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making", 
    "pagination": "661-677", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1008806799"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "pubmed_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "18620460"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1008806799"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T16:58", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_463.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004"
  }
]

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

227 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      134 URIs      119 LITERALS      16 BLANK NODES