2009-02
AUTHORSMarit D. Moen, Katherine A. Lyseng-Williamson, Lesley J. Scott
ABSTRACTLiposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome®) is a lipid-associated formulation of the broad-spectrum polyene antifungal agent amphotericin B. It is active against clinically relevant yeasts and moulds, including Candida spp., Aspergillus spp. and filamentous moulds such as Zygomycetes, and is approved for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in many countries worldwide. It was developed to improve the tolerability profile of amphotericin B deoxycholate, which was for many decades considered the gold standard of antifungal treatment, despite being associated with infusion-related events and nephrotoxicity.In well controlled trials, liposomal amphotericin B had similar efficacy to amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B lipid complex as empirical therapy in adult and paediatric patients with febrile neutropenia. In addition, caspofungin was noninferior to liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy in adult patients with febrile neutropenia. For the treatment of confirmed invasive fungal infections, liposomal amphotericin B was more effective than amphotericin B deoxycholate treatment in patients with disseminated histoplasmosis and AIDS, and was noninferior to amphotericin B deoxycholate in patients with acute cryptococcal meningitis and AIDS. In adults, micafungin was shown to be non-inferior to liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis. Data from animal studies suggested that higher dosages of liposomal amphotericin B might improve efficacy; however, in the AmBiLoad trial in patients with invasive mould infection, there was no statistical difference in efficacy between the standard dosage of liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg/day and a higher 10 mg/kg/day dosage, although the standard dosage was better tolerated.Despite being associated with fewer infusion-related adverse events and less nephrotoxicity than amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B lipid complex, liposomal amphotericin B use is still limited to some extent by these adverse events. Both echinocandins were better tolerated than liposomal amphotericin B. The cost of liposomal amphotericin B therapy may also restrict its use, but further pharmacoeconomic studies are required to fully define its cost effectiveness compared with other antifungal agents. Based on comparative data from well controlled trials, extensive clinical experience and its broad spectrum of activity, liposomal amphotericin B remains a first-line option for empirical therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia and in those with disseminated histoplasmosis, and is an option for the treatment of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis, and for invasive Candida spp. or Aspergillus spp. infections.Pharmacological PropertiesAmphotericin B, a macrocyclic, polyene antifungal agent, is thought to act by binding to ergosterol, the principal sterol in fungal cell membranes and Leishmania cells. This results in a change in membrane permeability, causing metabolic disturbance, leakage of small molecules and, as a consequence, cell death. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that liposomal amphotericin B remains closely associated with the liposomes in the circulation, thereby reducing the potential for nephrotoxicity and infusion-related toxicity associated with conventional amphotericin B. Amphotericin B shows very good in vitro activity against a broad spectrum of clinically relevant fungal isolates, including most strains of Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., and other filamentous fungi such as Zygomycetes. Liposomal amphotericin B has proven effective in various animal models of fungal infections, including those for candidiasis, aspergillosis, fusariosis and zygomycosis. Liposomal amphotericin B also shows immuno-modulatory effects, although the mechanisms involved are not fully understood, and differ from those of amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion.In adult patients with febrile neutropenia, intravenous liposomal amphotericin B has nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with higher than dose-proportional increases in exposure being consistent with reticuloendothelial saturation and redistribution of amphotericin B in the plasma compartment. Liposomal amphotericin B is rapidly and extensively distributed after single and multiple doses, with steady-state concentrations of amphotericin B attained within 4 days and no clinically relevant accumulation of the drug following multiple doses of 1–7.5 mg/kg/day. In autopsy tissue, the highest concentrations of the drug were found in the liver and spleen, followed by the kidney, lung, myocardium and brain tissue. Elimination of liposomal amphotericin B, like that of amphotericin B deoxycholate, is poorly understood; its route of metabolism is not known and its excretion has not been studied. The terminal elimination half-life is about 7 hours. No dosage adjustment is required based on age or renal impairment.Clinical EfficacyIn several randomized, double-blind trials (n = 73–1095) in adult and/or paediatric patients, liposomal amphotericin B was effective as empirical therapy or as treatment for confirmed invasive fungal infections, including invasive candidiasis, candidaemia, invasive mould infection (mainly aspergillosis), histoplasmosis and cryptococcal meningitis. All agents were administered as an intravenous infusion; the typical dosage for liposomal amphotericin B was 3 mg/kg/day. Treatment was generally given for 1–2 weeks.Participants in trials evaluating empirical therapy had neutropenia and a persistent fever despite antibacterial treatment and had received chemotherapy or undergone haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. As empirical therapy in adult and paediatric patients, liposomal amphotericin B appeared to be as effective as amphotericin B deoxycholate (approximately 50% of patients in each group achieved treatment success) or amphotericin B lipid complex (approximately 40% of liposomal amphotericin B recipients experienced treatment success). Of note, in the first trial, results of the statistical test to determine equivalence between treatments were not reported. In the second trial, efficacy was assessed as an ‘other’ endpoint. In another trial, caspofungin was shown to be noninferior to liposomal amphotericin B, with approximately one-third of patients in each group experiencing treatment success.Liposomal amphotericin B was significantly more effective than amphotericin B deoxycholate for the treatment of moderate to severe disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS, with 88% and 64% of patients, respectively, having a successful response. Liposomal amphotericin B was noninferior to amphotericin B deoxycholate for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in terms of mycological success. Micafungin therapy was shown to be noninferior to liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of adult patients with candidaemia or invasive candidiasis. In a substudy in paediatric patients, which was not powered to determine noninferiority, liposomal amphotericin B was as effective as micafungin for the treatment of candidaemia or invasive candidiasis. In this patient population, within each trial, 90% of adult patients and approximately three-quarters of paediatric patients in both treatment groups experienced a successful response. In patients with invasive mould infection (mainly aspergillosis), there was no difference in efficacy between a higher dosage of liposomal amphotericin B (10mg/kg/day) and the standard dosage (3 mg/kg/day), with 46% and 50% of patients experiencing a favourable overall response.TolerabilityIn well designed clinical trials, liposomal amphotericin B was generally at least as well tolerated as other lipid-associated formulations of amphotericin B and better tolerated than amphotericin B deoxycholate in adult and paediatric patients. Compared with other amphotericin B formulations, liposomal amphotericin B treatment was associated with a lower incidence of infusion-related adverse events and nephrotoxicity. A higher than recommended dosage of liposomal amphotericin B (10 mg/kg/day) was associated with an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity compared with the standard dosage (3 mg/kg/day), although the incidence of infusion-related reactions did not differ between treatment groups.In general, liposomal amphotericin B treatment was not as well tolerated as echinocandin therapy in well designed clinical trials. As empirical therapy or for the treatment of confirmed invasive fungal infections in adult patients, liposomal amphotericin B recipients experienced more infusion-related events and nephrotoxicity than caspofungin or micafungin recipients. There was no difference in the incidence of these adverse events between the liposomal amphotericin B and micafungin groups in a study in paediatric patients. More... »
PAGES361-392
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029608751
PUBMEDhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19275278
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Medical and Health Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1103",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Clinical Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Amphotericin B",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Animals",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Antifungal Agents",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Antineoplastic Agents",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Drug Administration Schedule",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Drug Resistance, Fungal",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Fever",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Fever of Unknown Origin",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Humans",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Infusions, Intravenous",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Mycoses",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Neutropenia",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Wolters Kluwer Health, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.417175.1",
"name": [
"Wolters Kluwer Health | Adis, 41 Centorian Drive, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, North Shore 0754, Auckland, New Zealand",
"Wolters Kluwer Health, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Moen",
"givenName": "Marit D.",
"id": "sg:person.01355575436.53",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01355575436.53"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Wolters Kluwer Health, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.417175.1",
"name": [
"Wolters Kluwer Health | Adis, 41 Centorian Drive, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, North Shore 0754, Auckland, New Zealand",
"Wolters Kluwer Health, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Lyseng-Williamson",
"givenName": "Katherine A.",
"id": "sg:person.0670744030.52",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0670744030.52"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Wolters Kluwer Health, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.417175.1",
"name": [
"Wolters Kluwer Health | Adis, 41 Centorian Drive, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, North Shore 0754, Auckland, New Zealand",
"Wolters Kluwer Health, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Scott",
"givenName": "Lesley J.",
"id": "sg:person.01244653776.31",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01244653776.31"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-199855040-00008",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1037108316",
"https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199855040-00008"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200767020-00009",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1028803597",
"https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200767020-00009"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200464090-00003",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1044515267",
"https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200464090-00003"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00277-007-0382-7",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018664418",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-007-0382-7"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s15010-008-7357-z",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1012761451",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-008-7357-z"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10096-004-1267-5",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051272762",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1267-5"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200868150-00010",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1047211600",
"https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200868150-00010"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.2165/00148581-200709050-00004",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1028593721",
"https://doi.org/10.2165/00148581-200709050-00004"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200565140-00009",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029615356",
"https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200565140-00009"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200868140-00002",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052447643",
"https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200868140-00002"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2009-02",
"datePublishedReg": "2009-02-01",
"description": "AbstractLiposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome\u00ae) is a lipid-associated formulation of the broad-spectrum polyene antifungal agent amphotericin B. It is active against clinically relevant yeasts and moulds, including Candida spp., Aspergillus spp. and filamentous moulds such as Zygomycetes, and is approved for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in many countries worldwide. It was developed to improve the tolerability profile of amphotericin B deoxycholate, which was for many decades considered the gold standard of antifungal treatment, despite being associated with infusion-related events and nephrotoxicity.In well controlled trials, liposomal amphotericin B had similar efficacy to amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B lipid complex as empirical therapy in adult and paediatric patients with febrile neutropenia. In addition, caspofungin was noninferior to liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy in adult patients with febrile neutropenia. For the treatment of confirmed invasive fungal infections, liposomal amphotericin B was more effective than amphotericin B deoxycholate treatment in patients with disseminated histoplasmosis and AIDS, and was noninferior to amphotericin B deoxycholate in patients with acute cryptococcal meningitis and AIDS. In adults, micafungin was shown to be non-inferior to liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis. Data from animal studies suggested that higher dosages of liposomal amphotericin B might improve efficacy; however, in the AmBiLoad trial in patients with invasive mould infection, there was no statistical difference in efficacy between the standard dosage of liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg/day and a higher 10 mg/kg/day dosage, although the standard dosage was better tolerated.Despite being associated with fewer infusion-related adverse events and less nephrotoxicity than amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B lipid complex, liposomal amphotericin B use is still limited to some extent by these adverse events. Both echinocandins were better tolerated than liposomal amphotericin B. The cost of liposomal amphotericin B therapy may also restrict its use, but further pharmacoeconomic studies are required to fully define its cost effectiveness compared with other antifungal agents. Based on comparative data from well controlled trials, extensive clinical experience and its broad spectrum of activity, liposomal amphotericin B remains a first-line option for empirical therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia and in those with disseminated histoplasmosis, and is an option for the treatment of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis, and for invasive Candida spp. or Aspergillus spp. infections.Pharmacological PropertiesAmphotericin B, a macrocyclic, polyene antifungal agent, is thought to act by binding to ergosterol, the principal sterol in fungal cell membranes and Leishmania cells. This results in a change in membrane permeability, causing metabolic disturbance, leakage of small molecules and, as a consequence, cell death. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that liposomal amphotericin B remains closely associated with the liposomes in the circulation, thereby reducing the potential for nephrotoxicity and infusion-related toxicity associated with conventional amphotericin B. Amphotericin B shows very good in vitro activity against a broad spectrum of clinically relevant fungal isolates, including most strains of Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., and other filamentous fungi such as Zygomycetes. Liposomal amphotericin B has proven effective in various animal models of fungal infections, including those for candidiasis, aspergillosis, fusariosis and zygomycosis. Liposomal amphotericin B also shows immuno-modulatory effects, although the mechanisms involved are not fully understood, and differ from those of amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion.In adult patients with febrile neutropenia, intravenous liposomal amphotericin B has nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with higher than dose-proportional increases in exposure being consistent with reticuloendothelial saturation and redistribution of amphotericin B in the plasma compartment. Liposomal amphotericin B is rapidly and extensively distributed after single and multiple doses, with steady-state concentrations of amphotericin B attained within 4 days and no clinically relevant accumulation of the drug following multiple doses of 1\u20137.5 mg/kg/day. In autopsy tissue, the highest concentrations of the drug were found in the liver and spleen, followed by the kidney, lung, myocardium and brain tissue. Elimination of liposomal amphotericin B, like that of amphotericin B deoxycholate, is poorly understood; its route of metabolism is not known and its excretion has not been studied. The terminal elimination half-life is about 7 hours. No dosage adjustment is required based on age or renal impairment.Clinical EfficacyIn several randomized, double-blind trials (n = 73\u20131095) in adult and/or paediatric patients, liposomal amphotericin B was effective as empirical therapy or as treatment for confirmed invasive fungal infections, including invasive candidiasis, candidaemia, invasive mould infection (mainly aspergillosis), histoplasmosis and cryptococcal meningitis. All agents were administered as an intravenous infusion; the typical dosage for liposomal amphotericin B was 3 mg/kg/day. Treatment was generally given for 1\u20132 weeks.Participants in trials evaluating empirical therapy had neutropenia and a persistent fever despite antibacterial treatment and had received chemotherapy or undergone haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. As empirical therapy in adult and paediatric patients, liposomal amphotericin B appeared to be as effective as amphotericin B deoxycholate (approximately 50% of patients in each group achieved treatment success) or amphotericin B lipid complex (approximately 40% of liposomal amphotericin B recipients experienced treatment success). Of note, in the first trial, results of the statistical test to determine equivalence between treatments were not reported. In the second trial, efficacy was assessed as an \u2018other\u2019 endpoint. In another trial, caspofungin was shown to be noninferior to liposomal amphotericin B, with approximately one-third of patients in each group experiencing treatment success.Liposomal amphotericin B was significantly more effective than amphotericin B deoxycholate for the treatment of moderate to severe disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS, with 88% and 64% of patients, respectively, having a successful response. Liposomal amphotericin B was noninferior to amphotericin B deoxycholate for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in terms of mycological success. Micafungin therapy was shown to be noninferior to liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of adult patients with candidaemia or invasive candidiasis. In a substudy in paediatric patients, which was not powered to determine noninferiority, liposomal amphotericin B was as effective as micafungin for the treatment of candidaemia or invasive candidiasis. In this patient population, within each trial, 90% of adult patients and approximately three-quarters of paediatric patients in both treatment groups experienced a successful response. In patients with invasive mould infection (mainly aspergillosis), there was no difference in efficacy between a higher dosage of liposomal amphotericin B (10mg/kg/day) and the standard dosage (3 mg/kg/day), with 46% and 50% of patients experiencing a favourable overall response.TolerabilityIn well designed clinical trials, liposomal amphotericin B was generally at least as well tolerated as other lipid-associated formulations of amphotericin B and better tolerated than amphotericin B deoxycholate in adult and paediatric patients. Compared with other amphotericin B formulations, liposomal amphotericin B treatment was associated with a lower incidence of infusion-related adverse events and nephrotoxicity. A higher than recommended dosage of liposomal amphotericin B (10 mg/kg/day) was associated with an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity compared with the standard dosage (3 mg/kg/day), although the incidence of infusion-related reactions did not differ between treatment groups.In general, liposomal amphotericin B treatment was not as well tolerated as echinocandin therapy in well designed clinical trials. As empirical therapy or for the treatment of confirmed invasive fungal infections in adult patients, liposomal amphotericin B recipients experienced more infusion-related events and nephrotoxicity than caspofungin or micafungin recipients. There was no difference in the incidence of these adverse events between the liposomal amphotericin B and micafungin groups in a study in paediatric patients.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1084788",
"issn": [
"0012-6667",
"1179-1950"
],
"name": "Drugs",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "3",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "69"
}
],
"keywords": [
"liposomal amphotericin B",
"amphotericin B deoxycholate",
"invasive fungal infections",
"invasive mold infections",
"liposomal amphotericin B treatment",
"infusion-related adverse events",
"amphotericin B lipid complex",
"lipid-associated formulations",
"infusion-related events",
"empirical therapy",
"pediatric patients",
"adult patients",
"treatment of candidaemia",
"febrile neutropenia",
"cryptococcal meningitis",
"amphotericin B treatment",
"adverse events",
"standard dosage",
"invasive candidiasis",
"disseminated histoplasmosis",
"amphotericin B",
"fungal infections",
"mold infections",
"multiple doses",
"clinical trials",
"Candida spp",
"treatment groups",
"amphotericin B deoxycholate treatment",
"amphotericin B.",
"intravenous liposomal amphotericin B",
"haematopoietic stem cell transplantation",
"liposomal amphotericin B therapy",
"amphotericin B colloidal dispersion",
"acute cryptococcal meningitis",
"amphotericin B lipid",
"amphotericin B use",
"invasive Candida spp",
"severe disseminated histoplasmosis",
"favorable overall response",
"amphotericin B recipients",
"double-blind trial",
"infusion-related reactions",
"amphotericin B therapy",
"infusion-related toxicity",
"dose-proportional increase",
"incidence of nephrotoxicity",
"liposomal amphotericin B.",
"first-line option",
"stem cell transplantation",
"high dosage",
"amphotericin B. Amphotericin B",
"immuno-modulatory effects",
"Further pharmacoeconomic studies",
"amphotericin B formulations",
"extensive clinical experience",
"successful response",
"Aspergillus spp",
"antifungal agents",
"treatment of AIDS",
"B treatment",
"Clinical EfficacyIn",
"mycological success",
"micafungin recipients",
"micafungin group",
"tolerability profile",
"renal impairment",
"persistent fever",
"B therapy",
"terminal elimination",
"B recipients",
"less nephrotoxicity",
"routes of metabolism",
"dosage adjustment",
"lipid complex",
"day dosage",
"micafungin therapy",
"intravenous infusion",
"cell transplantation",
"patient population",
"metabolic disturbances",
"similar efficacy",
"treatment success",
"antifungal treatment",
"lower incidence",
"neutropenia",
"echinocandin therapy",
"autopsy tissue",
"nephrotoxicity",
"relevant accumulation",
"patients",
"nonlinear pharmacokinetics",
"antifungal agent amphotericin B.",
"meningitis",
"animal studies",
"clinical experience",
"animal models",
"candidaemia",
"therapy",
"histoplasmosis",
"pharmacoeconomic studies",
"B formulations",
"candidiasis",
"B use",
"brain tissue",
"infection",
"plasma compartment",
"incidence",
"AIDS",
"trials",
"statistical difference",
"vivo studies",
"antibacterial treatment",
"gold standard",
"broad spectrum",
"efficacy",
"typical dosage",
"adults",
"caspofungin",
"treatment",
"second trial",
"steady-state concentrations",
"polyene antifungal agent",
"one-third",
"first trial",
"micafungin",
"cell death",
"overall response",
"doses",
"dosage",
"recipients",
"three-quarters",
"days",
"drugs",
"Leishmania cells",
"most strains",
"cost effectiveness",
"group",
"fungal cell membrane",
"tissue",
"deoxycholate",
"deoxycholate treatment",
"agents",
"EfficacyIn",
"TolerabilityIn",
"response",
"substudy",
"chemotherapy",
"B.",
"aspergillosis",
"zygomycosis",
"fever",
"transplantation",
"noninferiority",
"filamentous molds",
"options",
"lung",
"infusion",
"comparative data",
"pharmacokinetics",
"spleen",
"cell membrane",
"kidney",
"myocardium",
"excretion",
"differences",
"Zygomycetes",
"study",
"liver",
"echinocandins",
"impairment",
"weeks",
"endpoint",
"events",
"death",
"high concentrations",
"age",
"fusariosis",
"vitro",
"spp",
"activity",
"elimination",
"toxicity",
"exposure",
"metabolism",
"relevant yeasts",
"membrane permeability",
"hours",
"participants",
"statistical tests",
"cells",
"isolates",
"lipids",
"population",
"concentration",
"small molecules",
"use",
"circulation",
"compartments",
"adjustment",
"fungal isolates",
"data",
"liposomes",
"accumulation",
"success",
"increase",
"test",
"effect",
"disturbances",
"experience",
"strains",
"profile",
"changes",
"sterols",
"mechanism",
"leakage",
"extent",
"membrane",
"addition",
"consequences",
"principal sterol",
"effectiveness",
"permeability",
"standards",
"saturation",
"countries",
"potential",
"decades",
"results",
"formulation",
"route",
"ergosterol",
"molecules",
"complexes",
"reaction",
"note",
"filamentous fungi",
"model",
"mold",
"fungi",
"redistribution",
"cost",
"terms",
"yeast",
"spectra",
"equivalence",
"macrocyclic",
"colloidal dispersions",
"dispersion"
],
"name": "Liposomal Amphotericin B",
"pagination": "361-392",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1029608751"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010"
]
},
{
"name": "pubmed_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"19275278"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029608751"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T16:57",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_479.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
412 TRIPLES
21 PREDICATES
296 URIs
278 LITERALS
19 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010 | schema:about | N2cc1496981254ca5a1034d4c8e019b65 |
2 | ″ | ″ | N2e2ff64bcdf543858544b81262806797 |
3 | ″ | ″ | N47191a085ab4421c915fd2aa2c616757 |
4 | ″ | ″ | N50b849488f1143ceb4fc32c6ad79c498 |
5 | ″ | ″ | N72f8d2c2a6a24a9096ae317213e543e9 |
6 | ″ | ″ | N7b1bc256b4354ae1b197c3bd387aebcd |
7 | ″ | ″ | N7c88fb5cd6ea45a3b06c0da886829f6b |
8 | ″ | ″ | N7f97748c7a674a1b874691aacf9490a0 |
9 | ″ | ″ | N81d695e941564d6ba1c7563f4b6b6c43 |
10 | ″ | ″ | Nb1d04f8740e24afca14fc540c7858f8c |
11 | ″ | ″ | Nb5a4a6ef59ae4c39af92444c4fd68fac |
12 | ″ | ″ | Nc1c2e8ce5bcf4ea2b0ad07f2704aa908 |
13 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:11 |
14 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:1103 |
15 | ″ | schema:author | N8ba946ecb6fc4e2d88644654bc0a4a0f |
16 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/s00277-007-0382-7 |
17 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s10096-004-1267-5 |
18 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s15010-008-7357-z |
19 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-199855040-00008 |
20 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200464090-00003 |
21 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200565140-00009 |
22 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200767020-00009 |
23 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200868140-00002 |
24 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200868150-00010 |
25 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.2165/00148581-200709050-00004 |
26 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2009-02 |
27 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2009-02-01 |
28 | ″ | schema:description | AbstractLiposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome®) is a lipid-associated formulation of the broad-spectrum polyene antifungal agent amphotericin B. It is active against clinically relevant yeasts and moulds, including Candida spp., Aspergillus spp. and filamentous moulds such as Zygomycetes, and is approved for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in many countries worldwide. It was developed to improve the tolerability profile of amphotericin B deoxycholate, which was for many decades considered the gold standard of antifungal treatment, despite being associated with infusion-related events and nephrotoxicity.In well controlled trials, liposomal amphotericin B had similar efficacy to amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B lipid complex as empirical therapy in adult and paediatric patients with febrile neutropenia. In addition, caspofungin was noninferior to liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy in adult patients with febrile neutropenia. For the treatment of confirmed invasive fungal infections, liposomal amphotericin B was more effective than amphotericin B deoxycholate treatment in patients with disseminated histoplasmosis and AIDS, and was noninferior to amphotericin B deoxycholate in patients with acute cryptococcal meningitis and AIDS. In adults, micafungin was shown to be non-inferior to liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis. Data from animal studies suggested that higher dosages of liposomal amphotericin B might improve efficacy; however, in the AmBiLoad trial in patients with invasive mould infection, there was no statistical difference in efficacy between the standard dosage of liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg/day and a higher 10 mg/kg/day dosage, although the standard dosage was better tolerated.Despite being associated with fewer infusion-related adverse events and less nephrotoxicity than amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B lipid complex, liposomal amphotericin B use is still limited to some extent by these adverse events. Both echinocandins were better tolerated than liposomal amphotericin B. The cost of liposomal amphotericin B therapy may also restrict its use, but further pharmacoeconomic studies are required to fully define its cost effectiveness compared with other antifungal agents. Based on comparative data from well controlled trials, extensive clinical experience and its broad spectrum of activity, liposomal amphotericin B remains a first-line option for empirical therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia and in those with disseminated histoplasmosis, and is an option for the treatment of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis, and for invasive Candida spp. or Aspergillus spp. infections.Pharmacological PropertiesAmphotericin B, a macrocyclic, polyene antifungal agent, is thought to act by binding to ergosterol, the principal sterol in fungal cell membranes and Leishmania cells. This results in a change in membrane permeability, causing metabolic disturbance, leakage of small molecules and, as a consequence, cell death. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that liposomal amphotericin B remains closely associated with the liposomes in the circulation, thereby reducing the potential for nephrotoxicity and infusion-related toxicity associated with conventional amphotericin B. Amphotericin B shows very good in vitro activity against a broad spectrum of clinically relevant fungal isolates, including most strains of Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., and other filamentous fungi such as Zygomycetes. Liposomal amphotericin B has proven effective in various animal models of fungal infections, including those for candidiasis, aspergillosis, fusariosis and zygomycosis. Liposomal amphotericin B also shows immuno-modulatory effects, although the mechanisms involved are not fully understood, and differ from those of amphotericin B deoxycholate and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion.In adult patients with febrile neutropenia, intravenous liposomal amphotericin B has nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with higher than dose-proportional increases in exposure being consistent with reticuloendothelial saturation and redistribution of amphotericin B in the plasma compartment. Liposomal amphotericin B is rapidly and extensively distributed after single and multiple doses, with steady-state concentrations of amphotericin B attained within 4 days and no clinically relevant accumulation of the drug following multiple doses of 1–7.5 mg/kg/day. In autopsy tissue, the highest concentrations of the drug were found in the liver and spleen, followed by the kidney, lung, myocardium and brain tissue. Elimination of liposomal amphotericin B, like that of amphotericin B deoxycholate, is poorly understood; its route of metabolism is not known and its excretion has not been studied. The terminal elimination half-life is about 7 hours. No dosage adjustment is required based on age or renal impairment.Clinical EfficacyIn several randomized, double-blind trials (n = 73–1095) in adult and/or paediatric patients, liposomal amphotericin B was effective as empirical therapy or as treatment for confirmed invasive fungal infections, including invasive candidiasis, candidaemia, invasive mould infection (mainly aspergillosis), histoplasmosis and cryptococcal meningitis. All agents were administered as an intravenous infusion; the typical dosage for liposomal amphotericin B was 3 mg/kg/day. Treatment was generally given for 1–2 weeks.Participants in trials evaluating empirical therapy had neutropenia and a persistent fever despite antibacterial treatment and had received chemotherapy or undergone haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. As empirical therapy in adult and paediatric patients, liposomal amphotericin B appeared to be as effective as amphotericin B deoxycholate (approximately 50% of patients in each group achieved treatment success) or amphotericin B lipid complex (approximately 40% of liposomal amphotericin B recipients experienced treatment success). Of note, in the first trial, results of the statistical test to determine equivalence between treatments were not reported. In the second trial, efficacy was assessed as an ‘other’ endpoint. In another trial, caspofungin was shown to be noninferior to liposomal amphotericin B, with approximately one-third of patients in each group experiencing treatment success.Liposomal amphotericin B was significantly more effective than amphotericin B deoxycholate for the treatment of moderate to severe disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS, with 88% and 64% of patients, respectively, having a successful response. Liposomal amphotericin B was noninferior to amphotericin B deoxycholate for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in terms of mycological success. Micafungin therapy was shown to be noninferior to liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of adult patients with candidaemia or invasive candidiasis. In a substudy in paediatric patients, which was not powered to determine noninferiority, liposomal amphotericin B was as effective as micafungin for the treatment of candidaemia or invasive candidiasis. In this patient population, within each trial, 90% of adult patients and approximately three-quarters of paediatric patients in both treatment groups experienced a successful response. In patients with invasive mould infection (mainly aspergillosis), there was no difference in efficacy between a higher dosage of liposomal amphotericin B (10mg/kg/day) and the standard dosage (3 mg/kg/day), with 46% and 50% of patients experiencing a favourable overall response.TolerabilityIn well designed clinical trials, liposomal amphotericin B was generally at least as well tolerated as other lipid-associated formulations of amphotericin B and better tolerated than amphotericin B deoxycholate in adult and paediatric patients. Compared with other amphotericin B formulations, liposomal amphotericin B treatment was associated with a lower incidence of infusion-related adverse events and nephrotoxicity. A higher than recommended dosage of liposomal amphotericin B (10 mg/kg/day) was associated with an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity compared with the standard dosage (3 mg/kg/day), although the incidence of infusion-related reactions did not differ between treatment groups.In general, liposomal amphotericin B treatment was not as well tolerated as echinocandin therapy in well designed clinical trials. As empirical therapy or for the treatment of confirmed invasive fungal infections in adult patients, liposomal amphotericin B recipients experienced more infusion-related events and nephrotoxicity than caspofungin or micafungin recipients. There was no difference in the incidence of these adverse events between the liposomal amphotericin B and micafungin groups in a study in paediatric patients. |
29 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
30 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
31 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N38f980e589934db19e2070c3f44a10fd |
32 | ″ | ″ | Na9fe57961046428abcbd65ec631952dd |
33 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1084788 |
34 | ″ | schema:keywords | AIDS |
35 | ″ | ″ | Aspergillus spp |
36 | ″ | ″ | B formulations |
37 | ″ | ″ | B recipients |
38 | ″ | ″ | B therapy |
39 | ″ | ″ | B treatment |
40 | ″ | ″ | B use |
41 | ″ | ″ | B. |
42 | ″ | ″ | Candida spp |
43 | ″ | ″ | Clinical EfficacyIn |
44 | ″ | ″ | EfficacyIn |
45 | ″ | ″ | Further pharmacoeconomic studies |
46 | ″ | ″ | Leishmania cells |
47 | ″ | ″ | TolerabilityIn |
48 | ″ | ″ | Zygomycetes |
49 | ″ | ″ | accumulation |
50 | ″ | ″ | activity |
51 | ″ | ″ | acute cryptococcal meningitis |
52 | ″ | ″ | addition |
53 | ″ | ″ | adjustment |
54 | ″ | ″ | adult patients |
55 | ″ | ″ | adults |
56 | ″ | ″ | adverse events |
57 | ″ | ″ | age |
58 | ″ | ″ | agents |
59 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B |
60 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B colloidal dispersion |
61 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B deoxycholate |
62 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B deoxycholate treatment |
63 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B formulations |
64 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B lipid |
65 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B lipid complex |
66 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B recipients |
67 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B therapy |
68 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B treatment |
69 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B use |
70 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B. |
71 | ″ | ″ | amphotericin B. Amphotericin B |
72 | ″ | ″ | animal models |
73 | ″ | ″ | animal studies |
74 | ″ | ″ | antibacterial treatment |
75 | ″ | ″ | antifungal agent amphotericin B. |
76 | ″ | ″ | antifungal agents |
77 | ″ | ″ | antifungal treatment |
78 | ″ | ″ | aspergillosis |
79 | ″ | ″ | autopsy tissue |
80 | ″ | ″ | brain tissue |
81 | ″ | ″ | broad spectrum |
82 | ″ | ″ | candidaemia |
83 | ″ | ″ | candidiasis |
84 | ″ | ″ | caspofungin |
85 | ″ | ″ | cell death |
86 | ″ | ″ | cell membrane |
87 | ″ | ″ | cell transplantation |
88 | ″ | ″ | cells |
89 | ″ | ″ | changes |
90 | ″ | ″ | chemotherapy |
91 | ″ | ″ | circulation |
92 | ″ | ″ | clinical experience |
93 | ″ | ″ | clinical trials |
94 | ″ | ″ | colloidal dispersions |
95 | ″ | ″ | comparative data |
96 | ″ | ″ | compartments |
97 | ″ | ″ | complexes |
98 | ″ | ″ | concentration |
99 | ″ | ″ | consequences |
100 | ″ | ″ | cost |
101 | ″ | ″ | cost effectiveness |
102 | ″ | ″ | countries |
103 | ″ | ″ | cryptococcal meningitis |
104 | ″ | ″ | data |
105 | ″ | ″ | day dosage |
106 | ″ | ″ | days |
107 | ″ | ″ | death |
108 | ″ | ″ | decades |
109 | ″ | ″ | deoxycholate |
110 | ″ | ″ | deoxycholate treatment |
111 | ″ | ″ | differences |
112 | ″ | ″ | dispersion |
113 | ″ | ″ | disseminated histoplasmosis |
114 | ″ | ″ | disturbances |
115 | ″ | ″ | dosage |
116 | ″ | ″ | dosage adjustment |
117 | ″ | ″ | dose-proportional increase |
118 | ″ | ″ | doses |
119 | ″ | ″ | double-blind trial |
120 | ″ | ″ | drugs |
121 | ″ | ″ | echinocandin therapy |
122 | ″ | ″ | echinocandins |
123 | ″ | ″ | effect |
124 | ″ | ″ | effectiveness |
125 | ″ | ″ | efficacy |
126 | ″ | ″ | elimination |
127 | ″ | ″ | empirical therapy |
128 | ″ | ″ | endpoint |
129 | ″ | ″ | equivalence |
130 | ″ | ″ | ergosterol |
131 | ″ | ″ | events |
132 | ″ | ″ | excretion |
133 | ″ | ″ | experience |
134 | ″ | ″ | exposure |
135 | ″ | ″ | extensive clinical experience |
136 | ″ | ″ | extent |
137 | ″ | ″ | favorable overall response |
138 | ″ | ″ | febrile neutropenia |
139 | ″ | ″ | fever |
140 | ″ | ″ | filamentous fungi |
141 | ″ | ″ | filamentous molds |
142 | ″ | ″ | first trial |
143 | ″ | ″ | first-line option |
144 | ″ | ″ | formulation |
145 | ″ | ″ | fungal cell membrane |
146 | ″ | ″ | fungal infections |
147 | ″ | ″ | fungal isolates |
148 | ″ | ″ | fungi |
149 | ″ | ″ | fusariosis |
150 | ″ | ″ | gold standard |
151 | ″ | ″ | group |
152 | ″ | ″ | haematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
153 | ″ | ″ | high concentrations |
154 | ″ | ″ | high dosage |
155 | ″ | ″ | histoplasmosis |
156 | ″ | ″ | hours |
157 | ″ | ″ | immuno-modulatory effects |
158 | ″ | ″ | impairment |
159 | ″ | ″ | incidence |
160 | ″ | ″ | incidence of nephrotoxicity |
161 | ″ | ″ | increase |
162 | ″ | ″ | infection |
163 | ″ | ″ | infusion |
164 | ″ | ″ | infusion-related adverse events |
165 | ″ | ″ | infusion-related events |
166 | ″ | ″ | infusion-related reactions |
167 | ″ | ″ | infusion-related toxicity |
168 | ″ | ″ | intravenous infusion |
169 | ″ | ″ | intravenous liposomal amphotericin B |
170 | ″ | ″ | invasive Candida spp |
171 | ″ | ″ | invasive candidiasis |
172 | ″ | ″ | invasive fungal infections |
173 | ″ | ″ | invasive mold infections |
174 | ″ | ″ | isolates |
175 | ″ | ″ | kidney |
176 | ″ | ″ | leakage |
177 | ″ | ″ | less nephrotoxicity |
178 | ″ | ″ | lipid complex |
179 | ″ | ″ | lipid-associated formulations |
180 | ″ | ″ | lipids |
181 | ″ | ″ | liposomal amphotericin B |
182 | ″ | ″ | liposomal amphotericin B therapy |
183 | ″ | ″ | liposomal amphotericin B treatment |
184 | ″ | ″ | liposomal amphotericin B. |
185 | ″ | ″ | liposomes |
186 | ″ | ″ | liver |
187 | ″ | ″ | lower incidence |
188 | ″ | ″ | lung |
189 | ″ | ″ | macrocyclic |
190 | ″ | ″ | mechanism |
191 | ″ | ″ | membrane |
192 | ″ | ″ | membrane permeability |
193 | ″ | ″ | meningitis |
194 | ″ | ″ | metabolic disturbances |
195 | ″ | ″ | metabolism |
196 | ″ | ″ | micafungin |
197 | ″ | ″ | micafungin group |
198 | ″ | ″ | micafungin recipients |
199 | ″ | ″ | micafungin therapy |
200 | ″ | ″ | model |
201 | ″ | ″ | mold |
202 | ″ | ″ | mold infections |
203 | ″ | ″ | molecules |
204 | ″ | ″ | most strains |
205 | ″ | ″ | multiple doses |
206 | ″ | ″ | mycological success |
207 | ″ | ″ | myocardium |
208 | ″ | ″ | nephrotoxicity |
209 | ″ | ″ | neutropenia |
210 | ″ | ″ | noninferiority |
211 | ″ | ″ | nonlinear pharmacokinetics |
212 | ″ | ″ | note |
213 | ″ | ″ | one-third |
214 | ″ | ″ | options |
215 | ″ | ″ | overall response |
216 | ″ | ″ | participants |
217 | ″ | ″ | patient population |
218 | ″ | ″ | patients |
219 | ″ | ″ | pediatric patients |
220 | ″ | ″ | permeability |
221 | ″ | ″ | persistent fever |
222 | ″ | ″ | pharmacoeconomic studies |
223 | ″ | ″ | pharmacokinetics |
224 | ″ | ″ | plasma compartment |
225 | ″ | ″ | polyene antifungal agent |
226 | ″ | ″ | population |
227 | ″ | ″ | potential |
228 | ″ | ″ | principal sterol |
229 | ″ | ″ | profile |
230 | ″ | ″ | reaction |
231 | ″ | ″ | recipients |
232 | ″ | ″ | redistribution |
233 | ″ | ″ | relevant accumulation |
234 | ″ | ″ | relevant yeasts |
235 | ″ | ″ | renal impairment |
236 | ″ | ″ | response |
237 | ″ | ″ | results |
238 | ″ | ″ | route |
239 | ″ | ″ | routes of metabolism |
240 | ″ | ″ | saturation |
241 | ″ | ″ | second trial |
242 | ″ | ″ | severe disseminated histoplasmosis |
243 | ″ | ″ | similar efficacy |
244 | ″ | ″ | small molecules |
245 | ″ | ″ | spectra |
246 | ″ | ″ | spleen |
247 | ″ | ″ | spp |
248 | ″ | ″ | standard dosage |
249 | ″ | ″ | standards |
250 | ″ | ″ | statistical difference |
251 | ″ | ″ | statistical tests |
252 | ″ | ″ | steady-state concentrations |
253 | ″ | ″ | stem cell transplantation |
254 | ″ | ″ | sterols |
255 | ″ | ″ | strains |
256 | ″ | ″ | study |
257 | ″ | ″ | substudy |
258 | ″ | ″ | success |
259 | ″ | ″ | successful response |
260 | ″ | ″ | terminal elimination |
261 | ″ | ″ | terms |
262 | ″ | ″ | test |
263 | ″ | ″ | therapy |
264 | ″ | ″ | three-quarters |
265 | ″ | ″ | tissue |
266 | ″ | ″ | tolerability profile |
267 | ″ | ″ | toxicity |
268 | ″ | ″ | transplantation |
269 | ″ | ″ | treatment |
270 | ″ | ″ | treatment groups |
271 | ″ | ″ | treatment of AIDS |
272 | ″ | ″ | treatment of candidaemia |
273 | ″ | ″ | treatment success |
274 | ″ | ″ | trials |
275 | ″ | ″ | typical dosage |
276 | ″ | ″ | use |
277 | ″ | ″ | vitro |
278 | ″ | ″ | vivo studies |
279 | ″ | ″ | weeks |
280 | ″ | ″ | yeast |
281 | ″ | ″ | zygomycosis |
282 | ″ | schema:name | Liposomal Amphotericin B |
283 | ″ | schema:pagination | 361-392 |
284 | ″ | schema:productId | N26185fec97f442db8e35e0f1893df8f5 |
285 | ″ | ″ | N60531bc4c60747b98adea889c4dee596 |
286 | ″ | ″ | N9b160fcd8b734ca4ae3e0d0ef0e70a0c |
287 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029608751 |
288 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010 |
289 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-08-04T16:57 |
290 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
291 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | Nd59d07de69d14464a8353d2a7be8d903 |
292 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010 |
293 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
294 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
295 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
296 | N16fa9e8df01f4e9aaa5ee1cd3e41931a | rdf:first | sg:person.01244653776.31 |
297 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
298 | N26185fec97f442db8e35e0f1893df8f5 | schema:name | doi |
299 | ″ | schema:value | 10.2165/00003495-200969030-00010 |
300 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
301 | N2cc1496981254ca5a1034d4c8e019b65 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
302 | ″ | schema:name | Animals |
303 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
304 | N2e2ff64bcdf543858544b81262806797 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
305 | ″ | schema:name | Antineoplastic Agents |
306 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
307 | N38f980e589934db19e2070c3f44a10fd | schema:issueNumber | 3 |
308 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
309 | N47191a085ab4421c915fd2aa2c616757 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
310 | ″ | schema:name | Amphotericin B |
311 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
312 | N50b849488f1143ceb4fc32c6ad79c498 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
313 | ″ | schema:name | Drug Administration Schedule |
314 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
315 | N60531bc4c60747b98adea889c4dee596 | schema:name | pubmed_id |
316 | ″ | schema:value | 19275278 |
317 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
318 | N72f8d2c2a6a24a9096ae317213e543e9 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
319 | ″ | schema:name | Humans |
320 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
321 | N7b1bc256b4354ae1b197c3bd387aebcd | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
322 | ″ | schema:name | Neutropenia |
323 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
324 | N7c88fb5cd6ea45a3b06c0da886829f6b | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
325 | ″ | schema:name | Antifungal Agents |
326 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
327 | N7f97748c7a674a1b874691aacf9490a0 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
328 | ″ | schema:name | Infusions, Intravenous |
329 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
330 | N81d695e941564d6ba1c7563f4b6b6c43 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
331 | ″ | schema:name | Mycoses |
332 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
333 | N8ba946ecb6fc4e2d88644654bc0a4a0f | rdf:first | sg:person.01355575436.53 |
334 | ″ | rdf:rest | Ne9900b82c8564beaa3374706149a1409 |
335 | N9b160fcd8b734ca4ae3e0d0ef0e70a0c | schema:name | dimensions_id |
336 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1029608751 |
337 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
338 | Na9fe57961046428abcbd65ec631952dd | schema:volumeNumber | 69 |
339 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
340 | Nb1d04f8740e24afca14fc540c7858f8c | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
341 | ″ | schema:name | Fever of Unknown Origin |
342 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
343 | Nb5a4a6ef59ae4c39af92444c4fd68fac | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
344 | ″ | schema:name | Drug Resistance, Fungal |
345 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
346 | Nc1c2e8ce5bcf4ea2b0ad07f2704aa908 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
347 | ″ | schema:name | Fever |
348 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
349 | Nd59d07de69d14464a8353d2a7be8d903 | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
350 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
351 | Ne9900b82c8564beaa3374706149a1409 | rdf:first | sg:person.0670744030.52 |
352 | ″ | rdf:rest | N16fa9e8df01f4e9aaa5ee1cd3e41931a |
353 | anzsrc-for:11 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
354 | ″ | schema:name | Medical and Health Sciences |
355 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
356 | anzsrc-for:1103 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
357 | ″ | schema:name | Clinical Sciences |
358 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
359 | sg:journal.1084788 | schema:issn | 0012-6667 |
360 | ″ | ″ | 1179-1950 |
361 | ″ | schema:name | Drugs |
362 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
363 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
364 | sg:person.01244653776.31 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.417175.1 |
365 | ″ | schema:familyName | Scott |
366 | ″ | schema:givenName | Lesley J. |
367 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01244653776.31 |
368 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
369 | sg:person.01355575436.53 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.417175.1 |
370 | ″ | schema:familyName | Moen |
371 | ″ | schema:givenName | Marit D. |
372 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01355575436.53 |
373 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
374 | sg:person.0670744030.52 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.417175.1 |
375 | ″ | schema:familyName | Lyseng-Williamson |
376 | ″ | schema:givenName | Katherine A. |
377 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0670744030.52 |
378 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
379 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00277-007-0382-7 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018664418 |
380 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-007-0382-7 |
381 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
382 | sg:pub.10.1007/s10096-004-1267-5 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051272762 |
383 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1267-5 |
384 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
385 | sg:pub.10.1007/s15010-008-7357-z | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1012761451 |
386 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-008-7357-z |
387 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
388 | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-199855040-00008 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1037108316 |
389 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199855040-00008 |
390 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
391 | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200464090-00003 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1044515267 |
392 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200464090-00003 |
393 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
394 | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200565140-00009 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029615356 |
395 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200565140-00009 |
396 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
397 | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200767020-00009 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1028803597 |
398 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200767020-00009 |
399 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
400 | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200868140-00002 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052447643 |
401 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200868140-00002 |
402 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
403 | sg:pub.10.2165/00003495-200868150-00010 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1047211600 |
404 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200868150-00010 |
405 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
406 | sg:pub.10.2165/00148581-200709050-00004 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1028593721 |
407 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.2165/00148581-200709050-00004 |
408 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
409 | grid-institutes:grid.417175.1 | schema:alternateName | Wolters Kluwer Health, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA |
410 | ″ | schema:name | Wolters Kluwer Health | Adis, 41 Centorian Drive, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, North Shore 0754, Auckland, New Zealand |
411 | ″ | ″ | Wolters Kluwer Health, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA |
412 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |