Erythrocytic Malaria Growth or Invasion Inhibition Assays with Emphasis on Suspension Culture GIA View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:Chapter     


Chapter Info

DATE

2002-06-28

AUTHORS

Denise L. Doolan , J. David Haynes , J. Kathleen Moch , Douglas S. Smoot

ABSTRACT

Erythrocytic cycle malaria parasite growth or invasion inhibition assays (GIA) compare the effects of various test and control substances on malaria parasite growth in erythrocytes or invasion into erythrocytes in vitro. Although inhibitions by antimalarial drugs in vitro correlate well with drug protective levels required in vivo, as yet there are too few data to know how well inhibitions by antibodies in vitro correlate with the types and degrees of immune protection in vivo. Antibody-mediated GIA is frequently complicated by parasite strain-specific inhibitions, as well as nonspecific inhibitory factors generated in sera collected or stored under nonoptimal conditions. In this chapter, we describe methods for collecting and processing sera, for using different strains of parasite, and a simplified method for staining parasite DNA with Hoechst dye 33342 before quantitating parasites using ultraviolet (UV)-excited flow cytometry. We also describe a new type of GIA using suspension cultures in a 48-well plate. Critical to this method is enclosing the plate in a gassed, heat-sealed plastic bag, which, being low mass, can easily be rested at a 13.5° angle on a rotor platform (114 rpm with 1-in. displacement) to produce gentle pulsatile waves of media in each well. The suspension GIA, which, relative to the static GIA, increased inhibition by one antibody and decreased inhibition by another Table 1), may better simulate in vivo blood flow and may thus better predict in vivo efficacy. Table 1 An Example of GIA Data a Inhibition per cycle Suspension Static Isolate Anti-A (%) Anti-B (%) Anti-A (%) Anti-B (%) FVO 52 a -7 43 32 3D7 12 3 4 26 a Inhibition per cycle (IPC) compared in suspension GIA and static GIA for two inhibitory antibodies. One set of GIA data (from four 48-well plates, two-cycle cultures, 6% Hct, 0.5 (anti-A) or 1 (anti-B) mg/mL IgG, 150 mL per well) were analyzed by Eq. 3b, IPC = 100% × [1 –(PTF/PCF)1/2], where PTF is the final parasitemia in the presence of test antibody and PCF is the final parasitemia in the presence of control antibody. Parasitemias (infected erythrocytes per 100 erythrocytes) were determined by UV flow cytometry of 40,000 Hoechst dye 33342-stained erythrocytes. Initial parasitemias for FVO and 3D7 were 0.04% and 0.02% schizonts, respectively. In the suspension cultures the final control parasitemias for FVO and 3D7 were about 1.6% and 5.3% ring forms, respectively (some variation depending on the source of the control antibody), and in the static cultures the final control parasitemias were about 0.65% and 0.77%, respectively. Standard errors of the mean for the final parasitemias in triplicate wells averaged 0.03% for all but the static 3D7 GIA, which average 0.08%. An inhibition of 52% per cycle corresponded to an inhibition of 77% for the entire GIA. Inhibitions in bold were considered significant and were associated with a p < 0.05 in a two-tailed Students’ t-test when comparing the final parasitemias in the triplicate wells with the test antibody to those with the control antibody. A negative number indicates stimulation— an increased final parasitemia in test compared with control wells. Interpretation: Apparently anti-A inhibited by a mechanism that was as effective, or more, in suspension cultures as it was in static cultures, but was relatively isolate specific. By contrast, anti-B inhibited both isolates about equally well, but inhibited by a mechanism that was effective in the static cultures only. More... »

PAGES

535-554

Book

TITLE

Malaria Methods and Protocols

ISBN

1-59259-271-6

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1014150728


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1108", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Medical Microbiology", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Medical and Health Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "familyName": "Doolan", 
        "givenName": "Denise L.", 
        "id": "sg:person.01114332302.48", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01114332302.48"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "name": [
            "Department of Immunology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research; Malaria Program, Naval Medical Research Center"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Haynes", 
        "givenName": "J. David", 
        "id": "sg:person.014510037362.91", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014510037362.91"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "name": [
            "Department of Immunology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research; Malaria Program, Naval Medical Research Center"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Moch", 
        "givenName": "J. Kathleen", 
        "id": "sg:person.0723471026.80", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0723471026.80"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "name": [
            "Combat Casualty Care Department, Naval Medical Research Center"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Smoot", 
        "givenName": "Douglas S.", 
        "id": "sg:person.0577570347.99", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0577570347.99"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000044139", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001212466"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6851(93)90002-f", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029503429"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6851(93)90002-f", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029503429"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00931147", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1034906109", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00931147"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/144.3.270", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1059697874"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1074752740", 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1987.36.246", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1079556855"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1079794280", 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1080018713", 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1984.33.197", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1081706071"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1981.30.12", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1082099252"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1997.57.495", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1083165179"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.77", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1083298332"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2002-06-28", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2002-06-28", 
    "description": "Erythrocytic cycle malaria parasite growth or invasion inhibition assays (GIA) compare the effects of various test and control substances on malaria parasite growth in erythrocytes or invasion into erythrocytes in vitro. Although inhibitions by antimalarial drugs in vitro correlate well with drug protective levels required in vivo, as yet there are too few data to know how well inhibitions by antibodies in vitro correlate with the types and degrees of immune protection in vivo. Antibody-mediated GIA is frequently complicated by parasite strain-specific inhibitions, as well as nonspecific inhibitory factors generated in sera collected or stored under nonoptimal conditions. In this chapter, we describe methods for collecting and processing sera, for using different strains of parasite, and a simplified method for staining parasite DNA with Hoechst dye 33342 before quantitating parasites using ultraviolet (UV)-excited flow cytometry. We also describe a new type of GIA using suspension cultures in a 48-well plate. Critical to this method is enclosing the plate in a gassed, heat-sealed plastic bag, which, being low mass, can easily be rested at a 13.5\u00b0 angle on a rotor platform (114 rpm with 1-in. displacement) to produce gentle pulsatile waves of media in each well. The suspension GIA, which, relative to the static GIA, increased inhibition by one antibody and decreased inhibition by another Table 1), may better simulate in vivo blood flow and may thus better predict in vivo efficacy. Table 1 An Example of GIA Data a \u00a0 Inhibition per cycle \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Suspension Static Isolate Anti-A (%) Anti-B (%) Anti-A (%) Anti-B (%) FVO 52 a -7 43 32 3D7 12 3 4 26 a Inhibition per cycle (IPC) compared in suspension GIA and static GIA for two inhibitory antibodies. One set of GIA data (from four 48-well plates, two-cycle cultures, 6% Hct, 0.5 (anti-A) or 1 (anti-B) mg/mL IgG, 150 mL per well) were analyzed by Eq. 3b, IPC = 100% \u00d7 [1 \u2013(PTF/PCF)1/2], where PTF is the final parasitemia in the presence of test antibody and PCF is the final parasitemia in the presence of control antibody. Parasitemias (infected erythrocytes per 100 erythrocytes) were determined by UV flow cytometry of 40,000 Hoechst dye 33342-stained erythrocytes. Initial parasitemias for FVO and 3D7 were 0.04% and 0.02% schizonts, respectively. In the suspension cultures the final control parasitemias for FVO and 3D7 were about 1.6% and 5.3% ring forms, respectively (some variation depending on the source of the control antibody), and in the static cultures the final control parasitemias were about 0.65% and 0.77%, respectively. Standard errors of the mean for the final parasitemias in triplicate wells averaged 0.03% for all but the static 3D7 GIA, which average 0.08%. An inhibition of 52% per cycle corresponded to an inhibition of 77% for the entire GIA. Inhibitions in bold were considered significant and were associated with a p < 0.05 in a two-tailed Students\u2019 t-test when comparing the final parasitemias in the triplicate wells with the test antibody to those with the control antibody. A negative number indicates stimulation\u2014 an increased final parasitemia in test compared with control wells. Interpretation: Apparently anti-A inhibited by a mechanism that was as effective, or more, in suspension cultures as it was in static cultures, but was relatively isolate specific. By contrast, anti-B inhibited both isolates about equally well, but inhibited by a mechanism that was effective in the static cultures only.", 
    "genre": "chapter", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535", 
    "inLanguage": [
      "en"
    ], 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": {
      "isbn": [
        "1-59259-271-6"
      ], 
      "name": "Malaria Methods and Protocols", 
      "type": "Book"
    }, 
    "name": "Erythrocytic Malaria Growth or Invasion Inhibition Assays with Emphasis on Suspension Culture GIA", 
    "pagination": "535-554", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "readcube_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "436a05a57789a18789f8b0bf7ad11c6086bb4418802628b21f581088618bde9d"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1014150728"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "publisher": {
      "location": "New Jersey", 
      "name": "Humana Press", 
      "type": "Organisation"
    }, 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1014150728"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "chapters", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-15T17:12", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000001_0000000264/records_8678_00000251.jsonl", 
    "type": "Chapter", 
    "url": "http://link.springer.com/10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

115 TRIPLES      22 PREDICATES      37 URIs      18 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535 schema:about anzsrc-for:11
2 anzsrc-for:1108
3 schema:author Nab8f6f94d339402da3f6de4ad6d413af
4 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1007/bf00931147
5 https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1074752740
6 https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1079794280
7 https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1080018713
8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6851(93)90002-f
9 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000044139
10 https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/144.3.270
11 https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1981.30.12
12 https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1984.33.197
13 https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1987.36.246
14 https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1997.57.495
15 https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.77
16 schema:datePublished 2002-06-28
17 schema:datePublishedReg 2002-06-28
18 schema:description Erythrocytic cycle malaria parasite growth or invasion inhibition assays (GIA) compare the effects of various test and control substances on malaria parasite growth in erythrocytes or invasion into erythrocytes in vitro. Although inhibitions by antimalarial drugs in vitro correlate well with drug protective levels required in vivo, as yet there are too few data to know how well inhibitions by antibodies in vitro correlate with the types and degrees of immune protection in vivo. Antibody-mediated GIA is frequently complicated by parasite strain-specific inhibitions, as well as nonspecific inhibitory factors generated in sera collected or stored under nonoptimal conditions. In this chapter, we describe methods for collecting and processing sera, for using different strains of parasite, and a simplified method for staining parasite DNA with Hoechst dye 33342 before quantitating parasites using ultraviolet (UV)-excited flow cytometry. We also describe a new type of GIA using suspension cultures in a 48-well plate. Critical to this method is enclosing the plate in a gassed, heat-sealed plastic bag, which, being low mass, can easily be rested at a 13.5° angle on a rotor platform (114 rpm with 1-in. displacement) to produce gentle pulsatile waves of media in each well. The suspension GIA, which, relative to the static GIA, increased inhibition by one antibody and decreased inhibition by another Table 1), may better simulate in vivo blood flow and may thus better predict in vivo efficacy. Table 1 An Example of GIA Data a   Inhibition per cycle      Suspension Static Isolate Anti-A (%) Anti-B (%) Anti-A (%) Anti-B (%) FVO 52 a -7 43 32 3D7 12 3 4 26 a Inhibition per cycle (IPC) compared in suspension GIA and static GIA for two inhibitory antibodies. One set of GIA data (from four 48-well plates, two-cycle cultures, 6% Hct, 0.5 (anti-A) or 1 (anti-B) mg/mL IgG, 150 mL per well) were analyzed by Eq. 3b, IPC = 100% × [1 –(PTF/PCF)1/2], where PTF is the final parasitemia in the presence of test antibody and PCF is the final parasitemia in the presence of control antibody. Parasitemias (infected erythrocytes per 100 erythrocytes) were determined by UV flow cytometry of 40,000 Hoechst dye 33342-stained erythrocytes. Initial parasitemias for FVO and 3D7 were 0.04% and 0.02% schizonts, respectively. In the suspension cultures the final control parasitemias for FVO and 3D7 were about 1.6% and 5.3% ring forms, respectively (some variation depending on the source of the control antibody), and in the static cultures the final control parasitemias were about 0.65% and 0.77%, respectively. Standard errors of the mean for the final parasitemias in triplicate wells averaged 0.03% for all but the static 3D7 GIA, which average 0.08%. An inhibition of 52% per cycle corresponded to an inhibition of 77% for the entire GIA. Inhibitions in bold were considered significant and were associated with a p < 0.05 in a two-tailed Students’ t-test when comparing the final parasitemias in the triplicate wells with the test antibody to those with the control antibody. A negative number indicates stimulation— an increased final parasitemia in test compared with control wells. Interpretation: Apparently anti-A inhibited by a mechanism that was as effective, or more, in suspension cultures as it was in static cultures, but was relatively isolate specific. By contrast, anti-B inhibited both isolates about equally well, but inhibited by a mechanism that was effective in the static cultures only.
19 schema:genre chapter
20 schema:inLanguage en
21 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
22 schema:isPartOf N9f83ddf43de64b17ab38e2d29f30d856
23 schema:name Erythrocytic Malaria Growth or Invasion Inhibition Assays with Emphasis on Suspension Culture GIA
24 schema:pagination 535-554
25 schema:productId N4502c558ef3a4487ab2168dc0638658c
26 N82ed2c3b039140a1acc619eb9a644d1b
27 Nc9659b0eb11a49f2b5a389d238b0ba4f
28 schema:publisher N1ce530c2472543e4867af6b351f6ae55
29 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1014150728
30 https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535
31 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-15T17:12
32 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
33 schema:sdPublisher Nabb67b454b0f4df4826082b44db8bddc
34 schema:url http://link.springer.com/10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535
35 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
36 sgo:sdDataset chapters
37 rdf:type schema:Chapter
38 N1ce530c2472543e4867af6b351f6ae55 schema:location New Jersey
39 schema:name Humana Press
40 rdf:type schema:Organisation
41 N391877a811a54f15957a9b18e3648243 schema:name Department of Immunology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research; Malaria Program, Naval Medical Research Center
42 rdf:type schema:Organization
43 N43e6b9841206497f913b535b3b224837 rdf:first sg:person.0723471026.80
44 rdf:rest N76da68ae24504b56b958e3b91dff98a3
45 N4502c558ef3a4487ab2168dc0638658c schema:name doi
46 schema:value 10.1385/1-59259-271-6:535
47 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
48 N76da68ae24504b56b958e3b91dff98a3 rdf:first sg:person.0577570347.99
49 rdf:rest rdf:nil
50 N82ed2c3b039140a1acc619eb9a644d1b schema:name dimensions_id
51 schema:value pub.1014150728
52 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
53 N9306407b027e4b68a1e509425b5beb2e rdf:first sg:person.014510037362.91
54 rdf:rest N43e6b9841206497f913b535b3b224837
55 N93ea41d0fe334468b549d572b9bc30d8 schema:name Combat Casualty Care Department, Naval Medical Research Center
56 rdf:type schema:Organization
57 N9f83ddf43de64b17ab38e2d29f30d856 schema:isbn 1-59259-271-6
58 schema:name Malaria Methods and Protocols
59 rdf:type schema:Book
60 Nab8f6f94d339402da3f6de4ad6d413af rdf:first sg:person.01114332302.48
61 rdf:rest N9306407b027e4b68a1e509425b5beb2e
62 Nabb67b454b0f4df4826082b44db8bddc schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
63 rdf:type schema:Organization
64 Nc9659b0eb11a49f2b5a389d238b0ba4f schema:name readcube_id
65 schema:value 436a05a57789a18789f8b0bf7ad11c6086bb4418802628b21f581088618bde9d
66 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
67 Nd699c64c70a542c4acd10274d627c604 schema:name Department of Immunology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research; Malaria Program, Naval Medical Research Center
68 rdf:type schema:Organization
69 anzsrc-for:11 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
70 schema:name Medical and Health Sciences
71 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
72 anzsrc-for:1108 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
73 schema:name Medical Microbiology
74 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
75 sg:person.01114332302.48 schema:familyName Doolan
76 schema:givenName Denise L.
77 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01114332302.48
78 rdf:type schema:Person
79 sg:person.014510037362.91 schema:affiliation N391877a811a54f15957a9b18e3648243
80 schema:familyName Haynes
81 schema:givenName J. David
82 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014510037362.91
83 rdf:type schema:Person
84 sg:person.0577570347.99 schema:affiliation N93ea41d0fe334468b549d572b9bc30d8
85 schema:familyName Smoot
86 schema:givenName Douglas S.
87 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0577570347.99
88 rdf:type schema:Person
89 sg:person.0723471026.80 schema:affiliation Nd699c64c70a542c4acd10274d627c604
90 schema:familyName Moch
91 schema:givenName J. Kathleen
92 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0723471026.80
93 rdf:type schema:Person
94 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00931147 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1034906109
95 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00931147
96 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
97 https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1074752740 schema:CreativeWork
98 https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1079794280 schema:CreativeWork
99 https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1080018713 schema:CreativeWork
100 https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6851(93)90002-f schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029503429
101 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
102 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000044139 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001212466
103 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
104 https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/144.3.270 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1059697874
105 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
106 https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1981.30.12 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1082099252
107 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
108 https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1984.33.197 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1081706071
109 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
110 https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1987.36.246 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1079556855
111 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
112 https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1997.57.495 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1083165179
113 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
114 https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.77 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1083298332
115 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...