A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle      Open Access: True


Article Info

DATE

2019-12

AUTHORS

Carlin L. Rafie, Emily B. Zimmerman, Dawn E. Moser, Sarah Cook, Fatemeh Zarghami

ABSTRACT

Plain English summary: There is a need for methods that engage lay people and other stakeholders, such as patients and healthcare providers, in developing research questions about health issues important to them and their communities. Involving stakeholders helps ensure that funding goes to research that addresses their concerns. The SEED Method engages stakeholders in a systematic process to explore health issues and develop research questions. Diverse groups of stakeholders participate at three levels: as collaborators that lead the process throughout, as participants who use their expertise to develop the questions, and as consultants who provide additional perspectives about the health topic. We used the SEED Method to engage 61 stakeholders from different socioeconomic and professional backgrounds to create research questions on lung cancer outcomes. Participants included cancer patients and caregivers, healthcare providers and administrators, and policymakers from a rural Virginia community. They developed causal models that diagrammed factors that influence lung cancer outcomes and the relationships between them. They used these models to develop priority research questions. The questions reflect the participants' diverse perspectives and address different areas of inquiry related to lung cancer outcomes, including access to care, support systems, social determinants of health, and quality of care. Participants felt well prepared to perform the project tasks because they had the opportunity to review lung cancer information, receive causal model and research question development training, and participate in facilitated group activities. The SEED Method can be used in a variety of settings and applied to any health topic of interest to stakeholders. Abstract: Background Engagement of stakeholders in prioritization of health research can help ensure that funding is directed to research that reflects their concerns and needs. The Stakeholder Engagement in quEstion Development and Prioritization (SEED) Method is a multi-stakeholder methodology that uses principles of community engagement and causal modeling to develop health research questions that reflect the priorities of patients, clinicians, and other community stakeholders. We conducted a demonstration of the SEED Method to generate research questions on lung cancer outcomes, and to evaluate the process, outcomes, and effectiveness of the method for generating a research agenda that reflects diverse stakeholder perspectives. Methods The SEED Method engages community members at three levels: collaboration, participation, and consultation. We conducted a demonstration project from November, 2015 to July, 2016, in a rural Virginia community that was experiencing a significant disparity in lung cancer outcomes. A community research team led the project and selected three distinct stakeholder groups (Topic groups, TG) for participatory engagement in analysis of the health issue, causal modeling, and research question development. We evaluated the quality of stakeholder engagement and compared TG causal models and research questions to evaluate the diversity of stakeholder perspectives resulting from the methodology. Results The resulting research agenda poses questions on how a broad range of topics including access to care, support systems and coping mechanisms, social determinants of health, and quality of care impacts lung cancer outcomes. Participants felt well prepared for the tasks they were asked to perform due to the technical trainings and facilitated modeling and question development activities that are part of the SEED Method. The causal models and research questions developed by the Topic Groups reflected the diverse perspectives of the stakeholders. Conclusions The SEED Method has the potential to generate relevant stakeholder-centered research agendas on a variety of health-related topics, and to create community capacity for sustained research engagement. More... »

PAGES

3

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1111366947

PUBMED

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656063


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1117", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Public Health and Health Services", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Medical and Health Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Virginia Tech", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.438526.e", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 321 Wallace Hall (0430), 295 West Campus Drive, 24061, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Rafie", 
        "givenName": "Carlin L.", 
        "id": "sg:person.01077245407.74", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01077245407.74"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Virginia Commonwealth University", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.224260.0", 
          "name": [
            "Center on Society and Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 East Main St., Suite 5032, P.O. Box 980212, 23298-0159, Richmond, Virginia, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Zimmerman", 
        "givenName": "Emily B.", 
        "id": "sg:person.0753533512.24", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0753533512.24"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "name": [
            "24112, Martinsville, Virginia, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Moser", 
        "givenName": "Dawn E.", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Vanderbilt University Medical Center", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.412807.8", 
          "name": [
            "Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, 37203, Nashville, TN, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Cook", 
        "givenName": "Sarah", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Virginia Tech", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.438526.e", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 321 Wallace Hall (0430), 295 West Campus Drive, 24061, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Zarghami", 
        "givenName": "Fatemeh", 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.036913", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000979753"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00161.x", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1008185177"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyr087", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1008908409"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.026", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1012428798"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1012731680", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015980289"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015980289"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124534", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1023398127"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.774", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1023506209"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90138-t", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1031573530"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980016002056", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1040198435"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1049649312"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1050178961", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0675", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051581166"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmw104", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1059580274"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.3310/hta8150", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1071139773"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.034", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1084057276"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s13012-017-0625-5", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1090939804", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0625-5"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s13012-017-0625-5", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1090939804", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0625-5"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.31478/201406a", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1105003747"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000000785", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1105971134"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000000785", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1105971134"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2019-12", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2019-12-01", 
    "description": "Plain English summary: There is a need for methods that engage lay people and other stakeholders, such as patients and healthcare providers, in developing research questions about health issues important to them and their communities. Involving stakeholders helps ensure that funding goes to research that addresses their concerns. The SEED Method engages stakeholders in a systematic process to explore health issues and develop research questions. Diverse groups of stakeholders participate at three levels: as collaborators that lead the process throughout, as participants who use their expertise to develop the questions, and as consultants who provide additional perspectives about the health topic. We used the SEED Method to engage 61 stakeholders from different socioeconomic and professional backgrounds to create research questions on lung cancer outcomes. Participants included cancer patients and caregivers, healthcare providers and administrators, and policymakers from a rural Virginia community. They developed causal models that diagrammed factors that influence lung cancer outcomes and the relationships between them. They used these models to develop priority research questions. The questions reflect the participants' diverse perspectives and address different areas of inquiry related to lung cancer outcomes, including access to care, support systems, social determinants of health, and quality of care. Participants felt well prepared to perform the project tasks because they had the opportunity to review lung cancer information, receive causal model and research question development training, and participate in facilitated group activities. The SEED Method can be used in a variety of settings and applied to any health topic of interest to stakeholders.\nAbstract: Background Engagement of stakeholders in prioritization of health research can help ensure that funding is directed to research that reflects their concerns and needs. The Stakeholder Engagement in quEstion Development and Prioritization (SEED) Method is a multi-stakeholder methodology that uses principles of community engagement and causal modeling to develop health research questions that reflect the priorities of patients, clinicians, and other community stakeholders. We conducted a demonstration of the SEED Method to generate research questions on lung cancer outcomes, and to evaluate the process, outcomes, and effectiveness of the method for generating a research agenda that reflects diverse stakeholder perspectives. Methods The SEED Method engages community members at three levels: collaboration, participation, and consultation. We conducted a demonstration project from November, 2015 to July, 2016, in a rural Virginia community that was experiencing a significant disparity in lung cancer outcomes. A community research team led the project and selected three distinct stakeholder groups (Topic groups, TG) for participatory engagement in analysis of the health issue, causal modeling, and research question development. We evaluated the quality of stakeholder engagement and compared TG causal models and research questions to evaluate the diversity of stakeholder perspectives resulting from the methodology. Results The resulting research agenda poses\u00a0questions on how\u00a0a broad range of topics including access to care, support systems and coping mechanisms, social determinants of health, and quality of care impacts lung cancer outcomes. Participants felt well prepared for the tasks they were asked to perform due to the technical trainings and facilitated modeling and question development activities that are part of the SEED Method. The causal models and research questions developed by the Topic Groups reflected the diverse perspectives of the stakeholders. Conclusions The SEED Method has the potential to generate relevant stakeholder-centered research agendas on a variety of health-related topics, and to create community capacity for sustained research engagement.", 
    "genre": "research_article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y", 
    "inLanguage": [
      "en"
    ], 
    "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1136352", 
        "issn": [
          "2056-7529"
        ], 
        "name": "Research Involvement and Engagement", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "1", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "5"
      }
    ], 
    "name": "A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method", 
    "pagination": "3", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "readcube_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "8d048bbfadd040b2928202bfb49e0f08460c83f99aa8c152cea4eaf0a3d246bd"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "pubmed_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "30656063"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "nlm_unique_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "101708164"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1111366947"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1111366947"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-11T08:42", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000321_0000000321/records_74925_00000000.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://link.springer.com/10.1186%2Fs40900-018-0134-y"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

161 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      48 URIs      21 LITERALS      9 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y schema:about anzsrc-for:11
2 anzsrc-for:1117
3 schema:author N833bde75bc50449db097690452a6b611
4 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1
5 sg:pub.10.1186/s13012-017-0625-5
6 sg:pub.10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y
7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90138-t
8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.026
9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.034
10 https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980016002056
11 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00161.x
12 https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmw104
13 https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyr087
14 https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000000785
15 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060
16 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.774
17 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.036913
18 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124534
19 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
20 https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0675
21 https://doi.org/10.31478/201406a
22 https://doi.org/10.3310/hta8150
23 schema:datePublished 2019-12
24 schema:datePublishedReg 2019-12-01
25 schema:description Plain English summary: There is a need for methods that engage lay people and other stakeholders, such as patients and healthcare providers, in developing research questions about health issues important to them and their communities. Involving stakeholders helps ensure that funding goes to research that addresses their concerns. The SEED Method engages stakeholders in a systematic process to explore health issues and develop research questions. Diverse groups of stakeholders participate at three levels: as collaborators that lead the process throughout, as participants who use their expertise to develop the questions, and as consultants who provide additional perspectives about the health topic. We used the SEED Method to engage 61 stakeholders from different socioeconomic and professional backgrounds to create research questions on lung cancer outcomes. Participants included cancer patients and caregivers, healthcare providers and administrators, and policymakers from a rural Virginia community. They developed causal models that diagrammed factors that influence lung cancer outcomes and the relationships between them. They used these models to develop priority research questions. The questions reflect the participants' diverse perspectives and address different areas of inquiry related to lung cancer outcomes, including access to care, support systems, social determinants of health, and quality of care. Participants felt well prepared to perform the project tasks because they had the opportunity to review lung cancer information, receive causal model and research question development training, and participate in facilitated group activities. The SEED Method can be used in a variety of settings and applied to any health topic of interest to stakeholders. Abstract: Background Engagement of stakeholders in prioritization of health research can help ensure that funding is directed to research that reflects their concerns and needs. The Stakeholder Engagement in quEstion Development and Prioritization (SEED) Method is a multi-stakeholder methodology that uses principles of community engagement and causal modeling to develop health research questions that reflect the priorities of patients, clinicians, and other community stakeholders. We conducted a demonstration of the SEED Method to generate research questions on lung cancer outcomes, and to evaluate the process, outcomes, and effectiveness of the method for generating a research agenda that reflects diverse stakeholder perspectives. Methods The SEED Method engages community members at three levels: collaboration, participation, and consultation. We conducted a demonstration project from November, 2015 to July, 2016, in a rural Virginia community that was experiencing a significant disparity in lung cancer outcomes. A community research team led the project and selected three distinct stakeholder groups (Topic groups, TG) for participatory engagement in analysis of the health issue, causal modeling, and research question development. We evaluated the quality of stakeholder engagement and compared TG causal models and research questions to evaluate the diversity of stakeholder perspectives resulting from the methodology. Results The resulting research agenda poses questions on how a broad range of topics including access to care, support systems and coping mechanisms, social determinants of health, and quality of care impacts lung cancer outcomes. Participants felt well prepared for the tasks they were asked to perform due to the technical trainings and facilitated modeling and question development activities that are part of the SEED Method. The causal models and research questions developed by the Topic Groups reflected the diverse perspectives of the stakeholders. Conclusions The SEED Method has the potential to generate relevant stakeholder-centered research agendas on a variety of health-related topics, and to create community capacity for sustained research engagement.
26 schema:genre research_article
27 schema:inLanguage en
28 schema:isAccessibleForFree true
29 schema:isPartOf N47819e47587644958be74ba5537018d8
30 Ned1880f3426249228438d174ba9a5d3b
31 sg:journal.1136352
32 schema:name A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method
33 schema:pagination 3
34 schema:productId N1b51ca3f840d4f98838368e70a44338b
35 N622370b76630491a91bb5357ce83062f
36 N6b3990e9639e4bb7b7fb2ff54139237f
37 Ne145bd228a914ba997412f1dec339616
38 Ne44c66b738a742b984503b0cf83ee09b
39 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1111366947
40 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y
41 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-11T08:42
42 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
43 schema:sdPublisher N48c9e68c2af14f9896576cad146d1ac2
44 schema:url https://link.springer.com/10.1186%2Fs40900-018-0134-y
45 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
46 sgo:sdDataset articles
47 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
48 N1b51ca3f840d4f98838368e70a44338b schema:name nlm_unique_id
49 schema:value 101708164
50 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
51 N23f947f912dd4968af6db78fe24c56cf rdf:first N73056f7f547e45b9b9b369cdac301eef
52 rdf:rest N4c865fc802d4483f839ff307dcb9e170
53 N47819e47587644958be74ba5537018d8 schema:issueNumber 1
54 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
55 N48c9e68c2af14f9896576cad146d1ac2 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
56 rdf:type schema:Organization
57 N4c865fc802d4483f839ff307dcb9e170 rdf:first N516b1909dad949939e104f1f911080d7
58 rdf:rest rdf:nil
59 N516b1909dad949939e104f1f911080d7 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.438526.e
60 schema:familyName Zarghami
61 schema:givenName Fatemeh
62 rdf:type schema:Person
63 N622370b76630491a91bb5357ce83062f schema:name dimensions_id
64 schema:value pub.1111366947
65 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
66 N6b3990e9639e4bb7b7fb2ff54139237f schema:name pubmed_id
67 schema:value 30656063
68 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
69 N73056f7f547e45b9b9b369cdac301eef schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.412807.8
70 schema:familyName Cook
71 schema:givenName Sarah
72 rdf:type schema:Person
73 N833bde75bc50449db097690452a6b611 rdf:first sg:person.01077245407.74
74 rdf:rest N8ad5c3408a4a455a99f525466f70a901
75 N8ad5c3408a4a455a99f525466f70a901 rdf:first sg:person.0753533512.24
76 rdf:rest Nf7318b8ae0454ee891e2739e4594115a
77 Nd0608968a59049ccbb3d15ce77261805 schema:name 24112, Martinsville, Virginia, USA
78 rdf:type schema:Organization
79 Ne145bd228a914ba997412f1dec339616 schema:name readcube_id
80 schema:value 8d048bbfadd040b2928202bfb49e0f08460c83f99aa8c152cea4eaf0a3d246bd
81 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
82 Ne44c66b738a742b984503b0cf83ee09b schema:name doi
83 schema:value 10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y
84 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
85 Ned1880f3426249228438d174ba9a5d3b schema:volumeNumber 5
86 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
87 Nf2ce76a0cfe14111a89a40c7f788581b schema:affiliation Nd0608968a59049ccbb3d15ce77261805
88 schema:familyName Moser
89 schema:givenName Dawn E.
90 rdf:type schema:Person
91 Nf7318b8ae0454ee891e2739e4594115a rdf:first Nf2ce76a0cfe14111a89a40c7f788581b
92 rdf:rest N23f947f912dd4968af6db78fe24c56cf
93 anzsrc-for:11 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
94 schema:name Medical and Health Sciences
95 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
96 anzsrc-for:1117 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
97 schema:name Public Health and Health Services
98 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
99 sg:journal.1136352 schema:issn 2056-7529
100 schema:name Research Involvement and Engagement
101 rdf:type schema:Periodical
102 sg:person.01077245407.74 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.438526.e
103 schema:familyName Rafie
104 schema:givenName Carlin L.
105 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01077245407.74
106 rdf:type schema:Person
107 sg:person.0753533512.24 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.224260.0
108 schema:familyName Zimmerman
109 schema:givenName Emily B.
110 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0753533512.24
111 rdf:type schema:Person
112 sg:pub.10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1050178961
113 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1
114 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
115 sg:pub.10.1186/s13012-017-0625-5 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1090939804
116 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0625-5
117 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
118 sg:pub.10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1012731680
119 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0026-y
120 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
121 https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90138-t schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1031573530
122 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
123 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.026 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1012428798
124 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
125 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.034 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1084057276
126 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
127 https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980016002056 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1040198435
128 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
129 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00161.x schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1008185177
130 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
131 https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmw104 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1059580274
132 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
133 https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyr087 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1008908409
134 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
135 https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000000785 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1105971134
136 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
137 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015980289
138 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
139 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.774 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1023506209
140 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
141 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.036913 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000979753
142 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
143 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124534 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1023398127
144 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
145 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1049649312
146 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
147 https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0675 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051581166
148 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
149 https://doi.org/10.31478/201406a schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1105003747
150 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
151 https://doi.org/10.3310/hta8150 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1071139773
152 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
153 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.224260.0 schema:alternateName Virginia Commonwealth University
154 schema:name Center on Society and Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 East Main St., Suite 5032, P.O. Box 980212, 23298-0159, Richmond, Virginia, USA
155 rdf:type schema:Organization
156 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.412807.8 schema:alternateName Vanderbilt University Medical Center
157 schema:name Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, 37203, Nashville, TN, USA
158 rdf:type schema:Organization
159 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.438526.e schema:alternateName Virginia Tech
160 schema:name Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 321 Wallace Hall (0430), 295 West Campus Drive, 24061, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
161 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...