The validity and reliability of the four square step test in different adult populations: a systematic review View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle      Open Access: True


Article Info

DATE

2017-09-11

AUTHORS

Martha Moore, Karen Barker

ABSTRACT

BackgroundThe four square step test (FSST) was first validated in healthy older adults to provide a measure of dynamic standing balance and mobility. The FSST has since been used in a variety of patient populations. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the validity and reliability of the FSST in these different adult patient populations.MethodsThe literature search was conducted to highlight all the studies that measured validity and reliability of the FSST. Six electronic databases were searched including AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PEDro, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Grey literature was also searched for any documents relevant to the review. Two independent reviewers carried out study selection and quality assessment. The methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, which is a validated tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies, and the COSMIN four-point checklist, which contains standards for evaluating reliability studies on the measurement properties of health instruments.ResultsFifteen studies were reviewed studying community-dwelling older adults, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, multiple sclerosis, vestibular disorders, post stroke, post unilateral transtibial amputation, knee pain and hip osteoarthritis. Three of the studies were of moderate methodological quality scoring low in risk of bias and applicability for all domains in the QUADAS-2 tool. Three studies scored “fair” on the COSMIN four-point checklist for the reliability components. The concurrent validity of the FSST was measured in nine of the studies with moderate to strong correlations being found. Excellent Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were found between physiotherapists carrying out the tests (ICC = .99) with good to excellent test-retest reliability shown in nine of the studies (ICC = .73–.98).ConclusionsThe FSST may be an effective and valid tool for measuring dynamic balance and a participants’ falls risk. It has been shown to have strong correlations with other measures of balance and mobility with good reliability shown in a number of populations. However, the quality of the papers reviewed was variable with key factors, such as sample size and test set up, needing to be addressed before the tool can be confidently used in these specified populations. More... »

PAGES

187

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1091569377

PUBMED

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28893312


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Medical and Health Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1103", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Clinical Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Accidental Falls", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Exercise Test", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Humans", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Movement", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Patient Selection", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Postural Balance", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Reproducibility of Results", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Risk Assessment", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 7HE, Oxford, UK", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.461589.7", 
          "name": [
            "Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 7HE, Oxford, UK"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Moore", 
        "givenName": "Martha", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 7HE, Oxford, UK", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.461589.7", 
          "name": [
            "Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 7HE, Oxford, UK"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Barker", 
        "givenName": "Karen", 
        "id": "sg:person.0763042725.06", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0763042725.06"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00391-006-0397-z", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045610655", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-006-0397-z"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1471-2318-14-14", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1026256434", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-14"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1021468573", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1471-2474-6-3", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015562500", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-3"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2017-09-11", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2017-09-11", 
    "description": "BackgroundThe four square step test (FSST) was first validated in healthy older adults to provide a measure of dynamic standing balance and mobility. The FSST has since been used in a variety of patient populations. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the validity and reliability of the FSST in these different adult patient populations.MethodsThe literature search was conducted to highlight all the studies that measured validity and reliability of the FSST. Six electronic databases were searched including AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PEDro, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Grey literature was also searched for any documents relevant to the review. Two independent reviewers carried out study selection and quality assessment. The methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, which is a validated tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies, and the COSMIN four-point checklist, which contains standards for evaluating reliability studies on the measurement properties of health instruments.ResultsFifteen studies were reviewed studying community-dwelling older adults, Parkinson\u2019s disease, Huntington\u2019s disease, multiple sclerosis, vestibular disorders, post stroke, post unilateral transtibial amputation, knee pain and hip osteoarthritis. Three of the studies were of moderate methodological quality scoring low in risk of bias and applicability for all domains in the QUADAS-2 tool. Three studies scored \u201cfair\u201d on the COSMIN four-point checklist for the reliability components. The concurrent validity of the FSST was measured in nine of the studies with moderate to strong correlations being found. Excellent Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were found between physiotherapists carrying out the tests (ICC\u00a0=\u00a0.99) with good to excellent test-retest reliability shown in nine of the studies (ICC\u00a0=\u00a0.73\u2013.98).ConclusionsThe FSST may be an effective and valid tool for measuring dynamic balance and a participants\u2019 falls risk. It has been shown to have strong correlations with other measures of balance and mobility with good reliability shown in a number of populations. However, the quality of the papers reviewed was variable with key factors, such as sample size and test set up, needing to be addressed before the tool can be confidently used in these specified populations.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1046628", 
        "issn": [
          "2046-4053"
        ], 
        "name": "Systematic Reviews", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "1", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "6"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "Square Step Test", 
      "patient population", 
      "systematic review", 
      "older adults", 
      "community-dwelling older adults", 
      "adult patient population", 
      "risk of bias", 
      "excellent intraclass correlation coefficients", 
      "excellent test-retest reliability", 
      "QUADAS-2 tool", 
      "QUADAS-2 tool", 
      "step test", 
      "MethodsThe literature search", 
      "measures of balance", 
      "unilateral transtibial amputation", 
      "diagnostic accuracy studies", 
      "healthy older adults", 
      "Web of Science", 
      "intraclass correlation coefficient", 
      "knee pain", 
      "vestibular disorders", 
      "multiple sclerosis", 
      "hip osteoarthritis", 
      "test-retest reliability", 
      "post stroke", 
      "methodological quality scoring", 
      "STUDY SELECTION", 
      "different adult populations", 
      "methodological quality", 
      "independent reviewers", 
      "Parkinson's disease", 
      "ResultsFifteen studies", 
      "health instruments", 
      "transtibial amputation", 
      "electronic databases", 
      "adult population", 
      "literature search", 
      "disease", 
      "Huntington's disease", 
      "Google Scholar", 
      "four-point checklist", 
      "measurement properties", 
      "accuracy studies", 
      "grey literature", 
      "concurrent validity", 
      "valid tool", 
      "quality scoring", 
      "COSMIN", 
      "strong correlation", 
      "adults", 
      "quality assessment", 
      "dynamic balance", 
      "risk", 
      "population", 
      "review", 
      "sample size", 
      "checklist", 
      "pain", 
      "sclerosis", 
      "AMED", 
      "osteoarthritis", 
      "good reliability", 
      "MEDLINE", 
      "amputation", 
      "CINAHL", 
      "stroke", 
      "study", 
      "physiotherapists", 
      "disorders", 
      "assessment", 
      "test", 
      "FSST", 
      "PEDro", 
      "correlation coefficient", 
      "reliability study", 
      "reviewers", 
      "measures", 
      "correlation", 
      "participants", 
      "scoring", 
      "balance", 
      "validity", 
      "factors", 
      "quality", 
      "database", 
      "tool", 
      "search", 
      "key factors", 
      "purpose", 
      "literature", 
      "reliability", 
      "number", 
      "standards", 
      "bias", 
      "Web", 
      "instrument", 
      "variety", 
      "components", 
      "mobility", 
      "selection", 
      "size", 
      "number of populations", 
      "domain", 
      "reliability components", 
      "science", 
      "documents", 
      "scholars", 
      "coefficient", 
      "properties", 
      "applicability", 
      "paper"
    ], 
    "name": "The validity and reliability of the four square step test in different adult populations: a systematic review", 
    "pagination": "187", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1091569377"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "pubmed_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "28893312"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1091569377"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-12-01T06:36", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20221201/entities/gbq_results/article/article_726.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

224 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      147 URIs      135 LITERALS      15 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5 schema:about N004b8d9e914a449f92ba11cb27eb26d2
2 N0242111cf61247dfa91ee8a3edadffec
3 N26451b6ded4d4a2e80ef1783ccb12e68
4 N371599b855cc404594fbe8a17bad21f4
5 N401c262604ed4ea78f79e41d42b8a3fd
6 N8d0feb0e8985442fbab98ed0c4ccb125
7 N904d7f18acc64bbf8b4fee1038f61847
8 Na97e34d5919c4571a0f3ac5f6228042d
9 anzsrc-for:11
10 anzsrc-for:1103
11 schema:author N6af36e2fcc1e4d55a95088552072f008
12 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1007/s00391-006-0397-z
13 sg:pub.10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1
14 sg:pub.10.1186/1471-2318-14-14
15 sg:pub.10.1186/1471-2474-6-3
16 schema:datePublished 2017-09-11
17 schema:datePublishedReg 2017-09-11
18 schema:description BackgroundThe four square step test (FSST) was first validated in healthy older adults to provide a measure of dynamic standing balance and mobility. The FSST has since been used in a variety of patient populations. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine the validity and reliability of the FSST in these different adult patient populations.MethodsThe literature search was conducted to highlight all the studies that measured validity and reliability of the FSST. Six electronic databases were searched including AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PEDro, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Grey literature was also searched for any documents relevant to the review. Two independent reviewers carried out study selection and quality assessment. The methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, which is a validated tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies, and the COSMIN four-point checklist, which contains standards for evaluating reliability studies on the measurement properties of health instruments.ResultsFifteen studies were reviewed studying community-dwelling older adults, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, multiple sclerosis, vestibular disorders, post stroke, post unilateral transtibial amputation, knee pain and hip osteoarthritis. Three of the studies were of moderate methodological quality scoring low in risk of bias and applicability for all domains in the QUADAS-2 tool. Three studies scored “fair” on the COSMIN four-point checklist for the reliability components. The concurrent validity of the FSST was measured in nine of the studies with moderate to strong correlations being found. Excellent Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were found between physiotherapists carrying out the tests (ICC = .99) with good to excellent test-retest reliability shown in nine of the studies (ICC = .73–.98).ConclusionsThe FSST may be an effective and valid tool for measuring dynamic balance and a participants’ falls risk. It has been shown to have strong correlations with other measures of balance and mobility with good reliability shown in a number of populations. However, the quality of the papers reviewed was variable with key factors, such as sample size and test set up, needing to be addressed before the tool can be confidently used in these specified populations.
19 schema:genre article
20 schema:isAccessibleForFree true
21 schema:isPartOf N2e4dcaa61fd84d61beb4a8b857aa484a
22 N98572ef1af544ddb8e9ded723b955fb0
23 sg:journal.1046628
24 schema:keywords AMED
25 CINAHL
26 COSMIN
27 FSST
28 Google Scholar
29 Huntington's disease
30 MEDLINE
31 MethodsThe literature search
32 PEDro
33 Parkinson's disease
34 QUADAS-2 tool
35 ResultsFifteen studies
36 STUDY SELECTION
37 Square Step Test
38 Web
39 Web of Science
40 accuracy studies
41 adult patient population
42 adult population
43 adults
44 amputation
45 applicability
46 assessment
47 balance
48 bias
49 checklist
50 coefficient
51 community-dwelling older adults
52 components
53 concurrent validity
54 correlation
55 correlation coefficient
56 database
57 diagnostic accuracy studies
58 different adult populations
59 disease
60 disorders
61 documents
62 domain
63 dynamic balance
64 electronic databases
65 excellent intraclass correlation coefficients
66 excellent test-retest reliability
67 factors
68 four-point checklist
69 good reliability
70 grey literature
71 health instruments
72 healthy older adults
73 hip osteoarthritis
74 independent reviewers
75 instrument
76 intraclass correlation coefficient
77 key factors
78 knee pain
79 literature
80 literature search
81 measurement properties
82 measures
83 measures of balance
84 methodological quality
85 methodological quality scoring
86 mobility
87 multiple sclerosis
88 number
89 number of populations
90 older adults
91 osteoarthritis
92 pain
93 paper
94 participants
95 patient population
96 physiotherapists
97 population
98 post stroke
99 properties
100 purpose
101 quality
102 quality assessment
103 quality scoring
104 reliability
105 reliability components
106 reliability study
107 review
108 reviewers
109 risk
110 risk of bias
111 sample size
112 scholars
113 science
114 sclerosis
115 scoring
116 search
117 selection
118 size
119 standards
120 step test
121 stroke
122 strong correlation
123 study
124 systematic review
125 test
126 test-retest reliability
127 tool
128 transtibial amputation
129 unilateral transtibial amputation
130 valid tool
131 validity
132 variety
133 vestibular disorders
134 schema:name The validity and reliability of the four square step test in different adult populations: a systematic review
135 schema:pagination 187
136 schema:productId N1fe6c135076341d0b8de25b30aff9cf4
137 N46f1c448022a426ab63b9538bfd8b369
138 N5bdf62c31a6141c9ba44e3aafe541d16
139 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1091569377
140 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5
141 schema:sdDatePublished 2022-12-01T06:36
142 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
143 schema:sdPublisher Ncaffdf2718344ed8b439c2978bc6c608
144 schema:url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5
145 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
146 sgo:sdDataset articles
147 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
148 N004b8d9e914a449f92ba11cb27eb26d2 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
149 schema:name Postural Balance
150 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
151 N0242111cf61247dfa91ee8a3edadffec schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
152 schema:name Humans
153 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
154 N1fe6c135076341d0b8de25b30aff9cf4 schema:name pubmed_id
155 schema:value 28893312
156 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
157 N26451b6ded4d4a2e80ef1783ccb12e68 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
158 schema:name Risk Assessment
159 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
160 N2e4dcaa61fd84d61beb4a8b857aa484a schema:volumeNumber 6
161 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
162 N371599b855cc404594fbe8a17bad21f4 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
163 schema:name Accidental Falls
164 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
165 N401c262604ed4ea78f79e41d42b8a3fd schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
166 schema:name Reproducibility of Results
167 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
168 N46f1c448022a426ab63b9538bfd8b369 schema:name dimensions_id
169 schema:value pub.1091569377
170 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
171 N4c21d595ccb14fe196333cdbc9c8b1ae schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.461589.7
172 schema:familyName Moore
173 schema:givenName Martha
174 rdf:type schema:Person
175 N5bdf62c31a6141c9ba44e3aafe541d16 schema:name doi
176 schema:value 10.1186/s13643-017-0577-5
177 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
178 N6af36e2fcc1e4d55a95088552072f008 rdf:first N4c21d595ccb14fe196333cdbc9c8b1ae
179 rdf:rest Na63b30c3fd1c441ca25d86c6c91add6c
180 N8d0feb0e8985442fbab98ed0c4ccb125 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
181 schema:name Movement
182 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
183 N904d7f18acc64bbf8b4fee1038f61847 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
184 schema:name Patient Selection
185 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
186 N98572ef1af544ddb8e9ded723b955fb0 schema:issueNumber 1
187 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
188 Na63b30c3fd1c441ca25d86c6c91add6c rdf:first sg:person.0763042725.06
189 rdf:rest rdf:nil
190 Na97e34d5919c4571a0f3ac5f6228042d schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
191 schema:name Exercise Test
192 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
193 Ncaffdf2718344ed8b439c2978bc6c608 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
194 rdf:type schema:Organization
195 anzsrc-for:11 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
196 schema:name Medical and Health Sciences
197 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
198 anzsrc-for:1103 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
199 schema:name Clinical Sciences
200 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
201 sg:journal.1046628 schema:issn 2046-4053
202 schema:name Systematic Reviews
203 schema:publisher Springer Nature
204 rdf:type schema:Periodical
205 sg:person.0763042725.06 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.461589.7
206 schema:familyName Barker
207 schema:givenName Karen
208 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0763042725.06
209 rdf:type schema:Person
210 sg:pub.10.1007/s00391-006-0397-z schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045610655
211 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-006-0397-z
212 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
213 sg:pub.10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1021468573
214 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1
215 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
216 sg:pub.10.1186/1471-2318-14-14 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1026256434
217 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-14
218 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
219 sg:pub.10.1186/1471-2474-6-3 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015562500
220 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-6-3
221 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
222 grid-institutes:grid.461589.7 schema:alternateName Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 7HE, Oxford, UK
223 schema:name Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, OX3 7HE, Oxford, UK
224 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...