Using qualitative comparative analysis in a systematic review of a complex intervention View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle      Open Access: True


Article Info

DATE

2016-05-04

AUTHORS

Leila Kahwati, Sara Jacobs, Heather Kane, Megan Lewis, Meera Viswanathan, Carol E. Golin

ABSTRACT

BackgroundSystematic reviews evaluating complex interventions often encounter substantial clinical heterogeneity in intervention components and implementation features making synthesis challenging. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is a non-probabilistic method that uses mathematical set theory to study complex phenomena; it has been proposed as a potential method to complement traditional evidence synthesis in reviews of complex interventions to identify key intervention components or implementation features that might explain effectiveness or ineffectiveness. The objective of this study was to describe our approach in detail and examine the suitability of using QCA within the context of a systematic review.MethodsWe used data from a completed systematic review of behavioral interventions to improve medication adherence to conduct two substantive analyses using QCA. The first analysis sought to identify combinations of nine behavior change techniques/components (BCTs) found among effective interventions, and the second analysis sought to identify combinations of five implementation features (e.g., agent, target, mode, time span, exposure) found among effective interventions. For each substantive analysis, we reframed the review’s research questions to be designed for use with QCA, calibrated sets (i.e., transformed raw data into data used in analysis), and identified the necessary and/or sufficient combinations of BCTs and implementation features found in effective interventions.ResultsOur application of QCA for each substantive analysis is described in detail. We extended the original review findings by identifying seven combinations of BCTs and four combinations of implementation features that were sufficient for improving adherence. We found reasonable alignment between several systematic review steps and processes used in QCA except that typical approaches to study abstraction for some intervention components and features did not support a robust calibration for QCA.ConclusionsQCA was suitable for use within a systematic review of medication adherence interventions and offered insights beyond the single dimension stratifications used in the original completed review. Future prospective use of QCA during a review is needed to determine the optimal way to efficiently integrate QCA into existing approaches to evidence synthesis of complex interventions. More... »

PAGES

82

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1009318668

PUBMED

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27209206


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Medical and Health Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1117", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Public Health and Health Services", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Behavior Therapy", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Comparative Effectiveness Research", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Humans", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Medication Adherence", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Qualitative Research", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Review Literature as Topic", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.62562.35", 
          "name": [
            "RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Kahwati", 
        "givenName": "Leila", 
        "id": "sg:person.01353212123.25", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01353212123.25"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.62562.35", 
          "name": [
            "RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Jacobs", 
        "givenName": "Sara", 
        "id": "sg:person.0702747112.19", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0702747112.19"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.62562.35", 
          "name": [
            "RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Kane", 
        "givenName": "Heather", 
        "id": "sg:person.0653747614.69", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0653747614.69"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.62562.35", 
          "name": [
            "RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Lewis", 
        "givenName": "Megan", 
        "id": "sg:person.01274641213.01", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01274641213.01"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.62562.35", 
          "name": [
            "RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Viswanathan", 
        "givenName": "Meera", 
        "id": "sg:person.01165371576.76", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01165371576.76"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Departments of Medicine and Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.410711.2", 
          "name": [
            "Departments of Medicine and Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Golin", 
        "givenName": "Carol E.", 
        "id": "sg:person.01054511540.21", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01054511540.21"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s13142-014-0251-6", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007256533", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0251-6"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-7-15", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1009457747", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-15"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s13643-016-0255-z", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1032568043", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0255-z"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1471-2458-13-9", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1019378212", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-9"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1741-7015-9-79", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1012515501", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-79"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/2046-4053-3-67", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1017817446", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-67"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1745-6215-14-179", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1008770668", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-179"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2016-05-04", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2016-05-04", 
    "description": "BackgroundSystematic reviews evaluating complex interventions often encounter substantial clinical heterogeneity in intervention components and implementation features making synthesis challenging. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is a non-probabilistic method that uses mathematical set theory to study complex phenomena; it has been proposed as a potential method to complement traditional evidence synthesis in reviews of complex interventions to identify key intervention components or implementation features that might explain effectiveness or ineffectiveness. The objective of this study was to describe our approach in detail and examine the suitability of using QCA within the context of a systematic review.MethodsWe used data from a completed systematic review of behavioral interventions to improve medication adherence to conduct two substantive analyses using QCA. The first analysis sought to identify combinations of nine behavior change techniques/components (BCTs) found among effective interventions, and the second analysis sought to identify combinations of five implementation features (e.g., agent, target, mode, time span, exposure) found among effective interventions. For each substantive analysis, we reframed the review\u2019s research questions to be designed for use with QCA, calibrated sets (i.e., transformed raw data into data used in analysis), and identified the necessary and/or sufficient combinations of BCTs and implementation features found in effective interventions.ResultsOur application of QCA for each substantive analysis is described in detail. We extended the original review findings by identifying seven combinations of BCTs and four combinations of implementation features that were sufficient for improving adherence. We found reasonable alignment between several systematic review steps and processes used in QCA except that typical approaches to study abstraction for some intervention components and features did not support a robust calibration for QCA.ConclusionsQCA was suitable for use within a systematic review of medication adherence interventions and offered insights beyond the single dimension stratifications used in the original completed review. Future prospective use of QCA during a review is needed to determine the optimal way to efficiently integrate QCA into existing approaches to evidence synthesis of complex interventions.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y", 
    "inLanguage": "en", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
    "isFundedItemOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:grant.2576780", 
        "type": "MonetaryGrant"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:grant.2438707", 
        "type": "MonetaryGrant"
      }
    ], 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1046628", 
        "issn": [
          "2046-4053"
        ], 
        "name": "Systematic Reviews", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "1", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "5"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "implementation features", 
      "mathematical set theory", 
      "non-probabilistic methods", 
      "set theory", 
      "robust calibration", 
      "sufficient combination", 
      "typical approach", 
      "optimal way", 
      "complex phenomenon", 
      "theory", 
      "approach", 
      "potential method", 
      "detail", 
      "substantive analysis", 
      "set", 
      "features", 
      "comparative analysis", 
      "analysis", 
      "phenomenon", 
      "applications", 
      "components", 
      "effectiveness", 
      "QCA", 
      "first analysis", 
      "combination", 
      "step", 
      "calibration", 
      "heterogeneity", 
      "data", 
      "use", 
      "process", 
      "abstraction", 
      "way", 
      "objective", 
      "suitability", 
      "context", 
      "second analysis", 
      "research questions", 
      "questions", 
      "alignment", 
      "insights", 
      "substantial clinical heterogeneity", 
      "synthesis", 
      "evidence synthesis", 
      "stratification", 
      "prospective use", 
      "review", 
      "study", 
      "systematic review steps", 
      "BackgroundSystematic reviews", 
      "complex interventions", 
      "clinical heterogeneity", 
      "intervention components", 
      "key intervention components", 
      "systematic review", 
      "behavioral interventions", 
      "medication adherence", 
      "effective interventions", 
      "review's research questions", 
      "review steps", 
      "medication adherence interventions", 
      "adherence interventions", 
      "intervention", 
      "method", 
      "ineffectiveness", 
      "MethodsWe", 
      "adherence", 
      "review findings", 
      "findings", 
      "reasonable alignment", 
      "qualitative comparative analysis"
    ], 
    "name": "Using qualitative comparative analysis in a systematic review of a complex intervention", 
    "pagination": "82", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1009318668"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "pubmed_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "27209206"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1009318668"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-05-20T07:31", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220519/entities/gbq_results/article/article_691.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

226 TRIPLES      22 PREDICATES      110 URIs      95 LITERALS      13 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y schema:about N0c9d4c3bcfc447d7805082936d3ee4ac
2 N4b0e3038b80445188092bb887fbe9773
3 N7851032f9d784dfba88ce0414d823f27
4 N99a37b1fa0dc4a99b7da6e58561c5239
5 Ne0e6923088d741b885ea0c321d9d01b5
6 Ne61f370529c34b5ba618ae110c72da5a
7 anzsrc-for:11
8 anzsrc-for:1117
9 schema:author Ne653959b5e0d4326a62948ee858cf1ba
10 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1007/s13142-014-0251-6
11 sg:pub.10.1186/1471-2458-13-9
12 sg:pub.10.1186/1741-7015-9-79
13 sg:pub.10.1186/1745-6215-14-179
14 sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-7-15
15 sg:pub.10.1186/2046-4053-3-67
16 sg:pub.10.1186/s13643-016-0255-z
17 schema:datePublished 2016-05-04
18 schema:datePublishedReg 2016-05-04
19 schema:description BackgroundSystematic reviews evaluating complex interventions often encounter substantial clinical heterogeneity in intervention components and implementation features making synthesis challenging. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is a non-probabilistic method that uses mathematical set theory to study complex phenomena; it has been proposed as a potential method to complement traditional evidence synthesis in reviews of complex interventions to identify key intervention components or implementation features that might explain effectiveness or ineffectiveness. The objective of this study was to describe our approach in detail and examine the suitability of using QCA within the context of a systematic review.MethodsWe used data from a completed systematic review of behavioral interventions to improve medication adherence to conduct two substantive analyses using QCA. The first analysis sought to identify combinations of nine behavior change techniques/components (BCTs) found among effective interventions, and the second analysis sought to identify combinations of five implementation features (e.g., agent, target, mode, time span, exposure) found among effective interventions. For each substantive analysis, we reframed the review’s research questions to be designed for use with QCA, calibrated sets (i.e., transformed raw data into data used in analysis), and identified the necessary and/or sufficient combinations of BCTs and implementation features found in effective interventions.ResultsOur application of QCA for each substantive analysis is described in detail. We extended the original review findings by identifying seven combinations of BCTs and four combinations of implementation features that were sufficient for improving adherence. We found reasonable alignment between several systematic review steps and processes used in QCA except that typical approaches to study abstraction for some intervention components and features did not support a robust calibration for QCA.ConclusionsQCA was suitable for use within a systematic review of medication adherence interventions and offered insights beyond the single dimension stratifications used in the original completed review. Future prospective use of QCA during a review is needed to determine the optimal way to efficiently integrate QCA into existing approaches to evidence synthesis of complex interventions.
20 schema:genre article
21 schema:inLanguage en
22 schema:isAccessibleForFree true
23 schema:isPartOf N094e9785270a4d3a8a1a3507b77969f5
24 Nceb3f376c76e4a6d9d6cb7cc4adabf86
25 sg:journal.1046628
26 schema:keywords BackgroundSystematic reviews
27 MethodsWe
28 QCA
29 abstraction
30 adherence
31 adherence interventions
32 alignment
33 analysis
34 applications
35 approach
36 behavioral interventions
37 calibration
38 clinical heterogeneity
39 combination
40 comparative analysis
41 complex interventions
42 complex phenomenon
43 components
44 context
45 data
46 detail
47 effective interventions
48 effectiveness
49 evidence synthesis
50 features
51 findings
52 first analysis
53 heterogeneity
54 implementation features
55 ineffectiveness
56 insights
57 intervention
58 intervention components
59 key intervention components
60 mathematical set theory
61 medication adherence
62 medication adherence interventions
63 method
64 non-probabilistic methods
65 objective
66 optimal way
67 phenomenon
68 potential method
69 process
70 prospective use
71 qualitative comparative analysis
72 questions
73 reasonable alignment
74 research questions
75 review
76 review findings
77 review steps
78 review's research questions
79 robust calibration
80 second analysis
81 set
82 set theory
83 step
84 stratification
85 study
86 substantial clinical heterogeneity
87 substantive analysis
88 sufficient combination
89 suitability
90 synthesis
91 systematic review
92 systematic review steps
93 theory
94 typical approach
95 use
96 way
97 schema:name Using qualitative comparative analysis in a systematic review of a complex intervention
98 schema:pagination 82
99 schema:productId N012b02073a0a4264bab2a9d4c51754be
100 Na04792bba3914bc6b96c7c455c087d11
101 Nf88e383fc46d47cc835727280ca6db86
102 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1009318668
103 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y
104 schema:sdDatePublished 2022-05-20T07:31
105 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
106 schema:sdPublisher Na6d7fa5a495741049a389f2f4c09b302
107 schema:url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y
108 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
109 sgo:sdDataset articles
110 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
111 N012b02073a0a4264bab2a9d4c51754be schema:name pubmed_id
112 schema:value 27209206
113 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
114 N094e9785270a4d3a8a1a3507b77969f5 schema:volumeNumber 5
115 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
116 N0c9d4c3bcfc447d7805082936d3ee4ac schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
117 schema:name Comparative Effectiveness Research
118 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
119 N3ca0ecbd740a4e9e84cef0cdd69f1a52 rdf:first sg:person.01274641213.01
120 rdf:rest N51e08f2e78484f9884abbd6ec0181d42
121 N4b0e3038b80445188092bb887fbe9773 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
122 schema:name Humans
123 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
124 N51e08f2e78484f9884abbd6ec0181d42 rdf:first sg:person.01165371576.76
125 rdf:rest N80542a968a66498e8be3e747712d327f
126 N7851032f9d784dfba88ce0414d823f27 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
127 schema:name Behavior Therapy
128 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
129 N80542a968a66498e8be3e747712d327f rdf:first sg:person.01054511540.21
130 rdf:rest rdf:nil
131 N87f08cda26ec4f6eb473074d17e18a26 rdf:first sg:person.0653747614.69
132 rdf:rest N3ca0ecbd740a4e9e84cef0cdd69f1a52
133 N99a37b1fa0dc4a99b7da6e58561c5239 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
134 schema:name Medication Adherence
135 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
136 Na04792bba3914bc6b96c7c455c087d11 schema:name dimensions_id
137 schema:value pub.1009318668
138 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
139 Na6d7fa5a495741049a389f2f4c09b302 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
140 rdf:type schema:Organization
141 Nceb3f376c76e4a6d9d6cb7cc4adabf86 schema:issueNumber 1
142 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
143 Ne0e6923088d741b885ea0c321d9d01b5 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
144 schema:name Review Literature as Topic
145 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
146 Ne61f370529c34b5ba618ae110c72da5a schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
147 schema:name Qualitative Research
148 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
149 Ne653959b5e0d4326a62948ee858cf1ba rdf:first sg:person.01353212123.25
150 rdf:rest Nece1c313f9584694ae54b054c4cfae83
151 Nece1c313f9584694ae54b054c4cfae83 rdf:first sg:person.0702747112.19
152 rdf:rest N87f08cda26ec4f6eb473074d17e18a26
153 Nf88e383fc46d47cc835727280ca6db86 schema:name doi
154 schema:value 10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y
155 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
156 anzsrc-for:11 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
157 schema:name Medical and Health Sciences
158 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
159 anzsrc-for:1117 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
160 schema:name Public Health and Health Services
161 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
162 sg:grant.2438707 http://pending.schema.org/fundedItem sg:pub.10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y
163 rdf:type schema:MonetaryGrant
164 sg:grant.2576780 http://pending.schema.org/fundedItem sg:pub.10.1186/s13643-016-0256-y
165 rdf:type schema:MonetaryGrant
166 sg:journal.1046628 schema:issn 2046-4053
167 schema:name Systematic Reviews
168 schema:publisher Springer Nature
169 rdf:type schema:Periodical
170 sg:person.01054511540.21 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.410711.2
171 schema:familyName Golin
172 schema:givenName Carol E.
173 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01054511540.21
174 rdf:type schema:Person
175 sg:person.01165371576.76 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.62562.35
176 schema:familyName Viswanathan
177 schema:givenName Meera
178 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01165371576.76
179 rdf:type schema:Person
180 sg:person.01274641213.01 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.62562.35
181 schema:familyName Lewis
182 schema:givenName Megan
183 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01274641213.01
184 rdf:type schema:Person
185 sg:person.01353212123.25 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.62562.35
186 schema:familyName Kahwati
187 schema:givenName Leila
188 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01353212123.25
189 rdf:type schema:Person
190 sg:person.0653747614.69 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.62562.35
191 schema:familyName Kane
192 schema:givenName Heather
193 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0653747614.69
194 rdf:type schema:Person
195 sg:person.0702747112.19 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.62562.35
196 schema:familyName Jacobs
197 schema:givenName Sara
198 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0702747112.19
199 rdf:type schema:Person
200 sg:pub.10.1007/s13142-014-0251-6 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007256533
201 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0251-6
202 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
203 sg:pub.10.1186/1471-2458-13-9 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1019378212
204 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-9
205 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
206 sg:pub.10.1186/1741-7015-9-79 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1012515501
207 https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-79
208 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
209 sg:pub.10.1186/1745-6215-14-179 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1008770668
210 https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-179
211 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
212 sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-7-15 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1009457747
213 https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-15
214 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
215 sg:pub.10.1186/2046-4053-3-67 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1017817446
216 https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-67
217 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
218 sg:pub.10.1186/s13643-016-0255-z schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1032568043
219 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0255-z
220 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
221 grid-institutes:grid.410711.2 schema:alternateName Departments of Medicine and Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
222 schema:name Departments of Medicine and Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
223 rdf:type schema:Organization
224 grid-institutes:grid.62562.35 schema:alternateName RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
225 schema:name RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., 27709, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
226 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...