JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Medical and Health Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1103", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Clinical Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, 308433, Singapore, Singapore", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.240988.f", 
          "name": [
            "Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, 308433, Singapore, Singapore"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "How", 
        "givenName": "Guo Yuan", 
        "id": "sg:person.0671622144.11", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0671622144.11"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, 308433, Singapore, Singapore", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.240988.f", 
          "name": [
            "Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, 308433, Singapore, Singapore"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Pua", 
        "givenName": "Uei", 
        "id": "sg:person.0770602566.39", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0770602566.39"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00270-020-02493-7", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1127764839", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02493-7"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00270-020-02483-9", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1127153756", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02483-9"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00270-003-0143-5", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1037512805", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-003-0143-5"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2020-12-09", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2020-12-09", 
    "description": "ObjectivesWhile the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic looks to persist, institutions promote delaying procedures. Understanding trends and demands of interventional radiology (IR) procedures in the infected and COVID-free populations are needed in long-term planning. We detail IR procedure trends in the first 27\u00a0weeks of the pandemic and compare with the pre-pandemic era.MethodsIn this IRB approved retrospective electronic case review, all IR patients in our institution from 1 January to 9 July 2020, the same period in 2019 pre-pandemic and the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV) outbreak were included. IR procedures were classified using Interventional Radiology\u2014Procedure Acuity Scale (IR-PAS) and category of IR procedures. Along with descriptive frequencies, the Mann\u2013Whitney U test and Chi-square test of independence were performed.ResultsDuring the pandemic, 3655 IR procedures were performed compared to 3851 procedures pre-pandemic. No statistically significant difference in weekly IR caseloads across IR-PAS tiers between both periods (p\u2009=\u2009.088) and category of procedure (p\u2009=\u2009.054) were noted. General intervention procedures remained the largest proportion and musculoskeletal procedures the minority, in both periods. More general intervention radiology and oncology procedures were performed during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the SARS-CoV outbreak. Thirty-four (0.93%) IR procedures were performed on 30 COVID-19 patients. There was no IR procedure-related COVID-19 cross-transmission.ConclusionsDemand for IR procedures among COVID-free patients remains high, and IR procedures involving COVID-19 represents a fraction of the IR caseload. A sustainable model in providing timely IR services to COVID-free patients needs to be considered.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s13244-020-00938-8", 
    "inLanguage": "en", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1043606", 
        "issn": [
          "1869-4101"
        ], 
        "name": "Insights into Imaging", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "1", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "11"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "interventional radiology procedures", 
      "IR procedures", 
      "radiology procedures", 
      "severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak", 
      "SARS-CoV outbreak", 
      "COVID-19 patients", 
      "Mann-Whitney U test", 
      "COVID-19", 
      "COVID-19 pandemic", 
      "respiratory syndrome outbreak", 
      "chi-square test", 
      "pre-pandemic era", 
      "IR patients", 
      "intervention radiology", 
      "Acuity Scale", 
      "oncology procedures", 
      "patients", 
      "musculoskeletal procedures", 
      "case review", 
      "categories of procedures", 
      "novel coronavirus pandemic", 
      "U test", 
      "delaying procedures", 
      "descriptive frequencies", 
      "significant differences", 
      "intervention procedures", 
      "weeks", 
      "pandemic", 
      "same period", 
      "caseload", 
      "procedure trends", 
      "large proportion", 
      "outbreak", 
      "IR services", 
      "period", 
      "MethodsIn", 
      "IRB", 
      "procedure", 
      "coronavirus pandemic", 
      "eyes", 
      "radiology", 
      "test", 
      "review", 
      "population", 
      "proportion", 
      "categories", 
      "persist", 
      "differences", 
      "minority", 
      "institutions", 
      "sustainable model", 
      "trends", 
      "frequency", 
      "services", 
      "fraction", 
      "scale", 
      "era", 
      "planning", 
      "independence", 
      "model", 
      "tier", 
      "storms", 
      "long-term planning", 
      "demand"
    ], 
    "name": "Trends of interventional radiology procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic: the first 27 weeks in the eye of the storm", 
    "pagination": "131", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1133350647"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1186/s13244-020-00938-8"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "pubmed_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "33296046"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00938-8", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1133350647"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-06-01T22:21", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220601/entities/gbq_results/article/article_864.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00938-8"
  }
]

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

144 TRIPLES      22 PREDICATES      93 URIs      82 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES