The concept of vulnerability in medical ethics and philosophy. View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle      Open Access: True


Article Info

DATE

2019-12

AUTHORS

Joachim Boldt

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare is permeated by phenomena of vulnerability and their ethical significance. Nonetheless, application of this concept in healthcare ethics today is largely confined to clinical research. Approaches that further elaborate the concept in order to make it suitable for healthcare as a whole thus deserve renewed attention. METHODS: Conceptual analysis. RESULTS: Taking up the task to make the concept of vulnerability suitable for healthcare ethics as a whole involves two challenges. Firstly, starting from the concept as it used in research ethics, a more detailed characterization and systematization of the different realms of human abilities and the various ways in which these realms contain vulnerability is to be established. Secondly, at the same time, the sought-after concept of vulnerability should avoid picturing the relation between healthcare recipient and provider as a relation between a dependent individual in need and another individual capable of providing all the help necessary. An adequate concept of vulnerability should enable one to understand when and in which respects care providers may be vulnerable as well. Philosophical accounts of vulnerability can help to meet both of these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Philosophical accounts of vulnerability can help to make the concept of vulnerability suitable for healthcare ethics as a whole. They come with a price, though. While the ethical role of vulnerability in medical ethics usually is to signify states of affairs that are to be diminished or overcome, philosophical accounts introduce forms of vulnerability that are regarded as valuable. Further analyzing and systematizing forms and degrees of vulnerability thus comprises the task to distinguish between amounts and types of vulnerability that can count as valuable, and amounts and types of vulnerability that are to be alleviated. More... »

PAGES

6

References to SciGraph publications

  • 2018-12. Renewing Medicine’s basic concepts: on ambiguity in PHILOSOPHY, ETHICS, AND HUMANITIES IN MEDICINE
  • Identifiers

    URI

    http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6

    DOI

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6

    DIMENSIONS

    https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1113377890

    PUBMED

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30975177


    Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
    Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

    JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

    TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

    [
      {
        "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
        "about": [
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/2203", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Philosophy", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/22", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Philosophy and Religious Studies", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }
        ], 
        "author": [
          {
            "affiliation": {
              "alternateName": "University of Freiburg", 
              "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.5963.9", 
              "name": [
                "Department of Medical Ethics and the History of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. boldt@egm.uni-freiburg.de."
              ], 
              "type": "Organization"
            }, 
            "familyName": "Boldt", 
            "givenName": "Joachim", 
            "type": "Person"
          }
        ], 
        "citation": [
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2006.0024", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015048366"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315799186", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1016128632"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00631.x", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018267660"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00362", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051369308"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.2.1.121", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1084428214"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.5.2.11", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1084428306"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s13010-018-0061-4", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1105310380", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-018-0061-4"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s13010-018-0061-4", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1105310380", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-018-0061-4"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }
        ], 
        "datePublished": "2019-12", 
        "datePublishedReg": "2019-12-01", 
        "description": "BACKGROUND: Healthcare is permeated by phenomena of vulnerability and their ethical significance. Nonetheless, application of this concept in healthcare ethics today is largely confined to clinical research. Approaches that further elaborate the concept in order to make it suitable for healthcare as a whole thus deserve renewed attention.\nMETHODS: Conceptual analysis.\nRESULTS: Taking up the task to make the concept of vulnerability suitable for healthcare ethics as a whole involves two challenges. Firstly, starting from the concept as it used in research ethics, a more detailed characterization and systematization of the different realms of human abilities and the various ways in which these realms contain vulnerability is to be established. Secondly, at the same time, the sought-after concept of vulnerability should avoid picturing the relation between healthcare recipient and provider as a relation between a dependent individual in need and another individual capable of providing all the help necessary. An adequate concept of vulnerability should enable one to understand when and in which respects care providers may be vulnerable as well. Philosophical accounts of vulnerability can help to meet both of these challenges.\nCONCLUSIONS: Philosophical accounts of vulnerability can help to make the concept of vulnerability suitable for healthcare ethics as a whole. They come with a price, though. While the ethical role of vulnerability in medical ethics usually is to signify states of affairs that are to be diminished or overcome, philosophical accounts introduce forms of vulnerability that are regarded as valuable. Further analyzing and systematizing forms and degrees of vulnerability thus comprises the task to distinguish between amounts and types of vulnerability that can count as valuable, and amounts and types of vulnerability that are to be alleviated.", 
        "genre": "research_article", 
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6", 
        "inLanguage": [
          "en"
        ], 
        "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
        "isPartOf": [
          {
            "id": "sg:journal.1035959", 
            "issn": [
              "1747-5341"
            ], 
            "name": "Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine", 
            "type": "Periodical"
          }, 
          {
            "issueNumber": "1", 
            "type": "PublicationIssue"
          }, 
          {
            "type": "PublicationVolume", 
            "volumeNumber": "14"
          }
        ], 
        "name": "The concept of vulnerability in medical ethics and philosophy.", 
        "pagination": "6", 
        "productId": [
          {
            "name": "doi", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6"
            ]
          }, 
          {
            "name": "dimensions_id", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "pub.1113377890"
            ]
          }, 
          {
            "name": "nlm_unique_id", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "101258058"
            ]
          }, 
          {
            "name": "pubmed_id", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "30975177"
            ]
          }
        ], 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6", 
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1113377890"
        ], 
        "sdDataset": "articles", 
        "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-16T06:22", 
        "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
        "sdPublisher": {
          "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000377_0000000377/records_106816_00000003.jsonl", 
        "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
        "url": "https://peh-med.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6"
      }
    ]
     

    Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

    HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

    JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6'

    N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6'

    Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

    curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6'

    RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6'


     

    This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

    85 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      35 URIs      20 LITERALS      8 BLANK NODES

    Subject Predicate Object
    1 sg:pub.10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6 schema:about anzsrc-for:22
    2 anzsrc-for:2203
    3 schema:author N03371b1a59e44b0eaa332fa58f4e9c86
    4 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1186/s13010-018-0061-4
    5 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00362
    6 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00631.x
    7 https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2006.0024
    8 https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.2.1.121
    9 https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.5.2.11
    10 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315799186
    11 schema:datePublished 2019-12
    12 schema:datePublishedReg 2019-12-01
    13 schema:description BACKGROUND: Healthcare is permeated by phenomena of vulnerability and their ethical significance. Nonetheless, application of this concept in healthcare ethics today is largely confined to clinical research. Approaches that further elaborate the concept in order to make it suitable for healthcare as a whole thus deserve renewed attention. METHODS: Conceptual analysis. RESULTS: Taking up the task to make the concept of vulnerability suitable for healthcare ethics as a whole involves two challenges. Firstly, starting from the concept as it used in research ethics, a more detailed characterization and systematization of the different realms of human abilities and the various ways in which these realms contain vulnerability is to be established. Secondly, at the same time, the sought-after concept of vulnerability should avoid picturing the relation between healthcare recipient and provider as a relation between a dependent individual in need and another individual capable of providing all the help necessary. An adequate concept of vulnerability should enable one to understand when and in which respects care providers may be vulnerable as well. Philosophical accounts of vulnerability can help to meet both of these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Philosophical accounts of vulnerability can help to make the concept of vulnerability suitable for healthcare ethics as a whole. They come with a price, though. While the ethical role of vulnerability in medical ethics usually is to signify states of affairs that are to be diminished or overcome, philosophical accounts introduce forms of vulnerability that are regarded as valuable. Further analyzing and systematizing forms and degrees of vulnerability thus comprises the task to distinguish between amounts and types of vulnerability that can count as valuable, and amounts and types of vulnerability that are to be alleviated.
    14 schema:genre research_article
    15 schema:inLanguage en
    16 schema:isAccessibleForFree true
    17 schema:isPartOf N015cbb66c0a242dd836260185b7c9a95
    18 N14b3a54f66c94ac6a8376a74fac60987
    19 sg:journal.1035959
    20 schema:name The concept of vulnerability in medical ethics and philosophy.
    21 schema:pagination 6
    22 schema:productId N31b59bb2a5284fa9a222edd72b1c5a80
    23 N3ff048509f7344699903a63d8b909d10
    24 Ncadf3ab3ed41400e8b563e49dea73acd
    25 Nd800db7f0c564593bef221a553bcfa39
    26 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1113377890
    27 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6
    28 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-16T06:22
    29 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
    30 schema:sdPublisher Nb4ce10f2d12049d5ae5e53d866844225
    31 schema:url https://peh-med.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6
    32 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
    33 sgo:sdDataset articles
    34 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
    35 N015cbb66c0a242dd836260185b7c9a95 schema:issueNumber 1
    36 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
    37 N03371b1a59e44b0eaa332fa58f4e9c86 rdf:first N3fbc0d7cb4804d0da1c82dda3ad96ed9
    38 rdf:rest rdf:nil
    39 N14b3a54f66c94ac6a8376a74fac60987 schema:volumeNumber 14
    40 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
    41 N31b59bb2a5284fa9a222edd72b1c5a80 schema:name dimensions_id
    42 schema:value pub.1113377890
    43 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    44 N3fbc0d7cb4804d0da1c82dda3ad96ed9 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.5963.9
    45 schema:familyName Boldt
    46 schema:givenName Joachim
    47 rdf:type schema:Person
    48 N3ff048509f7344699903a63d8b909d10 schema:name pubmed_id
    49 schema:value 30975177
    50 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    51 Nb4ce10f2d12049d5ae5e53d866844225 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
    52 rdf:type schema:Organization
    53 Ncadf3ab3ed41400e8b563e49dea73acd schema:name nlm_unique_id
    54 schema:value 101258058
    55 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    56 Nd800db7f0c564593bef221a553bcfa39 schema:name doi
    57 schema:value 10.1186/s13010-019-0075-6
    58 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    59 anzsrc-for:22 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    60 schema:name Philosophy and Religious Studies
    61 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    62 anzsrc-for:2203 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    63 schema:name Philosophy
    64 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    65 sg:journal.1035959 schema:issn 1747-5341
    66 schema:name Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
    67 rdf:type schema:Periodical
    68 sg:pub.10.1186/s13010-018-0061-4 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1105310380
    69 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-018-0061-4
    70 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    71 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00362 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051369308
    72 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    73 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00631.x schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018267660
    74 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    75 https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.2006.0024 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015048366
    76 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    77 https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.2.1.121 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1084428214
    78 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    79 https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.5.2.11 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1084428306
    80 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    81 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315799186 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1016128632
    82 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    83 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.5963.9 schema:alternateName University of Freiburg
    84 schema:name Department of Medical Ethics and the History of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. boldt@egm.uni-freiburg.de.
    85 rdf:type schema:Organization
     




    Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


    ...