Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle Open Access: True
2017-11-28
AUTHORSBolong Zheng, Dingjun Hao, Hua Guo, Baorong He
ABSTRACTBackgroundACDF has been considered as the gold standard in the treatment of single level cervical disk protrusion. However, it may cause adjacent level degeneration due to regional biomechanical changes. TDR has been applied with satisfactory results for over a decade, but there is no consensus if TDR is safer and more efficient than ACDF. The current study was carried out to compare the efficiency and safety of TDR and ACDF in the treatment of patients with single level cervical disk protrusion.MethodsOne hundred forty-five consecutive patients who underwent either TDR or ACDF in our center were included in the current study. Time of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, VAS arm and neck pain scores, ROM, ODI, SF36 and Patient satisfaction were compared before the surgery, after the surgery, and during follow up 1, 3, 5, 8 years after the surgery.ResultsThe time of surgery was 64.6 ± 20.7 min in the ACDF group and 69.4 ± 19.3 min in the TDR group; intraoperative hemorrhage was 67.2 ± 14.3 ml in ACDF group and 70.7 ± 18.6 ml in TDR group. There were no significant differences between two groups concerning time of surgery and intraoperative blood loss. No differences were found concerning patient satisfaction between the two groups during the follow up (P > 0.05). Significant differences were found between the groups concerning VAS arm and neck pain scores, ROM, ODI and SF36 after the surgery and during the 8 year follow up.ConclusionTDR may be a more effective approach than ACDF for treating patients with single level cervical disk protrusion.KeywordsCervical disk herniation, ACDF, TDR, Retrospective study More... »
PAGES113
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s12893-017-0316-9
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0316-9
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1093057846
PUBMEDhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29183306
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Medical and Health Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1103",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Clinical Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Adult",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Blood Loss, Surgical",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Cervical Vertebrae",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Diskectomy",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Female",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Follow-Up Studies",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Humans",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Male",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Middle Aged",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Pain Measurement",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Patient Satisfaction",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Retrospective Studies",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Spinal Fusion",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Spondylosis",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Total Disc Replacement",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Treatment Outcome",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi\u2019an Jiaotong University, NO555,East Friendship Rd, 86710054, Xi\u2019an, Shanxi, China",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.452452.0",
"name": [
"Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi\u2019an Jiaotong University, NO555,East Friendship Rd, 86710054, Xi\u2019an, Shanxi, China"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Zheng",
"givenName": "Bolong",
"id": "sg:person.016337602543.83",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.016337602543.83"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi\u2019an Jiaotong University, NO555,East Friendship Rd, 86710054, Xi\u2019an, Shanxi, China",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.452452.0",
"name": [
"Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi\u2019an Jiaotong University, NO555,East Friendship Rd, 86710054, Xi\u2019an, Shanxi, China"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Hao",
"givenName": "Dingjun",
"id": "sg:person.014642314164.64",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014642314164.64"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi\u2019an Jiaotong University, NO555,East Friendship Rd, 86710054, Xi\u2019an, Shanxi, China",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.452452.0",
"name": [
"Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi\u2019an Jiaotong University, NO555,East Friendship Rd, 86710054, Xi\u2019an, Shanxi, China"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Guo",
"givenName": "Hua",
"id": "sg:person.01355574370.53",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01355574370.53"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi\u2019an Jiaotong University, NO555,East Friendship Rd, 86710054, Xi\u2019an, Shanxi, China",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.452452.0",
"name": [
"Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi\u2019an Jiaotong University, NO555,East Friendship Rd, 86710054, Xi\u2019an, Shanxi, China"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "He",
"givenName": "Baorong",
"id": "sg:person.01020254526.71",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01020254526.71"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00586-016-4897-2",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1044669242",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4897-2"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2017-11-28",
"datePublishedReg": "2017-11-28",
"description": "BackgroundACDF has been considered as the gold standard in the treatment of single level cervical disk protrusion. However, it may cause adjacent level degeneration due to regional biomechanical changes. TDR has been applied with satisfactory results for over a decade, but there is no consensus if TDR is safer and more efficient than ACDF. The current study was carried out to compare the efficiency and safety of TDR and ACDF in the treatment of patients with single level cervical disk protrusion.MethodsOne hundred forty-five consecutive patients who underwent either TDR or ACDF in our center were included in the current study. Time of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, VAS arm and neck pain scores, ROM, ODI, SF36 and Patient satisfaction were compared before the surgery, after the surgery, and during follow up 1, 3, 5, 8\u00a0years after the surgery.ResultsThe time of surgery was 64.6\u2009\u00b1\u200920.7\u00a0min in the ACDF group and 69.4\u2009\u00b1\u200919.3\u00a0min in the TDR group; intraoperative hemorrhage was 67.2\u2009\u00b1\u200914.3\u00a0ml in ACDF group and 70.7\u2009\u00b1\u200918.6\u00a0ml in TDR group. There were no significant differences between two groups concerning time of surgery and intraoperative blood loss. No differences were found concerning patient satisfaction between the two groups during the follow up (P\u2009>\u20090.05). Significant differences were found between the groups concerning VAS arm and neck pain scores, ROM, ODI and SF36 after the surgery and during the 8\u00a0year follow up.ConclusionTDR may be a more effective approach than ACDF for treating patients with single level cervical disk protrusion.KeywordsCervical disk herniation, ACDF, TDR, Retrospective study",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s12893-017-0316-9",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1024958",
"issn": [
"1471-2482"
],
"name": "BMC Surgery",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "1",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "17"
}
],
"keywords": [
"cervical disc protrusion",
"time of surgery",
"intraoperative blood loss",
"neck pain scores",
"disc protrusion",
"VAS arm",
"ACDF group",
"TDR group",
"pain scores",
"blood loss",
"patient satisfaction",
"treatment of patients",
"adjacent level degeneration",
"MethodsOne hundred forty",
"significant differences",
"consecutive patients",
"cervical spondylosis",
"intraoperative hemorrhage",
"disc herniation",
"hundred forty",
"ACDF",
"level degeneration",
"surgery",
"current study",
"patients",
"biomechanical changes",
"gold standard",
"SF36",
"ODI",
"treatment",
"scores",
"group",
"years",
"spondylosis",
"hemorrhage",
"herniation",
"TDR",
"arm",
"ROM",
"follow",
"min",
"degeneration",
"differences",
"protrusion",
"study",
"satisfaction",
"forties",
"safety",
"loss",
"satisfactory results",
"time",
"consensus",
"center",
"effective approach",
"changes",
"standards",
"decades",
"results",
"approach",
"efficiency"
],
"name": "ACDF vs TDR for patients with cervical spondylosis \u2013 an 8 year follow up study",
"pagination": "113",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1093057846"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1186/s12893-017-0316-9"
]
},
{
"name": "pubmed_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"29183306"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0316-9",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1093057846"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-20T07:33",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220519/entities/gbq_results/article/article_749.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0316-9"
}
]Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s12893-017-0316-9'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s12893-017-0316-9'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s12893-017-0316-9'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/s12893-017-0316-9'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
210 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
103 URIs
94 LITERALS
23 BLANK NODES