JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Medical and Health Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1103", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Clinical Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1117", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Public Health and Health Services", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Department of Informatics and Biostatistics, Unit\u00e9 Inserm UMR S717, H\u00f4pital Saint Louis, Universit\u00e9 Paris 7 Diderot, Paris, France", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, H\u00f4pital Europ\u00e9en Georges Pompidou, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cit\u00e9, Paris, France", 
            "Department of Informatics and Biostatistics, Unit\u00e9 Inserm UMR S717, H\u00f4pital Saint Louis, Universit\u00e9 Paris 7 Diderot, Paris, France"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Pirracchio", 
        "givenName": "Romain", 
        "id": "sg:person.01047623565.27", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01047623565.27"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Department of Informatics and Biostatistics, Unit\u00e9 Inserm UMR S717, H\u00f4pital Saint Louis, Universit\u00e9 Paris 7 Diderot, Paris, France", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Informatics and Biostatistics, Unit\u00e9 Inserm UMR S717, H\u00f4pital Saint Louis, Universit\u00e9 Paris 7 Diderot, Paris, France"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Resche-Rigon", 
        "givenName": "Matthieu", 
        "id": "sg:person.01036155166.50", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01036155166.50"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Department of Informatics and Biostatistics, Unit\u00e9 Inserm UMR S717, H\u00f4pital Saint Louis, Universit\u00e9 Paris 7 Diderot, Paris, France", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Informatics and Biostatistics, Unit\u00e9 Inserm UMR S717, H\u00f4pital Saint Louis, Universit\u00e9 Paris 7 Diderot, Paris, France"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Chevret", 
        "givenName": "Sylvie", 
        "id": "sg:person.0625147223.89", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0625147223.89"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, H\u00f4pital Europ\u00e9en Georges Pompidou, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cit\u00e9, Paris, France", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.414093.b", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, H\u00f4pital Europ\u00e9en Georges Pompidou, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cit\u00e9, Paris, France"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Journois", 
        "givenName": "Didier", 
        "id": "sg:person.01171372357.44", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01171372357.44"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/cc12611", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001588772", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12611"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2013-09-02", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2013-09-02", 
    "description": "BackgroundAs a result of reporting bias, or frauds, false or misunderstood findings may represent the majority of published research claims. This article provides simple methods that might help to appraise the quality of the reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCT).MethodsThis evaluation roadmap proposed herein relies on four steps: evaluation of the distribution of the reported variables; evaluation of the distribution of the reported p values; data simulation using parametric bootstrap and explicit computation of the p values. Such an approach was illustrated using published data from a retracted RCT comparing a hydroxyethyl starch versus albumin-based priming for cardiopulmonary bypass.ResultsDespite obvious nonnormal distributions, several variables are presented as if they were normally distributed. The set of 16 p values testing for differences in baseline characteristics across randomized groups did not follow a Uniform distribution on [0,1] (p = 0.045). The p values obtained by explicit computations were different from the results reported by the authors for the two following variables: urine output at 5 hours (calculated p value < 10-6, reported p \u2265 0.05); packed red blood cells (PRBC) during surgery (calculated p value = 0.08; reported p < 0.05). Finally, parametric bootstrap found p value > 0.05 in only 5 of the 10,000 simulated datasets concerning urine output 5 hours after surgery. Concerning PRBC transfused during surgery, parametric bootstrap showed that only the corresponding p value had less than a 50% chance to be inferior to 0.05 (3,920/10,000, p value < 0.05).ConclusionsSuch simple evaluation methods might offer some warning signals. However, it should be emphasized that such methods do not allow concluding to the presence of error or fraud but should rather be used to justify asking for an access to the raw data.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/2110-5820-3-29", 
    "inLanguage": "en", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1045300", 
        "issn": [
          "2110-5820"
        ], 
        "name": "Annals of Intensive Care", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "1", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "3"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "p-value", 
      "baseline characteristics", 
      "urine output", 
      "red blood cells", 
      "cardiopulmonary bypass", 
      "randomized groups", 
      "hydroxyethyl starch", 
      "surgery", 
      "blood cells", 
      "hours", 
      "RCTs", 
      "PRBC", 
      "bypass", 
      "trials", 
      "evaluation", 
      "albumin", 
      "priming", 
      "cells", 
      "group", 
      "majority", 
      "findings", 
      "reporting", 
      "variables", 
      "data", 
      "differences", 
      "simple evaluation method", 
      "warning signals", 
      "chance", 
      "bias", 
      "values", 
      "presence", 
      "results", 
      "access", 
      "method", 
      "quality", 
      "authors", 
      "characteristics", 
      "distribution", 
      "tool", 
      "nonnormal distributions", 
      "simple method", 
      "evaluation method", 
      "article", 
      "output", 
      "approach", 
      "evaluation roadmap", 
      "raw data", 
      "signals", 
      "claims", 
      "step", 
      "roadmap", 
      "statistical tools", 
      "starch", 
      "such methods", 
      "research claims", 
      "dataset", 
      "bootstrap", 
      "error", 
      "parametric bootstrap", 
      "set", 
      "data simulation", 
      "uniform distribution", 
      "presence of errors", 
      "fraud", 
      "simulations", 
      "computation", 
      "explicit computation"
    ], 
    "name": "Do simple screening statistical tools help to detect reporting bias?", 
    "pagination": "29", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1048530347"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1186/2110-5820-3-29"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "pubmed_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "24004521"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-3-29", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1048530347"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-06-01T22:12", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220601/entities/gbq_results/article/article_592.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-3-29"
  }
]

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

161 TRIPLES      22 PREDICATES      94 URIs      84 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES