A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle      Open Access: True


Article Info

DATE

2010-05-26

AUTHORS

Jo Rycroft-Malone, Marina Fontenla, Debra Bick, Kate Seers

ABSTRACT

Background'Protocol based care' was envisioned by policy makers as a mechanism for delivering on the service improvement agenda in England. Realistic evaluation is an increasingly popular approach, but few published examples exist, particularly in implementation research. To fill this gap, within this paper we describe the application of a realistic evaluation approach to the study of protocol-based care, whilst sharing findings of relevance about standardising care through the use of protocols, guidelines, and pathways.MethodsSituated between positivism and relativism, realistic evaluation is concerned with the identification of underlying causal mechanisms, how they work, and under what conditions. Fundamentally it focuses attention on finding out what works, for whom, how, and in what circumstances.ResultsIn this research, we were interested in understanding the relationships between the type and nature of particular approaches to protocol-based care (mechanisms), within different clinical settings (context), and what impacts this resulted in (outcomes). An evidence review using the principles of realist synthesis resulted in a number of propositions, i.e., context, mechanism, and outcome threads (CMOs). These propositions were then 'tested' through multiple case studies, using multiple methods including non-participant observation, interviews, and document analysis through an iterative analysis process. The initial propositions (conjectured CMOs) only partially corresponded to the findings that emerged during analysis. From the iterative analysis process of scrutinising mechanisms, context, and outcomes we were able to draw out some theoretically generalisable features about what works, for whom, how, and what circumstances in relation to the use of standardised care approaches (refined CMOs).ConclusionsAs one of the first studies to apply realistic evaluation in implementation research, it was a good fit, particularly given the growing emphasis on understanding how context influences evidence-based practice. The strengths and limitations of the approach are considered, including how to operationalise it and some of the challenges. This approach provided a useful interpretive framework with which to make sense of the multiple factors that were simultaneously at play and being observed through various data sources, and for developing explanatory theory about using standardised care approaches in practice. More... »

PAGES

38

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1748-5908-5-38

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-38

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1026139324

PUBMED

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20504293


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Medical and Health Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1117", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Public Health and Health Services", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Centre for Health Related Research, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Ffriddoedd Road, Bangor, UK", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.7362.0", 
          "name": [
            "Centre for Health Related Research, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Ffriddoedd Road, Bangor, UK"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Rycroft-Malone", 
        "givenName": "Jo", 
        "id": "sg:person.0710660206.62", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0710660206.62"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "RCN Research Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.7372.1", 
          "name": [
            "RCN Research Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Fontenla", 
        "givenName": "Marina", 
        "id": "sg:person.01357040304.57", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01357040304.57"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, UK", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.13097.3c", 
          "name": [
            "Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, UK"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Bick", 
        "givenName": "Debra", 
        "id": "sg:person.01033122255.15", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01033122255.15"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "RCN Research Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.7372.1", 
          "name": [
            "RCN Research Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Seers", 
        "givenName": "Kate", 
        "id": "sg:person.01045156011.03", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01045156011.03"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-1-4", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1021360224", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-4"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-4-78", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1028901506", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-78"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-4-61", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1035079664", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-61"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-4-53", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1049863451", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-53"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-4-68", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1002263857", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-68"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2010-05-26", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2010-05-26", 
    "description": "Background'Protocol based care' was envisioned by policy makers as a mechanism for delivering on the service improvement agenda in England. Realistic evaluation is an increasingly popular approach, but few published examples exist, particularly in implementation research. To fill this gap, within this paper we describe the application of a realistic evaluation approach to the study of protocol-based care, whilst sharing findings of relevance about standardising care through the use of protocols, guidelines, and pathways.MethodsSituated between positivism and relativism, realistic evaluation is concerned with the identification of underlying causal mechanisms, how they work, and under what conditions. Fundamentally it focuses attention on finding out what works, for whom, how, and in what circumstances.ResultsIn this research, we were interested in understanding the relationships between the type and nature of particular approaches to protocol-based care (mechanisms), within different clinical settings (context), and what impacts this resulted in (outcomes). An evidence review using the principles of realist synthesis resulted in a number of propositions, i.e., context, mechanism, and outcome threads (CMOs). These propositions were then 'tested' through multiple case studies, using multiple methods including non-participant observation, interviews, and document analysis through an iterative analysis process. The initial propositions (conjectured CMOs) only partially corresponded to the findings that emerged during analysis. From the iterative analysis process of scrutinising mechanisms, context, and outcomes we were able to draw out some theoretically generalisable features about what works, for whom, how, and what circumstances in relation to the use of standardised care approaches (refined CMOs).ConclusionsAs one of the first studies to apply realistic evaluation in implementation research, it was a good fit, particularly given the growing emphasis on understanding how context influences evidence-based practice. The strengths and limitations of the approach are considered, including how to operationalise it and some of the challenges. This approach provided a useful interpretive framework with which to make sense of the multiple factors that were simultaneously at play and being observed through various data sources, and for developing explanatory theory about using standardised care approaches in practice.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-5-38", 
    "inLanguage": "en", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1036000", 
        "issn": [
          "1748-5908"
        ], 
        "name": "Implementation Science", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "1", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "5"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "protocol-based care", 
      "care approach", 
      "implementation research", 
      "different clinical settings", 
      "iterative analysis process", 
      "use of protocols", 
      "evidence-based practice", 
      "evidence review", 
      "clinical setting", 
      "care", 
      "findings of relevance", 
      "realistic evaluation approach", 
      "realist synthesis", 
      "multiple factors", 
      "first study", 
      "generalisable features", 
      "service improvement agenda", 
      "non-participant observation", 
      "evaluation", 
      "findings", 
      "ResultsIn", 
      "study", 
      "outcomes", 
      "mechanism", 
      "evaluation approach", 
      "guidelines", 
      "causal mechanisms", 
      "review", 
      "improvement agenda", 
      "pathway", 
      "setting", 
      "use", 
      "practice", 
      "multiple methods", 
      "factors", 
      "realistic evaluation", 
      "cases", 
      "protocol", 
      "relevance", 
      "interviews", 
      "policy makers", 
      "analysis", 
      "circumstances", 
      "data sources", 
      "research", 
      "identification", 
      "relationship", 
      "number", 
      "types", 
      "approach", 
      "England", 
      "features", 
      "useful interpretive framework", 
      "limitations", 
      "challenges", 
      "emphasis", 
      "observations", 
      "conditions", 
      "relation", 
      "attention", 
      "method", 
      "context", 
      "best fit", 
      "synthesis", 
      "process", 
      "particular approach", 
      "multiple case study", 
      "makers", 
      "source", 
      "nature", 
      "initial proposition", 
      "gap", 
      "explanatory theory", 
      "play", 
      "fit", 
      "one", 
      "strength", 
      "analysis process", 
      "principles", 
      "sense", 
      "agenda", 
      "threads", 
      "document analysis", 
      "applications", 
      "case study", 
      "proposition", 
      "popular approach", 
      "example", 
      "framework", 
      "interpretive framework", 
      "paper", 
      "theory", 
      "number of propositions", 
      "positivism", 
      "relativism"
    ], 
    "name": "A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care", 
    "pagination": "38", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1026139324"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1186/1748-5908-5-38"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "pubmed_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "20504293"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-38", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1026139324"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-05-20T07:25", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220519/entities/gbq_results/article/article_506.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-38"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1748-5908-5-38'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1748-5908-5-38'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1748-5908-5-38'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1748-5908-5-38'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

203 TRIPLES      22 PREDICATES      126 URIs      113 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-5-38 schema:about anzsrc-for:11
2 anzsrc-for:1117
3 schema:author Nff8047fd5246454e85c94d566ade1de3
4 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-1-4
5 sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-4-53
6 sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-4-61
7 sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-4-68
8 sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-4-78
9 schema:datePublished 2010-05-26
10 schema:datePublishedReg 2010-05-26
11 schema:description Background'Protocol based care' was envisioned by policy makers as a mechanism for delivering on the service improvement agenda in England. Realistic evaluation is an increasingly popular approach, but few published examples exist, particularly in implementation research. To fill this gap, within this paper we describe the application of a realistic evaluation approach to the study of protocol-based care, whilst sharing findings of relevance about standardising care through the use of protocols, guidelines, and pathways.MethodsSituated between positivism and relativism, realistic evaluation is concerned with the identification of underlying causal mechanisms, how they work, and under what conditions. Fundamentally it focuses attention on finding out what works, for whom, how, and in what circumstances.ResultsIn this research, we were interested in understanding the relationships between the type and nature of particular approaches to protocol-based care (mechanisms), within different clinical settings (context), and what impacts this resulted in (outcomes). An evidence review using the principles of realist synthesis resulted in a number of propositions, i.e., context, mechanism, and outcome threads (CMOs). These propositions were then 'tested' through multiple case studies, using multiple methods including non-participant observation, interviews, and document analysis through an iterative analysis process. The initial propositions (conjectured CMOs) only partially corresponded to the findings that emerged during analysis. From the iterative analysis process of scrutinising mechanisms, context, and outcomes we were able to draw out some theoretically generalisable features about what works, for whom, how, and what circumstances in relation to the use of standardised care approaches (refined CMOs).ConclusionsAs one of the first studies to apply realistic evaluation in implementation research, it was a good fit, particularly given the growing emphasis on understanding how context influences evidence-based practice. The strengths and limitations of the approach are considered, including how to operationalise it and some of the challenges. This approach provided a useful interpretive framework with which to make sense of the multiple factors that were simultaneously at play and being observed through various data sources, and for developing explanatory theory about using standardised care approaches in practice.
12 schema:genre article
13 schema:inLanguage en
14 schema:isAccessibleForFree true
15 schema:isPartOf N19d47aab701b41b2b257cfc5c2e51288
16 N224276ea4f5d4141b8bb434f306a9017
17 sg:journal.1036000
18 schema:keywords England
19 ResultsIn
20 agenda
21 analysis
22 analysis process
23 applications
24 approach
25 attention
26 best fit
27 care
28 care approach
29 case study
30 cases
31 causal mechanisms
32 challenges
33 circumstances
34 clinical setting
35 conditions
36 context
37 data sources
38 different clinical settings
39 document analysis
40 emphasis
41 evaluation
42 evaluation approach
43 evidence review
44 evidence-based practice
45 example
46 explanatory theory
47 factors
48 features
49 findings
50 findings of relevance
51 first study
52 fit
53 framework
54 gap
55 generalisable features
56 guidelines
57 identification
58 implementation research
59 improvement agenda
60 initial proposition
61 interpretive framework
62 interviews
63 iterative analysis process
64 limitations
65 makers
66 mechanism
67 method
68 multiple case study
69 multiple factors
70 multiple methods
71 nature
72 non-participant observation
73 number
74 number of propositions
75 observations
76 one
77 outcomes
78 paper
79 particular approach
80 pathway
81 play
82 policy makers
83 popular approach
84 positivism
85 practice
86 principles
87 process
88 proposition
89 protocol
90 protocol-based care
91 realist synthesis
92 realistic evaluation
93 realistic evaluation approach
94 relation
95 relationship
96 relativism
97 relevance
98 research
99 review
100 sense
101 service improvement agenda
102 setting
103 source
104 strength
105 study
106 synthesis
107 theory
108 threads
109 types
110 use
111 use of protocols
112 useful interpretive framework
113 schema:name A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care
114 schema:pagination 38
115 schema:productId N378f0f34debc4feba94837f141f87008
116 N68dc9dc122734ec498f1c00525b1cc5d
117 N8cd7f2053b98459ca86d458c20eada0c
118 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1026139324
119 https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-38
120 schema:sdDatePublished 2022-05-20T07:25
121 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
122 schema:sdPublisher Nb9fbf8c1a4d64adbaea910c7308aa2aa
123 schema:url https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-38
124 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
125 sgo:sdDataset articles
126 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
127 N19d47aab701b41b2b257cfc5c2e51288 schema:volumeNumber 5
128 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
129 N224276ea4f5d4141b8bb434f306a9017 schema:issueNumber 1
130 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
131 N378f0f34debc4feba94837f141f87008 schema:name doi
132 schema:value 10.1186/1748-5908-5-38
133 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
134 N402ceeaa340c4705b467f14a304f614b rdf:first sg:person.01033122255.15
135 rdf:rest N758d2773047c4ea6a33993e6c2be3683
136 N68dc9dc122734ec498f1c00525b1cc5d schema:name dimensions_id
137 schema:value pub.1026139324
138 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
139 N758d2773047c4ea6a33993e6c2be3683 rdf:first sg:person.01045156011.03
140 rdf:rest rdf:nil
141 N8cd7f2053b98459ca86d458c20eada0c schema:name pubmed_id
142 schema:value 20504293
143 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
144 Nb9fbf8c1a4d64adbaea910c7308aa2aa schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
145 rdf:type schema:Organization
146 Nd8cce387bd15461697883b98d25cc0b4 rdf:first sg:person.01357040304.57
147 rdf:rest N402ceeaa340c4705b467f14a304f614b
148 Nff8047fd5246454e85c94d566ade1de3 rdf:first sg:person.0710660206.62
149 rdf:rest Nd8cce387bd15461697883b98d25cc0b4
150 anzsrc-for:11 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
151 schema:name Medical and Health Sciences
152 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
153 anzsrc-for:1117 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
154 schema:name Public Health and Health Services
155 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
156 sg:journal.1036000 schema:issn 1748-5908
157 schema:name Implementation Science
158 schema:publisher Springer Nature
159 rdf:type schema:Periodical
160 sg:person.01033122255.15 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.13097.3c
161 schema:familyName Bick
162 schema:givenName Debra
163 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01033122255.15
164 rdf:type schema:Person
165 sg:person.01045156011.03 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.7372.1
166 schema:familyName Seers
167 schema:givenName Kate
168 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01045156011.03
169 rdf:type schema:Person
170 sg:person.01357040304.57 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.7372.1
171 schema:familyName Fontenla
172 schema:givenName Marina
173 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01357040304.57
174 rdf:type schema:Person
175 sg:person.0710660206.62 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.7362.0
176 schema:familyName Rycroft-Malone
177 schema:givenName Jo
178 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0710660206.62
179 rdf:type schema:Person
180 sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-1-4 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1021360224
181 https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-4
182 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
183 sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-4-53 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1049863451
184 https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-53
185 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
186 sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-4-61 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1035079664
187 https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-61
188 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
189 sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-4-68 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1002263857
190 https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-68
191 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
192 sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-4-78 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1028901506
193 https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-78
194 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
195 grid-institutes:grid.13097.3c schema:alternateName Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, UK
196 schema:name Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, UK
197 rdf:type schema:Organization
198 grid-institutes:grid.7362.0 schema:alternateName Centre for Health Related Research, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Ffriddoedd Road, Bangor, UK
199 schema:name Centre for Health Related Research, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Ffriddoedd Road, Bangor, UK
200 rdf:type schema:Organization
201 grid-institutes:grid.7372.1 schema:alternateName RCN Research Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
202 schema:name RCN Research Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
203 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...