Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle Open Access: True
2008-01-07
AUTHORSAlison L Kitson, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Gill Harvey, Brendan McCormack, Kate Seers, Angie Titchen
ABSTRACTBackgroundThe PARiHS framework (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) has proved to be a useful practical and conceptual heuristic for many researchers and practitioners in framing their research or knowledge translation endeavours. However, as a conceptual framework it still remains untested and therefore its contribution to the overall development and testing of theory in the field of implementation science is largely unquantified.DiscussionThis being the case, the paper provides an integrated summary of our conceptual and theoretical thinking so far and introduces a typology (derived from social policy analysis) used to distinguish between the terms conceptual framework, theory and model – important definitional and conceptual issues in trying to refine theoretical and methodological approaches to knowledge translation.Secondly, the paper describes the next phase of our work, in particular concentrating on the conceptual thinking and mapping that has led to the generation of the hypothesis that the PARiHS framework is best utilised as a two-stage process: as a preliminary (diagnostic and evaluative) measure of the elements and sub-elements of evidence (E) and context (C), and then using the aggregated data from these measures to determine the most appropriate facilitation method. The exact nature of the intervention is thus determined by the specific actors in the specific context at a specific time and place.In the process of refining this next phase of our work, we have had to consider the wider issues around the use of theories to inform and shape our research activity; the ongoing challenges of developing robust and sensitive measures; facilitation as an intervention for getting research into practice; and finally to note how the current debates around evidence into practice are adopting wider notions that fit innovations more generally.SummaryThe paper concludes by suggesting that the future direction of the work on the PARiHS framework is to develop a two-stage diagnostic and evaluative approach, where the intervention is shaped and moulded by the information gathered about the specific situation and from participating stakeholders. In order to expedite the generation of new evidence and testing of emerging theories, we suggest the formation of an international research implementation science collaborative that can systematically collect and analyse experiences of using and testing the PARiHS framework and similar conceptual and theoretical approaches.We also recommend further refinement of the definitions around conceptual framework, theory, and model, suggesting a wider discussion that embraces multiple epistemological and ontological perspectives. More... »
PAGES1
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1748-5908-3-1
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-1
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1038971108
PUBMEDhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18179688
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/08",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Information and Computing Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Medical and Health Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Green College, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, OX2 6HG, Oxford, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.4991.5",
"name": [
"Green College, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, OX2 6HG, Oxford, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Kitson",
"givenName": "Alison L",
"id": "sg:person.01056302244.38",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01056302244.38"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Centre for Health Related Research, School for Health Care Sciences, College of Health & Behavioural Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.8155.9",
"name": [
"Centre for Health Related Research, School for Health Care Sciences, College of Health & Behavioural Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Rycroft-Malone",
"givenName": "Jo",
"id": "sg:person.0710660206.62",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0710660206.62"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Centre for Public Policy and Management, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Booth Street West, M15 6PB, Manchester, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.5379.8",
"name": [
"Centre for Public Policy and Management, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Booth Street West, M15 6PB, Manchester, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Harvey",
"givenName": "Gill",
"id": "sg:person.01031030774.44",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01031030774.44"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.12641.30",
"name": [
"Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "McCormack",
"givenName": "Brendan",
"id": "sg:person.01225540434.37",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01225540434.37"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "RCN Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, CV4 7 AL, Coventry, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.7372.1",
"name": [
"RCN Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, CV4 7 AL, Coventry, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Seers",
"givenName": "Kate",
"id": "sg:person.01045156011.03",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01045156011.03"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Fontys University of Applied Science, Eindhoven, The Netherlands",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.448801.1",
"name": [
"Fontys University of Applied Science, Eindhoven, The Netherlands"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Titchen",
"givenName": "Angie",
"id": "sg:person.0655156275.73",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0655156275.73"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-1-23",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015290905",
"https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-23"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf02912504",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015410300",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02912504"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-1-4",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1021360224",
"https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-4"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00239556",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1039171206",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00239556"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2008-01-07",
"datePublishedReg": "2008-01-07",
"description": "BackgroundThe PARiHS framework (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) has proved to be a useful practical and conceptual heuristic for many researchers and practitioners in framing their research or knowledge translation endeavours. However, as a conceptual framework it still remains untested and therefore its contribution to the overall development and testing of theory in the field of implementation science is largely unquantified.DiscussionThis being the case, the paper provides an integrated summary of our conceptual and theoretical thinking so far and introduces a typology (derived from social policy analysis) used to distinguish between the terms conceptual framework, theory and model \u2013 important definitional and conceptual issues in trying to refine theoretical and methodological approaches to knowledge translation.Secondly, the paper describes the next phase of our work, in particular concentrating on the conceptual thinking and mapping that has led to the generation of the hypothesis that the PARiHS framework is best utilised as a two-stage process: as a preliminary (diagnostic and evaluative) measure of the elements and sub-elements of evidence (E) and context (C), and then using the aggregated data from these measures to determine the most appropriate facilitation method. The exact nature of the intervention is thus determined by the specific actors in the specific context at a specific time and place.In the process of refining this next phase of our work, we have had to consider the wider issues around the use of theories to inform and shape our research activity; the ongoing challenges of developing robust and sensitive measures; facilitation as an intervention for getting research into practice; and finally to note how the current debates around evidence into practice are adopting wider notions that fit innovations more generally.SummaryThe paper concludes by suggesting that the future direction of the work on the PARiHS framework is to develop a two-stage diagnostic and evaluative approach, where the intervention is shaped and moulded by the information gathered about the specific situation and from participating stakeholders. In order to expedite the generation of new evidence and testing of emerging theories, we suggest the formation of an international research implementation science collaborative that can systematically collect and analyse experiences of using and testing the PARiHS framework and similar conceptual and theoretical approaches.We also recommend further refinement of the definitions around conceptual framework, theory, and model, suggesting a wider discussion that embraces multiple epistemological and ontological perspectives.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-3-1",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1036000",
"issn": [
"1748-5908"
],
"name": "Implementation Science",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "1",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "3"
}
],
"keywords": [
"conceptual framework",
"specific actors",
"conceptual heuristic",
"testing of theories",
"wider notion",
"implementation science",
"use of theory",
"wider issues",
"analyse experiences",
"wider discussion",
"evaluative approach",
"specific context",
"theoretical thinking",
"ontological perspective",
"methodological approach",
"conceptual issues",
"PARIHS framework",
"particular concentrating",
"conceptual thinking",
"overall development",
"knowledge translation",
"practical challenges",
"successful implementation",
"theoretical approach",
"practice",
"next phase",
"ongoing challenge",
"context",
"framework",
"thinking",
"facilitation methods",
"actors",
"issues",
"science",
"challenges",
"typology",
"stakeholders",
"process of refining",
"specific situations",
"theory",
"integrated summary",
"research",
"research activities",
"new evidence",
"perspective",
"innovation",
"endeavor",
"notion",
"experience",
"practitioners",
"future directions",
"intervention",
"discussion",
"place",
"paper",
"work",
"measures",
"approach",
"researchers",
"specific time",
"situation",
"nature",
"implementation",
"evidence",
"process",
"definition",
"development",
"preliminary measure",
"contribution",
"facilitation",
"exact nature",
"elements",
"generation",
"order",
"direction",
"two-stage process",
"field",
"cases",
"hypothesis",
"data",
"concentrating",
"use",
"activity",
"time",
"information",
"further refinement",
"translation",
"summary",
"model",
"heuristics",
"mapping",
"refining",
"formation",
"two-stage",
"sensitive measure",
"refinement",
"method",
"phase",
"testing",
"DiscussionThis"
],
"name": "Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges",
"pagination": "1",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1038971108"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1186/1748-5908-3-1"
]
},
{
"name": "pubmed_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"18179688"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-1",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1038971108"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-20T07:24",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220519/entities/gbq_results/article/article_471.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-1"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1748-5908-3-1'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1748-5908-3-1'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1748-5908-3-1'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1186/1748-5908-3-1'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
227 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
130 URIs
118 LITERALS
7 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-3-1 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:08 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:11 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | Nb71042c55cdf4ce9a3fe4ada65c19b2a |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00239556 |
5 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/bf02912504 |
6 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-1-23 |
7 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-1-4 |
8 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2008-01-07 |
9 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2008-01-07 |
10 | ″ | schema:description | BackgroundThe PARiHS framework (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) has proved to be a useful practical and conceptual heuristic for many researchers and practitioners in framing their research or knowledge translation endeavours. However, as a conceptual framework it still remains untested and therefore its contribution to the overall development and testing of theory in the field of implementation science is largely unquantified.DiscussionThis being the case, the paper provides an integrated summary of our conceptual and theoretical thinking so far and introduces a typology (derived from social policy analysis) used to distinguish between the terms conceptual framework, theory and model – important definitional and conceptual issues in trying to refine theoretical and methodological approaches to knowledge translation.Secondly, the paper describes the next phase of our work, in particular concentrating on the conceptual thinking and mapping that has led to the generation of the hypothesis that the PARiHS framework is best utilised as a two-stage process: as a preliminary (diagnostic and evaluative) measure of the elements and sub-elements of evidence (E) and context (C), and then using the aggregated data from these measures to determine the most appropriate facilitation method. The exact nature of the intervention is thus determined by the specific actors in the specific context at a specific time and place.In the process of refining this next phase of our work, we have had to consider the wider issues around the use of theories to inform and shape our research activity; the ongoing challenges of developing robust and sensitive measures; facilitation as an intervention for getting research into practice; and finally to note how the current debates around evidence into practice are adopting wider notions that fit innovations more generally.SummaryThe paper concludes by suggesting that the future direction of the work on the PARiHS framework is to develop a two-stage diagnostic and evaluative approach, where the intervention is shaped and moulded by the information gathered about the specific situation and from participating stakeholders. In order to expedite the generation of new evidence and testing of emerging theories, we suggest the formation of an international research implementation science collaborative that can systematically collect and analyse experiences of using and testing the PARiHS framework and similar conceptual and theoretical approaches.We also recommend further refinement of the definitions around conceptual framework, theory, and model, suggesting a wider discussion that embraces multiple epistemological and ontological perspectives. |
11 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
12 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
13 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | true |
14 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N2541f9336ba54b5db3aeb29ccf939aeb |
15 | ″ | ″ | Nd013b8cdcfa6430cadf8971d697d5b0b |
16 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1036000 |
17 | ″ | schema:keywords | DiscussionThis |
18 | ″ | ″ | PARIHS framework |
19 | ″ | ″ | activity |
20 | ″ | ″ | actors |
21 | ″ | ″ | analyse experiences |
22 | ″ | ″ | approach |
23 | ″ | ″ | cases |
24 | ″ | ″ | challenges |
25 | ″ | ″ | concentrating |
26 | ″ | ″ | conceptual framework |
27 | ″ | ″ | conceptual heuristic |
28 | ″ | ″ | conceptual issues |
29 | ″ | ″ | conceptual thinking |
30 | ″ | ″ | context |
31 | ″ | ″ | contribution |
32 | ″ | ″ | data |
33 | ″ | ″ | definition |
34 | ″ | ″ | development |
35 | ″ | ″ | direction |
36 | ″ | ″ | discussion |
37 | ″ | ″ | elements |
38 | ″ | ″ | endeavor |
39 | ″ | ″ | evaluative approach |
40 | ″ | ″ | evidence |
41 | ″ | ″ | exact nature |
42 | ″ | ″ | experience |
43 | ″ | ″ | facilitation |
44 | ″ | ″ | facilitation methods |
45 | ″ | ″ | field |
46 | ″ | ″ | formation |
47 | ″ | ″ | framework |
48 | ″ | ″ | further refinement |
49 | ″ | ″ | future directions |
50 | ″ | ″ | generation |
51 | ″ | ″ | heuristics |
52 | ″ | ″ | hypothesis |
53 | ″ | ″ | implementation |
54 | ″ | ″ | implementation science |
55 | ″ | ″ | information |
56 | ″ | ″ | innovation |
57 | ″ | ″ | integrated summary |
58 | ″ | ″ | intervention |
59 | ″ | ″ | issues |
60 | ″ | ″ | knowledge translation |
61 | ″ | ″ | mapping |
62 | ″ | ″ | measures |
63 | ″ | ″ | method |
64 | ″ | ″ | methodological approach |
65 | ″ | ″ | model |
66 | ″ | ″ | nature |
67 | ″ | ″ | new evidence |
68 | ″ | ″ | next phase |
69 | ″ | ″ | notion |
70 | ″ | ″ | ongoing challenge |
71 | ″ | ″ | ontological perspective |
72 | ″ | ″ | order |
73 | ″ | ″ | overall development |
74 | ″ | ″ | paper |
75 | ″ | ″ | particular concentrating |
76 | ″ | ″ | perspective |
77 | ″ | ″ | phase |
78 | ″ | ″ | place |
79 | ″ | ″ | practical challenges |
80 | ″ | ″ | practice |
81 | ″ | ″ | practitioners |
82 | ″ | ″ | preliminary measure |
83 | ″ | ″ | process |
84 | ″ | ″ | process of refining |
85 | ″ | ″ | refinement |
86 | ″ | ″ | refining |
87 | ″ | ″ | research |
88 | ″ | ″ | research activities |
89 | ″ | ″ | researchers |
90 | ″ | ″ | science |
91 | ″ | ″ | sensitive measure |
92 | ″ | ″ | situation |
93 | ″ | ″ | specific actors |
94 | ″ | ″ | specific context |
95 | ″ | ″ | specific situations |
96 | ″ | ″ | specific time |
97 | ″ | ″ | stakeholders |
98 | ″ | ″ | successful implementation |
99 | ″ | ″ | summary |
100 | ″ | ″ | testing |
101 | ″ | ″ | testing of theories |
102 | ″ | ″ | theoretical approach |
103 | ″ | ″ | theoretical thinking |
104 | ″ | ″ | theory |
105 | ″ | ″ | thinking |
106 | ″ | ″ | time |
107 | ″ | ″ | translation |
108 | ″ | ″ | two-stage |
109 | ″ | ″ | two-stage process |
110 | ″ | ″ | typology |
111 | ″ | ″ | use |
112 | ″ | ″ | use of theory |
113 | ″ | ″ | wider discussion |
114 | ″ | ″ | wider issues |
115 | ″ | ″ | wider notion |
116 | ″ | ″ | work |
117 | ″ | schema:name | Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges |
118 | ″ | schema:pagination | 1 |
119 | ″ | schema:productId | N0fbcdbb92fc644e8a479bed97c233a2f |
120 | ″ | ″ | N3ce40876b38d4975a35a9884af9c4e82 |
121 | ″ | ″ | Nd01d905b8fa4486dad477bf9be94ccd5 |
122 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1038971108 |
123 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-1 |
124 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-05-20T07:24 |
125 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
126 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | Nee7161f24b054921bac648f1d23ffbf6 |
127 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-1 |
128 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
129 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
130 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
131 | N0fbcdbb92fc644e8a479bed97c233a2f | schema:name | doi |
132 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1186/1748-5908-3-1 |
133 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
134 | N20e968d0678c4611be2c5c9a8c8176a7 | rdf:first | sg:person.0655156275.73 |
135 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
136 | N2541f9336ba54b5db3aeb29ccf939aeb | schema:issueNumber | 1 |
137 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
138 | N3ce40876b38d4975a35a9884af9c4e82 | schema:name | pubmed_id |
139 | ″ | schema:value | 18179688 |
140 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
141 | N4745a5d856804f9bb10fdfc1eb4513ca | rdf:first | sg:person.01225540434.37 |
142 | ″ | rdf:rest | N81ef260037a1414280dd3756d67c2195 |
143 | N81ef260037a1414280dd3756d67c2195 | rdf:first | sg:person.01045156011.03 |
144 | ″ | rdf:rest | N20e968d0678c4611be2c5c9a8c8176a7 |
145 | Nb71042c55cdf4ce9a3fe4ada65c19b2a | rdf:first | sg:person.01056302244.38 |
146 | ″ | rdf:rest | Ndb352fda236544c6a43f8d58838b12ad |
147 | Nd013b8cdcfa6430cadf8971d697d5b0b | schema:volumeNumber | 3 |
148 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
149 | Nd01d905b8fa4486dad477bf9be94ccd5 | schema:name | dimensions_id |
150 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1038971108 |
151 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
152 | Ndb352fda236544c6a43f8d58838b12ad | rdf:first | sg:person.0710660206.62 |
153 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nebf11aea9d184a019b1f2433728ec3da |
154 | Nebf11aea9d184a019b1f2433728ec3da | rdf:first | sg:person.01031030774.44 |
155 | ″ | rdf:rest | N4745a5d856804f9bb10fdfc1eb4513ca |
156 | Nee7161f24b054921bac648f1d23ffbf6 | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
157 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
158 | anzsrc-for:08 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
159 | ″ | schema:name | Information and Computing Sciences |
160 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
161 | anzsrc-for:11 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
162 | ″ | schema:name | Medical and Health Sciences |
163 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
164 | sg:journal.1036000 | schema:issn | 1748-5908 |
165 | ″ | schema:name | Implementation Science |
166 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
167 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
168 | sg:person.01031030774.44 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.5379.8 |
169 | ″ | schema:familyName | Harvey |
170 | ″ | schema:givenName | Gill |
171 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01031030774.44 |
172 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
173 | sg:person.01045156011.03 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.7372.1 |
174 | ″ | schema:familyName | Seers |
175 | ″ | schema:givenName | Kate |
176 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01045156011.03 |
177 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
178 | sg:person.01056302244.38 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.4991.5 |
179 | ″ | schema:familyName | Kitson |
180 | ″ | schema:givenName | Alison L |
181 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01056302244.38 |
182 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
183 | sg:person.01225540434.37 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.12641.30 |
184 | ″ | schema:familyName | McCormack |
185 | ″ | schema:givenName | Brendan |
186 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01225540434.37 |
187 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
188 | sg:person.0655156275.73 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.448801.1 |
189 | ″ | schema:familyName | Titchen |
190 | ″ | schema:givenName | Angie |
191 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0655156275.73 |
192 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
193 | sg:person.0710660206.62 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.8155.9 |
194 | ″ | schema:familyName | Rycroft-Malone |
195 | ″ | schema:givenName | Jo |
196 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0710660206.62 |
197 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
198 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00239556 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1039171206 |
199 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00239556 |
200 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
201 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf02912504 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015410300 |
202 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02912504 |
203 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
204 | sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-1-23 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015290905 |
205 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-23 |
206 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
207 | sg:pub.10.1186/1748-5908-1-4 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1021360224 |
208 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-4 |
209 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
210 | grid-institutes:grid.12641.30 | schema:alternateName | Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland, UK |
211 | ″ | schema:name | Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland, UK |
212 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
213 | grid-institutes:grid.448801.1 | schema:alternateName | Fontys University of Applied Science, Eindhoven, The Netherlands |
214 | ″ | schema:name | Fontys University of Applied Science, Eindhoven, The Netherlands |
215 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
216 | grid-institutes:grid.4991.5 | schema:alternateName | Green College, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, OX2 6HG, Oxford, UK |
217 | ″ | schema:name | Green College, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, OX2 6HG, Oxford, UK |
218 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
219 | grid-institutes:grid.5379.8 | schema:alternateName | Centre for Public Policy and Management, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Booth Street West, M15 6PB, Manchester, UK |
220 | ″ | schema:name | Centre for Public Policy and Management, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Booth Street West, M15 6PB, Manchester, UK |
221 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
222 | grid-institutes:grid.7372.1 | schema:alternateName | RCN Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, CV4 7 AL, Coventry, UK |
223 | ″ | schema:name | RCN Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick, CV4 7 AL, Coventry, UK |
224 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
225 | grid-institutes:grid.8155.9 | schema:alternateName | Centre for Health Related Research, School for Health Care Sciences, College of Health & Behavioural Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, UK |
226 | ″ | schema:name | Centre for Health Related Research, School for Health Care Sciences, College of Health & Behavioural Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, UK |
227 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |