Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle Open Access: True
2003-07
AUTHORS ABSTRACTWhile most experts agree that cervical screening is effective, there remains controversy over the most appropriate screening interval. Annual screening is common in North America. In England, some argue for 3-yearly screening while others believe 5-yearly screening is adequate, and the frequency varies from one part of the country to another. Screening histories of 1305 women aged 20-69 years, diagnosed with frankly invasive cervical cancer and 2532 age-matched controls were obtained from UK screening programme databases. Data were analysed in terms of time since last negative, and time since last screening smear. Five-yearly screening offers considerable protection (83%) against cancer at ages 55-69 years and even annual screening offers only modest additional protection (87%). Three-yearly screening offers additional protection (84%) over 5-yearly screening (73%) for cancers at ages 40-54 years, but is almost as good as annual screening (88%). In women aged 20-39 years, even annual screening is not as effective (76%) as 3-yearly screening in older women, and 3 years after screening cancer rates return to those in unscreened women. This calls into question the policy of having a uniform screening interval from age 20 to 64 years and stresses the value of screening in middle-aged women. British Journal of Cancer (2003) 89, 88-93. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974 www.bjcancer.com More... »
PAGES88
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1044836408
PUBMEDhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12838306
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1117",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Public Health and Health Services",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Medical and Health Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Adult",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Age Factors",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Aged",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Case-Control Studies",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Databases, Factual",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Female",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Health Policy",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Humans",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Mass Screening",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Medical Audit",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Medical History Taking",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Middle Aged",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Neoplasm Invasiveness",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Practice Guidelines as Topic",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "United Kingdom",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Uterine Cervical Neoplasms",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Vaginal Smears",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Cancer Research UK",
"id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.11485.39",
"name": [
"Cancer Research UK, Department of Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Sasieni",
"givenName": "P",
"id": "sg:person.01257735610.85",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01257735610.85"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Cancer Research UK",
"id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.11485.39",
"name": [
"Cancer Research UK, Department of Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Adams",
"givenName": "J",
"id": "sg:person.01116172313.51",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01116172313.51"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Cancer Research UK",
"id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.11485.39",
"name": [
"Cancer Research UK, Department of Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Cuzick",
"givenName": "J",
"id": "sg:person.01136740201.43",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01136740201.43"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00269.x",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1002995103"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.1546",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1009171682"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2001.00288.x",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029566248"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.293.6548.659",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1030672743"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04646-8",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1037908433"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/bjc.1996.196",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1056443386",
"https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.196"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/bjc.1996.196",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1056443386",
"https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.196"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1082220600",
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2003-07",
"datePublishedReg": "2003-07-01",
"description": "While most experts agree that cervical screening is effective, there remains controversy over the most appropriate screening interval. Annual screening is common in North America. In England, some argue for 3-yearly screening while others believe 5-yearly screening is adequate, and the frequency varies from one part of the country to another. Screening histories of 1305 women aged 20-69 years, diagnosed with frankly invasive cervical cancer and 2532 age-matched controls were obtained from UK screening programme databases. Data were analysed in terms of time since last negative, and time since last screening smear. Five-yearly screening offers considerable protection (83%) against cancer at ages 55-69 years and even annual screening offers only modest additional protection (87%). Three-yearly screening offers additional protection (84%) over 5-yearly screening (73%) for cancers at ages 40-54 years, but is almost as good as annual screening (88%). In women aged 20-39 years, even annual screening is not as effective (76%) as 3-yearly screening in older women, and 3 years after screening cancer rates return to those in unscreened women. This calls into question the policy of having a uniform screening interval from age 20 to 64 years and stresses the value of screening in middle-aged women. British Journal of Cancer (2003) 89, 88-93. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974 www.bjcancer.com",
"genre": "research_article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974",
"inLanguage": [
"en"
],
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1017082",
"issn": [
"0007-0920",
"1532-1827"
],
"name": "British Journal of Cancer",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "1",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "89"
}
],
"name": "Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories",
"pagination": "88",
"productId": [
{
"name": "readcube_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"d591f2ceec75c4a0bc82be751bfdd61bcee6f774ecadc499f5807032affda189"
]
},
{
"name": "pubmed_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"12838306"
]
},
{
"name": "nlm_unique_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"0370635"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974"
]
},
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1044836408"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1044836408"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2019-04-11T11:52",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000359_0000000359/records_29191_00000002.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/6600974"
}
]Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
172 TRIPLES
21 PREDICATES
53 URIs
38 LITERALS
26 BLANK NODES