Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

2002-09

AUTHORS

Leo Groarke

ABSTRACT

This paper responds to two aspects of Ralph Johnson's Manifest Rationality (2000). The first is his critique of deductivism. The second is his failure to make room for some species of argument (e.g., visual and kisceral arguments) proposed by recent commentators. In the first case, Johnson holds that argumentation theorists have adopted a notion of argument which is too narrow. In the second, that they have adopted one which is too broad. I discuss the case Johnson makes for both claims, and possible objections to his analysis. More... »

PAGES

277-286

References to SciGraph publications

  • 1999-02. Deductivism Within Pragma-Dialectics in ARGUMENTATION
  • Journal

    TITLE

    Argumentation

    ISSUE

    3

    VOLUME

    16

    Author Affiliations

    Identifiers

    URI

    http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1019993002329

    DOI

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1019993002329

    DIMENSIONS

    https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010647276


    Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
    Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

    JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

    TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

    [
      {
        "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
        "about": [
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/2203", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Philosophy", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/22", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Philosophy and Religious Studies", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }
        ], 
        "author": [
          {
            "affiliation": {
              "alternateName": "Wilfrid Laurier University", 
              "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.268252.9", 
              "name": [
                "Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 George Street, N3T 2Y3, Brantford, Ontario, Canada"
              ], 
              "type": "Organization"
            }, 
            "familyName": "Groarke", 
            "givenName": "Leo", 
            "id": "sg:person.014244306351.22", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014244306351.22"
            ], 
            "type": "Person"
          }
        ], 
        "citation": [
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1023/a:1007771101651", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1003513772", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007771101651"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology1999133", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1090971183"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }
        ], 
        "datePublished": "2002-09", 
        "datePublishedReg": "2002-09-01", 
        "description": "This paper responds to two aspects of Ralph Johnson's Manifest Rationality (2000). The first is his critique of deductivism. The second is his failure to make room for some species of argument (e.g., visual and kisceral arguments) proposed by recent commentators. In the first case, Johnson holds that argumentation theorists have adopted a notion of argument which is too narrow. In the second, that they have adopted one which is too broad. I discuss the case Johnson makes for both claims, and possible objections to his analysis.", 
        "genre": "research_article", 
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1023/a:1019993002329", 
        "inLanguage": [
          "en"
        ], 
        "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
        "isPartOf": [
          {
            "id": "sg:journal.1135917", 
            "issn": [
              "0920-427X", 
              "1572-8374"
            ], 
            "name": "Argumentation", 
            "type": "Periodical"
          }, 
          {
            "issueNumber": "3", 
            "type": "PublicationIssue"
          }, 
          {
            "type": "PublicationVolume", 
            "volumeNumber": "16"
          }
        ], 
        "name": "Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument", 
        "pagination": "277-286", 
        "productId": [
          {
            "name": "readcube_id", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "32b9a475c3039608980ec2d970653f6f7098abcd10c31a1aae7d381ebaa759c3"
            ]
          }, 
          {
            "name": "doi", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "10.1023/a:1019993002329"
            ]
          }, 
          {
            "name": "dimensions_id", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "pub.1010647276"
            ]
          }
        ], 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019993002329", 
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010647276"
        ], 
        "sdDataset": "articles", 
        "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-10T16:40", 
        "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
        "sdPublisher": {
          "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000001_0000000264/records_8669_00000503.jsonl", 
        "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
        "url": "http://link.springer.com/10.1023%2FA%3A1019993002329"
      }
    ]
     

    Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

    HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

    JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1019993002329'

    N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1019993002329'

    Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

    curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1019993002329'

    RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1019993002329'


     

    This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

    68 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      29 URIs      19 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

    Subject Predicate Object
    1 sg:pub.10.1023/a:1019993002329 schema:about anzsrc-for:22
    2 anzsrc-for:2203
    3 schema:author Nc40f96adeb9241bb8684fe7db2301eb7
    4 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1023/a:1007771101651
    5 https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology1999133
    6 schema:datePublished 2002-09
    7 schema:datePublishedReg 2002-09-01
    8 schema:description This paper responds to two aspects of Ralph Johnson's Manifest Rationality (2000). The first is his critique of deductivism. The second is his failure to make room for some species of argument (e.g., visual and kisceral arguments) proposed by recent commentators. In the first case, Johnson holds that argumentation theorists have adopted a notion of argument which is too narrow. In the second, that they have adopted one which is too broad. I discuss the case Johnson makes for both claims, and possible objections to his analysis.
    9 schema:genre research_article
    10 schema:inLanguage en
    11 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
    12 schema:isPartOf N33016b5b14134052a525c50f08fb5106
    13 Nc9b3cee50f3b4cf69c88ab7bbb3e14bb
    14 sg:journal.1135917
    15 schema:name Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument
    16 schema:pagination 277-286
    17 schema:productId N2673cea250914931aed920534150f22b
    18 Nb0aebbb30b9d4ab08a449473b2cadf15
    19 Nffe38cc750d2448cac9dc5c6710ed336
    20 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010647276
    21 https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019993002329
    22 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-10T16:40
    23 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
    24 schema:sdPublisher N2f5dfa8d2fed4145a3a5464e537c24c1
    25 schema:url http://link.springer.com/10.1023%2FA%3A1019993002329
    26 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
    27 sgo:sdDataset articles
    28 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
    29 N2673cea250914931aed920534150f22b schema:name dimensions_id
    30 schema:value pub.1010647276
    31 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    32 N2f5dfa8d2fed4145a3a5464e537c24c1 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
    33 rdf:type schema:Organization
    34 N33016b5b14134052a525c50f08fb5106 schema:volumeNumber 16
    35 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
    36 Nb0aebbb30b9d4ab08a449473b2cadf15 schema:name doi
    37 schema:value 10.1023/a:1019993002329
    38 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    39 Nc40f96adeb9241bb8684fe7db2301eb7 rdf:first sg:person.014244306351.22
    40 rdf:rest rdf:nil
    41 Nc9b3cee50f3b4cf69c88ab7bbb3e14bb schema:issueNumber 3
    42 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
    43 Nffe38cc750d2448cac9dc5c6710ed336 schema:name readcube_id
    44 schema:value 32b9a475c3039608980ec2d970653f6f7098abcd10c31a1aae7d381ebaa759c3
    45 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    46 anzsrc-for:22 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    47 schema:name Philosophy and Religious Studies
    48 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    49 anzsrc-for:2203 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    50 schema:name Philosophy
    51 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    52 sg:journal.1135917 schema:issn 0920-427X
    53 1572-8374
    54 schema:name Argumentation
    55 rdf:type schema:Periodical
    56 sg:person.014244306351.22 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.268252.9
    57 schema:familyName Groarke
    58 schema:givenName Leo
    59 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014244306351.22
    60 rdf:type schema:Person
    61 sg:pub.10.1023/a:1007771101651 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1003513772
    62 https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007771101651
    63 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    64 https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology1999133 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1090971183
    65 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    66 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.268252.9 schema:alternateName Wilfrid Laurier University
    67 schema:name Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 George Street, N3T 2Y3, Brantford, Ontario, Canada
    68 rdf:type schema:Organization
     




    Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


    ...