2002-09
AUTHORS ABSTRACTDifferential equations describing the tidal evolution of the earth's rotation and of the lunar orbital motion are presented in a simple close form. The equations differ in form for orbits fixed to the terrestrial equator and for orbits with the nodes precessing along the ecliptic due to solar perturbations. Analytical considerations show that if the contemporary lunar orbit were equatorial the evolution would develop from an unstable geosynchronous orbit of the period about 4.42 h (in the past) to a stable geosynchronous orbit of the period about 44.8 days (in the future). It is also demonstrated that at the contemporary epoch the orbital plane of the fictitious equatorial moon would be unstable in the Liapunov's sense, being asymptotically stable at early stages of the evolution. Evolution of the currently near-ecliptical lunar orbit and of the terrestrial rotation is traced backward in time by numerical integration of the evolutional equations. It is confirmed that about 1.8 billion years ago a critical phase of the evolution took place when the equatorial inclination of the moon reached small values and the moon was in a near vicinity of the earth. Before the critical epoch tcr two types of the evolution are possible, which at present cannot be unambiguously distinguished with the help of the purely dynamical considerations. In the scenario that seems to be the most realistic from the physical point of view, the evolution also has started from a geosynchronous equatorial lunar orbit of the period 4.19 h. At t < tcr the lunar orbit has been fixed to the precessing terrestrial equator by strong perturbations from the earth's flattening and by tidal effects; at the critical epoch the solar perturbations begin to dominate and transfer the moon to its contemporary near-ecliptical orbit which evolves now to the stable geosynchronous state. Probably this scenario is in favour of the Darwin's hypothesis about originating the moon by its separation from the earth. Too much short time scale of the evolution in this model might be enlarged if the dissipative Q factor had somewhat larger values in the past than in the present epoch. Values of the length of day and the length of month, estimated from paleontological data, are confronted with the results of the developed model. More... »
PAGES27-55
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1019955827459
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1019955827459
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1050776887
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/01",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Mathematical Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0102",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Applied Mathematics",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kutuzov Quay 10, 191187, St-Petersburg, Russia",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.465424.5",
"name": [
"Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kutuzov Quay 10, 191187, St-Petersburg, Russia"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Krasinsky",
"givenName": "G. A.",
"id": "sg:person.011040560377.45",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011040560377.45"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00899817",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1034094305",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00899817"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00907581",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1016998868",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00907581"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00642735",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1032243292",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00642735"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00563082",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045320758",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00563082"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1023/a:1008381000993",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1020962961",
"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008381000993"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2002-09",
"datePublishedReg": "2002-09-01",
"description": "Differential equations describing the tidal evolution of the earth's rotation and of the lunar orbital motion are presented in a simple close form. The equations differ in form for orbits fixed to the terrestrial equator and for orbits with the nodes precessing along the ecliptic due to solar perturbations. Analytical considerations show that if the contemporary lunar orbit were equatorial the evolution would develop from an unstable geosynchronous orbit of the period about 4.42 h (in the past) to a stable geosynchronous orbit of the period about 44.8 days (in the future). It is also demonstrated that at the contemporary epoch the orbital plane of the fictitious equatorial moon would be unstable in the Liapunov's sense, being asymptotically stable at early stages of the evolution. Evolution of the currently near-ecliptical lunar orbit and of the terrestrial rotation is traced backward in time by numerical integration of the evolutional equations. It is confirmed that about 1.8 billion years ago a critical phase of the evolution took place when the equatorial inclination of the moon reached small values and the moon was in a near vicinity of the earth. Before the critical epoch tcr two types of the evolution are possible, which at present cannot be unambiguously distinguished with the help of the purely dynamical considerations. In the scenario that seems to be the most realistic from the physical point of view, the evolution also has started from a geosynchronous equatorial lunar orbit of the period 4.19 h. At t < tcr the lunar orbit has been fixed to the precessing terrestrial equator by strong perturbations from the earth's flattening and by tidal effects; at the critical epoch the solar perturbations begin to dominate and transfer the moon to its contemporary near-ecliptical orbit which evolves now to the stable geosynchronous state. Probably this scenario is in favour of the Darwin's hypothesis about originating the moon by its separation from the earth. Too much short time scale of the evolution in this model might be enlarged if the dissipative Q factor had somewhat larger values in the past than in the present epoch. Values of the length of day and the length of month, estimated from paleontological data, are confronted with the results of the developed model.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1023/a:1019955827459",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1136436",
"issn": [
"0923-2958",
"1572-9478"
],
"name": "Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "1",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "84"
}
],
"keywords": [
"lunar orbit",
"simple close form",
"terrestrial equator",
"differential equations",
"evolutional equations",
"Liapunov sense",
"length of day",
"solar perturbations",
"Earth-Moon system",
"geosynchronous orbit",
"lunar orbital motion",
"numerical integration",
"dynamical considerations",
"dynamical history",
"short time scales",
"physical point",
"orbital motion",
"present epoch",
"equations",
"paleontological data",
"Earth's rotation",
"close form",
"tidal effects",
"Earth's flattening",
"tidal evolution",
"terrestrial rotation",
"equatorial inclination",
"time scales",
"analytical considerations",
"Moon",
"orbit",
"large values",
"small values",
"critical epoch",
"orbital plane",
"perturbations",
"strong perturbations",
"equator",
"contemporary epoch",
"Earth",
"near vicinity",
"evolution",
"epoch",
"Darwin's hypothesis",
"rotation",
"model",
"motion",
"flattening",
"period",
"sense",
"scenarios",
"vicinity",
"two types",
"plane",
"H.",
"form",
"scale",
"consideration",
"critical phase",
"point",
"values",
"past",
"early stages",
"system",
"nodes",
"present",
"history",
"inclination",
"length",
"state",
"help",
"data",
"phase",
"place",
"hypothesis",
"results",
"years",
"integration",
"stage",
"days",
"time",
"types",
"view",
"effect",
"separation",
"factors",
"months",
"favor"
],
"name": "Dynamical History of the Earth\u2013Moon System",
"pagination": "27-55",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1050776887"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1023/a:1019955827459"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019955827459",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1050776887"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-10T09:53",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220509/entities/gbq_results/article/article_356.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019955827459"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1019955827459'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1019955827459'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1019955827459'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1019955827459'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
166 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
119 URIs
106 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1023/a:1019955827459 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:01 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0102 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | Nc7d12441e5c34f6882ef54ea80d831c4 |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00563082 |
5 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00642735 |
6 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00899817 |
7 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00907581 |
8 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1023/a:1008381000993 |
9 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2002-09 |
10 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2002-09-01 |
11 | ″ | schema:description | Differential equations describing the tidal evolution of the earth's rotation and of the lunar orbital motion are presented in a simple close form. The equations differ in form for orbits fixed to the terrestrial equator and for orbits with the nodes precessing along the ecliptic due to solar perturbations. Analytical considerations show that if the contemporary lunar orbit were equatorial the evolution would develop from an unstable geosynchronous orbit of the period about 4.42 h (in the past) to a stable geosynchronous orbit of the period about 44.8 days (in the future). It is also demonstrated that at the contemporary epoch the orbital plane of the fictitious equatorial moon would be unstable in the Liapunov's sense, being asymptotically stable at early stages of the evolution. Evolution of the currently near-ecliptical lunar orbit and of the terrestrial rotation is traced backward in time by numerical integration of the evolutional equations. It is confirmed that about 1.8 billion years ago a critical phase of the evolution took place when the equatorial inclination of the moon reached small values and the moon was in a near vicinity of the earth. Before the critical epoch tcr two types of the evolution are possible, which at present cannot be unambiguously distinguished with the help of the purely dynamical considerations. In the scenario that seems to be the most realistic from the physical point of view, the evolution also has started from a geosynchronous equatorial lunar orbit of the period 4.19 h. At t < tcr the lunar orbit has been fixed to the precessing terrestrial equator by strong perturbations from the earth's flattening and by tidal effects; at the critical epoch the solar perturbations begin to dominate and transfer the moon to its contemporary near-ecliptical orbit which evolves now to the stable geosynchronous state. Probably this scenario is in favour of the Darwin's hypothesis about originating the moon by its separation from the earth. Too much short time scale of the evolution in this model might be enlarged if the dissipative Q factor had somewhat larger values in the past than in the present epoch. Values of the length of day and the length of month, estimated from paleontological data, are confronted with the results of the developed model. |
12 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
13 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
14 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
15 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N37a1222ef21f4310916fec63f6056ae3 |
16 | ″ | ″ | Ncfc63edf5e2f42878454a74204715126 |
17 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1136436 |
18 | ″ | schema:keywords | Darwin's hypothesis |
19 | ″ | ″ | Earth |
20 | ″ | ″ | Earth's flattening |
21 | ″ | ″ | Earth's rotation |
22 | ″ | ″ | Earth-Moon system |
23 | ″ | ″ | H. |
24 | ″ | ″ | Liapunov sense |
25 | ″ | ″ | Moon |
26 | ″ | ″ | analytical considerations |
27 | ″ | ″ | close form |
28 | ″ | ″ | consideration |
29 | ″ | ″ | contemporary epoch |
30 | ″ | ″ | critical epoch |
31 | ″ | ″ | critical phase |
32 | ″ | ″ | data |
33 | ″ | ″ | days |
34 | ″ | ″ | differential equations |
35 | ″ | ″ | dynamical considerations |
36 | ″ | ″ | dynamical history |
37 | ″ | ″ | early stages |
38 | ″ | ″ | effect |
39 | ″ | ″ | epoch |
40 | ″ | ″ | equations |
41 | ″ | ″ | equator |
42 | ″ | ″ | equatorial inclination |
43 | ″ | ″ | evolution |
44 | ″ | ″ | evolutional equations |
45 | ″ | ″ | factors |
46 | ″ | ″ | favor |
47 | ″ | ″ | flattening |
48 | ″ | ″ | form |
49 | ″ | ″ | geosynchronous orbit |
50 | ″ | ″ | help |
51 | ″ | ″ | history |
52 | ″ | ″ | hypothesis |
53 | ″ | ″ | inclination |
54 | ″ | ″ | integration |
55 | ″ | ″ | large values |
56 | ″ | ″ | length |
57 | ″ | ″ | length of day |
58 | ″ | ″ | lunar orbit |
59 | ″ | ″ | lunar orbital motion |
60 | ″ | ″ | model |
61 | ″ | ″ | months |
62 | ″ | ″ | motion |
63 | ″ | ″ | near vicinity |
64 | ″ | ″ | nodes |
65 | ″ | ″ | numerical integration |
66 | ″ | ″ | orbit |
67 | ″ | ″ | orbital motion |
68 | ″ | ″ | orbital plane |
69 | ″ | ″ | paleontological data |
70 | ″ | ″ | past |
71 | ″ | ″ | period |
72 | ″ | ″ | perturbations |
73 | ″ | ″ | phase |
74 | ″ | ″ | physical point |
75 | ″ | ″ | place |
76 | ″ | ″ | plane |
77 | ″ | ″ | point |
78 | ″ | ″ | present |
79 | ″ | ″ | present epoch |
80 | ″ | ″ | results |
81 | ″ | ″ | rotation |
82 | ″ | ″ | scale |
83 | ″ | ″ | scenarios |
84 | ″ | ″ | sense |
85 | ″ | ″ | separation |
86 | ″ | ″ | short time scales |
87 | ″ | ″ | simple close form |
88 | ″ | ″ | small values |
89 | ″ | ″ | solar perturbations |
90 | ″ | ″ | stage |
91 | ″ | ″ | state |
92 | ″ | ″ | strong perturbations |
93 | ″ | ″ | system |
94 | ″ | ″ | terrestrial equator |
95 | ″ | ″ | terrestrial rotation |
96 | ″ | ″ | tidal effects |
97 | ″ | ″ | tidal evolution |
98 | ″ | ″ | time |
99 | ″ | ″ | time scales |
100 | ″ | ″ | two types |
101 | ″ | ″ | types |
102 | ″ | ″ | values |
103 | ″ | ″ | vicinity |
104 | ″ | ″ | view |
105 | ″ | ″ | years |
106 | ″ | schema:name | Dynamical History of the Earth–Moon System |
107 | ″ | schema:pagination | 27-55 |
108 | ″ | schema:productId | Na3f2471b6e584a7c853e09a3bf366613 |
109 | ″ | ″ | Naff93bca012c4d9f9743f7fef70ed17d |
110 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1050776887 |
111 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019955827459 |
112 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-05-10T09:53 |
113 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
114 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | N9ac11d712697401ab6987f0a1f3cfdfe |
115 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019955827459 |
116 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
117 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
118 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
119 | N37a1222ef21f4310916fec63f6056ae3 | schema:volumeNumber | 84 |
120 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
121 | N9ac11d712697401ab6987f0a1f3cfdfe | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
122 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
123 | Na3f2471b6e584a7c853e09a3bf366613 | schema:name | doi |
124 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1023/a:1019955827459 |
125 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
126 | Naff93bca012c4d9f9743f7fef70ed17d | schema:name | dimensions_id |
127 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1050776887 |
128 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
129 | Nc7d12441e5c34f6882ef54ea80d831c4 | rdf:first | sg:person.011040560377.45 |
130 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
131 | Ncfc63edf5e2f42878454a74204715126 | schema:issueNumber | 1 |
132 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
133 | anzsrc-for:01 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
134 | ″ | schema:name | Mathematical Sciences |
135 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
136 | anzsrc-for:0102 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
137 | ″ | schema:name | Applied Mathematics |
138 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
139 | sg:journal.1136436 | schema:issn | 0923-2958 |
140 | ″ | ″ | 1572-9478 |
141 | ″ | schema:name | Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy |
142 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
143 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
144 | sg:person.011040560377.45 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.465424.5 |
145 | ″ | schema:familyName | Krasinsky |
146 | ″ | schema:givenName | G. A. |
147 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011040560377.45 |
148 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
149 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00563082 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045320758 |
150 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00563082 |
151 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
152 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00642735 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1032243292 |
153 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00642735 |
154 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
155 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00899817 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1034094305 |
156 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00899817 |
157 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
158 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00907581 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1016998868 |
159 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00907581 |
160 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
161 | sg:pub.10.1023/a:1008381000993 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1020962961 |
162 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008381000993 |
163 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
164 | grid-institutes:grid.465424.5 | schema:alternateName | Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kutuzov Quay 10, 191187, St-Petersburg, Russia |
165 | ″ | schema:name | Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kutuzov Quay 10, 191187, St-Petersburg, Russia |
166 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |