Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle
2000-08
AUTHORSMarvin W. Peterson, Catherine H. Augustine
ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study is to compare the influences of state characteristics related to student assessment, accreditation emphasis on student assessment, and institutional dynamics supporting student assessment on the approaches to student assessment that institutions have initiated. We conducted this study by examining the relevant literature, creating a national survey instrument, surveying undergraduate institutions throughout the United States, and analyzing the responses of the 885 public institutions who participated in our survey. Separate regressions were run for three different groups of institutional types on three approaches to assessment: cognitive, affective, and post-college. Regressions for the three institutional types explained 21 to 27% of the variance for cognitive assessment, 7 to 21% for affective assessment and 6 to 19% for post-college assessment. With the exception of a minor influence of state characteristics for doctoral and research universities, institutional dynamics and accreditation region were found to be the primary influences on student assessment approaches for all institutional types. We found that the drive for state-level accountability has not exceeded the influence of institutional accreditation and that internal dynamics appear to be the driving force of all three approaches to student assessment. More... »
PAGES443-479
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1007080408692
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1007080408692
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052461869
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1606",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Political Science",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/16",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Studies in Human Society",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "University of Michigan\u2013Ann Arbor",
"id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.214458.e",
"name": [
"National Center for Postsecondary Improvement Project 5.2, University of Michigan, 610 E. University, Room 2339, 48109-1259, Ann Arbor, MI"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Peterson",
"givenName": "Marvin W.",
"id": "sg:person.07400332044.84",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.07400332044.84"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "University of Michigan\u2013Ann Arbor",
"id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.214458.e",
"name": [
"National Center for Postsecondary Improvement Project 5.2, University of Michigan, 610 E. University, Room 2339, 48109-1259, Ann Arbor, MI"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Augustine",
"givenName": "Catherine H.",
"id": "sg:person.011412271626.74",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011412271626.74"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1988.9939163",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1011407625"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1987.9937092",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1025206642"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00136224",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1026358989",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00136224"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00136224",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1026358989",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00136224"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00992057",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1039094036",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992057"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "https://doi.org/10.1002/he.36919875906",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1044769110"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2000-08",
"datePublishedReg": "2000-08-01",
"description": "The purpose of this study is to compare the influences of state characteristics related to student assessment, accreditation emphasis on student assessment, and institutional dynamics supporting student assessment on the approaches to student assessment that institutions have initiated. We conducted this study by examining the relevant literature, creating a national survey instrument, surveying undergraduate institutions throughout the United States, and analyzing the responses of the 885 public institutions who participated in our survey. Separate regressions were run for three different groups of institutional types on three approaches to assessment: cognitive, affective, and post-college. Regressions for the three institutional types explained 21 to 27% of the variance for cognitive assessment, 7 to 21% for affective assessment and 6 to 19% for post-college assessment. With the exception of a minor influence of state characteristics for doctoral and research universities, institutional dynamics and accreditation region were found to be the primary influences on student assessment approaches for all institutional types. We found that the drive for state-level accountability has not exceeded the influence of institutional accreditation and that internal dynamics appear to be the driving force of all three approaches to student assessment.",
"genre": "research_article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1023/a:1007080408692",
"inLanguage": [
"en"
],
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1046373",
"issn": [
"0361-0365",
"1573-188X"
],
"name": "Research in Higher Education",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "4",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "41"
}
],
"name": "External and Internal Influences on Institutional Approaches to Student Assessment: Accountability or Improvement?",
"pagination": "443-479",
"productId": [
{
"name": "readcube_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"f9e493eebe3e69b220f7d2144c93540253664128f5a8d0fea5e12953dbfdeb2c"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1023/a:1007080408692"
]
},
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1052461869"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007080408692",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052461869"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2019-04-10T13:06",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000001_0000000264/records_8659_00000483.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1007080408692"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1007080408692'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1007080408692'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1007080408692'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1023/a:1007080408692'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
85 TRIPLES
21 PREDICATES
32 URIs
19 LITERALS
7 BLANK NODES