Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle Open Access: True
2011-03-31
AUTHORSShingo Tsujinaka, Fumio Konishi
ABSTRACTIn colorectal surgery, drains are expected to prevent hematoma, fluid collection, or abscess formation, to act as an indicator of postoperative complication, or to minimize the severity of complication-related symptoms. Routine drainage has not been advocated by meta-analyses as they failed to demonstrate any benefit in reducing anastomotic leak rate, minimizing symptoms, or serving as a warning function. Moreover, some reports even showed that drain itself is an independent risk factor of anastomosis. The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery has given further concern to this controversial issue, that the use of drain decreased anastomotic failure rate and the need for surgical re-intervention. While controversy still remains, the choice of using drain is left to the individual surgeon’s preference in daily practice. Therefore, surgeons should be well acquainted with purpose of drainage (prophylaxis, information, or treatment), characteristics (materials), clinical application of drain (type of drainage system, timing of removal), surgical outcomes after using drain (incidence of postoperative complication), and drain-related complications. If drains are used, careful observation with proper use is crucial for the management. It is important that the duration of drainage should not be inadequately extended. Any complications directly associated with the use of drain should be avoided. New concepts of drain have been proposed as diagnostic tool using biomarkers, and as preventive device against anastomotic leak. This article overviews the available, published data on the use of drain in colorectal surgery. More... »
PAGES3-8
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1013838618
PUBMEDhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22693394
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Medical and Health Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1103",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Clinical Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 1-847 Amanumacho, Omiya, Saitama-shi, 330-8503, Saitama, Japan",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.415020.2",
"name": [
"Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 1-847 Amanumacho, Omiya, Saitama-shi, 330-8503, Saitama, Japan"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Tsujinaka",
"givenName": "Shingo",
"id": "sg:person.0676447713.26",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0676447713.26"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 1-847 Amanumacho, Omiya, Saitama-shi, 330-8503, Saitama, Japan",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.415020.2",
"name": [
"Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 1-847 Amanumacho, Omiya, Saitama-shi, 330-8503, Saitama, Japan"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Konishi",
"givenName": "Fumio",
"id": "sg:person.01272216415.22",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01272216415.22"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00595-008-3835-2",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1047896439",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3835-2"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11605-006-0049-z",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1041872752",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-006-0049-z"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s101510200036",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010852380",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s101510200036"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00384-003-0498-8",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029948420",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0498-8"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11845-010-0589-9",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000473129",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0589-9"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00268-010-0831-7",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1014763698",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0831-7"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2011-03-31",
"datePublishedReg": "2011-03-31",
"description": "In colorectal surgery, drains are expected to prevent hematoma, fluid collection, or abscess formation, to act as an indicator of postoperative complication, or to minimize the severity of complication-related symptoms. Routine drainage has not been advocated by meta-analyses as they failed to demonstrate any benefit in reducing anastomotic leak rate, minimizing symptoms, or serving as a warning function. Moreover, some reports even showed that drain itself is an independent risk factor of anastomosis. The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery has given further concern to this controversial issue, that the use of drain decreased anastomotic failure rate and the need for surgical re-intervention. While controversy still remains, the choice of using drain is left to the individual surgeon\u2019s preference in daily practice. Therefore, surgeons should be well acquainted with purpose of drainage (prophylaxis, information, or treatment), characteristics (materials), clinical application of drain (type of drainage system, timing of removal), surgical outcomes after using drain (incidence of postoperative complication), and drain-related complications. If drains are used, careful observation with proper use is crucial for the management. It is important that the duration of drainage should not be inadequately extended. Any complications directly associated with the use of drain should be avoided. New concepts of drain have been proposed as diagnostic tool using biomarkers, and as preventive device against anastomotic leak. This article overviews the available, published data on the use of drain in colorectal surgery.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1043605",
"issn": [
"0975-7651",
"0976-6952"
],
"name": "Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "1",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "2"
}
],
"keywords": [
"use of drains",
"total mesorectal excision",
"colorectal surgery",
"anastomotic failure rate",
"anastomotic leak rate",
"independent risk factor",
"rectal cancer surgery",
"duration of drainage",
"drain-related complications",
"individual surgeon preference",
"routine drainage",
"postoperative complications",
"anastomotic leak",
"mesorectal excision",
"cancer surgery",
"surgical outcomes",
"purpose of drainage",
"risk factors",
"surgeon preference",
"fluid collection",
"surgery",
"complications",
"daily practice",
"clinical applications",
"careful observation",
"diagnostic tool",
"preventive devices",
"symptoms",
"failure rate",
"drainage",
"leak rate",
"hematoma",
"anastomosis",
"excision",
"controversial issue",
"proper use",
"further concern",
"surgeons",
"severity",
"biomarkers",
"outcomes",
"duration",
"use",
"leak",
"report",
"rate",
"drain",
"management",
"factors",
"controversy",
"benefits",
"warning function",
"need",
"indicators",
"practice",
"purpose",
"function",
"preferences",
"concern",
"data",
"choice",
"characteristics",
"collection",
"observations",
"tool",
"introduction",
"new concept",
"article",
"formation",
"issues",
"devices",
"concept",
"applications"
],
"name": "Drain vs No Drain After Colorectal Surgery",
"pagination": "3-8",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1013838618"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2"
]
},
{
"name": "pubmed_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"22693394"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1013838618"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-20T07:26",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220519/entities/gbq_results/article/article_541.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
166 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
104 URIs
90 LITERALS
7 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:11 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:1103 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | Nfacaf3b3316a4b8cb6eb2df3f44ec7a2 |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/s00268-010-0831-7 |
5 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s00384-003-0498-8 |
6 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s00595-008-3835-2 |
7 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s101510200036 |
8 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s11605-006-0049-z |
9 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s11845-010-0589-9 |
10 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2011-03-31 |
11 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2011-03-31 |
12 | ″ | schema:description | In colorectal surgery, drains are expected to prevent hematoma, fluid collection, or abscess formation, to act as an indicator of postoperative complication, or to minimize the severity of complication-related symptoms. Routine drainage has not been advocated by meta-analyses as they failed to demonstrate any benefit in reducing anastomotic leak rate, minimizing symptoms, or serving as a warning function. Moreover, some reports even showed that drain itself is an independent risk factor of anastomosis. The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery has given further concern to this controversial issue, that the use of drain decreased anastomotic failure rate and the need for surgical re-intervention. While controversy still remains, the choice of using drain is left to the individual surgeon’s preference in daily practice. Therefore, surgeons should be well acquainted with purpose of drainage (prophylaxis, information, or treatment), characteristics (materials), clinical application of drain (type of drainage system, timing of removal), surgical outcomes after using drain (incidence of postoperative complication), and drain-related complications. If drains are used, careful observation with proper use is crucial for the management. It is important that the duration of drainage should not be inadequately extended. Any complications directly associated with the use of drain should be avoided. New concepts of drain have been proposed as diagnostic tool using biomarkers, and as preventive device against anastomotic leak. This article overviews the available, published data on the use of drain in colorectal surgery. |
13 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
14 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
15 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | true |
16 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N9f4d84e633554b29a0af5a8390662314 |
17 | ″ | ″ | Nc84d575516c2469d9da8f02911fe962f |
18 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1043605 |
19 | ″ | schema:keywords | anastomosis |
20 | ″ | ″ | anastomotic failure rate |
21 | ″ | ″ | anastomotic leak |
22 | ″ | ″ | anastomotic leak rate |
23 | ″ | ″ | applications |
24 | ″ | ″ | article |
25 | ″ | ″ | benefits |
26 | ″ | ″ | biomarkers |
27 | ″ | ″ | cancer surgery |
28 | ″ | ″ | careful observation |
29 | ″ | ″ | characteristics |
30 | ″ | ″ | choice |
31 | ″ | ″ | clinical applications |
32 | ″ | ″ | collection |
33 | ″ | ″ | colorectal surgery |
34 | ″ | ″ | complications |
35 | ″ | ″ | concept |
36 | ″ | ″ | concern |
37 | ″ | ″ | controversial issue |
38 | ″ | ″ | controversy |
39 | ″ | ″ | daily practice |
40 | ″ | ″ | data |
41 | ″ | ″ | devices |
42 | ″ | ″ | diagnostic tool |
43 | ″ | ″ | drain |
44 | ″ | ″ | drain-related complications |
45 | ″ | ″ | drainage |
46 | ″ | ″ | duration |
47 | ″ | ″ | duration of drainage |
48 | ″ | ″ | excision |
49 | ″ | ″ | factors |
50 | ″ | ″ | failure rate |
51 | ″ | ″ | fluid collection |
52 | ″ | ″ | formation |
53 | ″ | ″ | function |
54 | ″ | ″ | further concern |
55 | ″ | ″ | hematoma |
56 | ″ | ″ | independent risk factor |
57 | ″ | ″ | indicators |
58 | ″ | ″ | individual surgeon preference |
59 | ″ | ″ | introduction |
60 | ″ | ″ | issues |
61 | ″ | ″ | leak |
62 | ″ | ″ | leak rate |
63 | ″ | ″ | management |
64 | ″ | ″ | mesorectal excision |
65 | ″ | ″ | need |
66 | ″ | ″ | new concept |
67 | ″ | ″ | observations |
68 | ″ | ″ | outcomes |
69 | ″ | ″ | postoperative complications |
70 | ″ | ″ | practice |
71 | ″ | ″ | preferences |
72 | ″ | ″ | preventive devices |
73 | ″ | ″ | proper use |
74 | ″ | ″ | purpose |
75 | ″ | ″ | purpose of drainage |
76 | ″ | ″ | rate |
77 | ″ | ″ | rectal cancer surgery |
78 | ″ | ″ | report |
79 | ″ | ″ | risk factors |
80 | ″ | ″ | routine drainage |
81 | ″ | ″ | severity |
82 | ″ | ″ | surgeon preference |
83 | ″ | ″ | surgeons |
84 | ″ | ″ | surgery |
85 | ″ | ″ | surgical outcomes |
86 | ″ | ″ | symptoms |
87 | ″ | ″ | tool |
88 | ″ | ″ | total mesorectal excision |
89 | ″ | ″ | use |
90 | ″ | ″ | use of drains |
91 | ″ | ″ | warning function |
92 | ″ | schema:name | Drain vs No Drain After Colorectal Surgery |
93 | ″ | schema:pagination | 3-8 |
94 | ″ | schema:productId | N150fc1b0463944079210489e63499529 |
95 | ″ | ″ | N1669941baaa444c78519f14464ec6811 |
96 | ″ | ″ | Nc1eaede46cb648e8baaa20545587dc90 |
97 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1013838618 |
98 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2 |
99 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-05-20T07:26 |
100 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
101 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | Nd2cc1ecb0bf346e19086a40182d03a39 |
102 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2 |
103 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
104 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
105 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
106 | N150fc1b0463944079210489e63499529 | schema:name | pubmed_id |
107 | ″ | schema:value | 22693394 |
108 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
109 | N1669941baaa444c78519f14464ec6811 | schema:name | dimensions_id |
110 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1013838618 |
111 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
112 | N88f6507f6b3b4b42a350f841ba066978 | rdf:first | sg:person.01272216415.22 |
113 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
114 | N9f4d84e633554b29a0af5a8390662314 | schema:issueNumber | 1 |
115 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
116 | Nc1eaede46cb648e8baaa20545587dc90 | schema:name | doi |
117 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/s13193-011-0041-2 |
118 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
119 | Nc84d575516c2469d9da8f02911fe962f | schema:volumeNumber | 2 |
120 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
121 | Nd2cc1ecb0bf346e19086a40182d03a39 | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
122 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
123 | Nfacaf3b3316a4b8cb6eb2df3f44ec7a2 | rdf:first | sg:person.0676447713.26 |
124 | ″ | rdf:rest | N88f6507f6b3b4b42a350f841ba066978 |
125 | anzsrc-for:11 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
126 | ″ | schema:name | Medical and Health Sciences |
127 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
128 | anzsrc-for:1103 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
129 | ″ | schema:name | Clinical Sciences |
130 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
131 | sg:journal.1043605 | schema:issn | 0975-7651 |
132 | ″ | ″ | 0976-6952 |
133 | ″ | schema:name | Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology |
134 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
135 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
136 | sg:person.01272216415.22 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.415020.2 |
137 | ″ | schema:familyName | Konishi |
138 | ″ | schema:givenName | Fumio |
139 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01272216415.22 |
140 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
141 | sg:person.0676447713.26 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.415020.2 |
142 | ″ | schema:familyName | Tsujinaka |
143 | ″ | schema:givenName | Shingo |
144 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0676447713.26 |
145 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
146 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00268-010-0831-7 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1014763698 |
147 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0831-7 |
148 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
149 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00384-003-0498-8 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029948420 |
150 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0498-8 |
151 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
152 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00595-008-3835-2 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1047896439 |
153 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3835-2 |
154 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
155 | sg:pub.10.1007/s101510200036 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010852380 |
156 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s101510200036 |
157 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
158 | sg:pub.10.1007/s11605-006-0049-z | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1041872752 |
159 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-006-0049-z |
160 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
161 | sg:pub.10.1007/s11845-010-0589-9 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000473129 |
162 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0589-9 |
163 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
164 | grid-institutes:grid.415020.2 | schema:alternateName | Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 1-847 Amanumacho, Omiya, Saitama-shi, 330-8503, Saitama, Japan |
165 | ″ | schema:name | Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 1-847 Amanumacho, Omiya, Saitama-shi, 330-8503, Saitama, Japan |
166 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |