Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle Open Access: True
2017-08-29
AUTHORSMartin Lehnert, Maximilian Röglinger, Johannes Seyfried
ABSTRACTDeciding which business processes to improve is a challenge for all organizations. The literature on business process management (BPM) offers several approaches that support process prioritization. As many approaches share the individual process as unit of analysis, they determine the processes’ need for improvement mostly based on performance indicators, but neglect how processes are interconnected. So far, the interconnections of processes are only captured for descriptive purposes in process model repositories or business process architectures (BPAs). Prioritizing processes without catering for their interconnectedness, however, biases prioritization decisions and causes a misallocation of corporate funds. What is missing are process prioritization approaches that consider the processes’ individual need for improvement and their interconnectedness. To address this research problem, the authors propose the ProcessPageRank (PPR) as their main contribution. The PPR prioritizes processes of a given BPA by ranking them according to their network-adjusted need for improvement. The PPR builds on knowledge from process performance management, BPAs, and network analysis – particularly the Google PageRank. As for evaluation, the authors validated the PPR’s design specification against empirically validated and theory-backed design propositions. They also instantiated the PPR’s design specification as a software prototype and applied the prototype to a real-world BPA. More... »
PAGES95-114
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12599-017-0490-4
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0490-4
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1091388542
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/08",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Information and Computing Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/15",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0806",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Information Systems",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1503",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Business and Management",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Research Center Finance and Information Management, University of Augsburg, Universit\u00e4tsstra\u00dfe 12, 86159, Augsburg, Germany",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.7307.3",
"name": [
"Research Center Finance and Information Management, University of Augsburg, Universit\u00e4tsstra\u00dfe 12, 86159, Augsburg, Germany"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Lehnert",
"givenName": "Martin",
"id": "sg:person.010545414635.16",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.010545414635.16"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Research Center Finance and Information Management, University of Bayreuth, Wittelsbacherring 10, 95444, Bayreuth, Germany",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.7384.8",
"name": [
"Research Center Finance and Information Management, University of Bayreuth, Wittelsbacherring 10, 95444, Bayreuth, Germany"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "R\u00f6glinger",
"givenName": "Maximilian",
"id": "sg:person.012164751751.05",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012164751751.05"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Research Center Finance and Information Management, University of Augsburg, Universit\u00e4tsstra\u00dfe 12, 86159, Augsburg, Germany",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.7307.3",
"name": [
"Research Center Finance and Information Management, University of Augsburg, Universit\u00e4tsstra\u00dfe 12, 86159, Augsburg, Germany"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Seyfried",
"givenName": "Johannes",
"id": "sg:person.014170351202.75",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014170351202.75"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s12599-015-0411-3",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001568935",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0411-3"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10257-014-0248-1",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010827449",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-014-0248-1"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_31",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1002200619",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_31"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4_4",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1034428134",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4_4"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_18",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1040925898",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_18"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1040561137",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3_5",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1006122570",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3_5"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s12599-011-0157-5",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1016592362",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-011-0157-5"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-663-14777-0",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1012340000",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14777-0"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4_9",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1050925944",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4_9"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4_12",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1049679761",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4_12"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_2",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1019213040",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_2"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_28",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029099112",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_28"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s12599-013-0263-7",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1044894250",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-013-0263-7"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s12599-010-0127-3",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1049827482",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-010-0127-3"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2017-08-29",
"datePublishedReg": "2017-08-29",
"description": "Deciding which business processes to improve is a challenge for all organizations. The literature on business process management (BPM) offers several approaches that support process prioritization. As many approaches share the individual process as unit of analysis, they determine the processes\u2019 need for improvement mostly based on performance indicators, but neglect how processes are interconnected. So far, the interconnections of processes are only captured for descriptive purposes in process model repositories or business process architectures (BPAs). Prioritizing processes without catering for their interconnectedness, however, biases prioritization decisions and causes a misallocation of corporate funds. What is missing are process prioritization approaches that consider the processes\u2019 individual need for improvement and their interconnectedness. To address this research problem, the authors propose the ProcessPageRank (PPR) as their main contribution. The PPR prioritizes processes of a given BPA by ranking them according to their network-adjusted need for improvement. The PPR builds on knowledge from process performance management, BPAs, and network analysis \u2013 particularly the Google PageRank. As for evaluation, the authors validated the PPR\u2019s design specification against empirically validated and theory-backed design propositions. They also instantiated the PPR\u2019s design specification as a software prototype and applied the prototype to a real-world BPA.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s12599-017-0490-4",
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1136455",
"issn": [
"2363-7005",
"1867-0202"
],
"name": "Business & Information Systems Engineering",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "2",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "60"
}
],
"keywords": [
"business process management",
"business processes",
"process model repositories",
"process performance management",
"interconnection of processes",
"design specifications",
"software prototype",
"model repository",
"process management",
"process prioritization",
"Google PageRank",
"research problem",
"main contribution",
"prioritization approach",
"design propositions",
"specification",
"performance management",
"prototype",
"network analysis",
"performance indicators",
"prioritization decisions",
"PageRank",
"repository",
"prioritization",
"individual needs",
"individual processes",
"corporate funds",
"need",
"unit of analysis",
"management",
"process",
"improvement",
"interconnected processes",
"challenges",
"interconnection",
"decisions",
"knowledge",
"organization",
"interconnectedness",
"evaluation",
"funds",
"authors",
"misallocation",
"proposition",
"analysis",
"purpose",
"units",
"descriptive purposes",
"contribution",
"approach",
"literature",
"indicators",
"problem",
"BPA"
],
"name": "Prioritization of Interconnected Processes",
"pagination": "95-114",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1091388542"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s12599-017-0490-4"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0490-4",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1091388542"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T17:05",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_745.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0490-4"
}
]Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12599-017-0490-4'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12599-017-0490-4'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12599-017-0490-4'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12599-017-0490-4'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
196 TRIPLES
21 PREDICATES
95 URIs
70 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES