EU defence cooperation after Brexit: what role for the UK in the future EU defence arrangements? View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle      Open Access: True


Article Info

DATE

2017-12

AUTHORS

Jolyon Howorth

ABSTRACT

The UK has traditionally played an ambivalent role in European security and defence policymaking. With Brexit, the EU loses one of its two serious military players. On the other hand, it has been liberated from the constraints imposed by London on the Common Security and Defence Policy, and this has created a new dynamism behind the defence project. There has been comparatively little commentary on the defence implications of Brexit, and the UK has been less than forthcoming in making concrete proposals for an ongoing UK–EU partnership. Both sides assert that they wish to maintain a strong cooperative relationship after Brexit, but the outlines of such an arrangement remain very unclear. This article suggests that the UK will have more to lose than the EU from any failure to reach agreement, and that UK ambivalence about links between the Common Security and Defence Policy and NATO will prove to be a major sticking point. More... »

PAGES

191-200

References to SciGraph publications

Journal

TITLE

European View

ISSUE

2

VOLUME

16

Author Affiliations

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1093092682


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1606", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Political Science", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/16", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Studies in Human Society", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Yale University", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.47100.32", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Political Science, Yale University, 115, Prospect Street, 06520, New Haven, CT, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Howorth", 
        "givenName": "Jolyon", 
        "id": "sg:person.016422161627.26", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.016422161627.26"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2016.1186973", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1028321957"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-1-137-42788-5", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1108778718", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-42788-5"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2017-12", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2017-12-01", 
    "description": "The UK has traditionally played an ambivalent role in European security and defence policymaking. With Brexit, the EU loses one of its two serious military players. On the other hand, it has been liberated from the constraints imposed by London on the Common Security and Defence Policy, and this has created a new dynamism behind the defence project. There has been comparatively little commentary on the defence implications of Brexit, and the UK has been less than forthcoming in making concrete proposals for an ongoing UK\u2013EU partnership. Both sides assert that they wish to maintain a strong cooperative relationship after Brexit, but the outlines of such an arrangement remain very unclear. This article suggests that the UK will have more to lose than the EU from any failure to reach agreement, and that UK ambivalence about links between the Common Security and Defence Policy and NATO will prove to be a major sticking point.", 
    "genre": "research_article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5", 
    "inLanguage": [
      "en"
    ], 
    "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1136621", 
        "issn": [
          "1781-6858", 
          "1865-5831"
        ], 
        "name": "European View", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "2", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "16"
      }
    ], 
    "name": "EU defence cooperation after Brexit: what role for the UK in the future EU defence arrangements?", 
    "pagination": "191-200", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "readcube_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "91499294aa4752851d06e03bb005ac8f777b80e42269a244b7c671f18cd811f6"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1093092682"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1093092682"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-10T18:33", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000001_0000000264/records_8675_00000602.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

68 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      29 URIs      19 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5 schema:about anzsrc-for:16
2 anzsrc-for:1606
3 schema:author N73702c7f9e7840fbad2e62c5e63fb1ba
4 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1007/978-1-137-42788-5
5 https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2016.1186973
6 schema:datePublished 2017-12
7 schema:datePublishedReg 2017-12-01
8 schema:description The UK has traditionally played an ambivalent role in European security and defence policymaking. With Brexit, the EU loses one of its two serious military players. On the other hand, it has been liberated from the constraints imposed by London on the Common Security and Defence Policy, and this has created a new dynamism behind the defence project. There has been comparatively little commentary on the defence implications of Brexit, and the UK has been less than forthcoming in making concrete proposals for an ongoing UK–EU partnership. Both sides assert that they wish to maintain a strong cooperative relationship after Brexit, but the outlines of such an arrangement remain very unclear. This article suggests that the UK will have more to lose than the EU from any failure to reach agreement, and that UK ambivalence about links between the Common Security and Defence Policy and NATO will prove to be a major sticking point.
9 schema:genre research_article
10 schema:inLanguage en
11 schema:isAccessibleForFree true
12 schema:isPartOf Ncdf6b3db7f844d82a46d01adca3a99c3
13 Nd189bd7ff9bf4241a2f48e053698f09b
14 sg:journal.1136621
15 schema:name EU defence cooperation after Brexit: what role for the UK in the future EU defence arrangements?
16 schema:pagination 191-200
17 schema:productId N203b564cf62f476c9685a12349ffbe64
18 N47e64957a85e4132a97de2175f69c7ca
19 Nd9e3122f91b245059ae6d20de9e018fd
20 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1093092682
21 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5
22 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-10T18:33
23 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
24 schema:sdPublisher Nd828c37c59bf465aaabc0caae09be675
25 schema:url http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5
26 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
27 sgo:sdDataset articles
28 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
29 N203b564cf62f476c9685a12349ffbe64 schema:name readcube_id
30 schema:value 91499294aa4752851d06e03bb005ac8f777b80e42269a244b7c671f18cd811f6
31 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
32 N47e64957a85e4132a97de2175f69c7ca schema:name doi
33 schema:value 10.1007/s12290-017-0455-5
34 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
35 N73702c7f9e7840fbad2e62c5e63fb1ba rdf:first sg:person.016422161627.26
36 rdf:rest rdf:nil
37 Ncdf6b3db7f844d82a46d01adca3a99c3 schema:volumeNumber 16
38 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
39 Nd189bd7ff9bf4241a2f48e053698f09b schema:issueNumber 2
40 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
41 Nd828c37c59bf465aaabc0caae09be675 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
42 rdf:type schema:Organization
43 Nd9e3122f91b245059ae6d20de9e018fd schema:name dimensions_id
44 schema:value pub.1093092682
45 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
46 anzsrc-for:16 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
47 schema:name Studies in Human Society
48 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
49 anzsrc-for:1606 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
50 schema:name Political Science
51 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
52 sg:journal.1136621 schema:issn 1781-6858
53 1865-5831
54 schema:name European View
55 rdf:type schema:Periodical
56 sg:person.016422161627.26 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.47100.32
57 schema:familyName Howorth
58 schema:givenName Jolyon
59 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.016422161627.26
60 rdf:type schema:Person
61 sg:pub.10.1007/978-1-137-42788-5 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1108778718
62 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-42788-5
63 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
64 https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2016.1186973 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1028321957
65 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
66 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.47100.32 schema:alternateName Yale University
67 schema:name Department of Political Science, Yale University, 115, Prospect Street, 06520, New Haven, CT, USA
68 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...