Construing the Legality of Solitary Confinement: Analysis of United States Federal Court Jurisprudence View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

2018-11-14

AUTHORS

Claire Angelique Nolasco, Michael S. Vaughn

ABSTRACT

This article analyzes the constitutional parameters of solitary confinement, administrative segregation, and/or punitive isolation within correctional facilities in the United States. After briefly discussing the harmful effects of isolation and the number of inmates subject to this type of confinement, it explains the U.S. Supreme Court’s “atypical and significant hardship” standard for assessing the legality of segregation. Evaluation of 68 cases decided by the 12 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals reveals how each Circuit decides when conditions of segregation amount to an “atypical and significant hardship” for the inmate, creating a liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process clause. Due to the Supreme Court’s ambiguity, the Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals lack agreement on (1) when liberty interests attach and (2) which confinement conditions outside of segregation should serve as a comparison baseline to assess “atypicality” and “hardship.” While inmates possess limited liberty interests when placed in segregation, the physical and psychological harms wrought by segregation, isolation, and solitary confinement are rarely considered when courts make constitutional determinations of such practices. More... »

PAGES

1-24

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1109896328


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1801", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Law", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/18", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Law and Legal Studies", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Texas A&M University \u2013 San Antonio", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.469272.c", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Social Sciences, Criminology Program, Texas A&M University-San Antonio, One University Way, 78224, San Antonio, TX, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Nolasco", 
        "givenName": "Claire Angelique", 
        "id": "sg:person.016563664267.90", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.016563664267.90"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Sam Houston State University", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.263046.5", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, Institute of Legal Studies in Criminal Justice, College of Criminal Justice, Sam Houston State University, 816 17th St., P.O. Box 2296, 77341-2296, Huntsville, TX, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Vaughn", 
        "givenName": "Michael S.", 
        "id": "sg:person.013751637261.68", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.013751637261.68"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250903518944", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018468057"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2015.1006648", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1034330912"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2011.599927", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045727455"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2011.631540", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052653739"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885507310999", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1054047715"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885507310999", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1054047715"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885507310999", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1054047715"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1086/500626", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1058782736"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2006.6412", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1059255207"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.140.11.1450", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1063473764"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128702239239", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1063569688"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128702239239", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1063569688"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1084031788", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1084031788", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1084031788", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1084031788", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1084031788", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092326", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1092525698"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2018-11-14", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2018-11-14", 
    "description": "This article analyzes the constitutional parameters of solitary confinement, administrative segregation, and/or punitive isolation within correctional facilities in the United States. After briefly discussing the harmful effects of isolation and the number of inmates subject to this type of confinement, it explains the U.S. Supreme Court\u2019s \u201catypical and significant hardship\u201d standard for assessing the legality of segregation. Evaluation of 68 cases decided by the 12 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals reveals how each Circuit decides when conditions of segregation amount to an \u201catypical and significant hardship\u201d for the inmate, creating a liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process clause. Due to the Supreme Court\u2019s ambiguity, the Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals lack agreement on (1) when liberty interests attach and (2) which confinement conditions outside of segregation should serve as a comparison baseline to assess \u201catypicality\u201d and \u201chardship.\u201d While inmates possess limited liberty interests when placed in segregation, the physical and psychological harms wrought by segregation, isolation, and solitary confinement are rarely considered when courts make constitutional determinations of such practices.", 
    "genre": "research_article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5", 
    "inLanguage": [
      "en"
    ], 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1043657", 
        "issn": [
          "1066-2316", 
          "1936-1351"
        ], 
        "name": "American Journal of Criminal Justice", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }
    ], 
    "name": "Construing the Legality of Solitary Confinement: Analysis of United States Federal Court Jurisprudence", 
    "pagination": "1-24", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "readcube_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "1975c46cd48dd18c0a3b34245170a1a6a9d5d87ffb1236ac7fd9e9718f082d20"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1109896328"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1109896328"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-11T08:08", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000265_0000000265/records_67393_00000000.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://link.springer.com/10.1007%2Fs12103-018-9463-5"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

99 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      35 URIs      16 LITERALS      5 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5 schema:about anzsrc-for:18
2 anzsrc-for:1801
3 schema:author Ne53f8c8631f940149996f1342b9f1b5b
4 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1
5 https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250903518944
6 https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2015.1006648
7 https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2011.631540
8 https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2011.599927
9 https://doi.org/10.1086/500626
10 https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2006.6412
11 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092326
12 https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.140.11.1450
13 https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128702239239
14 https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885507310999
15 schema:datePublished 2018-11-14
16 schema:datePublishedReg 2018-11-14
17 schema:description This article analyzes the constitutional parameters of solitary confinement, administrative segregation, and/or punitive isolation within correctional facilities in the United States. After briefly discussing the harmful effects of isolation and the number of inmates subject to this type of confinement, it explains the U.S. Supreme Court’s “atypical and significant hardship” standard for assessing the legality of segregation. Evaluation of 68 cases decided by the 12 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals reveals how each Circuit decides when conditions of segregation amount to an “atypical and significant hardship” for the inmate, creating a liberty interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process clause. Due to the Supreme Court’s ambiguity, the Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals lack agreement on (1) when liberty interests attach and (2) which confinement conditions outside of segregation should serve as a comparison baseline to assess “atypicality” and “hardship.” While inmates possess limited liberty interests when placed in segregation, the physical and psychological harms wrought by segregation, isolation, and solitary confinement are rarely considered when courts make constitutional determinations of such practices.
18 schema:genre research_article
19 schema:inLanguage en
20 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
21 schema:isPartOf sg:journal.1043657
22 schema:name Construing the Legality of Solitary Confinement: Analysis of United States Federal Court Jurisprudence
23 schema:pagination 1-24
24 schema:productId N5938f48b520442538bbb980af8780d80
25 N673c6b3c50354311ad841eb598cb3961
26 Nbaefabe577524e6aa9f8611d509e505c
27 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1109896328
28 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5
29 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-11T08:08
30 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
31 schema:sdPublisher N140872191fd4423f9339cf335583d6e3
32 schema:url https://link.springer.com/10.1007%2Fs12103-018-9463-5
33 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
34 sgo:sdDataset articles
35 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
36 N13804c66cc56484cb0c875609dd6f3e2 rdf:first sg:person.013751637261.68
37 rdf:rest rdf:nil
38 N140872191fd4423f9339cf335583d6e3 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
39 rdf:type schema:Organization
40 N5938f48b520442538bbb980af8780d80 schema:name dimensions_id
41 schema:value pub.1109896328
42 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
43 N673c6b3c50354311ad841eb598cb3961 schema:name doi
44 schema:value 10.1007/s12103-018-9463-5
45 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
46 Nbaefabe577524e6aa9f8611d509e505c schema:name readcube_id
47 schema:value 1975c46cd48dd18c0a3b34245170a1a6a9d5d87ffb1236ac7fd9e9718f082d20
48 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
49 Ne53f8c8631f940149996f1342b9f1b5b rdf:first sg:person.016563664267.90
50 rdf:rest N13804c66cc56484cb0c875609dd6f3e2
51 anzsrc-for:18 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
52 schema:name Law and Legal Studies
53 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
54 anzsrc-for:1801 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
55 schema:name Law
56 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
57 sg:journal.1043657 schema:issn 1066-2316
58 1936-1351
59 schema:name American Journal of Criminal Justice
60 rdf:type schema:Periodical
61 sg:person.013751637261.68 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.263046.5
62 schema:familyName Vaughn
63 schema:givenName Michael S.
64 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.013751637261.68
65 rdf:type schema:Person
66 sg:person.016563664267.90 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.469272.c
67 schema:familyName Nolasco
68 schema:givenName Claire Angelique
69 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.016563664267.90
70 rdf:type schema:Person
71 sg:pub.10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1084031788
72 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-017-0138-1
73 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
74 https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250903518944 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018468057
75 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
76 https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2015.1006648 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1034330912
77 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
78 https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2011.631540 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052653739
79 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
80 https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2011.599927 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045727455
81 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
82 https://doi.org/10.1086/500626 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1058782736
83 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
84 https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2006.6412 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1059255207
85 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
86 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092326 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1092525698
87 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
88 https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.140.11.1450 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1063473764
89 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
90 https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128702239239 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1063569688
91 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
92 https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885507310999 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1054047715
93 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
94 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.263046.5 schema:alternateName Sam Houston State University
95 schema:name Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, Institute of Legal Studies in Criminal Justice, College of Criminal Justice, Sam Houston State University, 816 17th St., P.O. Box 2296, 77341-2296, Huntsville, TX, USA
96 rdf:type schema:Organization
97 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.469272.c schema:alternateName Texas A&M University – San Antonio
98 schema:name Department of Social Sciences, Criminology Program, Texas A&M University-San Antonio, One University Way, 78224, San Antonio, TX, USA
99 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...