Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle
2021-09-10
AUTHORS ABSTRACTNew policing technologies have generated solutions to many policing issues. In particular, portable camera systems (in-car or body-worn) have been offered as a tool to address the issue of police excessive use of force. It has been argued that police camera systems increase transparency in law enforcement and deter both police officers and citizens from engaging in undesirable behaviors during encounters. However, the question of how effective these technologies are in increasing the accountability of police departments still remains unanswered. Some argue that the use of camera systems to record police behavior does not create a significant reduction in excessive use-of-force complaints or does not serve as an effective accountability tool as expected. From this perspective, this study explores the impact of in-car camera usage on police use-of-force investigations. This research examines the impact of in-car cameras on the total, dismissed, and sustained excessive use-of-force complaints against 891 police departments in the USA with more than 100 sworn officers. We employed Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) 2007 dataset to conduct this analysis. We utilized negative binomial regression analysis in STATA 15 to examine whether the adoption of vehicle camera systems by police agencies has an impact on dismissed and sustained complaints of inappropriate use-of-force. We found that the adoption of in-car cameras correlates with the number of dismissed cases; however, we did not find any significant relationship between in-car camera usage and sustained cases. Police departments using in-car camera systems are more likely to dismiss citizen complaints, rather than sustaining them. We concluded that video footages generated by in-car camera systems are inadequate in producing evidence to back up the complainants’ claims or in generating proof of excessive use of force for further investigation. Our findings suggest that police departments should not solely rely on in-car cameras if they want to enhance accountability and unearth police misconduct within their department. More... »
PAGES1-14
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1141037234
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/16",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Studies in Human Society",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1602",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Criminology",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Stockton University, 101 Vera King Farris Drive, 08205-9441, Galloway, NJ, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.262550.6",
"name": [
"School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Stockton University, 101 Vera King Farris Drive, 08205-9441, Galloway, NJ, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Sahin",
"givenName": "Nusret M.",
"id": "sg:person.015343333743.11",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015343333743.11"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Justice, Law, and Criminology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, 20016, Washington, DC, NW, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.63124.32",
"name": [
"Justice, Law, and Criminology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, 20016, Washington, DC, NW, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Cubukcu",
"givenName": "Suat",
"id": "sg:person.015473434050.88",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015473434050.88"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1027417793",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11896-019-09346-1",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1120988696",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09346-1"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2021-09-10",
"datePublishedReg": "2021-09-10",
"description": "New policing technologies have generated solutions to many policing issues. In particular, portable camera systems (in-car or body-worn) have been offered as a tool to address the issue of police excessive use of force. It has been argued that police camera systems increase transparency in law enforcement and deter both police officers and citizens from engaging in undesirable behaviors during encounters. However, the question of how effective these technologies are in increasing the accountability of police departments still remains unanswered. Some argue that the use of camera systems to record police behavior does not create a significant reduction in excessive use-of-force complaints or does not serve as an effective accountability tool as expected. From this perspective, this study explores the impact of in-car camera usage on police use-of-force investigations. This research examines the impact of in-car cameras on the total, dismissed, and sustained excessive use-of-force complaints against 891 police departments in the USA with more than 100 sworn officers. We employed Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) 2007 dataset to conduct this analysis. We utilized negative binomial regression analysis in STATA 15 to examine whether the adoption of vehicle camera systems by police agencies has an impact on dismissed and sustained complaints of inappropriate use-of-force. We found that the adoption of in-car cameras correlates with the number of dismissed cases; however, we did not find any significant relationship between in-car camera usage and sustained cases. Police departments using in-car camera systems are more likely to dismiss citizen complaints, rather than sustaining them. We concluded that video footages generated by in-car camera systems are inadequate in producing evidence to back up the complainants\u2019 claims or in generating proof of excessive use of force for further investigation. Our findings suggest that police departments should not solely rely on in-car cameras if they want to enhance accountability and unearth police misconduct within their department.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1053097",
"issn": [
"0882-0783",
"1936-6469"
],
"name": "Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
}
],
"keywords": [
"police departments",
"force complaints",
"car camera system",
"Law Enforcement Management",
"police accountability",
"police misconduct",
"Enforcement Management",
"police behavior",
"police agencies",
"police use",
"force incidents",
"citizen complaints",
"police officers",
"accountability tools",
"law enforcement",
"sustained case",
"accountability",
"negative binomial regression analysis",
"portable camera system",
"officers",
"vehicle camera systems",
"binomial regression analysis",
"force investigation",
"camera usage",
"citizens",
"adoption",
"issues",
"enforcement",
"complainants",
"agencies",
"car camera",
"misconduct",
"claims",
"force",
"excessive use",
"perspective",
"impact",
"undesirable behavior",
"encounters",
"transparency",
"questions",
"Department",
"incidents",
"USA",
"research",
"Stata 15",
"relationship",
"significant relationship",
"video footage",
"findings",
"footage",
"analysis",
"technology",
"management",
"tool",
"use",
"cases",
"complaints",
"system",
"regression analysis",
"evidence",
"inappropriate use",
"behavior",
"usage",
"study",
"number",
"investigation",
"dataset",
"further investigation",
"solution",
"reduction",
"total",
"proof",
"camera",
"significant reduction",
"camera system"
],
"name": "In-Car Cameras and Police Accountability in Use of Force Incidents",
"pagination": "1-14",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1141037234"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1141037234"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-20T07:38",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220519/entities/gbq_results/article/article_883.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
146 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
101 URIs
91 LITERALS
4 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:16 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:1602 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | N9991ffefaebc4654a27c60e9bbb0fe98 |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3 |
5 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s11896-019-09346-1 |
6 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2021-09-10 |
7 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2021-09-10 |
8 | ″ | schema:description | New policing technologies have generated solutions to many policing issues. In particular, portable camera systems (in-car or body-worn) have been offered as a tool to address the issue of police excessive use of force. It has been argued that police camera systems increase transparency in law enforcement and deter both police officers and citizens from engaging in undesirable behaviors during encounters. However, the question of how effective these technologies are in increasing the accountability of police departments still remains unanswered. Some argue that the use of camera systems to record police behavior does not create a significant reduction in excessive use-of-force complaints or does not serve as an effective accountability tool as expected. From this perspective, this study explores the impact of in-car camera usage on police use-of-force investigations. This research examines the impact of in-car cameras on the total, dismissed, and sustained excessive use-of-force complaints against 891 police departments in the USA with more than 100 sworn officers. We employed Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) 2007 dataset to conduct this analysis. We utilized negative binomial regression analysis in STATA 15 to examine whether the adoption of vehicle camera systems by police agencies has an impact on dismissed and sustained complaints of inappropriate use-of-force. We found that the adoption of in-car cameras correlates with the number of dismissed cases; however, we did not find any significant relationship between in-car camera usage and sustained cases. Police departments using in-car camera systems are more likely to dismiss citizen complaints, rather than sustaining them. We concluded that video footages generated by in-car camera systems are inadequate in producing evidence to back up the complainants’ claims or in generating proof of excessive use of force for further investigation. Our findings suggest that police departments should not solely rely on in-car cameras if they want to enhance accountability and unearth police misconduct within their department. |
9 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
10 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
11 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
12 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | sg:journal.1053097 |
13 | ″ | schema:keywords | Department |
14 | ″ | ″ | Enforcement Management |
15 | ″ | ″ | Law Enforcement Management |
16 | ″ | ″ | Stata 15 |
17 | ″ | ″ | USA |
18 | ″ | ″ | accountability |
19 | ″ | ″ | accountability tools |
20 | ″ | ″ | adoption |
21 | ″ | ″ | agencies |
22 | ″ | ″ | analysis |
23 | ″ | ″ | behavior |
24 | ″ | ″ | binomial regression analysis |
25 | ″ | ″ | camera |
26 | ″ | ″ | camera system |
27 | ″ | ″ | camera usage |
28 | ″ | ″ | car camera |
29 | ″ | ″ | car camera system |
30 | ″ | ″ | cases |
31 | ″ | ″ | citizen complaints |
32 | ″ | ″ | citizens |
33 | ″ | ″ | claims |
34 | ″ | ″ | complainants |
35 | ″ | ″ | complaints |
36 | ″ | ″ | dataset |
37 | ″ | ″ | encounters |
38 | ″ | ″ | enforcement |
39 | ″ | ″ | evidence |
40 | ″ | ″ | excessive use |
41 | ″ | ″ | findings |
42 | ″ | ″ | footage |
43 | ″ | ″ | force |
44 | ″ | ″ | force complaints |
45 | ″ | ″ | force incidents |
46 | ″ | ″ | force investigation |
47 | ″ | ″ | further investigation |
48 | ″ | ″ | impact |
49 | ″ | ″ | inappropriate use |
50 | ″ | ″ | incidents |
51 | ″ | ″ | investigation |
52 | ″ | ″ | issues |
53 | ″ | ″ | law enforcement |
54 | ″ | ″ | management |
55 | ″ | ″ | misconduct |
56 | ″ | ″ | negative binomial regression analysis |
57 | ″ | ″ | number |
58 | ″ | ″ | officers |
59 | ″ | ″ | perspective |
60 | ″ | ″ | police accountability |
61 | ″ | ″ | police agencies |
62 | ″ | ″ | police behavior |
63 | ″ | ″ | police departments |
64 | ″ | ″ | police misconduct |
65 | ″ | ″ | police officers |
66 | ″ | ″ | police use |
67 | ″ | ″ | portable camera system |
68 | ″ | ″ | proof |
69 | ″ | ″ | questions |
70 | ″ | ″ | reduction |
71 | ″ | ″ | regression analysis |
72 | ″ | ″ | relationship |
73 | ″ | ″ | research |
74 | ″ | ″ | significant reduction |
75 | ″ | ″ | significant relationship |
76 | ″ | ″ | solution |
77 | ″ | ″ | study |
78 | ″ | ″ | sustained case |
79 | ″ | ″ | system |
80 | ″ | ″ | technology |
81 | ″ | ″ | tool |
82 | ″ | ″ | total |
83 | ″ | ″ | transparency |
84 | ″ | ″ | undesirable behavior |
85 | ″ | ″ | usage |
86 | ″ | ″ | use |
87 | ″ | ″ | vehicle camera systems |
88 | ″ | ″ | video footage |
89 | ″ | schema:name | In-Car Cameras and Police Accountability in Use of Force Incidents |
90 | ″ | schema:pagination | 1-14 |
91 | ″ | schema:productId | N1a2839643bc0467ea33c6444ff2fb95a |
92 | ″ | ″ | N1c433194c5ec41098d83d361767e18fb |
93 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1141037234 |
94 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9 |
95 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-05-20T07:38 |
96 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
97 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | N177533ea115e4dae99c25293aab999a9 |
98 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9 |
99 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
100 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
101 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
102 | N177533ea115e4dae99c25293aab999a9 | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
103 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
104 | N1a2839643bc0467ea33c6444ff2fb95a | schema:name | dimensions_id |
105 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1141037234 |
106 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
107 | N1c433194c5ec41098d83d361767e18fb | schema:name | doi |
108 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/s11896-021-09472-9 |
109 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
110 | N9991ffefaebc4654a27c60e9bbb0fe98 | rdf:first | sg:person.015343333743.11 |
111 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nb856d2527417440b9305a0cf6ec304b0 |
112 | Nb856d2527417440b9305a0cf6ec304b0 | rdf:first | sg:person.015473434050.88 |
113 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
114 | anzsrc-for:16 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
115 | ″ | schema:name | Studies in Human Society |
116 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
117 | anzsrc-for:1602 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
118 | ″ | schema:name | Criminology |
119 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
120 | sg:journal.1053097 | schema:issn | 0882-0783 |
121 | ″ | ″ | 1936-6469 |
122 | ″ | schema:name | Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology |
123 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
124 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
125 | sg:person.015343333743.11 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.262550.6 |
126 | ″ | schema:familyName | Sahin |
127 | ″ | schema:givenName | Nusret M. |
128 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015343333743.11 |
129 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
130 | sg:person.015473434050.88 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.63124.32 |
131 | ″ | schema:familyName | Cubukcu |
132 | ″ | schema:givenName | Suat |
133 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015473434050.88 |
134 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
135 | sg:pub.10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1027417793 |
136 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3 |
137 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
138 | sg:pub.10.1007/s11896-019-09346-1 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1120988696 |
139 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09346-1 |
140 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
141 | grid-institutes:grid.262550.6 | schema:alternateName | School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Stockton University, 101 Vera King Farris Drive, 08205-9441, Galloway, NJ, USA |
142 | ″ | schema:name | School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Stockton University, 101 Vera King Farris Drive, 08205-9441, Galloway, NJ, USA |
143 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
144 | grid-institutes:grid.63124.32 | schema:alternateName | Justice, Law, and Criminology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, 20016, Washington, DC, NW, USA |
145 | ″ | schema:name | Justice, Law, and Criminology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, 20016, Washington, DC, NW, USA |
146 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |