Performance comparison of two efficient genomic selection methods (gsbay & MixP) applied in aquacultural organisms View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

2017-01-08

AUTHORS

Hailin Su, Hengde Li, Shi Wang, Yangfan Wang, Zhenmin Bao

ABSTRACT

Genomic selection is more and more popular in animal and plant breeding industries all around the world, as it can be applied early in life without impacting selection candidates. The objective of this study was to bring the advantages of genomic selection to scallop breeding. Two different genomic selection tools MixP and gsbay were applied on genomic evaluation of simulated data and Zhikong scallop (Chlamys farreri) field data. The data were compared with genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method which has been applied widely. Our results showed that both MixP and gsbay could accurately estimate single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker effects, and thereby could be applied for the analysis of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). In simulated data from different scenarios, the accuracy of GEBV acquired was ranged from 0.20 to 0.78 by MixP; it was ranged from 0.21 to 0.67 by gsbay; and it was ranged from 0.21 to 0.61 by GBLUP. Estimations made by MixP and gsbay were expected to be more reliable than those estimated by GBLUP. Predictions made by gsbay were more robust, while with MixP the computation is much faster, especially in dealing with large-scale data. These results suggested that both algorithms implemented by MixP and gsbay are feasible to carry out genomic selection in scallop breeding, and more genotype data will be necessary to produce genomic estimated breeding values with a higher accuracy for the industry. More... »

PAGES

137-144

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1047871264


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/04", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Earth Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0405", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Oceanography", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, 266003, Qingdao, P. R. China", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.4422.0", 
          "name": [
            "College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, 266003, Qingdao, P. R. China"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Su", 
        "givenName": "Hailin", 
        "id": "sg:person.0700023104.14", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0700023104.14"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "The Center for Applied Aquatic Genomics, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, 100141, Beijing, P. R. China", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.43308.3c", 
          "name": [
            "The Center for Applied Aquatic Genomics, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, 100141, Beijing, P. R. China"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Li", 
        "givenName": "Hengde", 
        "id": "sg:person.0736555162.75", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0736555162.75"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, 266003, Qingdao, P. R. China", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.4422.0", 
          "name": [
            "College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, 266003, Qingdao, P. R. China"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Wang", 
        "givenName": "Shi", 
        "id": "sg:person.01104322375.72", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01104322375.72"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, 266003, Qingdao, P. R. China", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.4422.0", 
          "name": [
            "College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, 266003, Qingdao, P. R. China"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Wang", 
        "givenName": "Yangfan", 
        "id": "sg:person.011640126705.52", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011640126705.52"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, 266003, Qingdao, P. R. China", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.4422.0", 
          "name": [
            "College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, 266003, Qingdao, P. R. China"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Bao", 
        "givenName": "Zhenmin", 
        "id": "sg:person.01346444540.04", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01346444540.04"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1039665694", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s12711-016-0193-1", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045801083", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-016-0193-1"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1011541525", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1038/nmeth.2023", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1030462219", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2023"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1745-6150-7-17", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052414932", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-7-17"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1297-9686-43-35", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1033984593", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-43-35"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2017-01-08", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2017-01-08", 
    "description": "Genomic selection is more and more popular in animal and plant breeding industries all around the world, as it can be applied early in life without impacting selection candidates. The objective of this study was to bring the advantages of genomic selection to scallop breeding. Two different genomic selection tools MixP and gsbay were applied on genomic evaluation of simulated data and Zhikong scallop (Chlamys farreri) field data. The data were compared with genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method which has been applied widely. Our results showed that both MixP and gsbay could accurately estimate single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker effects, and thereby could be applied for the analysis of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). In simulated data from different scenarios, the accuracy of GEBV acquired was ranged from 0.20 to 0.78 by MixP; it was ranged from 0.21 to 0.67 by gsbay; and it was ranged from 0.21 to 0.61 by GBLUP. Estimations made by MixP and gsbay were expected to be more reliable than those estimated by GBLUP. Predictions made by gsbay were more robust, while with MixP the computation is much faster, especially in dealing with large-scale data. These results suggested that both algorithms implemented by MixP and gsbay are feasible to carry out genomic selection in scallop breeding, and more genotype data will be necessary to produce genomic estimated breeding values with a higher accuracy for the industry.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isFundedItemOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:grant.7206176", 
        "type": "MonetaryGrant"
      }
    ], 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1034099", 
        "issn": [
          "1671-2463", 
          "1671-2463"
        ], 
        "name": "Journal of Ocean University of China", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "1", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "16"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "genomic selection", 
      "breeding values", 
      "genomic best linear unbiased prediction method", 
      "best linear unbiased prediction method", 
      "linear unbiased prediction method", 
      "genomic selection methods", 
      "accuracy of GEBV", 
      "plant breeding industry", 
      "selection candidates", 
      "breeding industry", 
      "scallop breeding", 
      "genomic evaluation", 
      "marker effects", 
      "GBLUP", 
      "breeding", 
      "MixP", 
      "genotype data", 
      "field data", 
      "selection", 
      "GEBV", 
      "selection method", 
      "industry", 
      "organisms", 
      "different scenarios", 
      "animals", 
      "objective", 
      "world", 
      "values", 
      "scenarios", 
      "data", 
      "effect", 
      "results", 
      "prediction method", 
      "large-scale data", 
      "estimation", 
      "candidates", 
      "study", 
      "analysis", 
      "simulated data", 
      "evaluation", 
      "comparison", 
      "method", 
      "prediction", 
      "advantages", 
      "high accuracy", 
      "performance comparison", 
      "accuracy", 
      "computation", 
      "life", 
      "algorithm"
    ], 
    "name": "Performance comparison of two efficient genomic selection methods (gsbay & MixP) applied in aquacultural organisms", 
    "pagination": "137-144", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1047871264"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1047871264"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T17:05", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_752.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

163 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      80 URIs      66 LITERALS      6 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6 schema:about anzsrc-for:04
2 anzsrc-for:0405
3 schema:author N78b1409d07f44fab9d632dde2a1e40d8
4 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0
5 sg:pub.10.1038/nmeth.2023
6 sg:pub.10.1186/1297-9686-43-35
7 sg:pub.10.1186/1745-6150-7-17
8 sg:pub.10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5
9 sg:pub.10.1186/s12711-016-0193-1
10 schema:datePublished 2017-01-08
11 schema:datePublishedReg 2017-01-08
12 schema:description Genomic selection is more and more popular in animal and plant breeding industries all around the world, as it can be applied early in life without impacting selection candidates. The objective of this study was to bring the advantages of genomic selection to scallop breeding. Two different genomic selection tools MixP and gsbay were applied on genomic evaluation of simulated data and Zhikong scallop (Chlamys farreri) field data. The data were compared with genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method which has been applied widely. Our results showed that both MixP and gsbay could accurately estimate single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker effects, and thereby could be applied for the analysis of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). In simulated data from different scenarios, the accuracy of GEBV acquired was ranged from 0.20 to 0.78 by MixP; it was ranged from 0.21 to 0.67 by gsbay; and it was ranged from 0.21 to 0.61 by GBLUP. Estimations made by MixP and gsbay were expected to be more reliable than those estimated by GBLUP. Predictions made by gsbay were more robust, while with MixP the computation is much faster, especially in dealing with large-scale data. These results suggested that both algorithms implemented by MixP and gsbay are feasible to carry out genomic selection in scallop breeding, and more genotype data will be necessary to produce genomic estimated breeding values with a higher accuracy for the industry.
13 schema:genre article
14 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
15 schema:isPartOf N81dd14260cd84af9876973f4ebec53a9
16 Nd91c1716f94945f2b71e3d53e1c486cb
17 sg:journal.1034099
18 schema:keywords GBLUP
19 GEBV
20 MixP
21 accuracy
22 accuracy of GEBV
23 advantages
24 algorithm
25 analysis
26 animals
27 best linear unbiased prediction method
28 breeding
29 breeding industry
30 breeding values
31 candidates
32 comparison
33 computation
34 data
35 different scenarios
36 effect
37 estimation
38 evaluation
39 field data
40 genomic best linear unbiased prediction method
41 genomic evaluation
42 genomic selection
43 genomic selection methods
44 genotype data
45 high accuracy
46 industry
47 large-scale data
48 life
49 linear unbiased prediction method
50 marker effects
51 method
52 objective
53 organisms
54 performance comparison
55 plant breeding industry
56 prediction
57 prediction method
58 results
59 scallop breeding
60 scenarios
61 selection
62 selection candidates
63 selection method
64 simulated data
65 study
66 values
67 world
68 schema:name Performance comparison of two efficient genomic selection methods (gsbay & MixP) applied in aquacultural organisms
69 schema:pagination 137-144
70 schema:productId N80cb2c72d4834d738f5f3af70d75e05c
71 Nbaa027d73b0a43159a0b43a4717636f6
72 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1047871264
73 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6
74 schema:sdDatePublished 2022-08-04T17:05
75 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
76 schema:sdPublisher Nebc1ca1eb0074eeb8ea78a101da72c89
77 schema:url https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6
78 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
79 sgo:sdDataset articles
80 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
81 N0f64a96a80354425b57127898aa1b12d rdf:first sg:person.01104322375.72
82 rdf:rest Nb46807a182464728b75d54e65c825af5
83 N78b1409d07f44fab9d632dde2a1e40d8 rdf:first sg:person.0700023104.14
84 rdf:rest Nd1d3800e7607417c8576700d76ac2b7e
85 N80cb2c72d4834d738f5f3af70d75e05c schema:name doi
86 schema:value 10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6
87 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
88 N81dd14260cd84af9876973f4ebec53a9 schema:volumeNumber 16
89 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
90 N8e68aa5a6fce455089206a60bbe809e9 rdf:first sg:person.01346444540.04
91 rdf:rest rdf:nil
92 Nb46807a182464728b75d54e65c825af5 rdf:first sg:person.011640126705.52
93 rdf:rest N8e68aa5a6fce455089206a60bbe809e9
94 Nbaa027d73b0a43159a0b43a4717636f6 schema:name dimensions_id
95 schema:value pub.1047871264
96 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
97 Nd1d3800e7607417c8576700d76ac2b7e rdf:first sg:person.0736555162.75
98 rdf:rest N0f64a96a80354425b57127898aa1b12d
99 Nd91c1716f94945f2b71e3d53e1c486cb schema:issueNumber 1
100 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
101 Nebc1ca1eb0074eeb8ea78a101da72c89 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
102 rdf:type schema:Organization
103 anzsrc-for:04 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
104 schema:name Earth Sciences
105 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
106 anzsrc-for:0405 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
107 schema:name Oceanography
108 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
109 sg:grant.7206176 http://pending.schema.org/fundedItem sg:pub.10.1007/s11802-017-3073-6
110 rdf:type schema:MonetaryGrant
111 sg:journal.1034099 schema:issn 1671-2463
112 schema:name Journal of Ocean University of China
113 schema:publisher Springer Nature
114 rdf:type schema:Periodical
115 sg:person.01104322375.72 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.4422.0
116 schema:familyName Wang
117 schema:givenName Shi
118 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01104322375.72
119 rdf:type schema:Person
120 sg:person.011640126705.52 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.4422.0
121 schema:familyName Wang
122 schema:givenName Yangfan
123 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011640126705.52
124 rdf:type schema:Person
125 sg:person.01346444540.04 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.4422.0
126 schema:familyName Bao
127 schema:givenName Zhenmin
128 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01346444540.04
129 rdf:type schema:Person
130 sg:person.0700023104.14 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.4422.0
131 schema:familyName Su
132 schema:givenName Hailin
133 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0700023104.14
134 rdf:type schema:Person
135 sg:person.0736555162.75 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.43308.3c
136 schema:familyName Li
137 schema:givenName Hengde
138 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0736555162.75
139 rdf:type schema:Person
140 sg:pub.10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1011541525
141 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0
142 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
143 sg:pub.10.1038/nmeth.2023 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1030462219
144 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2023
145 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
146 sg:pub.10.1186/1297-9686-43-35 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1033984593
147 https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-43-35
148 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
149 sg:pub.10.1186/1745-6150-7-17 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052414932
150 https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-7-17
151 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
152 sg:pub.10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1039665694
153 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0133-5
154 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
155 sg:pub.10.1186/s12711-016-0193-1 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045801083
156 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-016-0193-1
157 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
158 grid-institutes:grid.43308.3c schema:alternateName The Center for Applied Aquatic Genomics, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, 100141, Beijing, P. R. China
159 schema:name The Center for Applied Aquatic Genomics, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, 100141, Beijing, P. R. China
160 rdf:type schema:Organization
161 grid-institutes:grid.4422.0 schema:alternateName College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, 266003, Qingdao, P. R. China
162 schema:name College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, 266003, Qingdao, P. R. China
163 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...