Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle
2010-05-05
AUTHORSL. Mamy, V. Letouzey, P. Merviel, J. Gondry, P. Mares, P. Costa, R. de Tayrac
ABSTRACTObjectiveThe aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaginal surgery using mesh in women with recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse after abdominal sacrocolpopexy, in comparison with primary repair.Material and methodsPatients operated for recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse after abdominal sacrocolpopexy (study group) were retrospectively analyzed and compared with patients operated for anterior vaginal wall prolapse as primary repair (control group). All patients have been operated with an anterior type 1 polypropylene mesh. Preoperative evaluation included history, POP-Q classification and symptoms and quality of life questionnaires. Intra- and post-operative complications were recorded. Associated procedures, such as vaginal hysterectomy, sacrospinous fixation, posterior repair and sub-urethral sling, were also reported. After surgery, patients were seen at 6 weeks, 6 months, one and two years, using POP-Q classification, satisfaction index and symptoms and quality of life questionnaires. To complete follow-up, patients who were not seen recently had phone interviews on POP symptoms, satisfaction and late complications. Objective success was defined by the absence of anatomical recurrence of anterior vaginal wall prolapse (Ba < −1) at last follow-up.ResultsThe study included 65 implanted patients (32 in the study group and 33 in the control group). In the study group, one patient died from a cancer and two were lost to followup, leaving 29/32 patients available for analysis. In the control group, three patients have previously undergone vaginal surgery and one was lost to follow-up, leaving 29/33 patients available. In the study group, 17/29 patients underwent a transobturator four arms mesh (Ugytex®, Sofradim-Covidien), and 12/29 under went another operation — type 1 polypropylene mesh (Polyform®, Boston Scientific) fixed bilaterally to the arcus tendineus fascia pelvis and to the sacrospinous ligament using the Capio® (Boston Scientific). In the control group, 20/29 patients underwent the transobturator four arms mesh, and 9/29 underwent the mesh fixed bilaterally to the arcus tendineus fascia pelvis and to the sacrospinous ligament operation. Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline were similar in both groups, except for previous POP surgery, previous hysterectomy and previous SUI surgery, more frequent in the study group. Associated procedures (sacrospinous fixation, posterior repair and sub-urethral sling) were more frequent in the control group.With a mean follow-up time of 22 ± 12 months in the study group and 23 ± 14 months in the control group, objective success on the anterior compartment were 25/29 (86.2%) and 28/29 (93.1%), respectively (P > 0.05). Although all patients were satisfied with results of surgery, one patient in each group had a recurrence of apical defect (P > 0.05), no patient in the control group had a recurrence of posterior compartment prolapse (P > 0.05), and 7/20 (35%) patients in the study group had de novo posterior compartment prolapse (P < 0.05). Postoperative symptoms and quality of life evaluation were similar in both groups. De novo dyspareunia occurred in1/8 (12.5%) and 2/13 (15.4%) patients, in the study and the control group, respectively (P > 0.05). Overall rates of complications were 6/29 (20.7%) and 5/29 (17.2%), in the study and the control group (P > 0.05), respectively, including one ureteral kinking (3.4%) in the study group and 1/29 (3.4%) rate of vaginal erosion, which has necessitated re-operation in each group.ConclusionVaginal surgery using mesh is a valid option in women with recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. More... »
PAGES89-96
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1046120334
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Medical and Health Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1103",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Clinical Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CGO, 124, rue Camille-Desmoulins, F-80054, Amiens, France",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CHU Car\u00e9meau, place du Pr Robert-Debr\u00e9, F-30029, N\u00eemes cedex 09, France",
"Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CGO, 124, rue Camille-Desmoulins, F-80054, Amiens, France"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Mamy",
"givenName": "L.",
"id": "sg:person.01307217745.06",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01307217745.06"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CHU Car\u00e9meau, place du Pr Robert-Debr\u00e9, F-30029, N\u00eemes cedex 09, France",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.411165.6",
"name": [
"Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CHU Car\u00e9meau, place du Pr Robert-Debr\u00e9, F-30029, N\u00eemes cedex 09, France"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Letouzey",
"givenName": "V.",
"id": "sg:person.01263643110.24",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01263643110.24"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CGO, 124, rue Camille-Desmoulins, F-80054, Amiens, France",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CGO, 124, rue Camille-Desmoulins, F-80054, Amiens, France"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Merviel",
"givenName": "P.",
"id": "sg:person.0677221302.45",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0677221302.45"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CGO, 124, rue Camille-Desmoulins, F-80054, Amiens, France",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CGO, 124, rue Camille-Desmoulins, F-80054, Amiens, France"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Gondry",
"givenName": "J.",
"id": "sg:person.0603472723.13",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0603472723.13"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CHU Car\u00e9meau, place du Pr Robert-Debr\u00e9, F-30029, N\u00eemes cedex 09, France",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.411165.6",
"name": [
"Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CHU Car\u00e9meau, place du Pr Robert-Debr\u00e9, F-30029, N\u00eemes cedex 09, France"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Mares",
"givenName": "P.",
"id": "sg:person.01271327567.50",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01271327567.50"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Service d\u2019urologie, CHU Car\u00e9meau, place du Pr Robert-Debr\u00e9, F-30029, N\u00eemes, France",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.411165.6",
"name": [
"Service d\u2019urologie, CHU Car\u00e9meau, place du Pr Robert-Debr\u00e9, F-30029, N\u00eemes, France"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Costa",
"givenName": "P.",
"id": "sg:person.01165131466.26",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01165131466.26"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CHU Car\u00e9meau, place du Pr Robert-Debr\u00e9, F-30029, N\u00eemes cedex 09, France",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.411165.6",
"name": [
"Service de gyn\u00e9cologie-obst\u00e9trique, CHU Car\u00e9meau, place du Pr Robert-Debr\u00e9, F-30029, N\u00eemes cedex 09, France"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "de Tayrac",
"givenName": "R.",
"id": "sg:person.046406024.48",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.046406024.48"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s001920170017",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007978339",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920170017"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00192-007-0465-y",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010773791",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0465-y"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00192-007-0516-4",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1034400826",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0516-4"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00192-003-1066-z",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1047892557",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1066-z"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2010-05-05",
"datePublishedReg": "2010-05-05",
"description": "ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaginal surgery using mesh in women with recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse after abdominal sacrocolpopexy, in comparison with primary repair.Material and methodsPatients operated for recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse after abdominal sacrocolpopexy (study group) were retrospectively analyzed and compared with patients operated for anterior vaginal wall prolapse as primary repair (control group). All patients have been operated with an anterior type 1 polypropylene mesh. Preoperative evaluation included history, POP-Q classification and symptoms and quality of life questionnaires. Intra- and post-operative complications were recorded. Associated procedures, such as vaginal hysterectomy, sacrospinous fixation, posterior repair and sub-urethral sling, were also reported. After surgery, patients were seen at 6 weeks, 6 months, one and two years, using POP-Q classification, satisfaction index and symptoms and quality of life questionnaires. To complete follow-up, patients who were not seen recently had phone interviews on POP symptoms, satisfaction and late complications. Objective success was defined by the absence of anatomical recurrence of anterior vaginal wall prolapse (Ba < \u22121) at last follow-up.ResultsThe study included 65 implanted patients (32 in the study group and 33 in the control group). In the study group, one patient died from a cancer and two were lost to followup, leaving 29/32 patients available for analysis. In the control group, three patients have previously undergone vaginal surgery and one was lost to follow-up, leaving 29/33 patients available. In the study group, 17/29 patients underwent a transobturator four arms mesh (Ugytex\u00ae, Sofradim-Covidien), and 12/29 under went another operation \u2014 type 1 polypropylene mesh (Polyform\u00ae, Boston Scientific) fixed bilaterally to the arcus tendineus fascia pelvis and to the sacrospinous ligament using the Capio\u00ae (Boston Scientific). In the control group, 20/29 patients underwent the transobturator four arms mesh, and 9/29 underwent the mesh fixed bilaterally to the arcus tendineus fascia pelvis and to the sacrospinous ligament operation. Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline were similar in both groups, except for previous POP surgery, previous hysterectomy and previous SUI surgery, more frequent in the study group. Associated procedures (sacrospinous fixation, posterior repair and sub-urethral sling) were more frequent in the control group.With a mean follow-up time of 22 \u00b1 12 months in the study group and 23 \u00b1 14 months in the control group, objective success on the anterior compartment were 25/29 (86.2%) and 28/29 (93.1%), respectively (P > 0.05). Although all patients were satisfied with results of surgery, one patient in each group had a recurrence of apical defect (P > 0.05), no patient in the control group had a recurrence of posterior compartment prolapse (P > 0.05), and 7/20 (35%) patients in the study group had de novo posterior compartment prolapse (P < 0.05). Postoperative symptoms and quality of life evaluation were similar in both groups. De novo dyspareunia occurred in1/8 (12.5%) and 2/13 (15.4%) patients, in the study and the control group, respectively (P > 0.05). Overall rates of complications were 6/29 (20.7%) and 5/29 (17.2%), in the study and the control group (P > 0.05), respectively, including one ureteral kinking (3.4%) in the study group and 1/29 (3.4%) rate of vaginal erosion, which has necessitated re-operation in each group.ConclusionVaginal surgery using mesh is a valid option in women with recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse after abdominal sacrocolpopexy.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1040392",
"issn": [
"1778-3712",
"1778-3720"
],
"name": "Pelvi-p\u00e9rin\u00e9ologie",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "2",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "6"
}
],
"keywords": [
"anterior vaginal wall prolapse",
"recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse",
"vaginal wall prolapse",
"POP-Q classification",
"arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis",
"posterior compartment prolapse",
"study group",
"tendineus fasciae pelvis",
"abdominal sacrocolpopexy",
"control group",
"vaginal surgery",
"primary repair",
"Life Questionnaire",
"Associated procedures",
"type 1 polypropylene mesh",
"polypropylene mesh",
"sub-urethral sling",
"previous POP surgery",
"previous SUI surgery",
"de novo dyspareunia",
"post-operative complications",
"results of surgery",
"objective success",
"SUI surgery",
"previous hysterectomy",
"mean follow",
"postoperative symptoms",
"novo dyspareunia",
"sacrospinous fixation",
"POP symptoms",
"late complications",
"clinical characteristics",
"vaginal hysterectomy",
"preoperative evaluation",
"POP surgery",
"vaginal erosion",
"anatomical recurrence",
"ureteral kinking",
"posterior repair",
"sacrospinous ligament",
"ResultsThe study",
"prolapse",
"surgery",
"patients",
"anterior compartment",
"symptoms",
"complications",
"valid option",
"sacrocolpopexy",
"recurrence",
"apical defects",
"phone interviews",
"hysterectomy",
"months",
"overall rate",
"pelvis",
"women",
"repair",
"group",
"questionnaire",
"promontofixation",
"MethodsPatients",
"dyspareunia",
"sling",
"follow",
"cancer",
"study",
"ligament",
"baseline",
"life evaluation",
"weeks",
"efficacy",
"evaluation",
"satisfaction index",
"rate",
"safety",
"procedure",
"fixation",
"kinking",
"options",
"aim",
"years",
"quality",
"compartments",
"index",
"absence",
"intra",
"history",
"satisfaction",
"classification",
"success",
"interviews",
"Capio",
"defects",
"time",
"comparison",
"analysis",
"results",
"characteristics",
"mesh",
"erosion",
"operation",
"materials"
],
"name": "La chirurgie vaginale proth\u00e9tique est-elle une strat\u00e9gie valide chez une patiente pr\u00e9sentant une cystoc\u00e8le r\u00e9cidiv\u00e9e apr\u00e8s promontofixation ?",
"pagination": "89-96",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1046120334"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1046120334"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T16:58",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_524.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
224 TRIPLES
21 PREDICATES
131 URIs
119 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:11 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:1103 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | N65aefe5839d64a6aa7ef4c44d9c6db0c |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/s00192-003-1066-z |
5 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s00192-007-0465-y |
6 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s00192-007-0516-4 |
7 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s001920170017 |
8 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2010-05-05 |
9 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2010-05-05 |
10 | ″ | schema:description | ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaginal surgery using mesh in women with recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse after abdominal sacrocolpopexy, in comparison with primary repair.Material and methodsPatients operated for recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse after abdominal sacrocolpopexy (study group) were retrospectively analyzed and compared with patients operated for anterior vaginal wall prolapse as primary repair (control group). All patients have been operated with an anterior type 1 polypropylene mesh. Preoperative evaluation included history, POP-Q classification and symptoms and quality of life questionnaires. Intra- and post-operative complications were recorded. Associated procedures, such as vaginal hysterectomy, sacrospinous fixation, posterior repair and sub-urethral sling, were also reported. After surgery, patients were seen at 6 weeks, 6 months, one and two years, using POP-Q classification, satisfaction index and symptoms and quality of life questionnaires. To complete follow-up, patients who were not seen recently had phone interviews on POP symptoms, satisfaction and late complications. Objective success was defined by the absence of anatomical recurrence of anterior vaginal wall prolapse (Ba < −1) at last follow-up.ResultsThe study included 65 implanted patients (32 in the study group and 33 in the control group). In the study group, one patient died from a cancer and two were lost to followup, leaving 29/32 patients available for analysis. In the control group, three patients have previously undergone vaginal surgery and one was lost to follow-up, leaving 29/33 patients available. In the study group, 17/29 patients underwent a transobturator four arms mesh (Ugytex®, Sofradim-Covidien), and 12/29 under went another operation — type 1 polypropylene mesh (Polyform®, Boston Scientific) fixed bilaterally to the arcus tendineus fascia pelvis and to the sacrospinous ligament using the Capio® (Boston Scientific). In the control group, 20/29 patients underwent the transobturator four arms mesh, and 9/29 underwent the mesh fixed bilaterally to the arcus tendineus fascia pelvis and to the sacrospinous ligament operation. Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline were similar in both groups, except for previous POP surgery, previous hysterectomy and previous SUI surgery, more frequent in the study group. Associated procedures (sacrospinous fixation, posterior repair and sub-urethral sling) were more frequent in the control group.With a mean follow-up time of 22 ± 12 months in the study group and 23 ± 14 months in the control group, objective success on the anterior compartment were 25/29 (86.2%) and 28/29 (93.1%), respectively (P > 0.05). Although all patients were satisfied with results of surgery, one patient in each group had a recurrence of apical defect (P > 0.05), no patient in the control group had a recurrence of posterior compartment prolapse (P > 0.05), and 7/20 (35%) patients in the study group had de novo posterior compartment prolapse (P < 0.05). Postoperative symptoms and quality of life evaluation were similar in both groups. De novo dyspareunia occurred in1/8 (12.5%) and 2/13 (15.4%) patients, in the study and the control group, respectively (P > 0.05). Overall rates of complications were 6/29 (20.7%) and 5/29 (17.2%), in the study and the control group (P > 0.05), respectively, including one ureteral kinking (3.4%) in the study group and 1/29 (3.4%) rate of vaginal erosion, which has necessitated re-operation in each group.ConclusionVaginal surgery using mesh is a valid option in women with recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. |
11 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
12 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
13 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N6b6aa97425374d9c8ff40ea1ce4e388d |
14 | ″ | ″ | Nd00a7d3792844f8fa163c6ebfd2c5adf |
15 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1040392 |
16 | ″ | schema:keywords | Associated procedures |
17 | ″ | ″ | Capio |
18 | ″ | ″ | Life Questionnaire |
19 | ″ | ″ | MethodsPatients |
20 | ″ | ″ | POP surgery |
21 | ″ | ″ | POP symptoms |
22 | ″ | ″ | POP-Q classification |
23 | ″ | ″ | ResultsThe study |
24 | ″ | ″ | SUI surgery |
25 | ″ | ″ | abdominal sacrocolpopexy |
26 | ″ | ″ | absence |
27 | ″ | ″ | aim |
28 | ″ | ″ | analysis |
29 | ″ | ″ | anatomical recurrence |
30 | ″ | ″ | anterior compartment |
31 | ″ | ″ | anterior vaginal wall prolapse |
32 | ″ | ″ | apical defects |
33 | ″ | ″ | arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis |
34 | ″ | ″ | baseline |
35 | ″ | ″ | cancer |
36 | ″ | ″ | characteristics |
37 | ″ | ″ | classification |
38 | ″ | ″ | clinical characteristics |
39 | ″ | ″ | comparison |
40 | ″ | ″ | compartments |
41 | ″ | ″ | complications |
42 | ″ | ″ | control group |
43 | ″ | ″ | de novo dyspareunia |
44 | ″ | ″ | defects |
45 | ″ | ″ | dyspareunia |
46 | ″ | ″ | efficacy |
47 | ″ | ″ | erosion |
48 | ″ | ″ | evaluation |
49 | ″ | ″ | fixation |
50 | ″ | ″ | follow |
51 | ″ | ″ | group |
52 | ″ | ″ | history |
53 | ″ | ″ | hysterectomy |
54 | ″ | ″ | index |
55 | ″ | ″ | interviews |
56 | ″ | ″ | intra |
57 | ″ | ″ | kinking |
58 | ″ | ″ | late complications |
59 | ″ | ″ | life evaluation |
60 | ″ | ″ | ligament |
61 | ″ | ″ | materials |
62 | ″ | ″ | mean follow |
63 | ″ | ″ | mesh |
64 | ″ | ″ | months |
65 | ″ | ″ | novo dyspareunia |
66 | ″ | ″ | objective success |
67 | ″ | ″ | operation |
68 | ″ | ″ | options |
69 | ″ | ″ | overall rate |
70 | ″ | ″ | patients |
71 | ″ | ″ | pelvis |
72 | ″ | ″ | phone interviews |
73 | ″ | ″ | polypropylene mesh |
74 | ″ | ″ | post-operative complications |
75 | ″ | ″ | posterior compartment prolapse |
76 | ″ | ″ | posterior repair |
77 | ″ | ″ | postoperative symptoms |
78 | ″ | ″ | preoperative evaluation |
79 | ″ | ″ | previous POP surgery |
80 | ″ | ″ | previous SUI surgery |
81 | ″ | ″ | previous hysterectomy |
82 | ″ | ″ | primary repair |
83 | ″ | ″ | procedure |
84 | ″ | ″ | prolapse |
85 | ″ | ″ | promontofixation |
86 | ″ | ″ | quality |
87 | ″ | ″ | questionnaire |
88 | ″ | ″ | rate |
89 | ″ | ″ | recurrence |
90 | ″ | ″ | recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse |
91 | ″ | ″ | repair |
92 | ″ | ″ | results |
93 | ″ | ″ | results of surgery |
94 | ″ | ″ | sacrocolpopexy |
95 | ″ | ″ | sacrospinous fixation |
96 | ″ | ″ | sacrospinous ligament |
97 | ″ | ″ | safety |
98 | ″ | ″ | satisfaction |
99 | ″ | ″ | satisfaction index |
100 | ″ | ″ | sling |
101 | ″ | ″ | study |
102 | ″ | ″ | study group |
103 | ″ | ″ | sub-urethral sling |
104 | ″ | ″ | success |
105 | ″ | ″ | surgery |
106 | ″ | ″ | symptoms |
107 | ″ | ″ | tendineus fasciae pelvis |
108 | ″ | ″ | time |
109 | ″ | ″ | type 1 polypropylene mesh |
110 | ″ | ″ | ureteral kinking |
111 | ″ | ″ | vaginal erosion |
112 | ″ | ″ | vaginal hysterectomy |
113 | ″ | ″ | vaginal surgery |
114 | ″ | ″ | vaginal wall prolapse |
115 | ″ | ″ | valid option |
116 | ″ | ″ | weeks |
117 | ″ | ″ | women |
118 | ″ | ″ | years |
119 | ″ | schema:name | La chirurgie vaginale prothétique est-elle une stratégie valide chez une patiente présentant une cystocèle récidivée après promontofixation ? |
120 | ″ | schema:pagination | 89-96 |
121 | ″ | schema:productId | Nacb16b6debd4445f97a72c6e31dc6a55 |
122 | ″ | ″ | Nf092ff04de5b497f8bf6df7264ae40bc |
123 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1046120334 |
124 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3 |
125 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-08-04T16:58 |
126 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
127 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | Nfd350536ef644e1caa82a73ee0390a48 |
128 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3 |
129 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
130 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
131 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
132 | N0bffcb92199f461086255c812dcc7fe2 | rdf:first | sg:person.0603472723.13 |
133 | ″ | rdf:rest | N99bc4bc53f964e16a54863840a077e1a |
134 | N1410ae71f63c425b8d057d1c1b7d3d39 | rdf:first | sg:person.0677221302.45 |
135 | ″ | rdf:rest | N0bffcb92199f461086255c812dcc7fe2 |
136 | N65aefe5839d64a6aa7ef4c44d9c6db0c | rdf:first | sg:person.01307217745.06 |
137 | ″ | rdf:rest | Na3904f55399c45798a9508e833db99d6 |
138 | N6b6aa97425374d9c8ff40ea1ce4e388d | schema:volumeNumber | 6 |
139 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
140 | N790c0ba466e44b848f71be4bb4d26971 | rdf:first | sg:person.046406024.48 |
141 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
142 | N99bc4bc53f964e16a54863840a077e1a | rdf:first | sg:person.01271327567.50 |
143 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nf97a00fcdc5648b383ce2f371e5e5614 |
144 | Na3904f55399c45798a9508e833db99d6 | rdf:first | sg:person.01263643110.24 |
145 | ″ | rdf:rest | N1410ae71f63c425b8d057d1c1b7d3d39 |
146 | Nacb16b6debd4445f97a72c6e31dc6a55 | schema:name | dimensions_id |
147 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1046120334 |
148 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
149 | Nd00a7d3792844f8fa163c6ebfd2c5adf | schema:issueNumber | 2 |
150 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
151 | Nf092ff04de5b497f8bf6df7264ae40bc | schema:name | doi |
152 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/s11608-010-0312-3 |
153 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
154 | Nf97a00fcdc5648b383ce2f371e5e5614 | rdf:first | sg:person.01165131466.26 |
155 | ″ | rdf:rest | N790c0ba466e44b848f71be4bb4d26971 |
156 | Nfd350536ef644e1caa82a73ee0390a48 | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
157 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
158 | anzsrc-for:11 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
159 | ″ | schema:name | Medical and Health Sciences |
160 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
161 | anzsrc-for:1103 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
162 | ″ | schema:name | Clinical Sciences |
163 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
164 | sg:journal.1040392 | schema:issn | 1778-3712 |
165 | ″ | ″ | 1778-3720 |
166 | ″ | schema:name | Pelvi-périnéologie |
167 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
168 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
169 | sg:person.01165131466.26 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.411165.6 |
170 | ″ | schema:familyName | Costa |
171 | ″ | schema:givenName | P. |
172 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01165131466.26 |
173 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
174 | sg:person.01263643110.24 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.411165.6 |
175 | ″ | schema:familyName | Letouzey |
176 | ″ | schema:givenName | V. |
177 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01263643110.24 |
178 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
179 | sg:person.01271327567.50 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.411165.6 |
180 | ″ | schema:familyName | Mares |
181 | ″ | schema:givenName | P. |
182 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01271327567.50 |
183 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
184 | sg:person.01307217745.06 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
185 | ″ | schema:familyName | Mamy |
186 | ″ | schema:givenName | L. |
187 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01307217745.06 |
188 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
189 | sg:person.046406024.48 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.411165.6 |
190 | ″ | schema:familyName | de Tayrac |
191 | ″ | schema:givenName | R. |
192 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.046406024.48 |
193 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
194 | sg:person.0603472723.13 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
195 | ″ | schema:familyName | Gondry |
196 | ″ | schema:givenName | J. |
197 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0603472723.13 |
198 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
199 | sg:person.0677221302.45 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
200 | ″ | schema:familyName | Merviel |
201 | ″ | schema:givenName | P. |
202 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0677221302.45 |
203 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
204 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00192-003-1066-z | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1047892557 |
205 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1066-z |
206 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
207 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00192-007-0465-y | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010773791 |
208 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0465-y |
209 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
210 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00192-007-0516-4 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1034400826 |
211 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0516-4 |
212 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
213 | sg:pub.10.1007/s001920170017 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007978339 |
214 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920170017 |
215 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
216 | grid-institutes:None | schema:alternateName | Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CGO, 124, rue Camille-Desmoulins, F-80054, Amiens, France |
217 | ″ | schema:name | Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CGO, 124, rue Camille-Desmoulins, F-80054, Amiens, France |
218 | ″ | ″ | Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Carémeau, place du Pr Robert-Debré, F-30029, Nîmes cedex 09, France |
219 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
220 | grid-institutes:grid.411165.6 | schema:alternateName | Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Carémeau, place du Pr Robert-Debré, F-30029, Nîmes cedex 09, France |
221 | ″ | ″ | Service d’urologie, CHU Carémeau, place du Pr Robert-Debré, F-30029, Nîmes, France |
222 | ″ | schema:name | Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Carémeau, place du Pr Robert-Debré, F-30029, Nîmes cedex 09, France |
223 | ″ | ″ | Service d’urologie, CHU Carémeau, place du Pr Robert-Debré, F-30029, Nîmes, France |
224 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |