Ethics and Nanotechnology: Views of Nanotechnology Researchers View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

2008-08

AUTHORS

Robert McGinn

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted of nanotechnology (NT) researchers’ views about ethics in relation to their work. By means of a purpose-built questionnaire, made available on the Internet, the study probed NT researchers’ general attitudes toward and beliefs about ethics in relation to NT, as well as their views about specific NT-related ethical issues. The questionnaire attracted 1,037 respondents from 13 U.S. university-based NT research facilities. Responses to key questionnaire items are summarized and noteworthy findings presented. For most respondents, the ethical responsibilities of NT researchers are not limited to those related to safety and integrity in the laboratory. Most believe that NT researchers also have specific ethical responsibilities to the society in which their research is done and likely to be applied. NT appears to be one of the first areas of contemporary technoscientific activity in which a long-standing belief is being seriously challenged: the belief that society is solely responsible for what happens when a researcher’s work, viewed as neutral and merely enabling, is applied in a particular social context. Survey data reveal that most respondents strongly disagree with that paradigmatic belief. Finally, an index gauging NT researcher sensitivity to ethics and ethical issues related to NT was constructed. A substantial majority of respondents exhibited medium or high levels of sensitivity to ethics in relation to NT. Although most respondents view themselves as not particularly well informed about ethics in relation to NT, a substantial majority are aware of and receptive to ethical issues related to their work, and believe that these issues merit consideration by society and study by current and future NT practitioners. More... »

PAGES

101-131

Journal

TITLE

NanoEthics

ISSUE

2

VOLUME

2

Author Affiliations

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1041038671


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/2203", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Philosophy", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/22", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Philosophy and Religious Studies", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Stanford University", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.168010.e", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Management Science and Engineering, Program in Science, Technology, and Society, Stanford University, 94305-2120, Stanford, CA, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "McGinn", 
        "givenName": "Robert", 
        "id": "sg:person.01006541510.73", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01006541510.73"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/14/3/201", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1024426719"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310701396992", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1058327115"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2008-08", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2008-08-01", 
    "description": "A study was conducted of nanotechnology (NT) researchers\u2019 views about ethics in relation to their work. By means of a purpose-built questionnaire, made available on the Internet, the study probed NT researchers\u2019 general attitudes toward and beliefs about ethics in relation to NT, as well as their views about specific NT-related ethical issues. The questionnaire attracted 1,037 respondents from 13 U.S. university-based NT research facilities. Responses to key questionnaire items are summarized and noteworthy findings presented. For most respondents, the ethical responsibilities of NT researchers are not limited to those related to safety and integrity in the laboratory. Most believe that NT researchers also have specific ethical responsibilities to the society in which their research is done and likely to be applied. NT appears to be one of the first areas of contemporary technoscientific activity in which a long-standing belief is being seriously challenged: the belief that society is solely responsible for what happens when a researcher\u2019s work, viewed as neutral and merely enabling, is applied in a particular social context. Survey data reveal that most respondents strongly disagree with that paradigmatic belief. Finally, an index gauging NT researcher sensitivity to ethics and ethical issues related to NT was constructed. A substantial majority of respondents exhibited medium or high levels of sensitivity to ethics in relation to NT. Although most respondents view themselves as not particularly well informed about ethics in relation to NT, a substantial majority are aware of and receptive to ethical issues related to their work, and believe that these issues merit consideration by society and study by current and future NT practitioners.", 
    "genre": "research_article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0", 
    "inLanguage": [
      "en"
    ], 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1038811", 
        "issn": [
          "1871-4757", 
          "1871-4765"
        ], 
        "name": "NanoEthics", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "2", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "2"
      }
    ], 
    "name": "Ethics and Nanotechnology: Views of Nanotechnology Researchers", 
    "pagination": "101-131", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "readcube_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "c37eb1597408b200212141fcdef69c6b69dee6b0a2f628ee2fea84d62b44e131"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1041038671"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1041038671"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-11T02:11", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000001_0000000264/records_8700_00000523.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2Fs11569-008-0040-0"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

67 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      29 URIs      19 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0 schema:about anzsrc-for:22
2 anzsrc-for:2203
3 schema:author N0b1f0a3740d341088d679bb9ddb9179b
4 schema:citation https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310701396992
5 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/14/3/201
6 schema:datePublished 2008-08
7 schema:datePublishedReg 2008-08-01
8 schema:description A study was conducted of nanotechnology (NT) researchers’ views about ethics in relation to their work. By means of a purpose-built questionnaire, made available on the Internet, the study probed NT researchers’ general attitudes toward and beliefs about ethics in relation to NT, as well as their views about specific NT-related ethical issues. The questionnaire attracted 1,037 respondents from 13 U.S. university-based NT research facilities. Responses to key questionnaire items are summarized and noteworthy findings presented. For most respondents, the ethical responsibilities of NT researchers are not limited to those related to safety and integrity in the laboratory. Most believe that NT researchers also have specific ethical responsibilities to the society in which their research is done and likely to be applied. NT appears to be one of the first areas of contemporary technoscientific activity in which a long-standing belief is being seriously challenged: the belief that society is solely responsible for what happens when a researcher’s work, viewed as neutral and merely enabling, is applied in a particular social context. Survey data reveal that most respondents strongly disagree with that paradigmatic belief. Finally, an index gauging NT researcher sensitivity to ethics and ethical issues related to NT was constructed. A substantial majority of respondents exhibited medium or high levels of sensitivity to ethics in relation to NT. Although most respondents view themselves as not particularly well informed about ethics in relation to NT, a substantial majority are aware of and receptive to ethical issues related to their work, and believe that these issues merit consideration by society and study by current and future NT practitioners.
9 schema:genre research_article
10 schema:inLanguage en
11 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
12 schema:isPartOf N1765e6f8b3aa47ebb96bed82ef878e24
13 N3f769840bba3492987c251297a6eef73
14 sg:journal.1038811
15 schema:name Ethics and Nanotechnology: Views of Nanotechnology Researchers
16 schema:pagination 101-131
17 schema:productId N92bfa5672f38469d9b0145171358f74e
18 Nb4f55a2a8952454892b5937e65d906d2
19 Nd3b1d6cbd6434978ab34fe886b8311c3
20 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1041038671
21 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0
22 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-11T02:11
23 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
24 schema:sdPublisher Nc32e90777f7447e7b6a62544f04b0f5e
25 schema:url http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2Fs11569-008-0040-0
26 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
27 sgo:sdDataset articles
28 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
29 N0b1f0a3740d341088d679bb9ddb9179b rdf:first sg:person.01006541510.73
30 rdf:rest rdf:nil
31 N1765e6f8b3aa47ebb96bed82ef878e24 schema:volumeNumber 2
32 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
33 N3f769840bba3492987c251297a6eef73 schema:issueNumber 2
34 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
35 N92bfa5672f38469d9b0145171358f74e schema:name dimensions_id
36 schema:value pub.1041038671
37 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
38 Nb4f55a2a8952454892b5937e65d906d2 schema:name doi
39 schema:value 10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0
40 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
41 Nc32e90777f7447e7b6a62544f04b0f5e schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
42 rdf:type schema:Organization
43 Nd3b1d6cbd6434978ab34fe886b8311c3 schema:name readcube_id
44 schema:value c37eb1597408b200212141fcdef69c6b69dee6b0a2f628ee2fea84d62b44e131
45 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
46 anzsrc-for:22 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
47 schema:name Philosophy and Religious Studies
48 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
49 anzsrc-for:2203 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
50 schema:name Philosophy
51 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
52 sg:journal.1038811 schema:issn 1871-4757
53 1871-4765
54 schema:name NanoEthics
55 rdf:type schema:Periodical
56 sg:person.01006541510.73 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.168010.e
57 schema:familyName McGinn
58 schema:givenName Robert
59 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01006541510.73
60 rdf:type schema:Person
61 https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310701396992 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1058327115
62 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
63 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/14/3/201 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1024426719
64 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
65 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.168010.e schema:alternateName Stanford University
66 schema:name Department of Management Science and Engineering, Program in Science, Technology, and Society, Stanford University, 94305-2120, Stanford, CA, USA
67 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...