Three Sosaian Responses and a Wittgensteinian Response to the Dream Argument in the Zhuangzi View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

2016-09

AUTHORS

Leo K. C. Cheung

ABSTRACT

Ernest Sosa has proposed at least three responses to the dream argument for skepticism in his writings in the past decade. The first and the main purpose of this paper is to critically examine the three Sosaian responses, as well as a Wittgensteinian response Sosa would endorse, by investigating whether they can refute the six different versions of the dream argument found in a passage in the Zhuangzi. The second purpose of this paper is exactly to offer an exposition of the passage in the Zhuangzi so as to show that there were already sophisticated versions of the dream argument in ancient China. The main results of the critical examination are as follows. For four of the six versions of the dream argument found in the Zhuangzi, each of them can be refuted by either the Wittgensteinian response or one of the three Sosaian responses. With respect to the remaining two versions of the dream argument, one of them can be refuted partially by two of Sosa’s responses. First, that version of the dream argument can be refuted by one of Sosa’s responses, provided the imagination model of dreaming is adopted. Second, it can also be refuted by another of Sosa’s responses without assuming the imagination model of dreaming, though both the view that there is unsafe knowledge and a certain externalist reliabilism need to be adopted. However, another of the two remaining versions of the dream argument cannot be refuted by any of the Sosaian responses, nor the Wittgensteinian response. This shows that the three Sosaian responses and the Wittgensteinian response cannot refute significantly many different versions of the dream argument. Sosa’s responses, including the Wittgensteinian response, therefore are not in general successful in the refutation of he dream argument for skepticism. More... »

PAGES

721-743

References to SciGraph publications

  • 2017-06. The modal account of luck revisited in SYNTHESE
  • 2007-10. Anti-luck epistemology in SYNTHESE
  • 2005-09. Unsafe Knowledge in SYNTHESE
  • 2011-07. Dream Skepticism and the Conditionality Problem in ERKENNTNIS
  • 2009-04. Replies to Brown, Pritchard and Conee in PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
  • Journal

    TITLE

    Philosophia

    ISSUE

    3

    VOLUME

    44

    Author Affiliations

    Identifiers

    URI

    http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11406-016-9732-9

    DOI

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9732-9

    DIMENSIONS

    https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1048035262


    Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
    Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

    JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

    TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

    [
      {
        "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
        "about": [
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1107", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Immunology", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Medical and Health Sciences", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }
        ], 
        "author": [
          {
            "affiliation": {
              "alternateName": "Chinese University of Hong Kong", 
              "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.10784.3a", 
              "name": [
                "Department of Philosophy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong"
              ], 
              "type": "Organization"
            }, 
            "familyName": "Cheung", 
            "givenName": "Leo K. C.", 
            "id": "sg:person.015654227337.50", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015654227337.50"
            ], 
            "type": "Person"
          }
        ], 
        "citation": [
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10670-010-9268-5", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1009613693", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-010-9268-5"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-004-6213-7", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010052688", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6213-7"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-004-6213-7", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010052688", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6213-7"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00564.x", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1022365579"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.33.s13.7", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1030553908"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-006-9039-7", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1037037608", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9039-7"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11098-009-9339-0", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1039916711", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9339-0"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-016-1047-7", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1042820225", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1047-7"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-016-1047-7", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1042820225", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1047-7"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-016-1047-7", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1042820225", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1047-7"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2004.00207.x", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1050886385"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119030614.ch8", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052124080"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.2307/2564624", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1069992973"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2009_2", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1073210049"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247349.001.0001", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1098757873"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297023.001.0001", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1098773493"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }
        ], 
        "datePublished": "2016-09", 
        "datePublishedReg": "2016-09-01", 
        "description": "Ernest Sosa has proposed at least three responses to the dream argument for skepticism in his writings in the past decade. The first and the main purpose of this paper is to critically examine the three Sosaian responses, as well as a Wittgensteinian response Sosa would endorse, by investigating whether they can refute the six different versions of the dream argument found in a passage in the Zhuangzi. The second purpose of this paper is exactly to offer an exposition of the passage in the Zhuangzi so as to show that there were already sophisticated versions of the dream argument in ancient China. The main results of the critical examination are as follows. For four of the six versions of the dream argument found in the Zhuangzi, each of them can be refuted by either the Wittgensteinian response or one of the three Sosaian responses. With respect to the remaining two versions of the dream argument, one of them can be refuted partially by two of Sosa\u2019s responses. First, that version of the dream argument can be refuted by one of Sosa\u2019s responses, provided the imagination model of dreaming is adopted. Second, it can also be refuted by another of Sosa\u2019s responses without assuming the imagination model of dreaming, though both the view that there is unsafe knowledge and a certain externalist reliabilism need to be adopted. However, another of the two remaining versions of the dream argument cannot be refuted by any of the Sosaian responses, nor the Wittgensteinian response. This shows that the three Sosaian responses and the Wittgensteinian response cannot refute significantly many different versions of the dream argument. Sosa\u2019s responses, including the Wittgensteinian response, therefore are not in general successful in the refutation of he dream argument for skepticism.", 
        "genre": "research_article", 
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11406-016-9732-9", 
        "inLanguage": [
          "en"
        ], 
        "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
        "isPartOf": [
          {
            "id": "sg:journal.1327675", 
            "issn": [
              "0048-3893", 
              "1574-9274"
            ], 
            "name": "Philosophia", 
            "type": "Periodical"
          }, 
          {
            "issueNumber": "3", 
            "type": "PublicationIssue"
          }, 
          {
            "type": "PublicationVolume", 
            "volumeNumber": "44"
          }
        ], 
        "name": "Three Sosaian Responses and a Wittgensteinian Response to the Dream Argument in the Zhuangzi", 
        "pagination": "721-743", 
        "productId": [
          {
            "name": "readcube_id", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "e4d4bed95721f59691eb4937ed517f2653f354784ad10ec4a0d7be39c1cc7fcf"
            ]
          }, 
          {
            "name": "doi", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "10.1007/s11406-016-9732-9"
            ]
          }, 
          {
            "name": "dimensions_id", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "pub.1048035262"
            ]
          }
        ], 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9732-9", 
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1048035262"
        ], 
        "sdDataset": "articles", 
        "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-11T12:39", 
        "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
        "sdPublisher": {
          "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000363_0000000363/records_70043_00000002.jsonl", 
        "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
        "url": "https://link.springer.com/10.1007%2Fs11406-016-9732-9"
      }
    ]
     

    Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

    HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

    JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11406-016-9732-9'

    N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11406-016-9732-9'

    Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

    curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11406-016-9732-9'

    RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11406-016-9732-9'


     

    This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

    105 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      40 URIs      19 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

    Subject Predicate Object
    1 sg:pub.10.1007/s11406-016-9732-9 schema:about anzsrc-for:11
    2 anzsrc-for:1107
    3 schema:author N2c8f7ecd7a6b489795623d74a0ae41f4
    4 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1007/s10670-010-9268-5
    5 sg:pub.10.1007/s11098-009-9339-0
    6 sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-004-6213-7
    7 sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-006-9039-7
    8 sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-016-1047-7
    9 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119030614.ch8
    10 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247349.001.0001
    11 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297023.001.0001
    12 https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.33.s13.7
    13 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2004.00207.x
    14 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00564.x
    15 https://doi.org/10.2307/2564624
    16 https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2009_2
    17 schema:datePublished 2016-09
    18 schema:datePublishedReg 2016-09-01
    19 schema:description Ernest Sosa has proposed at least three responses to the dream argument for skepticism in his writings in the past decade. The first and the main purpose of this paper is to critically examine the three Sosaian responses, as well as a Wittgensteinian response Sosa would endorse, by investigating whether they can refute the six different versions of the dream argument found in a passage in the Zhuangzi. The second purpose of this paper is exactly to offer an exposition of the passage in the Zhuangzi so as to show that there were already sophisticated versions of the dream argument in ancient China. The main results of the critical examination are as follows. For four of the six versions of the dream argument found in the Zhuangzi, each of them can be refuted by either the Wittgensteinian response or one of the three Sosaian responses. With respect to the remaining two versions of the dream argument, one of them can be refuted partially by two of Sosa’s responses. First, that version of the dream argument can be refuted by one of Sosa’s responses, provided the imagination model of dreaming is adopted. Second, it can also be refuted by another of Sosa’s responses without assuming the imagination model of dreaming, though both the view that there is unsafe knowledge and a certain externalist reliabilism need to be adopted. However, another of the two remaining versions of the dream argument cannot be refuted by any of the Sosaian responses, nor the Wittgensteinian response. This shows that the three Sosaian responses and the Wittgensteinian response cannot refute significantly many different versions of the dream argument. Sosa’s responses, including the Wittgensteinian response, therefore are not in general successful in the refutation of he dream argument for skepticism.
    20 schema:genre research_article
    21 schema:inLanguage en
    22 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
    23 schema:isPartOf N98e3c608c1d64017a02326674a47ce3e
    24 Nef67e069930745fabbd44af52840bbaf
    25 sg:journal.1327675
    26 schema:name Three Sosaian Responses and a Wittgensteinian Response to the Dream Argument in the Zhuangzi
    27 schema:pagination 721-743
    28 schema:productId N0222c541678244988d566fe5bd710ae8
    29 N08e2170379654d79946abd712257808b
    30 Nb84546220d0f48da8af6185d90f46368
    31 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1048035262
    32 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9732-9
    33 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-11T12:39
    34 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
    35 schema:sdPublisher Naa97cc82735f492b90ea75ac3d831cec
    36 schema:url https://link.springer.com/10.1007%2Fs11406-016-9732-9
    37 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
    38 sgo:sdDataset articles
    39 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
    40 N0222c541678244988d566fe5bd710ae8 schema:name readcube_id
    41 schema:value e4d4bed95721f59691eb4937ed517f2653f354784ad10ec4a0d7be39c1cc7fcf
    42 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    43 N08e2170379654d79946abd712257808b schema:name doi
    44 schema:value 10.1007/s11406-016-9732-9
    45 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    46 N2c8f7ecd7a6b489795623d74a0ae41f4 rdf:first sg:person.015654227337.50
    47 rdf:rest rdf:nil
    48 N98e3c608c1d64017a02326674a47ce3e schema:issueNumber 3
    49 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
    50 Naa97cc82735f492b90ea75ac3d831cec schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
    51 rdf:type schema:Organization
    52 Nb84546220d0f48da8af6185d90f46368 schema:name dimensions_id
    53 schema:value pub.1048035262
    54 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    55 Nef67e069930745fabbd44af52840bbaf schema:volumeNumber 44
    56 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
    57 anzsrc-for:11 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    58 schema:name Medical and Health Sciences
    59 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    60 anzsrc-for:1107 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    61 schema:name Immunology
    62 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    63 sg:journal.1327675 schema:issn 0048-3893
    64 1574-9274
    65 schema:name Philosophia
    66 rdf:type schema:Periodical
    67 sg:person.015654227337.50 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.10784.3a
    68 schema:familyName Cheung
    69 schema:givenName Leo K. C.
    70 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015654227337.50
    71 rdf:type schema:Person
    72 sg:pub.10.1007/s10670-010-9268-5 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1009613693
    73 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-010-9268-5
    74 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    75 sg:pub.10.1007/s11098-009-9339-0 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1039916711
    76 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9339-0
    77 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    78 sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-004-6213-7 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010052688
    79 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-6213-7
    80 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    81 sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-006-9039-7 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1037037608
    82 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9039-7
    83 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    84 sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-016-1047-7 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1042820225
    85 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1047-7
    86 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    87 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119030614.ch8 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052124080
    88 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    89 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247349.001.0001 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1098757873
    90 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    91 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297023.001.0001 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1098773493
    92 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    93 https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.33.s13.7 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1030553908
    94 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    95 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2004.00207.x schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1050886385
    96 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    97 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00564.x schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1022365579
    98 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    99 https://doi.org/10.2307/2564624 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1069992973
    100 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    101 https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2009_2 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1073210049
    102 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    103 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.10784.3a schema:alternateName Chinese University of Hong Kong
    104 schema:name Department of Philosophy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong
    105 rdf:type schema:Organization
     




    Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


    ...