On Two Versions of ‘the Surprise Examination Paradox’ View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

2013-03

AUTHORS

Leo K. C. Cheung

ABSTRACT

In this paper, I consider a popular version of the clever student’s reasoning in the surprise examination case, and demonstrate that a valid argument can be constructed. The valid argument is a reductio ad absurdum with the proposition that the student knows on the morning of the first day that the teacher’s announcement is fulfilled as its reductio. But it would not give rise to any paradox. In the process, I criticize Saul Kripke’s solution and Timothy Williamson’s attack on a key step of the student’s reasoning. I then consider the condemned prisoner case in W. V. Quine’s paper ‘On a So-Called Paradox’. I argue that the prisoner’s reasoning as conceived by Quine is more relevant and reasonable than the student’s argument in the popular version of the surprise examination case. I also argue that Quine’s criticism of the prisoner’s reasoning is correct, and therefore that the condemned prisoner case, and the surprise examination case as well, would not generate any paradox. More... »

PAGES

159-170

References to SciGraph publications

  • 1975-02. The surprise examination paradox in JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC
  • Journal

    TITLE

    Philosophia

    ISSUE

    1

    VOLUME

    41

    Author Affiliations

    Identifiers

    URI

    http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11406-013-9416-7

    DOI

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9416-7

    DIMENSIONS

    https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1017681154


    Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
    Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

    JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

    TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

    [
      {
        "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
        "about": [
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/2203", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Philosophy", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/22", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Philosophy and Religious Studies", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }
        ], 
        "author": [
          {
            "affiliation": {
              "alternateName": "Chinese University of Hong Kong", 
              "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.10784.3a", 
              "name": [
                "Department of Philosophy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong"
              ], 
              "type": "Organization"
            }, 
            "familyName": "Cheung", 
            "givenName": "Leo K. C.", 
            "id": "sg:person.015654227337.50", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015654227337.50"
            ], 
            "type": "Person"
          }
        ], 
        "citation": [
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00263122", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010165187", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00263122"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00263122", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010165187", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00263122"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408212340761", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1027233264"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/lxii.245.65", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1059882747"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/lxxxii.325.125", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1059884682"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511812576", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1098732015"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }
        ], 
        "datePublished": "2013-03", 
        "datePublishedReg": "2013-03-01", 
        "description": "In this paper, I consider a popular version of the clever student\u2019s reasoning in the surprise examination case, and demonstrate that a valid argument can be constructed. The valid argument is a reductio ad absurdum with the proposition that the student knows on the morning of the first day that the teacher\u2019s announcement is fulfilled as its reductio. But it would not give rise to any paradox. In the process, I criticize Saul Kripke\u2019s solution and Timothy Williamson\u2019s attack on a key step of the student\u2019s reasoning. I then consider the condemned prisoner case in W. V. Quine\u2019s paper \u2018On a So-Called Paradox\u2019. I argue that the prisoner\u2019s reasoning as conceived by Quine is more relevant and reasonable than the student\u2019s argument in the popular version of the surprise examination case. I also argue that Quine\u2019s criticism of the prisoner\u2019s reasoning is correct, and therefore that the condemned prisoner case, and the surprise examination case as well, would not generate any paradox.", 
        "genre": "research_article", 
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11406-013-9416-7", 
        "inLanguage": [
          "en"
        ], 
        "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
        "isPartOf": [
          {
            "id": "sg:journal.1327675", 
            "issn": [
              "0048-3893", 
              "1574-9274"
            ], 
            "name": "Philosophia", 
            "type": "Periodical"
          }, 
          {
            "issueNumber": "1", 
            "type": "PublicationIssue"
          }, 
          {
            "type": "PublicationVolume", 
            "volumeNumber": "41"
          }
        ], 
        "name": "On Two Versions of \u2018the Surprise Examination Paradox\u2019", 
        "pagination": "159-170", 
        "productId": [
          {
            "name": "readcube_id", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "543e5ef3342393e0d59fb686d731d7e445d85f040df8dcf2dc7f388a35c0620d"
            ]
          }, 
          {
            "name": "doi", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "10.1007/s11406-013-9416-7"
            ]
          }, 
          {
            "name": "dimensions_id", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "pub.1017681154"
            ]
          }
        ], 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9416-7", 
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1017681154"
        ], 
        "sdDataset": "articles", 
        "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-10T15:03", 
        "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
        "sdPublisher": {
          "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000001_0000000264/records_8663_00000521.jsonl", 
        "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
        "url": "http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2Fs11406-013-9416-7"
      }
    ]
     

    Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

    HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

    JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11406-013-9416-7'

    N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11406-013-9416-7'

    Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

    curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11406-013-9416-7'

    RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11406-013-9416-7'


     

    This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

    77 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      32 URIs      19 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

    Subject Predicate Object
    1 sg:pub.10.1007/s11406-013-9416-7 schema:about anzsrc-for:22
    2 anzsrc-for:2203
    3 schema:author N1cd0e13f47fa4385a122d61e2e4b574d
    4 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1007/bf00263122
    5 https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511812576
    6 https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408212340761
    7 https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/lxii.245.65
    8 https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/lxxxii.325.125
    9 schema:datePublished 2013-03
    10 schema:datePublishedReg 2013-03-01
    11 schema:description In this paper, I consider a popular version of the clever student’s reasoning in the surprise examination case, and demonstrate that a valid argument can be constructed. The valid argument is a reductio ad absurdum with the proposition that the student knows on the morning of the first day that the teacher’s announcement is fulfilled as its reductio. But it would not give rise to any paradox. In the process, I criticize Saul Kripke’s solution and Timothy Williamson’s attack on a key step of the student’s reasoning. I then consider the condemned prisoner case in W. V. Quine’s paper ‘On a So-Called Paradox’. I argue that the prisoner’s reasoning as conceived by Quine is more relevant and reasonable than the student’s argument in the popular version of the surprise examination case. I also argue that Quine’s criticism of the prisoner’s reasoning is correct, and therefore that the condemned prisoner case, and the surprise examination case as well, would not generate any paradox.
    12 schema:genre research_article
    13 schema:inLanguage en
    14 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
    15 schema:isPartOf N42a1d6b5e2e340709ef0ef43227be59e
    16 Nfe1d12cbbce641548c72eb1fa00c5f02
    17 sg:journal.1327675
    18 schema:name On Two Versions of ‘the Surprise Examination Paradox’
    19 schema:pagination 159-170
    20 schema:productId N2f11458a3e504bee9c5fd7be281b683d
    21 Naac54240c02b45e68bf8fe8b5d131e01
    22 Nff3f6ee9fd324cc9ac381514f77324fd
    23 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1017681154
    24 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9416-7
    25 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-10T15:03
    26 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
    27 schema:sdPublisher Nce88633bec584aa08c64afc9c22c695f
    28 schema:url http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2Fs11406-013-9416-7
    29 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
    30 sgo:sdDataset articles
    31 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
    32 N1cd0e13f47fa4385a122d61e2e4b574d rdf:first sg:person.015654227337.50
    33 rdf:rest rdf:nil
    34 N2f11458a3e504bee9c5fd7be281b683d schema:name dimensions_id
    35 schema:value pub.1017681154
    36 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    37 N42a1d6b5e2e340709ef0ef43227be59e schema:issueNumber 1
    38 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
    39 Naac54240c02b45e68bf8fe8b5d131e01 schema:name readcube_id
    40 schema:value 543e5ef3342393e0d59fb686d731d7e445d85f040df8dcf2dc7f388a35c0620d
    41 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    42 Nce88633bec584aa08c64afc9c22c695f schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
    43 rdf:type schema:Organization
    44 Nfe1d12cbbce641548c72eb1fa00c5f02 schema:volumeNumber 41
    45 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
    46 Nff3f6ee9fd324cc9ac381514f77324fd schema:name doi
    47 schema:value 10.1007/s11406-013-9416-7
    48 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    49 anzsrc-for:22 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    50 schema:name Philosophy and Religious Studies
    51 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    52 anzsrc-for:2203 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    53 schema:name Philosophy
    54 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    55 sg:journal.1327675 schema:issn 0048-3893
    56 1574-9274
    57 schema:name Philosophia
    58 rdf:type schema:Periodical
    59 sg:person.015654227337.50 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.10784.3a
    60 schema:familyName Cheung
    61 schema:givenName Leo K. C.
    62 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015654227337.50
    63 rdf:type schema:Person
    64 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00263122 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010165187
    65 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00263122
    66 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    67 https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511812576 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1098732015
    68 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    69 https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408212340761 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1027233264
    70 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    71 https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/lxii.245.65 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1059882747
    72 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    73 https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/lxxxii.325.125 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1059884682
    74 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    75 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.10784.3a schema:alternateName Chinese University of Hong Kong
    76 schema:name Department of Philosophy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong
    77 rdf:type schema:Organization
     




    Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


    ...