JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/14", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Economics", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1402", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Applied Economics", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Department of social sciences, Universit\u00e9 du Qu\u00e9bec en Outaouais, CRREP and CDESG, Quebec, Canada", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.265705.3", 
          "name": [
            "Department of social sciences, Universit\u00e9 du Qu\u00e9bec en Outaouais, CRREP and CDESG, Quebec, Canada"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Dauphin", 
        "givenName": "Anyck", 
        "id": "sg:person.010122752310.94", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.010122752310.94"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Bernard Fortin Department of economics, Universit\u00e9 Laval, CRREP and CIRANO, Quebec, Canada", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.23856.3a", 
          "name": [
            "Bernard Fortin Department of economics, Universit\u00e9 Laval, CRREP and CIRANO, Quebec, Canada"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Fortin", 
        "givenName": "Bernard", 
        "id": "sg:person.0616777542.40", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0616777542.40"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Guy Lacroix Department of economics, Universit\u00e9 Laval, CRREP and CIRANO, Quebec, Canada", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.23856.3a", 
          "name": [
            "Guy Lacroix Department of economics, Universit\u00e9 Laval, CRREP and CIRANO, Quebec, Canada"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Lacroix", 
        "givenName": "Guy", 
        "id": "sg:person.015040455560.06", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015040455560.06"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00181-005-0258-4", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1005641255", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-005-0258-4"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2017-01-25", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2017-01-25", 
    "description": "The collective household model is based upon the assumption that decision makers have achieved efficient outcomes. This paradigm, which has become one of the leading approaches in family economics, is seldom, if ever, rejected, raising doubt about its falsifiability. We show that the standard approach to test the collective model may yield misleading inferences. We develop a new test procedure to assess its validity. Our approach extends to households that potentially include more than two decision makers. We provide an informal meta-analysis that suggests that much of the evidence in favor of collective rationality in the empirical literature appears to be inconsistent with our test. We illustrate the latter using data from a survey we have conducted in Burkina Faso. Consumption efficiency within monogamous households is not rejected using the standard testing procedure while it is clearly rejected using our proposed test procedure. Furthermore, our test also rejects consumption efficiency for bigamous households. We conclude that intra-household efficiency does yield empirically falsifiable restrictions despite being scarcely rejected in the literature.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11150-016-9359-4", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1042479", 
        "issn": [
          "1569-5239", 
          "1573-7152"
        ], 
        "name": "Review of Economics of the Household", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "3", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "16"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "collective household model", 
      "consumption efficiency", 
      "decision makers", 
      "household model", 
      "family economics", 
      "efficient outcomes", 
      "empirical literature", 
      "collective rationality", 
      "misleading inferences", 
      "falsifiable restrictions", 
      "households", 
      "monogamous households", 
      "collective model", 
      "makers", 
      "Burkina Faso", 
      "economics", 
      "standard approach", 
      "rationality", 
      "testing procedures", 
      "literature", 
      "standard testing procedures", 
      "new test procedure", 
      "model", 
      "efficiency", 
      "favor", 
      "test procedure", 
      "Faso", 
      "assumption", 
      "restriction", 
      "evidence", 
      "doubt", 
      "approach", 
      "inference", 
      "survey", 
      "falsifiability", 
      "data", 
      "outcomes", 
      "paradigm", 
      "test", 
      "procedure", 
      "validity"
    ], 
    "name": "Is consumption efficiency within households falsifiable?", 
    "pagination": "737-766", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1074203024"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/s11150-016-9359-4"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-016-9359-4", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1074203024"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T17:05", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_747.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-016-9359-4"
  }
]

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

121 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      66 URIs      57 LITERALS      6 BLANK NODES