Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle
2008-10-10
AUTHORSJ. L. Willers, J. N. Jenkins, J. M. McKinion, Pat Gerard, K. B. Hood, J. R. Bassie, M. D. Cauthen
ABSTRACTThe problem of analyzing georeferenced cotton pest insect samples when a large percentage of the counts are zero is examined. The use of appropriate statistical methods for their analysis is required. To demonstrate this, georeferenced samples (n = 63) of tarnished plant bugs (TPBs; Lygus lineolaris [Palisot de Beauvois] (Heteroptera: Miridae)) were analyzed by three statistical methods and the results were compared. Correlation analysis of the sample counts with 25 classes of cotton growth derived from an unsupervized classification of multispectral imagery was followed by a complete enumeration analysis comprising three scenarios. The first scenario assumed the insect samples were unstratified. A distribution of sample averages was created by complete enumeration of all combinations of samples taken four at a time. The second scenario used imagery of the cotton fields to allocate the samples among three cotton growth categories (marginal, good or best) derived by a supervized classification of the 25 unsupervized classes. The insect samples associated with these categorical habitats were completely enumerated using allocations of 4, 6, 8 or 10 samples at a time from various sample sizes to determine how different allocations affected the results. The mean was not affected, but the standard deviation decreased with increased allocation sizes in all habitats. The third scenario used the two observers and three habitat categories to create six additional complete enumeration distributions by allocating four samples at a time from groups of varying sample sizes. These enumeration distributions are non-parametric estimators of the sampling distribution of: (1) the sample averages of a given sample size when samples are taken from the entire field, (2) the sample averages of a given size when samples are taken from each cotton habitat or (3) the sample averages of a given sample size from samples taken from each habitat by each observer. To support the enumeration analyses, these insect samples were analyzed further by Poisson regression models. These models showed significant differences between TPB counts by the two observers and among the habitats, whereas the observer by habitat interaction was not significant. For every combination of observer and cotton growth category, a Poisson regression model estimated the mean rate of TPB numbers. These means were similar to the corresponding modes of the complete enumeration distributions. The two non-standard methods showed that TPB numbers differed by habitat categories even though there were samples with a zero count, whereas a correlation analysis failed to identify a relationship between TPB sample counts and unsupervized habitat classes. More... »
PAGES189-212
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051029643
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/07",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0703",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Crop and Pasture Production",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Genetics and Precision Agriculture Research Unit, USDA - ARS, P.O. Box 5367, 39762, Mississippi State, MS, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.512878.1",
"name": [
"Genetics and Precision Agriculture Research Unit, USDA - ARS, P.O. Box 5367, 39762, Mississippi State, MS, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Willers",
"givenName": "J. L.",
"id": "sg:person.015431005375.40",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015431005375.40"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Genetics and Precision Agriculture Research Unit, USDA - ARS, P.O. Box 5367, 39762, Mississippi State, MS, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.512878.1",
"name": [
"Genetics and Precision Agriculture Research Unit, USDA - ARS, P.O. Box 5367, 39762, Mississippi State, MS, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Jenkins",
"givenName": "J. N.",
"id": "sg:person.0665207223.69",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0665207223.69"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Genetics and Precision Agriculture Research Unit, USDA - ARS, P.O. Box 5367, 39762, Mississippi State, MS, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.512878.1",
"name": [
"Genetics and Precision Agriculture Research Unit, USDA - ARS, P.O. Box 5367, 39762, Mississippi State, MS, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "McKinion",
"givenName": "J. M.",
"id": "sg:person.013016262443.43",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.013016262443.43"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.26090.3d",
"name": [
"Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Gerard",
"givenName": "Pat",
"id": "sg:person.0644130544.49",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0644130544.49"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Perthshire Farms, Gunnison, MS, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"Perthshire Farms, Gunnison, MS, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Hood",
"givenName": "K. B.",
"id": "sg:person.016642573201.03",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.016642573201.03"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Bassie Ag Service, Cleveland, MS, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"Bassie Ag Service, Cleveland, MS, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Bassie",
"givenName": "J. R.",
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Cauthen Entomological Service, Rena Lara, MS, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"Cauthen Entomological Service, Rena Lara, MS, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Cauthen",
"givenName": "M. D.",
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1023/a:1013318002609",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000543063",
"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013318002609"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1186/1742-5573-3-3",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1020342706",
"https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-3-3"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11119-005-3680-x",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015443442",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-005-3680-x"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-662-03978-6",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052962971",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03978-6"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s004420050461",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1017709182",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050461"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1023/a:1009662915320",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007340224",
"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009662915320"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2008-10-10",
"datePublishedReg": "2008-10-10",
"description": "The problem of analyzing georeferenced cotton pest insect samples when a large percentage of the counts are zero is examined. The use of appropriate statistical methods for their analysis is required. To demonstrate this, georeferenced samples (n\u00a0=\u00a063) of tarnished plant bugs (TPBs; Lygus lineolaris [Palisot de Beauvois] (Heteroptera: Miridae)) were analyzed by three statistical methods and the results were compared. Correlation analysis of the sample counts with 25 classes of cotton growth derived from an unsupervized classification of multispectral imagery was followed by a complete enumeration analysis comprising three scenarios. The first scenario assumed the insect samples were unstratified. A distribution of sample averages was created by complete enumeration of all combinations of samples taken four at a time. The second scenario used imagery of the cotton fields to allocate the samples among three cotton growth categories (marginal, good or best) derived by a supervized classification of the 25 unsupervized classes. The insect samples associated with these categorical habitats were completely enumerated using allocations of 4, 6, 8 or 10 samples at a time from various sample sizes to determine how different allocations affected the results. The mean was not affected, but the standard deviation decreased with increased allocation sizes in all habitats. The third scenario used the two observers and three habitat categories to create six additional complete enumeration distributions by allocating four samples at a time from groups of varying sample sizes. These enumeration distributions are non-parametric estimators of the sampling distribution of: (1) the sample averages of a given sample size when samples are taken from the entire field, (2) the sample averages of a given size when samples are taken from each cotton habitat or (3) the sample averages of a given sample size from samples taken from each habitat by each observer. To support the enumeration analyses, these insect samples were analyzed further by Poisson regression models. These models showed significant differences between TPB counts by the two observers and among the habitats, whereas the observer by habitat interaction was not significant. For every combination of observer and cotton growth category, a Poisson regression model estimated the mean rate of TPB numbers. These means were similar to the corresponding modes of the complete enumeration distributions. The two non-standard methods showed that TPB numbers differed by habitat categories even though there were samples with a zero count, whereas a correlation analysis failed to identify a relationship between TPB sample counts and unsupervized habitat classes.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1135929",
"issn": [
"1385-2256",
"1573-1618"
],
"name": "Precision Agriculture",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "3",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "10"
}
],
"keywords": [
"sample average",
"insect samples",
"statistical methods",
"habitat categories",
"plant bug",
"sampling distribution",
"appropriate statistical methods",
"tarnished plant bug",
"non-parametric estimators",
"sample counts",
"habitat interactions",
"non-standard methods",
"habitats",
"combination of observer",
"habitat classes",
"sample size",
"cotton growth",
"observer",
"corresponding modes",
"complete enumeration",
"method of analysis",
"cotton fields",
"allocation size",
"growth categories",
"class",
"enumeration analysis",
"combination of samples",
"regression models",
"estimator",
"field",
"distribution",
"model",
"Poisson regression models",
"entire field",
"bugs",
"allocation",
"scenarios",
"problem",
"cotton",
"first scenario",
"standard deviation",
"number",
"second scenario",
"different allocations",
"means",
"third scenario",
"growth",
"enumeration",
"correlation analysis",
"size",
"analysis",
"results",
"average",
"deviation",
"interaction",
"time",
"mode",
"combination",
"large percentage",
"classification",
"mean rate",
"count",
"samples",
"categories",
"relationship",
"differences",
"significant differences",
"percentage",
"rate",
"use",
"group",
"multispectral imagery",
"method",
"imagery"
],
"name": "Methods of analysis for georeferenced sample counts of tarnished plant bugs in cotton",
"pagination": "189-212",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1051029643"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051029643"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-20T07:25",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220519/entities/gbq_results/article/article_470.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
206 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
105 URIs
91 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x | schema:about | anzsrc-for:07 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0703 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | N5e54c21a57fd432797fbfc5836d321ce |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-662-03978-6 |
5 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s004420050461 |
6 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s11119-005-3680-x |
7 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1023/a:1009662915320 |
8 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1023/a:1013318002609 |
9 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1186/1742-5573-3-3 |
10 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2008-10-10 |
11 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2008-10-10 |
12 | ″ | schema:description | The problem of analyzing georeferenced cotton pest insect samples when a large percentage of the counts are zero is examined. The use of appropriate statistical methods for their analysis is required. To demonstrate this, georeferenced samples (n = 63) of tarnished plant bugs (TPBs; Lygus lineolaris [Palisot de Beauvois] (Heteroptera: Miridae)) were analyzed by three statistical methods and the results were compared. Correlation analysis of the sample counts with 25 classes of cotton growth derived from an unsupervized classification of multispectral imagery was followed by a complete enumeration analysis comprising three scenarios. The first scenario assumed the insect samples were unstratified. A distribution of sample averages was created by complete enumeration of all combinations of samples taken four at a time. The second scenario used imagery of the cotton fields to allocate the samples among three cotton growth categories (marginal, good or best) derived by a supervized classification of the 25 unsupervized classes. The insect samples associated with these categorical habitats were completely enumerated using allocations of 4, 6, 8 or 10 samples at a time from various sample sizes to determine how different allocations affected the results. The mean was not affected, but the standard deviation decreased with increased allocation sizes in all habitats. The third scenario used the two observers and three habitat categories to create six additional complete enumeration distributions by allocating four samples at a time from groups of varying sample sizes. These enumeration distributions are non-parametric estimators of the sampling distribution of: (1) the sample averages of a given sample size when samples are taken from the entire field, (2) the sample averages of a given size when samples are taken from each cotton habitat or (3) the sample averages of a given sample size from samples taken from each habitat by each observer. To support the enumeration analyses, these insect samples were analyzed further by Poisson regression models. These models showed significant differences between TPB counts by the two observers and among the habitats, whereas the observer by habitat interaction was not significant. For every combination of observer and cotton growth category, a Poisson regression model estimated the mean rate of TPB numbers. These means were similar to the corresponding modes of the complete enumeration distributions. The two non-standard methods showed that TPB numbers differed by habitat categories even though there were samples with a zero count, whereas a correlation analysis failed to identify a relationship between TPB sample counts and unsupervized habitat classes. |
13 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
14 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
15 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
16 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N10465569b5c546c388aec39ee5beea05 |
17 | ″ | ″ | N97f614dade41451fade6e9ea0e7be62f |
18 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1135929 |
19 | ″ | schema:keywords | Poisson regression models |
20 | ″ | ″ | allocation |
21 | ″ | ″ | allocation size |
22 | ″ | ″ | analysis |
23 | ″ | ″ | appropriate statistical methods |
24 | ″ | ″ | average |
25 | ″ | ″ | bugs |
26 | ″ | ″ | categories |
27 | ″ | ″ | class |
28 | ″ | ″ | classification |
29 | ″ | ″ | combination |
30 | ″ | ″ | combination of observer |
31 | ″ | ″ | combination of samples |
32 | ″ | ″ | complete enumeration |
33 | ″ | ″ | correlation analysis |
34 | ″ | ″ | corresponding modes |
35 | ″ | ″ | cotton |
36 | ″ | ″ | cotton fields |
37 | ″ | ″ | cotton growth |
38 | ″ | ″ | count |
39 | ″ | ″ | deviation |
40 | ″ | ″ | differences |
41 | ″ | ″ | different allocations |
42 | ″ | ″ | distribution |
43 | ″ | ″ | entire field |
44 | ″ | ″ | enumeration |
45 | ″ | ″ | enumeration analysis |
46 | ″ | ″ | estimator |
47 | ″ | ″ | field |
48 | ″ | ″ | first scenario |
49 | ″ | ″ | group |
50 | ″ | ″ | growth |
51 | ″ | ″ | growth categories |
52 | ″ | ″ | habitat categories |
53 | ″ | ″ | habitat classes |
54 | ″ | ″ | habitat interactions |
55 | ″ | ″ | habitats |
56 | ″ | ″ | imagery |
57 | ″ | ″ | insect samples |
58 | ″ | ″ | interaction |
59 | ″ | ″ | large percentage |
60 | ″ | ″ | mean rate |
61 | ″ | ″ | means |
62 | ″ | ″ | method |
63 | ″ | ″ | method of analysis |
64 | ″ | ″ | mode |
65 | ″ | ″ | model |
66 | ″ | ″ | multispectral imagery |
67 | ″ | ″ | non-parametric estimators |
68 | ″ | ″ | non-standard methods |
69 | ″ | ″ | number |
70 | ″ | ″ | observer |
71 | ″ | ″ | percentage |
72 | ″ | ″ | plant bug |
73 | ″ | ″ | problem |
74 | ″ | ″ | rate |
75 | ″ | ″ | regression models |
76 | ″ | ″ | relationship |
77 | ″ | ″ | results |
78 | ″ | ″ | sample average |
79 | ″ | ″ | sample counts |
80 | ″ | ″ | sample size |
81 | ″ | ″ | samples |
82 | ″ | ″ | sampling distribution |
83 | ″ | ″ | scenarios |
84 | ″ | ″ | second scenario |
85 | ″ | ″ | significant differences |
86 | ″ | ″ | size |
87 | ″ | ″ | standard deviation |
88 | ″ | ″ | statistical methods |
89 | ″ | ″ | tarnished plant bug |
90 | ″ | ″ | third scenario |
91 | ″ | ″ | time |
92 | ″ | ″ | use |
93 | ″ | schema:name | Methods of analysis for georeferenced sample counts of tarnished plant bugs in cotton |
94 | ″ | schema:pagination | 189-212 |
95 | ″ | schema:productId | N77a2bf60669c4e6fae20677a0f1945fa |
96 | ″ | ″ | Nc6f0b4db642d4ad39b17f761c970f700 |
97 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051029643 |
98 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x |
99 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-05-20T07:25 |
100 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
101 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | N4f2a9123267f4ff59efadce080ce11bf |
102 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x |
103 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
104 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
105 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
106 | N10465569b5c546c388aec39ee5beea05 | schema:volumeNumber | 10 |
107 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
108 | N1df8af42751f4ec48668304f574f14d1 | rdf:first | Ncfcffdb48b8b4c298db5fc9d5dea9158 |
109 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
110 | N4b6b0a85270e4a429fbba435ef119caf | rdf:first | sg:person.0665207223.69 |
111 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nbdedf3d7378248a88039e86e22ff57d4 |
112 | N4f2a9123267f4ff59efadce080ce11bf | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
113 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
114 | N5e54c21a57fd432797fbfc5836d321ce | rdf:first | sg:person.015431005375.40 |
115 | ″ | rdf:rest | N4b6b0a85270e4a429fbba435ef119caf |
116 | N77a2bf60669c4e6fae20677a0f1945fa | schema:name | doi |
117 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/s11119-008-9085-x |
118 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
119 | N97f614dade41451fade6e9ea0e7be62f | schema:issueNumber | 3 |
120 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
121 | Nbdedf3d7378248a88039e86e22ff57d4 | rdf:first | sg:person.013016262443.43 |
122 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nc08ffbe9060d409fb1b2d720d1576866 |
123 | Nc0365c7334fb401d8107152726cb610b | rdf:first | sg:person.016642573201.03 |
124 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nf7340db1b98043778ec92f13b6fa59db |
125 | Nc08ffbe9060d409fb1b2d720d1576866 | rdf:first | sg:person.0644130544.49 |
126 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nc0365c7334fb401d8107152726cb610b |
127 | Nc6f0b4db642d4ad39b17f761c970f700 | schema:name | dimensions_id |
128 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1051029643 |
129 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
130 | Ncfcffdb48b8b4c298db5fc9d5dea9158 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
131 | ″ | schema:familyName | Cauthen |
132 | ″ | schema:givenName | M. D. |
133 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
134 | Nec1dfecde5884e5b87fd03a4dd4a157d | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
135 | ″ | schema:familyName | Bassie |
136 | ″ | schema:givenName | J. R. |
137 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
138 | Nf7340db1b98043778ec92f13b6fa59db | rdf:first | Nec1dfecde5884e5b87fd03a4dd4a157d |
139 | ″ | rdf:rest | N1df8af42751f4ec48668304f574f14d1 |
140 | anzsrc-for:07 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
141 | ″ | schema:name | Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences |
142 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
143 | anzsrc-for:0703 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
144 | ″ | schema:name | Crop and Pasture Production |
145 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
146 | sg:journal.1135929 | schema:issn | 1385-2256 |
147 | ″ | ″ | 1573-1618 |
148 | ″ | schema:name | Precision Agriculture |
149 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
150 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
151 | sg:person.013016262443.43 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.512878.1 |
152 | ″ | schema:familyName | McKinion |
153 | ″ | schema:givenName | J. M. |
154 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.013016262443.43 |
155 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
156 | sg:person.015431005375.40 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.512878.1 |
157 | ″ | schema:familyName | Willers |
158 | ″ | schema:givenName | J. L. |
159 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015431005375.40 |
160 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
161 | sg:person.016642573201.03 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
162 | ″ | schema:familyName | Hood |
163 | ″ | schema:givenName | K. B. |
164 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.016642573201.03 |
165 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
166 | sg:person.0644130544.49 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.26090.3d |
167 | ″ | schema:familyName | Gerard |
168 | ″ | schema:givenName | Pat |
169 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0644130544.49 |
170 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
171 | sg:person.0665207223.69 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.512878.1 |
172 | ″ | schema:familyName | Jenkins |
173 | ″ | schema:givenName | J. N. |
174 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0665207223.69 |
175 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
176 | sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-662-03978-6 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052962971 |
177 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03978-6 |
178 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
179 | sg:pub.10.1007/s004420050461 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1017709182 |
180 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050461 |
181 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
182 | sg:pub.10.1007/s11119-005-3680-x | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015443442 |
183 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-005-3680-x |
184 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
185 | sg:pub.10.1023/a:1009662915320 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007340224 |
186 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009662915320 |
187 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
188 | sg:pub.10.1023/a:1013318002609 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000543063 |
189 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013318002609 |
190 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
191 | sg:pub.10.1186/1742-5573-3-3 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1020342706 |
192 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-3-3 |
193 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
194 | grid-institutes:None | schema:alternateName | Bassie Ag Service, Cleveland, MS, USA |
195 | ″ | ″ | Cauthen Entomological Service, Rena Lara, MS, USA |
196 | ″ | ″ | Perthshire Farms, Gunnison, MS, USA |
197 | ″ | schema:name | Bassie Ag Service, Cleveland, MS, USA |
198 | ″ | ″ | Cauthen Entomological Service, Rena Lara, MS, USA |
199 | ″ | ″ | Perthshire Farms, Gunnison, MS, USA |
200 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
201 | grid-institutes:grid.26090.3d | schema:alternateName | Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA |
202 | ″ | schema:name | Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA |
203 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
204 | grid-institutes:grid.512878.1 | schema:alternateName | Genetics and Precision Agriculture Research Unit, USDA - ARS, P.O. Box 5367, 39762, Mississippi State, MS, USA |
205 | ″ | schema:name | Genetics and Precision Agriculture Research Unit, USDA - ARS, P.O. Box 5367, 39762, Mississippi State, MS, USA |
206 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |