Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle Open Access: True
2017-08-29
AUTHORS ABSTRACTThe advocates of Integrative Bioethics have insisted that this recently emerging project aspires to become a new stage of bioethical development, surpassing both biomedically oriented bioethics and global bioethics. We claim in this paper that if the project wants to successfully replace the two existing paradigms, it at least needs to properly address and surmount the lack of common moral vocabulary problem. This problem points to a semantic incommensurability due to cross-language communication in moral terms. This paper proceeds as follows. In the first part, we provide an overview of Integrative Bioethics and its conceptual building blocks: mutlidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity. In the second part, we disclose the problem of semantic incommensurability. The third part gives an overview of various positions on the understanding of interdisciplinarity and integration in interdisciplinary communication, and corresponding attempts at solving the lack of common moral vocabulary problem. Here we lean mostly on Holbrook’s three theses regarding the character of interdisciplinary communication. Finally, in the fourth part, we discuss a particular bioethical case—that of euthanasia—to demonstrate the challenge semantic incommensurability poses to dialogues in Integrative Bioethics. We conclude that Integrative Bioethics does not offer a methodological toolset that would warrant optimism in its advocates’ predictions of surpassing current modes of doing bioethics. Since Integrative Bioethics leaves controversial methodological questions unresolved on almost all counts and shows no attempts at overcoming the critical stumbling points, we argue for its rejection. More... »
PAGES265-276
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11019-017-9799-5
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9799-5
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1091390148
PUBMEDhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28852925
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/22",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Philosophy and Religious Studies",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/2203",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Philosophy",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Bioethical Issues",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Bioethics",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Ethical Theory",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Ethicists",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Euthanasia",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Health Resources",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Humans",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Morals",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Principle-Based Ethics",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Oude Boteringestraat 52, 9712 GL, Groningen, The Netherlands",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.4830.f",
"name": [
"Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Oude Boteringestraat 52, 9712 GL, Groningen, The Netherlands"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Savi\u0107",
"givenName": "Lovro",
"id": "sg:person.0650063037.18",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0650063037.18"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Doctoral School of Political Science, Public Policy and International Relations, Central European University, Nador 9, 1051, Budapest, Hungary",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"Doctoral School of Political Science, Public Policy and International Relations, Central European University, Nador 9, 1051, Budapest, Hungary"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Ivankovi\u0107",
"givenName": "Viktor",
"id": "sg:person.0601747637.08",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0601747637.08"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-015-8895-9_17",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1011492929",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8895-9_17"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11229-012-0179-7",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1046403130",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0179-7"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11019-012-9381-0",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1006642157",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-012-9381-0"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00047271",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018405634",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00047271"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11406-016-9770-3",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1013576958",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9770-3"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/1-4020-4725-8",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1039398186",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4725-8"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10539-005-5144-0",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1032676897",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-5144-0"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1023/a:1024814710487",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1033567018",
"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024814710487"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11019-013-9504-2",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010380871",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-013-9504-2"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2017-08-29",
"datePublishedReg": "2017-08-29",
"description": "The advocates of Integrative Bioethics have insisted that this recently emerging project aspires to become a new stage of bioethical development, surpassing both biomedically oriented bioethics and global bioethics. We claim in this paper that if the project wants to successfully replace the two existing paradigms, it at least needs to properly address and surmount the lack of common moral vocabulary problem. This problem points to a semantic incommensurability due to cross-language communication in moral terms. This paper proceeds as follows. In the first part, we provide an overview of Integrative Bioethics and its conceptual building blocks: mutlidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity. In the second part, we disclose the problem of semantic incommensurability. The third part gives an overview of various positions on the understanding of interdisciplinarity and integration in interdisciplinary communication, and corresponding attempts at solving the lack of common moral vocabulary problem. Here we lean mostly on Holbrook\u2019s three theses regarding the character of interdisciplinary communication. Finally, in the fourth part, we discuss a particular bioethical case\u2014that of euthanasia\u2014to demonstrate the challenge semantic incommensurability poses to dialogues in Integrative Bioethics. We conclude that Integrative Bioethics does not offer a methodological toolset that would warrant optimism in its advocates\u2019 predictions of surpassing current modes of doing bioethics. Since Integrative Bioethics leaves controversial methodological questions unresolved on almost all counts and shows no attempts at overcoming the critical stumbling points, we argue for its rejection.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11019-017-9799-5",
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1119477",
"issn": [
"1386-7423",
"1572-8633"
],
"name": "Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "2",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "21"
}
],
"keywords": [
"integrative bioethics",
"semantic incommensurability",
"understanding of interdisciplinarity",
"cross-language communication",
"global bioethics",
"moral terms",
"conceptual building blocks",
"bioethical developments",
"bioethical cases",
"bioethics",
"interdisciplinary communication",
"stumbling point",
"methodological questions",
"incommensurability",
"fourth part",
"third part",
"interdisciplinarity",
"advocates",
"new stage",
"first part",
"second part",
"transdisciplinarity",
"attempt",
"thesis",
"dialogue",
"euthanasia",
"understanding",
"questions",
"project",
"part",
"character",
"optimism",
"problem",
"paradigm",
"rejection",
"turn",
"overview",
"communication",
"position",
"paper",
"point",
"terms",
"lack",
"current mode",
"development",
"integration",
"cases",
"mode",
"burden",
"building blocks",
"stage",
"toolset",
"block",
"prediction",
"count",
"vocabulary problem",
"methodological toolset"
],
"name": "Against the integrative turn in bioethics: burdens of understanding",
"pagination": "265-276",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1091390148"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s11019-017-9799-5"
]
},
{
"name": "pubmed_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"28852925"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9799-5",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1091390148"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T17:05",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_726.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9799-5"
}
]Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11019-017-9799-5'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11019-017-9799-5'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11019-017-9799-5'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s11019-017-9799-5'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
200 TRIPLES
21 PREDICATES
100 URIs
83 LITERALS
16 BLANK NODES