Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle Open Access: True
2017-02-07
AUTHORS ABSTRACTBioeconomy solutions potentially reduce the utilization demand of natural resources, and therefore, represent steps towards circular economy, but are not per se equivalent to sustainability. Thus, production may remain to be achieved against losses in natural resources or at other environmental costs, and materials produced by bioeconomy are not necessarily biodegradable. As a consequence, the assumption that emerging bioeconomy by itself provides an environmentally sustainable economy is not justified, as technologies do not necessarily become sustainable merely through their conversion to using renewable resources for their production. A source of the above assumption is that the utility of bioeconomy is mostly assessed in interaction between technology developers and economists, resulting in biased assessment with private commercial technology benefits being included, but environmental costs, especially longer term ones, not being sufficiently considered in the economic models. A possible solution to this conceptual contradiction may come from bioethics, as a strong concept in environmental ethics is that no technological intervention can be imposed on nature beyond its receptive capacity. To achieve a better balanced analysis of bioeconomy, environmental and ecological, as well as non-economic social aspects, need to be included in the overall assessment. More... »
PAGES153-170
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1083698425
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/22",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Philosophy and Religious Studies",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/2201",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Applied Ethics",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/2203",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Philosophy",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Agro-Environmental Research Institute, National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Herman O. u. 15, 1022, Budapest, Hungary",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.431264.6",
"name": [
"Agro-Environmental Research Institute, National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Herman O. u. 15, 1022, Budapest, Hungary"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Sz\u00e9k\u00e1cs",
"givenName": "Andr\u00e1s",
"id": "sg:person.01041763677.79",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01041763677.79"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s13280-015-0730-0",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1042214104",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0730-0"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/415023a",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1036456340",
"https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/srep22521",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1041332479",
"https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22521"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/387253a0",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1022749439",
"https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s12302-014-0034-1",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1049336257",
"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-014-0034-1"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/535221a",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000224718",
"https://doi.org/10.1038/535221a"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11948-011-9316-9",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1053201079",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9316-9"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/531435a",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1046892476",
"https://doi.org/10.1038/531435a"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10806-015-9542-2",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1038076747",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9542-2"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1017/s1745855208006303",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1054944021",
"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1745855208006303"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1028845548",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10806-015-9550-2",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1017277149",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9550-2"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2017-02-07",
"datePublishedReg": "2017-02-07",
"description": "Bioeconomy solutions potentially reduce the utilization demand of natural resources, and therefore, represent steps towards circular economy, but are not per se equivalent to sustainability. Thus, production may remain to be achieved against losses in natural resources or at other environmental costs, and materials produced by bioeconomy are not necessarily biodegradable. As a consequence, the assumption that emerging bioeconomy by itself provides an environmentally sustainable economy is not justified, as technologies do not necessarily become sustainable merely through their conversion to using renewable resources for their production. A source of the above assumption is that the utility of bioeconomy is mostly assessed in interaction between technology developers and economists, resulting in biased assessment with private commercial technology benefits being included, but environmental costs, especially longer term ones, not being sufficiently considered in the economic models. A possible solution to this conceptual contradiction may come from bioethics, as a strong concept in environmental ethics is that no technological intervention can be imposed on nature beyond its receptive capacity. To achieve a better balanced analysis of bioeconomy, environmental and ecological, as well as non-economic social aspects, need to be included in the overall assessment.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1",
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"isFundedItemOf": [
{
"id": "sg:grant.4191095",
"type": "MonetaryGrant"
}
],
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1027182",
"issn": [
"1187-7863",
"1573-322X"
],
"name": "Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "1",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "30"
}
],
"keywords": [
"environmental costs",
"natural resources",
"long-term ones",
"economic model",
"sustainable economy",
"economy",
"balanced analysis",
"biased assessment",
"receptive capacity",
"circular economy",
"term one",
"overall assessment",
"conceptual contradictions",
"bioeconomy",
"cost",
"economists",
"renewable resources",
"technology benefits",
"social aspects",
"resources",
"strong concept",
"assumption",
"utilization demand",
"demand",
"sustainability",
"ecological aspects",
"benefits",
"above assumptions",
"utility",
"possible solutions",
"model",
"contradictions",
"consequences",
"technological interventions",
"aspects",
"production",
"technology developers",
"analysis",
"environmental ethics",
"assessment",
"developers",
"nature",
"concept",
"one",
"source",
"technology",
"ethics",
"intervention",
"capacity",
"equivalent",
"loss",
"solution",
"step",
"interaction",
"conversion",
"materials",
"bioethics"
],
"name": "Environmental and Ecological Aspects in the Overall Assessment of Bioeconomy",
"pagination": "153-170",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1083698425"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1083698425"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T17:05",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_748.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1"
}
]Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
168 TRIPLES
21 PREDICATES
94 URIs
73 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES