Public choice and the development of modern laboratory experimental methods in economics and political science View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

2014-09-07

AUTHORS

Charles R. Plott

ABSTRACT

The paper is an account of the development of laboratory experimental methods in the early 1970s as influenced by the fields of Public Choice and Social Choice. Just a few key experiments conducted during a period when no experimental markets research was taking place, provide a bridge with the subsequent, rapid, growth of experimental economics. A new focus on public goods and externalities, as opposed to private goods traditionally used in economics experiments, required new representations of the commodity space and preference inducement methods. The importance of voting and collective decision making processes dictated the testing of equilibrium concepts from political science and cooperative game theory as opposed to the competitive equilibrium and Nash equilibria found in economics. The existence of many theories from multiple disciplines required new experimental designs and experimental tests. The Public Choice and Social Choice emphasis on comparing the performance of different types of collective decision processes induced early experiments related to institutional design and testing. More... »

PAGES

331-353

References to SciGraph publications

  • 1967-12. A method for finding “acceptable proposals” in group decision processes in PUBLIC CHOICE
  • 1984-01. The free rider problem: Experimental evidence in PUBLIC CHOICE
  • 1998. Committee Decisions with Complementary Valuation in THE THEORY OF COMMITTEES AND ELECTIONS BY DUNCAN BLACK AND COMMITTEE DECISIONS WITH COMPLEMENTARY VALUATION BY DUNCAN BLACK AND R.A. NEWING
  • Identifiers

    URI

    http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0

    DOI

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0

    DIMENSIONS

    https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1023990149


    Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
    Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

    JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

    TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

    [
      {
        "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
        "about": [
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/14", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Economics", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1401", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Economic Theory", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1402", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Applied Economics", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }
        ], 
        "author": [
          {
            "affiliation": {
              "alternateName": "California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA", 
              "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.20861.3d", 
              "name": [
                "California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA"
              ], 
              "type": "Organization"
            }, 
            "familyName": "Plott", 
            "givenName": "Charles R.", 
            "id": "sg:person.015156246113.99", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015156246113.99"
            ], 
            "type": "Person"
          }
        ], 
        "citation": [
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-011-4860-3_22", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1031069487", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4860-3_22"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00137902", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1041051258", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00137902"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf01718651", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052650277", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01718651"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }
        ], 
        "datePublished": "2014-09-07", 
        "datePublishedReg": "2014-09-07", 
        "description": "The paper is an account of the development of laboratory experimental methods in the early 1970s as influenced by the fields of Public Choice and Social Choice. Just a few key experiments conducted during a period when no experimental markets research was taking place, provide a bridge with the subsequent, rapid, growth of experimental economics. A new focus on public goods and externalities, as opposed to private goods traditionally used in economics experiments, required new representations of the commodity space and preference inducement methods. The importance of voting and collective decision making processes dictated the testing of equilibrium concepts from political science and cooperative game theory as opposed to the competitive equilibrium and Nash equilibria found in economics. The existence of many theories from multiple disciplines required new experimental designs and experimental tests. The Public Choice and Social Choice emphasis on comparing the performance of different types of collective decision processes induced early experiments related to institutional design and testing.", 
        "genre": "article", 
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0", 
        "inLanguage": "en", 
        "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
        "isPartOf": [
          {
            "id": "sg:journal.1136102", 
            "issn": [
              "1043-4062", 
              "1572-9966"
            ], 
            "name": "Constitutional Political Economy", 
            "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
            "type": "Periodical"
          }, 
          {
            "issueNumber": "4", 
            "type": "PublicationIssue"
          }, 
          {
            "type": "PublicationVolume", 
            "volumeNumber": "25"
          }
        ], 
        "keywords": [
          "public choice", 
          "laboratory experimental methods", 
          "cooperative game theory", 
          "collective decision process", 
          "experimental economics", 
          "private goods", 
          "economic experiments", 
          "commodity space", 
          "importance of voting", 
          "competitive equilibrium", 
          "political science", 
          "public goods", 
          "game theory", 
          "equilibrium concept", 
          "social choice", 
          "Nash equilibrium", 
          "institutional design", 
          "economics", 
          "market research", 
          "goods", 
          "collective decision", 
          "early 1970s", 
          "choice", 
          "decision process", 
          "externalities", 
          "equilibrium", 
          "new experimental design", 
          "decisions", 
          "voting", 
          "theory", 
          "growth", 
          "new focus", 
          "different types", 
          "account", 
          "development", 
          "disciplines", 
          "existence", 
          "period", 
          "importance", 
          "focus", 
          "emphasis", 
          "science", 
          "research", 
          "place", 
          "concept", 
          "multiple disciplines", 
          "performance", 
          "process", 
          "experimental design", 
          "types", 
          "method", 
          "design", 
          "experimental methods", 
          "test", 
          "experiments", 
          "new representation", 
          "space", 
          "representation", 
          "testing", 
          "field", 
          "experimental tests", 
          "key experiments", 
          "bridge", 
          "earlier experiments", 
          "paper", 
          "experimental markets research", 
          "preference inducement methods", 
          "inducement methods", 
          "Social Choice emphasis", 
          "Choice emphasis", 
          "modern laboratory experimental methods"
        ], 
        "name": "Public choice and the development of modern laboratory experimental methods in economics and political science", 
        "pagination": "331-353", 
        "productId": [
          {
            "name": "dimensions_id", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "pub.1023990149"
            ]
          }, 
          {
            "name": "doi", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0"
            ]
          }
        ], 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0", 
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1023990149"
        ], 
        "sdDataset": "articles", 
        "sdDatePublished": "2021-12-01T19:32", 
        "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
        "sdPublisher": {
          "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20211201/entities/gbq_results/article/article_630.jsonl", 
        "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
        "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0"
      }
    ]
     

    Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

    HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

    JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0'

    N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0'

    Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

    curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0'

    RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0'


     

    This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

    145 TRIPLES      22 PREDICATES      100 URIs      88 LITERALS      6 BLANK NODES

    Subject Predicate Object
    1 sg:pub.10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0 schema:about anzsrc-for:14
    2 anzsrc-for:1401
    3 anzsrc-for:1402
    4 schema:author Nca8a502f9c2143da99ee559bb5a1c053
    5 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-011-4860-3_22
    6 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00137902
    7 sg:pub.10.1007/bf01718651
    8 schema:datePublished 2014-09-07
    9 schema:datePublishedReg 2014-09-07
    10 schema:description The paper is an account of the development of laboratory experimental methods in the early 1970s as influenced by the fields of Public Choice and Social Choice. Just a few key experiments conducted during a period when no experimental markets research was taking place, provide a bridge with the subsequent, rapid, growth of experimental economics. A new focus on public goods and externalities, as opposed to private goods traditionally used in economics experiments, required new representations of the commodity space and preference inducement methods. The importance of voting and collective decision making processes dictated the testing of equilibrium concepts from political science and cooperative game theory as opposed to the competitive equilibrium and Nash equilibria found in economics. The existence of many theories from multiple disciplines required new experimental designs and experimental tests. The Public Choice and Social Choice emphasis on comparing the performance of different types of collective decision processes induced early experiments related to institutional design and testing.
    11 schema:genre article
    12 schema:inLanguage en
    13 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
    14 schema:isPartOf N0b1299d3011a4f3e95abc80775a56a7c
    15 Ne4972f9e78eb488fb52fdd373dc5eb64
    16 sg:journal.1136102
    17 schema:keywords Choice emphasis
    18 Nash equilibrium
    19 Social Choice emphasis
    20 account
    21 bridge
    22 choice
    23 collective decision
    24 collective decision process
    25 commodity space
    26 competitive equilibrium
    27 concept
    28 cooperative game theory
    29 decision process
    30 decisions
    31 design
    32 development
    33 different types
    34 disciplines
    35 earlier experiments
    36 early 1970s
    37 economic experiments
    38 economics
    39 emphasis
    40 equilibrium
    41 equilibrium concept
    42 existence
    43 experimental design
    44 experimental economics
    45 experimental markets research
    46 experimental methods
    47 experimental tests
    48 experiments
    49 externalities
    50 field
    51 focus
    52 game theory
    53 goods
    54 growth
    55 importance
    56 importance of voting
    57 inducement methods
    58 institutional design
    59 key experiments
    60 laboratory experimental methods
    61 market research
    62 method
    63 modern laboratory experimental methods
    64 multiple disciplines
    65 new experimental design
    66 new focus
    67 new representation
    68 paper
    69 performance
    70 period
    71 place
    72 political science
    73 preference inducement methods
    74 private goods
    75 process
    76 public choice
    77 public goods
    78 representation
    79 research
    80 science
    81 social choice
    82 space
    83 test
    84 testing
    85 theory
    86 types
    87 voting
    88 schema:name Public choice and the development of modern laboratory experimental methods in economics and political science
    89 schema:pagination 331-353
    90 schema:productId Ne8b82856ae404f5fba85f296a264e5f7
    91 Nee07585a02ac4a1da9de43815bd56675
    92 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1023990149
    93 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0
    94 schema:sdDatePublished 2021-12-01T19:32
    95 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
    96 schema:sdPublisher Ne49463e5548640e694f18e23213fc2a7
    97 schema:url https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0
    98 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
    99 sgo:sdDataset articles
    100 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
    101 N0b1299d3011a4f3e95abc80775a56a7c schema:issueNumber 4
    102 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
    103 Nca8a502f9c2143da99ee559bb5a1c053 rdf:first sg:person.015156246113.99
    104 rdf:rest rdf:nil
    105 Ne49463e5548640e694f18e23213fc2a7 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
    106 rdf:type schema:Organization
    107 Ne4972f9e78eb488fb52fdd373dc5eb64 schema:volumeNumber 25
    108 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
    109 Ne8b82856ae404f5fba85f296a264e5f7 schema:name dimensions_id
    110 schema:value pub.1023990149
    111 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    112 Nee07585a02ac4a1da9de43815bd56675 schema:name doi
    113 schema:value 10.1007/s10602-014-9172-0
    114 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    115 anzsrc-for:14 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    116 schema:name Economics
    117 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    118 anzsrc-for:1401 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    119 schema:name Economic Theory
    120 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    121 anzsrc-for:1402 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    122 schema:name Applied Economics
    123 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    124 sg:journal.1136102 schema:issn 1043-4062
    125 1572-9966
    126 schema:name Constitutional Political Economy
    127 schema:publisher Springer Nature
    128 rdf:type schema:Periodical
    129 sg:person.015156246113.99 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.20861.3d
    130 schema:familyName Plott
    131 schema:givenName Charles R.
    132 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015156246113.99
    133 rdf:type schema:Person
    134 sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-011-4860-3_22 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1031069487
    135 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4860-3_22
    136 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    137 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00137902 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1041051258
    138 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00137902
    139 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    140 sg:pub.10.1007/bf01718651 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052650277
    141 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01718651
    142 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    143 grid-institutes:grid.20861.3d schema:alternateName California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
    144 schema:name California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
    145 rdf:type schema:Organization
     




    Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


    ...