Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle Open Access: True
2015-11-20
AUTHORSL. M. Kubasiewicz, N. Bunnefeld, A. I. T. Tulloch, C. P. Quine, K. J. Park
ABSTRACTHuman population growth has led to increased contact between people and wildlife, with adverse impacts for both, such as damage to economic crops and wildlife persecution. Diversionary feeding, where food is used to draw animals away from problem activities or locations, is sometimes proposed as a socially acceptable conservation action, but little information exists on its success or what influences its efficacy. Here, we review literature on diversionary feeding and evaluate factors contributing to its success or failure. Success varied greatly among studies and successful uptake of diversionary food did not consistently produce outcomes that met stakeholder objectives. Studies often failed to report results in sufficient detail to allow a quantitative evaluation of efficiency. Of 30 trials presented in 21 studies, 13 enabled assessment of outcomes related to the ultimate objective of reducing conflict (related to threatened prey density, crop yield or nuisance reports) and only five of these were considered successful by the researchers conducting the study. A grand mean increase of 15 % in respective measures of success at the outcome stage was found across all studies. Although diversionary feeding is considered expensive, cost-effectiveness analyses were rarely conducted. Only a third of studies reported information on costs and benefits that could be used to inform future management actions. We propose a decision-making framework that incorporates ecological knowledge, financial costs and evidence from previous studies to aid the planning and implementation of diversionary feeding in an adaptive format. Future studies of diversionary feeding should clearly report objectives, results, costs and effort to allow the return-on-investment to be calculated for different levels of management effort. More... »
PAGES1-22
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018231124
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/05",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Environmental Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0502",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Environmental Science and Management",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, Stirling, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.11918.30",
"name": [
"Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, Stirling, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Kubasiewicz",
"givenName": "L. M.",
"id": "sg:person.012447576463.15",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012447576463.15"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, Stirling, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.11918.30",
"name": [
"Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, Stirling, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Bunnefeld",
"givenName": "N.",
"id": "sg:person.01113643521.22",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01113643521.22"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "National Environmental Research Program Environmental Decisions Hub, University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, QLD, Australia",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.1003.2",
"name": [
"National Environmental Research Program Environmental Decisions Hub, University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, QLD, Australia"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Tulloch",
"givenName": "A. I. T.",
"id": "sg:person.01040455225.96",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01040455225.96"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Forest Research, Centre for Ecosystems, Society and Biosecurity, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.479676.d",
"name": [
"Forest Research, Centre for Ecosystems, Society and Biosecurity, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Quine",
"givenName": "C. P.",
"id": "sg:person.07577501157.29",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.07577501157.29"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, Stirling, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.11918.30",
"name": [
"Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, Stirling, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Park",
"givenName": "K. J.",
"id": "sg:person.0632274735.79",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0632274735.79"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10344-011-0601-3",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001023196",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0601-3"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00442-010-1645-x",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000087452",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1645-x"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10764-011-9541-8",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1035506585",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-011-9541-8"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10344-004-0047-y",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1044966799",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-004-0047-y"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10531-010-9941-7",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029334251",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9941-7"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1023/b:bioc.0000034011.05412.cd",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1033117005",
"https://doi.org/10.1023/b:bioc.0000034011.05412.cd"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2015-11-20",
"datePublishedReg": "2015-11-20",
"description": "Human population growth has led to increased contact between people and wildlife, with adverse impacts for both, such as damage to economic crops and wildlife persecution. Diversionary feeding, where food is used to draw animals away from problem activities or locations, is sometimes proposed as a socially acceptable conservation action, but little information exists on its success or what influences its efficacy. Here, we review literature on diversionary feeding and evaluate factors contributing to its success or failure. Success varied greatly among studies and successful uptake of diversionary food did not consistently produce outcomes that met stakeholder objectives. Studies often failed to report results in sufficient detail to allow a quantitative evaluation of efficiency. Of 30 trials presented in 21 studies, 13 enabled assessment of outcomes related to the ultimate objective of reducing conflict (related to threatened prey density, crop yield or nuisance reports) and only five of these were considered successful by the researchers conducting the study. A grand mean increase of 15\u00a0% in respective measures of success at the outcome stage was found across all studies. Although diversionary feeding is considered expensive, cost-effectiveness analyses were rarely conducted. Only a third of studies reported information on costs and benefits that could be used to inform future management actions. We propose a decision-making framework that incorporates ecological knowledge, financial costs and evidence from previous studies to aid the planning and implementation of diversionary feeding in an adaptive format. Future studies of diversionary feeding should clearly report objectives, results, costs\u00a0and effort to allow the return-on-investment to be calculated for different levels of management effort.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1128750",
"issn": [
"0960-3115",
"1572-9710"
],
"name": "Biodiversity and Conservation",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "1",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "25"
}
],
"keywords": [
"diversionary feeding",
"future management actions",
"human population growth",
"effective management strategies",
"conservation actions",
"conservation conflicts",
"ecological knowledge",
"management actions",
"management efforts",
"diversionary food",
"stakeholder objectives",
"population growth",
"decision-making framework",
"management strategies",
"adverse impact",
"third of studies",
"enabled assessment",
"economic crops",
"little information",
"wildlife",
"crops",
"problem activities",
"outcome stage",
"successful uptake",
"success",
"feeding",
"different levels",
"adaptive format",
"efforts",
"food",
"future studies",
"financial costs",
"objective",
"ultimate objective",
"impact",
"uptake",
"respective measures",
"planning",
"sufficient detail",
"persecution",
"assessment",
"conflict",
"location",
"previous studies",
"information",
"study",
"quantitative evaluation",
"growth",
"animals",
"results",
"benefits",
"action",
"measures",
"strategies",
"knowledge",
"factors",
"increase",
"framework",
"investment",
"levels",
"cost",
"activity",
"mean increase",
"third",
"stage",
"damage",
"evidence",
"analysis",
"return",
"implementation",
"researchers",
"evaluation",
"people",
"efficiency",
"literature",
"cost-effectiveness analysis",
"detail",
"outcomes",
"contact",
"trials",
"format",
"efficacy",
"failure"
],
"name": "Diversionary feeding: an effective management strategy for conservation conflict?",
"pagination": "1-22",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1018231124"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018231124"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-06-01T22:13",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220601/entities/gbq_results/article/article_668.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
199 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
114 URIs
100 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:05 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0502 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | Ne977188425574d9bbd7473be4c0bd33b |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/s00442-010-1645-x |
5 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s10344-004-0047-y |
6 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s10344-011-0601-3 |
7 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s10531-010-9941-7 |
8 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s10764-011-9541-8 |
9 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1023/b:bioc.0000034011.05412.cd |
10 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2015-11-20 |
11 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2015-11-20 |
12 | ″ | schema:description | Human population growth has led to increased contact between people and wildlife, with adverse impacts for both, such as damage to economic crops and wildlife persecution. Diversionary feeding, where food is used to draw animals away from problem activities or locations, is sometimes proposed as a socially acceptable conservation action, but little information exists on its success or what influences its efficacy. Here, we review literature on diversionary feeding and evaluate factors contributing to its success or failure. Success varied greatly among studies and successful uptake of diversionary food did not consistently produce outcomes that met stakeholder objectives. Studies often failed to report results in sufficient detail to allow a quantitative evaluation of efficiency. Of 30 trials presented in 21 studies, 13 enabled assessment of outcomes related to the ultimate objective of reducing conflict (related to threatened prey density, crop yield or nuisance reports) and only five of these were considered successful by the researchers conducting the study. A grand mean increase of 15 % in respective measures of success at the outcome stage was found across all studies. Although diversionary feeding is considered expensive, cost-effectiveness analyses were rarely conducted. Only a third of studies reported information on costs and benefits that could be used to inform future management actions. We propose a decision-making framework that incorporates ecological knowledge, financial costs and evidence from previous studies to aid the planning and implementation of diversionary feeding in an adaptive format. Future studies of diversionary feeding should clearly report objectives, results, costs and effort to allow the return-on-investment to be calculated for different levels of management effort. |
13 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
14 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
15 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | true |
16 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N425eb5da58c247a3b0f9cba8471c0770 |
17 | ″ | ″ | Nd34548ca6269473ea3a1038dae61ec8e |
18 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1128750 |
19 | ″ | schema:keywords | action |
20 | ″ | ″ | activity |
21 | ″ | ″ | adaptive format |
22 | ″ | ″ | adverse impact |
23 | ″ | ″ | analysis |
24 | ″ | ″ | animals |
25 | ″ | ″ | assessment |
26 | ″ | ″ | benefits |
27 | ″ | ″ | conflict |
28 | ″ | ″ | conservation actions |
29 | ″ | ″ | conservation conflicts |
30 | ″ | ″ | contact |
31 | ″ | ″ | cost |
32 | ″ | ″ | cost-effectiveness analysis |
33 | ″ | ″ | crops |
34 | ″ | ″ | damage |
35 | ″ | ″ | decision-making framework |
36 | ″ | ″ | detail |
37 | ″ | ″ | different levels |
38 | ″ | ″ | diversionary feeding |
39 | ″ | ″ | diversionary food |
40 | ″ | ″ | ecological knowledge |
41 | ″ | ″ | economic crops |
42 | ″ | ″ | effective management strategies |
43 | ″ | ″ | efficacy |
44 | ″ | ″ | efficiency |
45 | ″ | ″ | efforts |
46 | ″ | ″ | enabled assessment |
47 | ″ | ″ | evaluation |
48 | ″ | ″ | evidence |
49 | ″ | ″ | factors |
50 | ″ | ″ | failure |
51 | ″ | ″ | feeding |
52 | ″ | ″ | financial costs |
53 | ″ | ″ | food |
54 | ″ | ″ | format |
55 | ″ | ″ | framework |
56 | ″ | ″ | future management actions |
57 | ″ | ″ | future studies |
58 | ″ | ″ | growth |
59 | ″ | ″ | human population growth |
60 | ″ | ″ | impact |
61 | ″ | ″ | implementation |
62 | ″ | ″ | increase |
63 | ″ | ″ | information |
64 | ″ | ″ | investment |
65 | ″ | ″ | knowledge |
66 | ″ | ″ | levels |
67 | ″ | ″ | literature |
68 | ″ | ″ | little information |
69 | ″ | ″ | location |
70 | ″ | ″ | management actions |
71 | ″ | ″ | management efforts |
72 | ″ | ″ | management strategies |
73 | ″ | ″ | mean increase |
74 | ″ | ″ | measures |
75 | ″ | ″ | objective |
76 | ″ | ″ | outcome stage |
77 | ″ | ″ | outcomes |
78 | ″ | ″ | people |
79 | ″ | ″ | persecution |
80 | ″ | ″ | planning |
81 | ″ | ″ | population growth |
82 | ″ | ″ | previous studies |
83 | ″ | ″ | problem activities |
84 | ″ | ″ | quantitative evaluation |
85 | ″ | ″ | researchers |
86 | ″ | ″ | respective measures |
87 | ″ | ″ | results |
88 | ″ | ″ | return |
89 | ″ | ″ | stage |
90 | ″ | ″ | stakeholder objectives |
91 | ″ | ″ | strategies |
92 | ″ | ″ | study |
93 | ″ | ″ | success |
94 | ″ | ″ | successful uptake |
95 | ″ | ″ | sufficient detail |
96 | ″ | ″ | third |
97 | ″ | ″ | third of studies |
98 | ″ | ″ | trials |
99 | ″ | ″ | ultimate objective |
100 | ″ | ″ | uptake |
101 | ″ | ″ | wildlife |
102 | ″ | schema:name | Diversionary feeding: an effective management strategy for conservation conflict? |
103 | ″ | schema:pagination | 1-22 |
104 | ″ | schema:productId | N342c2b6376d24b1aad7f10c27e1816ad |
105 | ″ | ″ | N9f6667f605ae432282a17d3c030fd1a6 |
106 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018231124 |
107 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1 |
108 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-06-01T22:13 |
109 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
110 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | N334655fc38d14d99981df517fa9c87ba |
111 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1 |
112 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
113 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
114 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
115 | N334655fc38d14d99981df517fa9c87ba | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
116 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
117 | N342c2b6376d24b1aad7f10c27e1816ad | schema:name | dimensions_id |
118 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1018231124 |
119 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
120 | N425eb5da58c247a3b0f9cba8471c0770 | schema:issueNumber | 1 |
121 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
122 | N5605c5202e0b4c2f8f95e17830ba4f6a | rdf:first | sg:person.07577501157.29 |
123 | ″ | rdf:rest | N7ab2561434b94325b8a237681800f1ec |
124 | N7ab2561434b94325b8a237681800f1ec | rdf:first | sg:person.0632274735.79 |
125 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
126 | N9f6667f605ae432282a17d3c030fd1a6 | schema:name | doi |
127 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/s10531-015-1026-1 |
128 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
129 | Nb4549ccfba1a45e69b82e367db52231b | rdf:first | sg:person.01113643521.22 |
130 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nf5c5c920bb634b36a81a56f9f8fd8fb3 |
131 | Nd34548ca6269473ea3a1038dae61ec8e | schema:volumeNumber | 25 |
132 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
133 | Ne977188425574d9bbd7473be4c0bd33b | rdf:first | sg:person.012447576463.15 |
134 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nb4549ccfba1a45e69b82e367db52231b |
135 | Nf5c5c920bb634b36a81a56f9f8fd8fb3 | rdf:first | sg:person.01040455225.96 |
136 | ″ | rdf:rest | N5605c5202e0b4c2f8f95e17830ba4f6a |
137 | anzsrc-for:05 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
138 | ″ | schema:name | Environmental Sciences |
139 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
140 | anzsrc-for:0502 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
141 | ″ | schema:name | Environmental Science and Management |
142 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
143 | sg:journal.1128750 | schema:issn | 0960-3115 |
144 | ″ | ″ | 1572-9710 |
145 | ″ | schema:name | Biodiversity and Conservation |
146 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
147 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
148 | sg:person.01040455225.96 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.1003.2 |
149 | ″ | schema:familyName | Tulloch |
150 | ″ | schema:givenName | A. I. T. |
151 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01040455225.96 |
152 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
153 | sg:person.01113643521.22 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.11918.30 |
154 | ″ | schema:familyName | Bunnefeld |
155 | ″ | schema:givenName | N. |
156 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01113643521.22 |
157 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
158 | sg:person.012447576463.15 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.11918.30 |
159 | ″ | schema:familyName | Kubasiewicz |
160 | ″ | schema:givenName | L. M. |
161 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012447576463.15 |
162 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
163 | sg:person.0632274735.79 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.11918.30 |
164 | ″ | schema:familyName | Park |
165 | ″ | schema:givenName | K. J. |
166 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0632274735.79 |
167 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
168 | sg:person.07577501157.29 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.479676.d |
169 | ″ | schema:familyName | Quine |
170 | ″ | schema:givenName | C. P. |
171 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.07577501157.29 |
172 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
173 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00442-010-1645-x | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000087452 |
174 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1645-x |
175 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
176 | sg:pub.10.1007/s10344-004-0047-y | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1044966799 |
177 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-004-0047-y |
178 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
179 | sg:pub.10.1007/s10344-011-0601-3 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001023196 |
180 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0601-3 |
181 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
182 | sg:pub.10.1007/s10531-010-9941-7 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029334251 |
183 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9941-7 |
184 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
185 | sg:pub.10.1007/s10764-011-9541-8 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1035506585 |
186 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-011-9541-8 |
187 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
188 | sg:pub.10.1023/b:bioc.0000034011.05412.cd | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1033117005 |
189 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1023/b:bioc.0000034011.05412.cd |
190 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
191 | grid-institutes:grid.1003.2 | schema:alternateName | National Environmental Research Program Environmental Decisions Hub, University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, QLD, Australia |
192 | ″ | schema:name | National Environmental Research Program Environmental Decisions Hub, University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, QLD, Australia |
193 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
194 | grid-institutes:grid.11918.30 | schema:alternateName | Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, Stirling, UK |
195 | ″ | schema:name | Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, Stirling, UK |
196 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
197 | grid-institutes:grid.479676.d | schema:alternateName | Forest Research, Centre for Ecosystems, Society and Biosecurity, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland |
198 | ″ | schema:name | Forest Research, Centre for Ecosystems, Society and Biosecurity, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland |
199 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |