Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle
2012-03-01
AUTHORSNorman Dandy, Stephanie Ballantyne, Darren Moseley, Robin Gill, Christopher Quine, René Van Der Wal
ABSTRACTWildlife management methods such as culling (lethal control) and fencing can be controversial in some circumstances. Such controversy can be problematic for decision-makers or those managing decision-making processes and can lead to management delays or inertia. Understanding the reasons why people support or oppose specific management methods is therefore an important objective for researchers. Attitudes towards methods are in part based on individual beliefs about those methods, the species of wildlife being managed and other associated phenomena. This paper adopts a qualitative approach to develop understanding of these beliefs. We conducted 17 focus-groups on wild deer management at two locations in Britain, with both ‘professional’ land manager and ‘public’ participants (n = 103). We identified a number of individual beliefs which are grouped into five categories: naturalness, overabundance, impacts, effectiveness and animal welfare. Our findings suggest that potentially controversial management methods will receive most support where the objective is to maintain a ‘natural’ environment, at sites where impacts are evident, and when using targeted and effective methods. More... »
PAGES695-706
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10344-012-0619-1
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10344-012-0619-1
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1006621358
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/06",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Biological Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0608",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Zoology",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Centre for Human and Ecological Sciences, Alice Holt Lodge, Forest Research, GU10 4LH, Farnham, Surrey, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.479676.d",
"name": [
"Centre for Human and Ecological Sciences, Alice Holt Lodge, Forest Research, GU10 4LH, Farnham, Surrey, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Dandy",
"givenName": "Norman",
"id": "sg:person.07567276663.34",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.07567276663.34"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Centre for Human and Ecological Sciences, Northern Research Station, Forest Research, EH25 9SY, Roslin, Midlothian, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.479676.d",
"name": [
"Centre for Human and Ecological Sciences, Northern Research Station, Forest Research, EH25 9SY, Roslin, Midlothian, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Ballantyne",
"givenName": "Stephanie",
"id": "sg:person.014436133535.14",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014436133535.14"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Centre for Human and Ecological Sciences, Northern Research Station, Forest Research, EH25 9SY, Roslin, Midlothian, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.479676.d",
"name": [
"Centre for Human and Ecological Sciences, Northern Research Station, Forest Research, EH25 9SY, Roslin, Midlothian, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Moseley",
"givenName": "Darren",
"id": "sg:person.010123403735.07",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.010123403735.07"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Centre for Human and Ecological Sciences, Northern Research Station, Forest Research, EH25 9SY, Roslin, Midlothian, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.479676.d",
"name": [
"Centre for Human and Ecological Sciences, Northern Research Station, Forest Research, EH25 9SY, Roslin, Midlothian, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Gill",
"givenName": "Robin",
"id": "sg:person.010330161452.95",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.010330161452.95"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Centre for Human and Ecological Sciences, Northern Research Station, Forest Research, EH25 9SY, Roslin, Midlothian, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.479676.d",
"name": [
"Centre for Human and Ecological Sciences, Northern Research Station, Forest Research, EH25 9SY, Roslin, Midlothian, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Quine",
"givenName": "Christopher",
"id": "sg:person.07577501157.29",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.07577501157.29"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Aberdeen Centre for Environmental Sustainability, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Auris, 23\u00a0St. Machar Drive, AB24 3UU, Aberdeen, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.7107.1",
"name": [
"Aberdeen Centre for Environmental Sustainability, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Auris, 23\u00a0St. Machar Drive, AB24 3UU, Aberdeen, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Van Der Wal",
"givenName": "Ren\u00e9",
"id": "sg:person.0720504365.19",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0720504365.19"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/429261a",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001099549",
"https://doi.org/10.1038/429261a"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10530-009-9628-8",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1049373389",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9628-8"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10531-010-9941-7",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1029334251",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9941-7"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10344-007-0117-z",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1031998548",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-007-0117-z"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10344-007-0092-4",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1042761234",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-007-0092-4"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-0-387-77040-6",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1035590332",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77040-6"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10344-010-0374-0",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1011363006",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-010-0374-0"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10344-008-0212-9",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1019678485",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0212-9"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2012-03-01",
"datePublishedReg": "2012-03-01",
"description": "Wildlife management methods such as culling (lethal control) and fencing can be controversial in some circumstances. Such controversy can be problematic for decision-makers or those managing decision-making processes and can lead to management delays or inertia. Understanding the reasons why people support or oppose specific management methods is therefore an important objective for researchers. Attitudes towards methods are in part based on individual beliefs about those methods, the species of wildlife being managed and other associated phenomena. This paper adopts a qualitative approach to develop understanding of these beliefs. We conducted 17 focus-groups on wild deer management at two locations in Britain, with both \u2018professional\u2019 land manager and \u2018public\u2019 participants (n\u2009=\u2009103). We identified a number of individual beliefs which are grouped into five categories: naturalness, overabundance, impacts, effectiveness and animal welfare. Our findings suggest that potentially controversial management methods will receive most support where the objective is to maintain a \u2018natural\u2019 environment, at sites where impacts are evident, and when using targeted and effective methods.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10344-012-0619-1",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1023151",
"issn": [
"1612-4642",
"1439-0574"
],
"name": "European Journal of Wildlife Research",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "4",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "58"
}
],
"keywords": [
"species of wildlife",
"management methods",
"land managers",
"deer management",
"specific management methods",
"most support",
"wildlife",
"fencing",
"decision-making process",
"impact",
"species",
"animal welfare",
"naturalness",
"managers",
"overabundance",
"culling",
"management",
"sites",
"important objective",
"objective",
"environment",
"location",
"such controversies",
"Britain",
"understanding",
"effective method",
"categories",
"part",
"welfare",
"process",
"method",
"approach",
"support",
"study",
"number",
"reasons",
"circumstances",
"researchers",
"people",
"qualitative approach",
"effectiveness",
"findings",
"controversy",
"phenomenon",
"inertia",
"paper",
"opposition",
"attitudes",
"beliefs",
"delay",
"individual beliefs",
"qualitative study",
"participants",
"management delays"
],
"name": "Exploring beliefs behind support for and opposition to wildlife management methods: a qualitative study",
"pagination": "695-706",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1006621358"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s10344-012-0619-1"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-012-0619-1",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1006621358"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-10T10:03",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220509/entities/gbq_results/article/article_584.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-012-0619-1"
}
]Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10344-012-0619-1'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10344-012-0619-1'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10344-012-0619-1'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10344-012-0619-1'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
184 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
87 URIs
71 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES