Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle
2017-06-22
AUTHORSA. M. Mustapha, O. T. Arogundade, O. R. Vincent, O. J. Adeniran
ABSTRACTToday’s business entities face an ever-growing number of laws and regulations due to recent high profile business scandals and failures. Small and medium scale enterprises (SMSE) in developing countries do not have an efficient compliance checking mechanism to make their business processes compliant with these regulatory standards. This checking mechanism is needed to give the enterprises full assurance of complete adherence to regulatory standards, bodies, or Service Level Agreements. Therefore, a structured and efficient compliance management model is needed to aid SMSE in launching their businesses safely and to ensure business processes fit into the classical regulatory standards. This paper presents a business rules compliance checking model and architecture for SMSEs in developing countries to verify and monitor their business process models at design time and at run time. It involves a systematic compliance requirements classification and analysis that employs a goal based requirement engineering approach prior to design time verification. It also introduces the idea and demonstration of network analysis for runtime business processes monitoring. The business process model will be verified at design time using a Simple PROMELA Interpreter model checker through Linear Temporal Logic rules. The approaches were tested on a financial institution in Nigeria, a developing nation in Africa at the time of this research. In order to ensure that the choice of the requirements analysis approach was efficient, a number of standard metrics for evaluating requirements engineering techniques were used and promising results were obtained. We also carried out a comparative analysis of the proposed approach in this paper with the approaches of previous research papers. This approach proved to be effective in terms of clarity, simplicity, flexibility and expressiveness while reducing incomplete adherence of business processes and enhancing the correctness of the business process. More... »
PAGES155-185
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1086123218
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/08",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Information and Computing Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/15",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0806",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Information Systems",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1503",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Business and Management",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Agriculture, 234, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.448723.e",
"name": [
"Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Agriculture, 234, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Mustapha",
"givenName": "A. M.",
"id": "sg:person.015661042057.79",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015661042057.79"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Agriculture, 234, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.448723.e",
"name": [
"Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Agriculture, 234, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Arogundade",
"givenName": "O. T.",
"id": "sg:person.07756163225.48",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.07756163225.48"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Agriculture, 234, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.448723.e",
"name": [
"Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Agriculture, 234, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Vincent",
"givenName": "O. R.",
"id": "sg:person.012654341725.74",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012654341725.74"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Mathematics, Federal University of Agriculture, 234, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.448723.e",
"name": [
"Department of Mathematics, Federal University of Agriculture, 234, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Adeniran",
"givenName": "O. J.",
"id": "sg:person.016452755171.47",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.016452755171.47"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10796-009-9185-9",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018594095",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9185-9"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10270-014-0395-3",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1030097208",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-014-0395-3"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-319-29504-6_3",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1002172665",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29504-6_3"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_4",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1019823667",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_4"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-642-24148-2_17",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015913655",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24148-2_17"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2017-06-22",
"datePublishedReg": "2017-06-22",
"description": "Today\u2019s business entities face an ever-growing number of laws and regulations due to recent high profile business scandals and failures. Small and medium scale enterprises (SMSE) in developing countries do not have an efficient compliance checking mechanism to make their business processes compliant with these regulatory standards. This checking mechanism is needed to give the enterprises full assurance of complete adherence to regulatory standards, bodies, or Service Level Agreements. Therefore, a structured and efficient compliance management model is needed to aid SMSE in launching their businesses safely and to ensure business processes fit into the classical regulatory standards. This paper presents a business rules compliance checking model and architecture for SMSEs in developing countries to verify and monitor their business process models at design time and at run time. It involves a systematic compliance requirements classification and analysis that employs a goal based requirement engineering approach prior to design time verification. It also introduces the idea and demonstration of network analysis for runtime business processes monitoring. The business process model will be verified at design time using a Simple PROMELA Interpreter model checker through Linear Temporal Logic rules. The approaches were tested on a financial institution in Nigeria, a developing nation in Africa at the time of this research. In order to ensure that the choice of the requirements analysis approach was efficient, a number of standard metrics for evaluating requirements engineering techniques were used and promising results were obtained. We also carried out a comparative analysis of the proposed approach in this paper with the approaches of previous research papers. This approach proved to be effective in terms of clarity, simplicity, flexibility and expressiveness while reducing incomplete adherence of business processes and enhancing the correctness of the business process.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1136606",
"issn": [
"1617-9846",
"1617-9854"
],
"name": "Information Systems and e-Business Management",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "1",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "16"
}
],
"keywords": [
"business processes",
"business process models",
"business entities",
"Simple Promela Interpreter (SPIN) model checker",
"design time",
"medium scale enterprises",
"business process monitoring",
"requirements engineering techniques",
"Service Level Agreements",
"requirements engineering approaches",
"requirements analysis approach",
"temporal logic rules",
"regulatory standards",
"process model",
"business scandals",
"financial institutions",
"scale enterprises",
"efficient compliance",
"requirements classification",
"Level Agreements",
"model checker",
"requirements management",
"previous research papers",
"management model",
"checking mechanism",
"time verification",
"logic rules",
"number of laws",
"run time",
"rule compliance",
"standard metrics",
"research paper",
"engineering techniques",
"full assurance",
"architecture",
"engineering approach",
"promising results",
"terms of clarity",
"process monitoring",
"SMS",
"business",
"enterprises",
"network analysis",
"scandals",
"countries",
"checker",
"analysis approach",
"expressiveness",
"correctness",
"comparative analysis",
"compliance",
"verification",
"paper",
"metrics",
"standards",
"management",
"classification",
"approach",
"model",
"assurance",
"institutions",
"research",
"choice",
"flexibility",
"rules",
"clarity",
"SMSE",
"process",
"entities",
"time",
"Nigeria",
"simplicity",
"goal",
"idea",
"nations",
"technique",
"number",
"monitoring",
"complete adherence",
"analysis",
"order",
"regulation",
"terms",
"Africa",
"demonstration",
"law",
"results",
"mechanism",
"failure",
"body",
"agreement",
"incomplete adherence",
"adherence"
],
"name": "Towards a compliance requirement management for SMSEs: a model and architecture",
"pagination": "155-185",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1086123218"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1086123218"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T17:04",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_719.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
201 TRIPLES
21 PREDICATES
124 URIs
109 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y | schema:about | anzsrc-for:08 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0806 |
3 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:15 |
4 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:1503 |
5 | ″ | schema:author | N1929f84ba43b4f91ac4903f8c97a7d1e |
6 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_4 |
7 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-319-29504-6_3 |
8 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-642-24148-2_17 |
9 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s10270-014-0395-3 |
10 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s10796-009-9185-9 |
11 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2017-06-22 |
12 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2017-06-22 |
13 | ″ | schema:description | Today’s business entities face an ever-growing number of laws and regulations due to recent high profile business scandals and failures. Small and medium scale enterprises (SMSE) in developing countries do not have an efficient compliance checking mechanism to make their business processes compliant with these regulatory standards. This checking mechanism is needed to give the enterprises full assurance of complete adherence to regulatory standards, bodies, or Service Level Agreements. Therefore, a structured and efficient compliance management model is needed to aid SMSE in launching their businesses safely and to ensure business processes fit into the classical regulatory standards. This paper presents a business rules compliance checking model and architecture for SMSEs in developing countries to verify and monitor their business process models at design time and at run time. It involves a systematic compliance requirements classification and analysis that employs a goal based requirement engineering approach prior to design time verification. It also introduces the idea and demonstration of network analysis for runtime business processes monitoring. The business process model will be verified at design time using a Simple PROMELA Interpreter model checker through Linear Temporal Logic rules. The approaches were tested on a financial institution in Nigeria, a developing nation in Africa at the time of this research. In order to ensure that the choice of the requirements analysis approach was efficient, a number of standard metrics for evaluating requirements engineering techniques were used and promising results were obtained. We also carried out a comparative analysis of the proposed approach in this paper with the approaches of previous research papers. This approach proved to be effective in terms of clarity, simplicity, flexibility and expressiveness while reducing incomplete adherence of business processes and enhancing the correctness of the business process. |
14 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
15 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
16 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N8f48c1164255415e9f3f6c4a813b0533 |
17 | ″ | ″ | N933e6b09201d4383a6109348867b5380 |
18 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1136606 |
19 | ″ | schema:keywords | Africa |
20 | ″ | ″ | Level Agreements |
21 | ″ | ″ | Nigeria |
22 | ″ | ″ | SMS |
23 | ″ | ″ | SMSE |
24 | ″ | ″ | Service Level Agreements |
25 | ″ | ″ | Simple Promela Interpreter (SPIN) model checker |
26 | ″ | ″ | adherence |
27 | ″ | ″ | agreement |
28 | ″ | ″ | analysis |
29 | ″ | ″ | analysis approach |
30 | ″ | ″ | approach |
31 | ″ | ″ | architecture |
32 | ″ | ″ | assurance |
33 | ″ | ″ | body |
34 | ″ | ″ | business |
35 | ″ | ″ | business entities |
36 | ″ | ″ | business process models |
37 | ″ | ″ | business process monitoring |
38 | ″ | ″ | business processes |
39 | ″ | ″ | business scandals |
40 | ″ | ″ | checker |
41 | ″ | ″ | checking mechanism |
42 | ″ | ″ | choice |
43 | ″ | ″ | clarity |
44 | ″ | ″ | classification |
45 | ″ | ″ | comparative analysis |
46 | ″ | ″ | complete adherence |
47 | ″ | ″ | compliance |
48 | ″ | ″ | correctness |
49 | ″ | ″ | countries |
50 | ″ | ″ | demonstration |
51 | ″ | ″ | design time |
52 | ″ | ″ | efficient compliance |
53 | ″ | ″ | engineering approach |
54 | ″ | ″ | engineering techniques |
55 | ″ | ″ | enterprises |
56 | ″ | ″ | entities |
57 | ″ | ″ | expressiveness |
58 | ″ | ″ | failure |
59 | ″ | ″ | financial institutions |
60 | ″ | ″ | flexibility |
61 | ″ | ″ | full assurance |
62 | ″ | ″ | goal |
63 | ″ | ″ | idea |
64 | ″ | ″ | incomplete adherence |
65 | ″ | ″ | institutions |
66 | ″ | ″ | law |
67 | ″ | ″ | logic rules |
68 | ″ | ″ | management |
69 | ″ | ″ | management model |
70 | ″ | ″ | mechanism |
71 | ″ | ″ | medium scale enterprises |
72 | ″ | ″ | metrics |
73 | ″ | ″ | model |
74 | ″ | ″ | model checker |
75 | ″ | ″ | monitoring |
76 | ″ | ″ | nations |
77 | ″ | ″ | network analysis |
78 | ″ | ″ | number |
79 | ″ | ″ | number of laws |
80 | ″ | ″ | order |
81 | ″ | ″ | paper |
82 | ″ | ″ | previous research papers |
83 | ″ | ″ | process |
84 | ″ | ″ | process model |
85 | ″ | ″ | process monitoring |
86 | ″ | ″ | promising results |
87 | ″ | ″ | regulation |
88 | ″ | ″ | regulatory standards |
89 | ″ | ″ | requirements analysis approach |
90 | ″ | ″ | requirements classification |
91 | ″ | ″ | requirements engineering approaches |
92 | ″ | ″ | requirements engineering techniques |
93 | ″ | ″ | requirements management |
94 | ″ | ″ | research |
95 | ″ | ″ | research paper |
96 | ″ | ″ | results |
97 | ″ | ″ | rule compliance |
98 | ″ | ″ | rules |
99 | ″ | ″ | run time |
100 | ″ | ″ | scale enterprises |
101 | ″ | ″ | scandals |
102 | ″ | ″ | simplicity |
103 | ″ | ″ | standard metrics |
104 | ″ | ″ | standards |
105 | ″ | ″ | technique |
106 | ″ | ″ | temporal logic rules |
107 | ″ | ″ | terms |
108 | ″ | ″ | terms of clarity |
109 | ″ | ″ | time |
110 | ″ | ″ | time verification |
111 | ″ | ″ | verification |
112 | ″ | schema:name | Towards a compliance requirement management for SMSEs: a model and architecture |
113 | ″ | schema:pagination | 155-185 |
114 | ″ | schema:productId | N0bbbc52869a94bcaac371717606148cf |
115 | ″ | ″ | N4a65e7ee26704efaad9b6d60447ed61f |
116 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1086123218 |
117 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y |
118 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-08-04T17:04 |
119 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
120 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | Nc8bdaa96337244ae9733d81aa38ce9fc |
121 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y |
122 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
123 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
124 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
125 | N0bbbc52869a94bcaac371717606148cf | schema:name | doi |
126 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y |
127 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
128 | N1929f84ba43b4f91ac4903f8c97a7d1e | rdf:first | sg:person.015661042057.79 |
129 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nc8c1e90136764d61a0373bf9069faf93 |
130 | N4a65e7ee26704efaad9b6d60447ed61f | schema:name | dimensions_id |
131 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1086123218 |
132 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
133 | N869ea79476f04086ae80c4e7d42febaa | rdf:first | sg:person.016452755171.47 |
134 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
135 | N8f48c1164255415e9f3f6c4a813b0533 | schema:issueNumber | 1 |
136 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
137 | N933e6b09201d4383a6109348867b5380 | schema:volumeNumber | 16 |
138 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
139 | Nc8bdaa96337244ae9733d81aa38ce9fc | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
140 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
141 | Nc8c1e90136764d61a0373bf9069faf93 | rdf:first | sg:person.07756163225.48 |
142 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nce4894ad263a4ec7ad21980f6c8ec449 |
143 | Nce4894ad263a4ec7ad21980f6c8ec449 | rdf:first | sg:person.012654341725.74 |
144 | ″ | rdf:rest | N869ea79476f04086ae80c4e7d42febaa |
145 | anzsrc-for:08 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
146 | ″ | schema:name | Information and Computing Sciences |
147 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
148 | anzsrc-for:0806 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
149 | ″ | schema:name | Information Systems |
150 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
151 | anzsrc-for:15 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
152 | ″ | schema:name | Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services |
153 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
154 | anzsrc-for:1503 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
155 | ″ | schema:name | Business and Management |
156 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
157 | sg:journal.1136606 | schema:issn | 1617-9846 |
158 | ″ | ″ | 1617-9854 |
159 | ″ | schema:name | Information Systems and e-Business Management |
160 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
161 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
162 | sg:person.012654341725.74 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.448723.e |
163 | ″ | schema:familyName | Vincent |
164 | ″ | schema:givenName | O. R. |
165 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012654341725.74 |
166 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
167 | sg:person.015661042057.79 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.448723.e |
168 | ″ | schema:familyName | Mustapha |
169 | ″ | schema:givenName | A. M. |
170 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015661042057.79 |
171 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
172 | sg:person.016452755171.47 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.448723.e |
173 | ″ | schema:familyName | Adeniran |
174 | ″ | schema:givenName | O. J. |
175 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.016452755171.47 |
176 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
177 | sg:person.07756163225.48 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.448723.e |
178 | ″ | schema:familyName | Arogundade |
179 | ″ | schema:givenName | O. T. |
180 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.07756163225.48 |
181 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
182 | sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_4 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1019823667 |
183 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_4 |
184 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
185 | sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-319-29504-6_3 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1002172665 |
186 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29504-6_3 |
187 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
188 | sg:pub.10.1007/978-3-642-24148-2_17 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1015913655 |
189 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24148-2_17 |
190 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
191 | sg:pub.10.1007/s10270-014-0395-3 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1030097208 |
192 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-014-0395-3 |
193 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
194 | sg:pub.10.1007/s10796-009-9185-9 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018594095 |
195 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9185-9 |
196 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
197 | grid-institutes:grid.448723.e | schema:alternateName | Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Agriculture, 234, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria |
198 | ″ | ″ | Department of Mathematics, Federal University of Agriculture, 234, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria |
199 | ″ | schema:name | Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Agriculture, 234, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria |
200 | ″ | ″ | Department of Mathematics, Federal University of Agriculture, 234, Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria |
201 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |