Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle
2021-11-29
AUTHORSAbdulrahman Al-Naseem, Abdelrahman Sallam, Ahmed Gonnah, Omar Masoud, Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr, Ilyas S. Aleem
ABSTRACTPurposeRobot-assisted pelvic screw fixation is a new technology with promising benefits on intraoperative outcomes for patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. We aim to compare robot-assisted pelvic screw fixation to the traditional fluoroscopy-assisted technique with regards to intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used along with a search of electronic information to identify all studies comparing the outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional screw fixation in patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. Primary outcomes included operative duration (minutes), intraoperative bleeding (mL), fluoroscopy exposure and intraoperative drilling frequency. Secondary outcome measures included Majeed score, healing time (minutes) and rate (%), postoperative complications, screw positioning, incision length (cm) and guide wire insertion times (minutes). The random effects model was used for analysis.ResultsFour observational studies including a total of 294 patients were identified. There was a significant difference between robot-assisted and conventional groups in terms of operative duration (MD = − 24.66, p < 0.05), intraoperative bleeding (MD = − 10.37, P < 0.05), fluoroscopy exposure (MD = − 2.15, P < 0.05) and intraoperative drilling frequency (MD = − 2.42, P = < 0.05). For secondary outcomes, no significant difference was seen in Majeed score, healing time and rate and postoperative complications. The robot-assisted group had better screw positioning, smaller incision length, and shorter anaesthesia and guide wire insertion times.ConclusionsRobot-assisted fixation has superior intraoperative outcomes compared to conventional fixation. Further studies are needed to look at postoperative outcomes as there is no significant difference in postoperative prognosis between the techniques. More... »
PAGES1-12
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1143452757
PUBMEDhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842991
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Medical and Health Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1103",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Clinical Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.5379.8",
"name": [
"School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Al-Naseem",
"givenName": "Abdulrahman",
"id": "sg:person.013641046253.74",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.013641046253.74"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.5379.8",
"name": [
"School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Sallam",
"givenName": "Abdelrahman",
"id": "sg:person.010157630117.36",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.010157630117.36"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.10025.36",
"name": [
"School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Gonnah",
"givenName": "Ahmed",
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "School of Medicine, King\u2019s College London, London, UK",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.13097.3c",
"name": [
"School of Medicine, King\u2019s College London, London, UK"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Masoud",
"givenName": "Omar",
"id": "sg:person.014350126141.29",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014350126141.29"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Spine, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.414179.e",
"name": [
"Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Spine, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Abd-El-Barr",
"givenName": "Muhammad M.",
"id": "sg:person.0642277542.72",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0642277542.72"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.214458.e",
"name": [
"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Aleem",
"givenName": "Ilyas S.",
"id": "sg:person.01300451205.57",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01300451205.57"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1186/s40634-020-00309-8",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1132950083",
"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00309-8"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00264-012-1496-7",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1008796422",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1496-7"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s10195-015-0363-x",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1035561824",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-015-0363-x"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00064-019-0612-x",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1116492096",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-019-0612-x"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11548-016-1465-5",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000166032",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1465-5"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s11999-013-3119-z",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1011599138",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3119-z"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2021-11-29",
"datePublishedReg": "2021-11-29",
"description": "PurposeRobot-assisted pelvic screw fixation is a new technology with promising benefits on intraoperative outcomes for patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. We aim to compare robot-assisted pelvic screw fixation to the traditional fluoroscopy-assisted technique with regards to intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used along with a search of electronic information to identify all studies comparing the outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional screw fixation in patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. Primary outcomes included operative duration\u00a0(minutes), intraoperative bleeding\u00a0(mL), fluoroscopy exposure and intraoperative drilling\u00a0frequency. Secondary outcome measures included Majeed score, healing time (minutes) and rate (%), postoperative complications, screw positioning, incision length (cm) and guide wire insertion times (minutes). The random effects model was used for analysis.ResultsFour observational studies including a total of 294 patients were identified. There was a significant difference between robot-assisted and conventional groups in terms of operative duration (MD\u2009=\u2009\u2212\u00a024.66, p\u2009<\u20090.05), intraoperative bleeding (MD\u2009=\u2009\u2212\u00a010.37, P\u2009<\u20090.05), fluoroscopy exposure (MD\u2009=\u2009\u2212\u00a02.15, P\u2009<\u20090.05) and intraoperative drilling frequency (MD\u2009=\u2009\u2212\u00a02.42, P\u2009=\u2009\u2009<\u20090.05). For secondary outcomes, no significant difference was seen in Majeed score, healing time and rate and postoperative complications. The robot-assisted group had better screw positioning, smaller incision length, and shorter anaesthesia and guide wire insertion times.ConclusionsRobot-assisted fixation has superior intraoperative outcomes compared to conventional fixation. Further studies are needed to look at postoperative outcomes as there is no significant difference in postoperative prognosis between the techniques.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1114904",
"issn": [
"1633-8065",
"1432-1068"
],
"name": "European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
}
],
"keywords": [
"posterior pelvic ring injuries",
"pelvic ring injuries",
"ring injuries",
"screw fixation",
"postoperative complications",
"postoperative outcomes",
"operative duration",
"Majeed score",
"incision length",
"intraoperative outcomes",
"systematic review",
"significant differences",
"MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items",
"screw positioning",
"pelvic screw fixation",
"conventional screw fixation",
"percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation",
"Secondary outcome measures",
"smaller incision length",
"robot-assisted group",
"Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines",
"insertion time",
"Preferred Reporting Items",
"random-effects model",
"sacroiliac screw fixation",
"primary outcome",
"intraoperative bleeding",
"Secondary outcomes",
"postoperative prognosis",
"short anesthesia",
"outcome measures",
"observational study",
"conventional group",
"healing time",
"Reporting Items",
"patients",
"injury",
"outcomes",
"complications",
"Further studies",
"effects model",
"fixation",
"scores",
"duration",
"exposure",
"bleeding",
"review",
"anesthesia",
"ConclusionsRobot",
"prognosis",
"group",
"promising benefits",
"differences",
"study",
"total",
"PurposeRobot",
"conventional fixation",
"rate",
"guidelines",
"time",
"frequency",
"benefits",
"measures",
"length",
"regard",
"positioning",
"search",
"items",
"technique",
"analysis",
"information",
"new technologies",
"model",
"terms",
"electronic information",
"technology",
"drilling",
"robot",
"drilling frequency"
],
"name": "Robot-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis",
"pagination": "1-12",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1143452757"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x"
]
},
{
"name": "pubmed_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"34842991"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1143452757"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-10T10:30",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220509/entities/gbq_results/article/article_909.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
205 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
109 URIs
95 LITERALS
5 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x | schema:about | anzsrc-for:11 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:1103 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | N9ca4b4fb9cea494a9af953f8ce91ea77 |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/s00064-019-0612-x |
5 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s00264-012-1496-7 |
6 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s10195-015-0363-x |
7 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s11548-016-1465-5 |
8 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s11999-013-3119-z |
9 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1186/s40634-020-00309-8 |
10 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2021-11-29 |
11 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2021-11-29 |
12 | ″ | schema:description | PurposeRobot-assisted pelvic screw fixation is a new technology with promising benefits on intraoperative outcomes for patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. We aim to compare robot-assisted pelvic screw fixation to the traditional fluoroscopy-assisted technique with regards to intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used along with a search of electronic information to identify all studies comparing the outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional screw fixation in patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries. Primary outcomes included operative duration (minutes), intraoperative bleeding (mL), fluoroscopy exposure and intraoperative drilling frequency. Secondary outcome measures included Majeed score, healing time (minutes) and rate (%), postoperative complications, screw positioning, incision length (cm) and guide wire insertion times (minutes). The random effects model was used for analysis.ResultsFour observational studies including a total of 294 patients were identified. There was a significant difference between robot-assisted and conventional groups in terms of operative duration (MD = − 24.66, p < 0.05), intraoperative bleeding (MD = − 10.37, P < 0.05), fluoroscopy exposure (MD = − 2.15, P < 0.05) and intraoperative drilling frequency (MD = − 2.42, P = < 0.05). For secondary outcomes, no significant difference was seen in Majeed score, healing time and rate and postoperative complications. The robot-assisted group had better screw positioning, smaller incision length, and shorter anaesthesia and guide wire insertion times.ConclusionsRobot-assisted fixation has superior intraoperative outcomes compared to conventional fixation. Further studies are needed to look at postoperative outcomes as there is no significant difference in postoperative prognosis between the techniques. |
13 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
14 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
15 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
16 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | sg:journal.1114904 |
17 | ″ | schema:keywords | ConclusionsRobot |
18 | ″ | ″ | Further studies |
19 | ″ | ″ | Majeed score |
20 | ″ | ″ | Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines |
21 | ″ | ″ | MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items |
22 | ″ | ″ | Preferred Reporting Items |
23 | ″ | ″ | PurposeRobot |
24 | ″ | ″ | Reporting Items |
25 | ″ | ″ | Secondary outcome measures |
26 | ″ | ″ | Secondary outcomes |
27 | ″ | ″ | analysis |
28 | ″ | ″ | anesthesia |
29 | ″ | ″ | benefits |
30 | ″ | ″ | bleeding |
31 | ″ | ″ | complications |
32 | ″ | ″ | conventional fixation |
33 | ″ | ″ | conventional group |
34 | ″ | ″ | conventional screw fixation |
35 | ″ | ″ | differences |
36 | ″ | ″ | drilling |
37 | ″ | ″ | drilling frequency |
38 | ″ | ″ | duration |
39 | ″ | ″ | effects model |
40 | ″ | ″ | electronic information |
41 | ″ | ″ | exposure |
42 | ″ | ″ | fixation |
43 | ″ | ″ | frequency |
44 | ″ | ″ | group |
45 | ″ | ″ | guidelines |
46 | ″ | ″ | healing time |
47 | ″ | ″ | incision length |
48 | ″ | ″ | information |
49 | ″ | ″ | injury |
50 | ″ | ″ | insertion time |
51 | ″ | ″ | intraoperative bleeding |
52 | ″ | ″ | intraoperative outcomes |
53 | ″ | ″ | items |
54 | ″ | ″ | length |
55 | ″ | ″ | measures |
56 | ″ | ″ | model |
57 | ″ | ″ | new technologies |
58 | ″ | ″ | observational study |
59 | ″ | ″ | operative duration |
60 | ″ | ″ | outcome measures |
61 | ″ | ″ | outcomes |
62 | ″ | ″ | patients |
63 | ″ | ″ | pelvic ring injuries |
64 | ″ | ″ | pelvic screw fixation |
65 | ″ | ″ | percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation |
66 | ″ | ″ | positioning |
67 | ″ | ″ | posterior pelvic ring injuries |
68 | ″ | ″ | postoperative complications |
69 | ″ | ″ | postoperative outcomes |
70 | ″ | ″ | postoperative prognosis |
71 | ″ | ″ | primary outcome |
72 | ″ | ″ | prognosis |
73 | ″ | ″ | promising benefits |
74 | ″ | ″ | random-effects model |
75 | ″ | ″ | rate |
76 | ″ | ″ | regard |
77 | ″ | ″ | review |
78 | ″ | ″ | ring injuries |
79 | ″ | ″ | robot |
80 | ″ | ″ | robot-assisted group |
81 | ″ | ″ | sacroiliac screw fixation |
82 | ″ | ″ | scores |
83 | ″ | ″ | screw fixation |
84 | ″ | ″ | screw positioning |
85 | ″ | ″ | search |
86 | ″ | ″ | short anesthesia |
87 | ″ | ″ | significant differences |
88 | ″ | ″ | smaller incision length |
89 | ″ | ″ | study |
90 | ″ | ″ | systematic review |
91 | ″ | ″ | technique |
92 | ″ | ″ | technology |
93 | ″ | ″ | terms |
94 | ″ | ″ | time |
95 | ″ | ″ | total |
96 | ″ | schema:name | Robot-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
97 | ″ | schema:pagination | 1-12 |
98 | ″ | schema:productId | N1deceeec5c7744829581b5b2172cb1f7 |
99 | ″ | ″ | N5a95b032824d46e78a6cfaf302196e06 |
100 | ″ | ″ | Na2c1260dd05d473e803370c5fe9c30b9 |
101 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1143452757 |
102 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x |
103 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-05-10T10:30 |
104 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
105 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | Nf08aca3beefc4847b3f64a76ce65853a |
106 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x |
107 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
108 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
109 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
110 | N1deceeec5c7744829581b5b2172cb1f7 | schema:name | dimensions_id |
111 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1143452757 |
112 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
113 | N32cfee36c9254acbbea996b2d57cc9b9 | rdf:first | Necdc0323230e4b068dfd714524452887 |
114 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nc39b713fb54b4a6b83212a45f14d2d5d |
115 | N5a95b032824d46e78a6cfaf302196e06 | schema:name | doi |
116 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/s00590-021-03167-x |
117 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
118 | N5f95d31db0d94df78acd2a05716075be | rdf:first | sg:person.010157630117.36 |
119 | ″ | rdf:rest | N32cfee36c9254acbbea996b2d57cc9b9 |
120 | N9ca4b4fb9cea494a9af953f8ce91ea77 | rdf:first | sg:person.013641046253.74 |
121 | ″ | rdf:rest | N5f95d31db0d94df78acd2a05716075be |
122 | Na2c1260dd05d473e803370c5fe9c30b9 | schema:name | pubmed_id |
123 | ″ | schema:value | 34842991 |
124 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
125 | Nc39b713fb54b4a6b83212a45f14d2d5d | rdf:first | sg:person.014350126141.29 |
126 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nd9e8a25b5a4b4c93ac0228fa846440cc |
127 | Nd9e8a25b5a4b4c93ac0228fa846440cc | rdf:first | sg:person.0642277542.72 |
128 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nde939962584841d6be8afecd5b5f4310 |
129 | Nde939962584841d6be8afecd5b5f4310 | rdf:first | sg:person.01300451205.57 |
130 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
131 | Necdc0323230e4b068dfd714524452887 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.10025.36 |
132 | ″ | schema:familyName | Gonnah |
133 | ″ | schema:givenName | Ahmed |
134 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
135 | Nf08aca3beefc4847b3f64a76ce65853a | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
136 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
137 | anzsrc-for:11 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
138 | ″ | schema:name | Medical and Health Sciences |
139 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
140 | anzsrc-for:1103 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
141 | ″ | schema:name | Clinical Sciences |
142 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
143 | sg:journal.1114904 | schema:issn | 1432-1068 |
144 | ″ | ″ | 1633-8065 |
145 | ″ | schema:name | European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology |
146 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
147 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
148 | sg:person.010157630117.36 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.5379.8 |
149 | ″ | schema:familyName | Sallam |
150 | ″ | schema:givenName | Abdelrahman |
151 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.010157630117.36 |
152 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
153 | sg:person.01300451205.57 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.214458.e |
154 | ″ | schema:familyName | Aleem |
155 | ″ | schema:givenName | Ilyas S. |
156 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01300451205.57 |
157 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
158 | sg:person.013641046253.74 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.5379.8 |
159 | ″ | schema:familyName | Al-Naseem |
160 | ″ | schema:givenName | Abdulrahman |
161 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.013641046253.74 |
162 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
163 | sg:person.014350126141.29 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.13097.3c |
164 | ″ | schema:familyName | Masoud |
165 | ″ | schema:givenName | Omar |
166 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014350126141.29 |
167 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
168 | sg:person.0642277542.72 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.414179.e |
169 | ″ | schema:familyName | Abd-El-Barr |
170 | ″ | schema:givenName | Muhammad M. |
171 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0642277542.72 |
172 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
173 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00064-019-0612-x | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1116492096 |
174 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-019-0612-x |
175 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
176 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00264-012-1496-7 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1008796422 |
177 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1496-7 |
178 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
179 | sg:pub.10.1007/s10195-015-0363-x | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1035561824 |
180 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-015-0363-x |
181 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
182 | sg:pub.10.1007/s11548-016-1465-5 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1000166032 |
183 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1465-5 |
184 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
185 | sg:pub.10.1007/s11999-013-3119-z | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1011599138 |
186 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3119-z |
187 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
188 | sg:pub.10.1186/s40634-020-00309-8 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1132950083 |
189 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00309-8 |
190 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
191 | grid-institutes:grid.10025.36 | schema:alternateName | School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK |
192 | ″ | schema:name | School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK |
193 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
194 | grid-institutes:grid.13097.3c | schema:alternateName | School of Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK |
195 | ″ | schema:name | School of Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK |
196 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
197 | grid-institutes:grid.214458.e | schema:alternateName | Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA |
198 | ″ | schema:name | Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA |
199 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
200 | grid-institutes:grid.414179.e | schema:alternateName | Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Spine, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, USA |
201 | ″ | schema:name | Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Spine, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, USA |
202 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
203 | grid-institutes:grid.5379.8 | schema:alternateName | School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK |
204 | ″ | schema:name | School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK |
205 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |