Interpretation of nitrogen isotope signatures using the NIFTE model View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

1999-08

AUTHORS

Erik A. Hobbie, Stephen A. Macko, Herman H. Shugart

ABSTRACT

Nitrogen cycling in forest soils has been intensively studied for many years because nitrogen is often the limiting nutrient for forest growth. Complex interactions between soil, microbes, and plants and the consequent inability to correlate δ15N changes with biologic processes have limited the use of natural abundances of nitrogen isotopes to study nitrogen (N) dynamics. During an investigation of N dynamics along the 250-year-old successional sequence in Glacier Bay, Alaska, United States, we observed several puzzling isotopic patterns, including a consistent decline in δ15N of the late successional dominant Picea at older sites, a lack of agreement between mineral N δ15N and foliar δ15N, and high isotopic signatures for mycorrhizal fungi. In order to understand the mechanisms creating these patterns, we developed a model of N dynamics and N isotopes (Nitrogen Isotope Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, NIFTE), which simulated the major transformations of the N cycle and predicted isotopic signatures of different plant species and soil pools. Comparisons with field data from five sites along the successional sequence indicated that NIFTE can duplicate observed patterns in δ15N of soil, foliage, and mineral N over time. Different scenarios that could account for the observed isotopic patterns were tested in model simulations. Possible mechanisms included increased isotopic fractionation on mineralization, fractionation during the transfer of nitrogen from mycorrhizal fungi to plants, variable fractionation on uptake by mycorrhizal fungi compared to plants, no fractionation on mycorrhizal transfer, and elimination of mycorrhizal fungi as a pool in the model. The model results suggest that fractionation during mineralization must be small (˜2‰), and that no fractionation occurs during plant or mycorrhizal uptake. A net fractionation during mycorrhizal transfer of nitrogen to vegetation provided the best fit to isotopic data on mineral N, plants, soils, and mycorrhizal fungi. The model and field results indicate that the importance of mycorrhizal fungi to N uptake is probably less under conditions of high N availability. Use of this model should encourage a more rigorous assessment of isotopic signatures in ecosystem studies and provide insights into the biologic transformations which affect those signatures. This should lead to an enhanced understanding of some of the fundamental controls on nitrogen dynamics. More... »

PAGES

405-415

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s004420050873

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420050873

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051281770

PUBMED

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28308017


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/06", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Biological Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0602", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Ecology", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0607", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Plant Biology", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA, US", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.27755.32", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA, US"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Hobbie", 
        "givenName": "Erik A.", 
        "id": "sg:person.0631420750.75", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0631420750.75"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA, US", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.27755.32", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA, US"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Macko", 
        "givenName": "Stephen A.", 
        "id": "sg:person.013256350705.53", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.013256350705.53"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA, US", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.27755.32", 
          "name": [
            "Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA, US"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Shugart", 
        "givenName": "Herman H.", 
        "id": "sg:person.0733637452.33", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0733637452.33"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "1999-08", 
    "datePublishedReg": "1999-08-01", 
    "description": "Abstract Nitrogen cycling in forest soils has been intensively studied for many years because nitrogen is often the limiting nutrient for forest growth. Complex interactions between soil, microbes, and plants and the consequent inability to correlate \u03b415N changes with biologic processes have limited the use of natural abundances of nitrogen isotopes to study nitrogen (N) dynamics. During an investigation of N dynamics along the 250-year-old successional sequence in Glacier Bay, Alaska, United States, we observed several puzzling isotopic patterns, including a consistent decline in \u03b415N of the late successional dominant Picea at older sites, a lack of agreement between mineral N \u03b415N and foliar \u03b415N, and high isotopic signatures for mycorrhizal fungi. In order to understand the mechanisms creating these patterns, we developed a model of N dynamics and N isotopes (Nitrogen Isotope Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, NIFTE), which simulated the major transformations of the N cycle and predicted isotopic signatures of different plant species and soil pools. Comparisons with field data from five sites along the successional sequence indicated that NIFTE can duplicate observed patterns in \u03b415N of soil, foliage, and mineral N over time. Different scenarios that could account for the observed isotopic patterns were tested in model simulations. Possible mechanisms included increased isotopic fractionation on mineralization, fractionation during the transfer of nitrogen from mycorrhizal fungi to plants, variable fractionation on uptake by mycorrhizal fungi compared to plants, no fractionation on mycorrhizal transfer, and elimination of mycorrhizal fungi as a pool in the model. The model results suggest that fractionation during mineralization must be small (\u02dc2\u2030), and that no fractionation occurs during plant or mycorrhizal uptake. A net fractionation during mycorrhizal transfer of nitrogen to vegetation provided the best fit to isotopic data on mineral N, plants, soils, and mycorrhizal fungi. The model and field results indicate that the importance of mycorrhizal fungi to N uptake is probably less under conditions of high N availability. Use of this model should encourage a more rigorous assessment of isotopic signatures in ecosystem studies and provide insights into the biologic transformations which affect those signatures. This should lead to an enhanced understanding of some of the fundamental controls on nitrogen dynamics.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s004420050873", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1009586", 
        "issn": [
          "0029-8549", 
          "1432-1939"
        ], 
        "name": "Oecologia", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "3", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "120"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "mycorrhizal fungi", 
      "N dynamics", 
      "nitrogen dynamics", 
      "isotopic signatures", 
      "mineral N", 
      "successional sequence", 
      "\u03b415N of soil", 
      "high isotopic signatures", 
      "nitrogen isotope signatures", 
      "high N availability", 
      "different plant species", 
      "transfer of nitrogen", 
      "isotopic patterns", 
      "soil pools", 
      "forest soil", 
      "foliar \u03b415N", 
      "mycorrhizal uptake", 
      "nitrogen cycling", 
      "N availability", 
      "ecosystem studies", 
      "N cycle", 
      "forest growth", 
      "nitrogen isotopes", 
      "older sites", 
      "plant species", 
      "N uptake", 
      "N isotopes", 
      "observed isotopic patterns", 
      "\u03b415N", 
      "biologic transformation", 
      "isotope signatures", 
      "soil", 
      "Glacier Bay", 
      "net fractionation", 
      "natural abundance", 
      "observed patterns", 
      "consistent decline", 
      "field data", 
      "plants", 
      "isotopic fractionation", 
      "fungi", 
      "nitrogen", 
      "fundamental control", 
      "model results", 
      "biologic processes", 
      "model simulations", 
      "mineralization", 
      "field results", 
      "complex interactions", 
      "rigorous assessment", 
      "variable fractionation", 
      "isotopes", 
      "consequent inability", 
      "pool", 
      "uptake", 
      "different scenarios", 
      "vegetation", 
      "isotopic data", 
      "dynamics", 
      "sequence", 
      "fractionation", 
      "foliage", 
      "sites", 
      "abundance", 
      "nutrients", 
      "cycling", 
      "Bay", 
      "Picea", 
      "patterns", 
      "species", 
      "NIFTE", 
      "microbes", 
      "Alaska", 
      "major transformation", 
      "United States", 
      "enhanced understanding", 
      "signatures", 
      "availability", 
      "decline", 
      "possible mechanism", 
      "mechanism", 
      "growth", 
      "lack of agreement", 
      "scenarios", 
      "assessment", 
      "use", 
      "importance", 
      "insights", 
      "best fit", 
      "interaction", 
      "data", 
      "cycle", 
      "transfer", 
      "understanding", 
      "control", 
      "model", 
      "years", 
      "results", 
      "conditions", 
      "lack", 
      "transformation", 
      "inability", 
      "interpretation", 
      "process", 
      "study", 
      "comparison", 
      "state", 
      "fit", 
      "order", 
      "time", 
      "simulations", 
      "agreement", 
      "elimination", 
      "investigation"
    ], 
    "name": "Interpretation of nitrogen isotope signatures using the NIFTE model", 
    "pagination": "405-415", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1051281770"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/s004420050873"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "pubmed_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "28308017"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050873", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051281770"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-12-01T06:23", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20221201/entities/gbq_results/article/article_341.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050873"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s004420050873'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s004420050873'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s004420050873'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s004420050873'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

193 TRIPLES      20 PREDICATES      141 URIs      132 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/s004420050873 schema:about anzsrc-for:06
2 anzsrc-for:0602
3 anzsrc-for:0607
4 schema:author Nc71a9451c28a49e8ab0770b3cb262c65
5 schema:datePublished 1999-08
6 schema:datePublishedReg 1999-08-01
7 schema:description Abstract Nitrogen cycling in forest soils has been intensively studied for many years because nitrogen is often the limiting nutrient for forest growth. Complex interactions between soil, microbes, and plants and the consequent inability to correlate δ15N changes with biologic processes have limited the use of natural abundances of nitrogen isotopes to study nitrogen (N) dynamics. During an investigation of N dynamics along the 250-year-old successional sequence in Glacier Bay, Alaska, United States, we observed several puzzling isotopic patterns, including a consistent decline in δ15N of the late successional dominant Picea at older sites, a lack of agreement between mineral N δ15N and foliar δ15N, and high isotopic signatures for mycorrhizal fungi. In order to understand the mechanisms creating these patterns, we developed a model of N dynamics and N isotopes (Nitrogen Isotope Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, NIFTE), which simulated the major transformations of the N cycle and predicted isotopic signatures of different plant species and soil pools. Comparisons with field data from five sites along the successional sequence indicated that NIFTE can duplicate observed patterns in δ15N of soil, foliage, and mineral N over time. Different scenarios that could account for the observed isotopic patterns were tested in model simulations. Possible mechanisms included increased isotopic fractionation on mineralization, fractionation during the transfer of nitrogen from mycorrhizal fungi to plants, variable fractionation on uptake by mycorrhizal fungi compared to plants, no fractionation on mycorrhizal transfer, and elimination of mycorrhizal fungi as a pool in the model. The model results suggest that fractionation during mineralization must be small (˜2‰), and that no fractionation occurs during plant or mycorrhizal uptake. A net fractionation during mycorrhizal transfer of nitrogen to vegetation provided the best fit to isotopic data on mineral N, plants, soils, and mycorrhizal fungi. The model and field results indicate that the importance of mycorrhizal fungi to N uptake is probably less under conditions of high N availability. Use of this model should encourage a more rigorous assessment of isotopic signatures in ecosystem studies and provide insights into the biologic transformations which affect those signatures. This should lead to an enhanced understanding of some of the fundamental controls on nitrogen dynamics.
8 schema:genre article
9 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
10 schema:isPartOf N16dfd58a7a384ae1934dd55023419cb1
11 N70c0627f879c47098fb1f8348de255db
12 sg:journal.1009586
13 schema:keywords Alaska
14 Bay
15 Glacier Bay
16 N availability
17 N cycle
18 N dynamics
19 N isotopes
20 N uptake
21 NIFTE
22 Picea
23 United States
24 abundance
25 agreement
26 assessment
27 availability
28 best fit
29 biologic processes
30 biologic transformation
31 comparison
32 complex interactions
33 conditions
34 consequent inability
35 consistent decline
36 control
37 cycle
38 cycling
39 data
40 decline
41 different plant species
42 different scenarios
43 dynamics
44 ecosystem studies
45 elimination
46 enhanced understanding
47 field data
48 field results
49 fit
50 foliage
51 foliar δ15N
52 forest growth
53 forest soil
54 fractionation
55 fundamental control
56 fungi
57 growth
58 high N availability
59 high isotopic signatures
60 importance
61 inability
62 insights
63 interaction
64 interpretation
65 investigation
66 isotope signatures
67 isotopes
68 isotopic data
69 isotopic fractionation
70 isotopic patterns
71 isotopic signatures
72 lack
73 lack of agreement
74 major transformation
75 mechanism
76 microbes
77 mineral N
78 mineralization
79 model
80 model results
81 model simulations
82 mycorrhizal fungi
83 mycorrhizal uptake
84 natural abundance
85 net fractionation
86 nitrogen
87 nitrogen cycling
88 nitrogen dynamics
89 nitrogen isotope signatures
90 nitrogen isotopes
91 nutrients
92 observed isotopic patterns
93 observed patterns
94 older sites
95 order
96 patterns
97 plant species
98 plants
99 pool
100 possible mechanism
101 process
102 results
103 rigorous assessment
104 scenarios
105 sequence
106 signatures
107 simulations
108 sites
109 soil
110 soil pools
111 species
112 state
113 study
114 successional sequence
115 time
116 transfer
117 transfer of nitrogen
118 transformation
119 understanding
120 uptake
121 use
122 variable fractionation
123 vegetation
124 years
125 δ15N
126 δ15N of soil
127 schema:name Interpretation of nitrogen isotope signatures using the NIFTE model
128 schema:pagination 405-415
129 schema:productId N57b2c12fd69c4f64b4240408bc351a58
130 N85c124b36dee418c824c651a33119215
131 Nfe99a697bd8242b3a46e83969b71f3c3
132 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051281770
133 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050873
134 schema:sdDatePublished 2022-12-01T06:23
135 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
136 schema:sdPublisher N09decc784643483b8e33da771037cb91
137 schema:url https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050873
138 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
139 sgo:sdDataset articles
140 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
141 N09decc784643483b8e33da771037cb91 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
142 rdf:type schema:Organization
143 N16dfd58a7a384ae1934dd55023419cb1 schema:volumeNumber 120
144 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
145 N57b2c12fd69c4f64b4240408bc351a58 schema:name doi
146 schema:value 10.1007/s004420050873
147 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
148 N5acaf0da345145149701ca147adbb55c rdf:first sg:person.013256350705.53
149 rdf:rest Nb82c3fa40c4f4e2bb3323aea4f9cc5b4
150 N70c0627f879c47098fb1f8348de255db schema:issueNumber 3
151 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
152 N85c124b36dee418c824c651a33119215 schema:name dimensions_id
153 schema:value pub.1051281770
154 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
155 Nb82c3fa40c4f4e2bb3323aea4f9cc5b4 rdf:first sg:person.0733637452.33
156 rdf:rest rdf:nil
157 Nc71a9451c28a49e8ab0770b3cb262c65 rdf:first sg:person.0631420750.75
158 rdf:rest N5acaf0da345145149701ca147adbb55c
159 Nfe99a697bd8242b3a46e83969b71f3c3 schema:name pubmed_id
160 schema:value 28308017
161 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
162 anzsrc-for:06 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
163 schema:name Biological Sciences
164 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
165 anzsrc-for:0602 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
166 schema:name Ecology
167 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
168 anzsrc-for:0607 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
169 schema:name Plant Biology
170 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
171 sg:journal.1009586 schema:issn 0029-8549
172 1432-1939
173 schema:name Oecologia
174 schema:publisher Springer Nature
175 rdf:type schema:Periodical
176 sg:person.013256350705.53 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.27755.32
177 schema:familyName Macko
178 schema:givenName Stephen A.
179 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.013256350705.53
180 rdf:type schema:Person
181 sg:person.0631420750.75 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.27755.32
182 schema:familyName Hobbie
183 schema:givenName Erik A.
184 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0631420750.75
185 rdf:type schema:Person
186 sg:person.0733637452.33 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.27755.32
187 schema:familyName Shugart
188 schema:givenName Herman H.
189 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0733637452.33
190 rdf:type schema:Person
191 grid-institutes:grid.27755.32 schema:alternateName Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA, US
192 schema:name Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA, US
193 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...