How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists? View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle      Open Access: True


Article Info

DATE

2002-08

AUTHORS

Anders Møller, Michael D. Jennions

ABSTRACT

The average amount of variance explained by the main factor of interest in ecological and evolutionary studies is an important quantity because it allows evaluation of the general strength of research findings. It also has important implications for the planning of studies. Theoretically we should be able to explain 100% of the variance in data, but randomness and noise may reduce this amount considerably in biological studies. We performed a meta-analysis using data from 43 published meta-analyses in ecology and evolution with 93 estimates of mean effect size using Pearson's r and 136 estimates using Hedges' d or g. This revealed that (depending on the exact analysis) the mean amount of variance (r 2) explained was 2.51-5.42%. The various 95% confidence intervals fell between 1.99 and 7.05%. There was a strongly positive relationship between the fail-safe number (the number of null results needed to nullify an effect) and the coefficient of determination (r 2) or effect size. Analysis at the level of individual tests of null hypotheses showed that the amount of variance key factors explained differed among fields with the largest amount in physiological ecology, lower amounts in ecology and the lowest in evolutionary studies. In all fields though, the hypothesized relationship (e.g. main effect of a fixed treatment) explained little of the variation in the trait of interest. Our finding has important implications for the interpretation of scientific studies. Across studies, the average effect size reported is between Pearson r=0.180 and 0.193 and Hedges' d=0.631 and 0.721. Thus the average sample sizes needed to conclude that a particular relationship is absent with a power of 80% and α=0.05 (two-tailed) are considerably larger than usually recorded in studies of evolution and ecology. For example, to detect r=0.193, the required sample size is 207. More... »

PAGES

492-500

Journal

TITLE

Oecologia

ISSUE

4

VOLUME

132

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1032307177

PUBMED

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28547634


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0602", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Ecology", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/06", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Biological Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Sorbonne University", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.462844.8", 
          "name": [
            "Laboratoire d'Ecologie Evolutive Parasitaire, CNRS UMR 7103, Universit\u00e9 Pierre et Marie Curie, 7 quai St. Bernard, Case 237, 75252, Paris Cedex 05, France"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "M\u00f8ller", 
        "givenName": "Anders", 
        "id": "sg:person.015020067503.88", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015020067503.88"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Australian National University", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.1001.0", 
          "name": [
            "Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0948, APO AA 34002\u20130948, USA", 
            "School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, A.C.T. 0200, Canberra, Australia"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Jennions", 
        "givenName": "Michael D.", 
        "id": "sg:person.01040041443.21", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01040041443.21"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2002-08", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2002-08-01", 
    "description": "The average amount of variance explained by the main factor of interest in ecological and evolutionary studies is an important quantity because it allows evaluation of the general strength of research findings. It also has important implications for the planning of studies. Theoretically we should be able to explain 100% of the variance in data, but randomness and noise may reduce this amount considerably in biological studies. We performed a meta-analysis using data from 43 published meta-analyses in ecology and evolution with 93 estimates of mean effect size using Pearson's r and 136 estimates using Hedges' d or g. This revealed that (depending on the exact analysis) the mean amount of variance (r 2) explained was 2.51-5.42%. The various 95% confidence intervals fell between 1.99 and 7.05%. There was a strongly positive relationship between the fail-safe number (the number of null results needed to nullify an effect) and the coefficient of determination (r 2) or effect size. Analysis at the level of individual tests of null hypotheses showed that the amount of variance key factors explained differed among fields with the largest amount in physiological ecology, lower amounts in ecology and the lowest in evolutionary studies. In all fields though, the hypothesized relationship (e.g. main effect of a fixed treatment) explained little of the variation in the trait of interest. Our finding has important implications for the interpretation of scientific studies. Across studies, the average effect size reported is between Pearson r=0.180 and 0.193 and Hedges' d=0.631 and 0.721. Thus the average sample sizes needed to conclude that a particular relationship is absent with a power of 80% and \u03b1=0.05 (two-tailed) are considerably larger than usually recorded in studies of evolution and ecology. For example, to detect r=0.193, the required sample size is 207.", 
    "genre": "research_article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2", 
    "inLanguage": [
      "en"
    ], 
    "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1009586", 
        "issn": [
          "0029-8549", 
          "1432-1939"
        ], 
        "name": "Oecologia", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "4", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "132"
      }
    ], 
    "name": "How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists?", 
    "pagination": "492-500", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "readcube_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "99e7aebb51ec8d5916ceedd16ef7f9653d6d03c51823cd5224ebf2bfc3955a1c"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "pubmed_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "28547634"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "nlm_unique_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "0150372"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1032307177"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1032307177"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-10T21:41", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000001_0000000264/records_8687_00000533.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2Fs00442-002-0952-2"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

80 TRIPLES      20 PREDICATES      29 URIs      21 LITERALS      9 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2 schema:about anzsrc-for:06
2 anzsrc-for:0602
3 schema:author N5c52b66b471b4868a1a5a753e0a992a8
4 schema:datePublished 2002-08
5 schema:datePublishedReg 2002-08-01
6 schema:description The average amount of variance explained by the main factor of interest in ecological and evolutionary studies is an important quantity because it allows evaluation of the general strength of research findings. It also has important implications for the planning of studies. Theoretically we should be able to explain 100% of the variance in data, but randomness and noise may reduce this amount considerably in biological studies. We performed a meta-analysis using data from 43 published meta-analyses in ecology and evolution with 93 estimates of mean effect size using Pearson's r and 136 estimates using Hedges' d or g. This revealed that (depending on the exact analysis) the mean amount of variance (r <sup>2</sup>) explained was 2.51-5.42%. The various 95% confidence intervals fell between 1.99 and 7.05%. There was a strongly positive relationship between the fail-safe number (the number of null results needed to nullify an effect) and the coefficient of determination (r <sup>2</sup>) or effect size. Analysis at the level of individual tests of null hypotheses showed that the amount of variance key factors explained differed among fields with the largest amount in physiological ecology, lower amounts in ecology and the lowest in evolutionary studies. In all fields though, the hypothesized relationship (e.g. main effect of a fixed treatment) explained little of the variation in the trait of interest. Our finding has important implications for the interpretation of scientific studies. Across studies, the average effect size reported is between Pearson r=0.180 and 0.193 and Hedges' d=0.631 and 0.721. Thus the average sample sizes needed to conclude that a particular relationship is absent with a power of 80% and α=0.05 (two-tailed) are considerably larger than usually recorded in studies of evolution and ecology. For example, to detect r=0.193, the required sample size is 207.
7 schema:genre research_article
8 schema:inLanguage en
9 schema:isAccessibleForFree true
10 schema:isPartOf N27bc84980422484ba4fbbab1bf8a8e52
11 Nf38f41b34dfb4e3192f06dad4d422053
12 sg:journal.1009586
13 schema:name How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists?
14 schema:pagination 492-500
15 schema:productId N2d31ebcbd07c4a5baa9299d5e4221f6b
16 N413dccd3b73440a1a381b6210f6ea62d
17 N63ecf4e04f2c4dc1bfd19cade048d6f2
18 Nebde468b9f684e11a8d45270bca477ef
19 Nfbf29e0e58a14d83af50e8a43f1ddcad
20 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1032307177
21 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2
22 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-10T21:41
23 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
24 schema:sdPublisher N3f1a244f8d1847dda60128e27520ca57
25 schema:url http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2Fs00442-002-0952-2
26 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
27 sgo:sdDataset articles
28 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
29 N27bc84980422484ba4fbbab1bf8a8e52 schema:volumeNumber 132
30 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
31 N2d31ebcbd07c4a5baa9299d5e4221f6b schema:name readcube_id
32 schema:value 99e7aebb51ec8d5916ceedd16ef7f9653d6d03c51823cd5224ebf2bfc3955a1c
33 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
34 N3f1a244f8d1847dda60128e27520ca57 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
35 rdf:type schema:Organization
36 N413dccd3b73440a1a381b6210f6ea62d schema:name dimensions_id
37 schema:value pub.1032307177
38 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
39 N5c52b66b471b4868a1a5a753e0a992a8 rdf:first sg:person.015020067503.88
40 rdf:rest N74cce69d4ba24abd940f26ad6ea2bc52
41 N63ecf4e04f2c4dc1bfd19cade048d6f2 schema:name doi
42 schema:value 10.1007/s00442-002-0952-2
43 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
44 N74cce69d4ba24abd940f26ad6ea2bc52 rdf:first sg:person.01040041443.21
45 rdf:rest rdf:nil
46 Nebde468b9f684e11a8d45270bca477ef schema:name pubmed_id
47 schema:value 28547634
48 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
49 Nf38f41b34dfb4e3192f06dad4d422053 schema:issueNumber 4
50 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
51 Nfbf29e0e58a14d83af50e8a43f1ddcad schema:name nlm_unique_id
52 schema:value 0150372
53 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
54 anzsrc-for:06 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
55 schema:name Biological Sciences
56 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
57 anzsrc-for:0602 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
58 schema:name Ecology
59 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
60 sg:journal.1009586 schema:issn 0029-8549
61 1432-1939
62 schema:name Oecologia
63 rdf:type schema:Periodical
64 sg:person.01040041443.21 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.1001.0
65 schema:familyName Jennions
66 schema:givenName Michael D.
67 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01040041443.21
68 rdf:type schema:Person
69 sg:person.015020067503.88 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.462844.8
70 schema:familyName Møller
71 schema:givenName Anders
72 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015020067503.88
73 rdf:type schema:Person
74 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.1001.0 schema:alternateName Australian National University
75 schema:name School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, A.C.T. 0200, Canberra, Australia
76 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0948, APO AA 34002–0948, USA
77 rdf:type schema:Organization
78 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.462844.8 schema:alternateName Sorbonne University
79 schema:name Laboratoire d'Ecologie Evolutive Parasitaire, CNRS UMR 7103, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 7 quai St. Bernard, Case 237, 75252, Paris Cedex 05, France
80 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...