The Hadley circulation: assessing NCEP/NCAR reanalysis and sparse in-situ estimates View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

1999-10

AUTHORS

D. E. Waliser, Zhixiong Shi, J. R. Lanzante, A. H. Oort

ABSTRACT

We present a comparison of the zonal mean meridional circulations derived from monthly in situ data (i.e. radiosondes and ship reports) and from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis product. To facilitate the interpretation of the results, a third estimate of the mean meridional circulation is produced by subsampling the reanalysis at the locations where radiosonde and surface ship data are available for the in situ calculation. This third estimate, known as the subsampled estimate, is compared to the complete reanalysis estimate to assess biases in conventional, in situ estimates of the Hadley circulation associated with the sparseness of the data sources (i.e., radiosonde network). The subsampled estimate is also compared to the in situ estimate to assess the biases introduced into the reanalysis product by the numerical model, initialization process and/or indirect data sources such as satellite retrievals. The comparisons suggest that a number of qualitative differences between the in situ and reanalysis estimates are mainly associated with the sparse sampling and simplified interpolation schemes associated with in situ estimates. These differences include: (1) a southern Hadley cell that consistently extends up to 200 hPa in the reanalysis, whereas the bulk of the circulation for the in situ and subsampled estimates tends to be confined to the lower half of the troposphere, (2) more well-defined and consistent poleward limits of the Hadley cells in the reanalysis compared to the in-situ and subsampled estimates, and (3) considerably less variability in magnitude and latitudinal extent of the Ferrel cells and southern polar cell exhibited in the reanalysis estimate compared to the in situ and subsampled estimates. Quantitative comparison shows that the subsampled estimate, relative to the reanalysis estimate, produces a stronger northern Hadley cell (∼20%), a weaker southern Hadley cell (∼20–60%), and weaker Ferrel cells in both hemispheres. These differences stem from poorly measured oceanic regions which necessitate significant interpolation over broad regions. Moreover, they help to pinpoint specific shortcomings in the present and previous in situ estimates of the Hadley circulation. Comparisons between the subsampled and in situ estimates suggest that the subsampled estimate produces a slightly stronger Hadley circulation in both hemispheres, with the relative differences in some seasons as large as 20–30%. 6These differences suggest that the mean meridional circulation associated with the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis is more energetic than observations suggest. Examination of ENSO-related changes to the Hadley circulation suggest that the in situ and subsampled estimates significantly overestimate the effects of ENSO on the Hadley circulation due to the reliance on sparsely distributed data. While all three estimates capture the large-scale region of low-level equatorial convergence near the dateline that occurs during El Nino, the in situ and subsampled estimates fail to effectively reproduce the large-scale areas of equatorial mass divergence to the west and east of this convergence area, leading to an overestimate of the effects of ENSO on the zonal mean circulation. More... »

PAGES

719-735

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s003820050312

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003820050312

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045622519


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/04", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Earth Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0405", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Oceanography", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary Atmospheres, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5000, USA E-mail: waliser@terra.MSRC.Sunysb.EDU, US", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.36425.36", 
          "name": [
            "Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary Atmospheres, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5000, USA E-mail: waliser@terra.MSRC.Sunysb.EDU, US"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Waliser", 
        "givenName": "D. E.", 
        "id": "sg:person.01112400134.33", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01112400134.33"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary Atmospheres, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5000, USA E-mail: waliser@terra.MSRC.Sunysb.EDU, US", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.36425.36", 
          "name": [
            "Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary Atmospheres, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5000, USA E-mail: waliser@terra.MSRC.Sunysb.EDU, US"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Shi", 
        "givenName": "Zhixiong", 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08542, USA, US", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.16750.35", 
          "name": [
            "Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08542, USA, US"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Lanzante", 
        "givenName": "J. R.", 
        "id": "sg:person.0610623062.47", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0610623062.47"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08542, USA, US", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.16750.35", 
          "name": [
            "Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08542, USA, US"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Oort", 
        "givenName": "A. H.", 
        "id": "sg:person.016330125101.24", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.016330125101.24"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "1999-10", 
    "datePublishedReg": "1999-10-01", 
    "description": "Abstract\u2002We present a comparison of the zonal mean meridional circulations derived from monthly in situ data (i.e. radiosondes and ship reports) and from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis product. To facilitate the interpretation of the results, a third estimate of the mean meridional circulation is produced by subsampling the reanalysis at the locations where radiosonde and surface ship data are available for the in situ calculation. This third estimate, known as the subsampled estimate, is compared to the complete reanalysis estimate to assess biases in conventional, in situ estimates of the Hadley circulation associated with the sparseness of the data sources (i.e., radiosonde network). The subsampled estimate is also compared to the in situ estimate to assess the biases introduced into the reanalysis product by the numerical model, initialization process and/or indirect data sources such as satellite retrievals. The comparisons suggest that a number of qualitative differences between the in situ and reanalysis estimates are mainly associated with the sparse sampling and simplified interpolation schemes associated with in situ estimates. These differences include: (1) a southern Hadley cell that consistently extends up to 200 hPa in the reanalysis, whereas the bulk of the circulation for the in situ and subsampled estimates tends to be confined to the lower half of the troposphere, (2) more well-defined and consistent poleward limits of the Hadley cells in the reanalysis compared to the in-situ and subsampled estimates, and (3) considerably less variability in magnitude and latitudinal extent of the Ferrel cells and southern polar cell exhibited in the reanalysis estimate compared to the in situ and subsampled estimates. Quantitative comparison shows that the subsampled estimate, relative to the reanalysis estimate, produces a stronger northern Hadley cell (\u223c20%), a weaker southern Hadley cell (\u223c20\u201360%), and weaker Ferrel cells in both hemispheres. These differences stem from poorly measured oceanic regions which necessitate significant interpolation over broad regions. Moreover, they help to pinpoint specific shortcomings in the present and previous in situ estimates of the Hadley circulation. Comparisons between the subsampled and in situ estimates suggest that the subsampled estimate produces a slightly stronger Hadley circulation in both hemispheres, with the relative differences in some seasons as large as 20\u201330%. 6These differences suggest that the mean meridional circulation associated with the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis is more energetic than observations suggest. Examination of ENSO-related changes to the Hadley circulation suggest that the in situ and subsampled estimates significantly overestimate the effects of ENSO on the Hadley circulation due to the reliance on sparsely distributed data. While all three estimates capture the large-scale region of low-level equatorial convergence near the dateline that occurs during El Nino, the in situ and subsampled estimates fail to effectively reproduce the large-scale areas of equatorial mass divergence to the west and east of this convergence area, leading to an overestimate of the effects of ENSO on the zonal mean circulation.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s003820050312", 
    "inLanguage": "en", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1049631", 
        "issn": [
          "0930-7575", 
          "1432-0894"
        ], 
        "name": "Climate Dynamics", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "10", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "15"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "NCEP/NCAR reanalysis", 
      "southern Hadley cell", 
      "Hadley circulation", 
      "reanalysis estimates", 
      "Hadley cell", 
      "effects of ENSO", 
      "mean meridional circulation", 
      "situ estimates", 
      "meridional circulation", 
      "reanalysis products", 
      "Ferrel cell", 
      "NCEP/NCAR reanalysis products", 
      "northern Hadley cell", 
      "zonal mean circulation", 
      "stronger Hadley circulation", 
      "large-scale regions", 
      "oceanic regions", 
      "equatorial convergence", 
      "El Nino", 
      "mean circulation", 
      "large-scale areas", 
      "situ data", 
      "ship data", 
      "satellite retrievals", 
      "poleward limit", 
      "convergence area", 
      "broad region", 
      "ENSO", 
      "latitudinal extent", 
      "mass divergence", 
      "reanalysis", 
      "significant interpolation", 
      "numerical model", 
      "circulation", 
      "third estimate", 
      "polar cells", 
      "situ calculation", 
      "lower half", 
      "hemisphere", 
      "sparse sampling", 
      "less variability", 
      "estimates", 
      "dateline", 
      "Nino", 
      "biases", 
      "region", 
      "interpolation scheme", 
      "troposphere", 
      "west", 
      "East", 
      "data sources", 
      "area", 
      "source", 
      "variability", 
      "situ", 
      "relative difference", 
      "season", 
      "overestimate", 
      "data", 
      "initialization process", 
      "quantitative comparison", 
      "interpretation", 
      "magnitude", 
      "location", 
      "comparison", 
      "sampling", 
      "convergence", 
      "changes", 
      "extent", 
      "retrieval", 
      "interpolation", 
      "divergence", 
      "bulk", 
      "sparseness", 
      "model", 
      "differences", 
      "sparse", 
      "process", 
      "half", 
      "specific shortcomings", 
      "products", 
      "limit", 
      "calculations", 
      "results", 
      "scheme", 
      "effect", 
      "shortcomings", 
      "qualitative differences", 
      "reliance", 
      "number", 
      "indirect data sources", 
      "examination", 
      "observations", 
      "cells", 
      "NCAR reanalysis product", 
      "surface ship data", 
      "complete reanalysis estimate", 
      "consistent poleward limits", 
      "southern polar cell", 
      "stronger northern Hadley cell", 
      "weaker southern Hadley cell", 
      "weaker Ferrel cells", 
      "NCAR reanalysis", 
      "Examination of ENSO", 
      "low-level equatorial convergence", 
      "equatorial mass divergence"
    ], 
    "name": "The Hadley circulation: assessing NCEP/NCAR reanalysis and sparse in-situ estimates", 
    "pagination": "719-735", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1045622519"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/s003820050312"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050312", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045622519"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2021-12-01T19:11", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20211201/entities/gbq_results/article/article_312.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050312"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s003820050312'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s003820050312'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s003820050312'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s003820050312'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

187 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      132 URIs      124 LITERALS      6 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/s003820050312 schema:about anzsrc-for:04
2 anzsrc-for:0405
3 schema:author N38230ee1d2a945b38de15e00fe585708
4 schema:datePublished 1999-10
5 schema:datePublishedReg 1999-10-01
6 schema:description Abstract We present a comparison of the zonal mean meridional circulations derived from monthly in situ data (i.e. radiosondes and ship reports) and from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis product. To facilitate the interpretation of the results, a third estimate of the mean meridional circulation is produced by subsampling the reanalysis at the locations where radiosonde and surface ship data are available for the in situ calculation. This third estimate, known as the subsampled estimate, is compared to the complete reanalysis estimate to assess biases in conventional, in situ estimates of the Hadley circulation associated with the sparseness of the data sources (i.e., radiosonde network). The subsampled estimate is also compared to the in situ estimate to assess the biases introduced into the reanalysis product by the numerical model, initialization process and/or indirect data sources such as satellite retrievals. The comparisons suggest that a number of qualitative differences between the in situ and reanalysis estimates are mainly associated with the sparse sampling and simplified interpolation schemes associated with in situ estimates. These differences include: (1) a southern Hadley cell that consistently extends up to 200 hPa in the reanalysis, whereas the bulk of the circulation for the in situ and subsampled estimates tends to be confined to the lower half of the troposphere, (2) more well-defined and consistent poleward limits of the Hadley cells in the reanalysis compared to the in-situ and subsampled estimates, and (3) considerably less variability in magnitude and latitudinal extent of the Ferrel cells and southern polar cell exhibited in the reanalysis estimate compared to the in situ and subsampled estimates. Quantitative comparison shows that the subsampled estimate, relative to the reanalysis estimate, produces a stronger northern Hadley cell (∼20%), a weaker southern Hadley cell (∼20–60%), and weaker Ferrel cells in both hemispheres. These differences stem from poorly measured oceanic regions which necessitate significant interpolation over broad regions. Moreover, they help to pinpoint specific shortcomings in the present and previous in situ estimates of the Hadley circulation. Comparisons between the subsampled and in situ estimates suggest that the subsampled estimate produces a slightly stronger Hadley circulation in both hemispheres, with the relative differences in some seasons as large as 20–30%. 6These differences suggest that the mean meridional circulation associated with the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis is more energetic than observations suggest. Examination of ENSO-related changes to the Hadley circulation suggest that the in situ and subsampled estimates significantly overestimate the effects of ENSO on the Hadley circulation due to the reliance on sparsely distributed data. While all three estimates capture the large-scale region of low-level equatorial convergence near the dateline that occurs during El Nino, the in situ and subsampled estimates fail to effectively reproduce the large-scale areas of equatorial mass divergence to the west and east of this convergence area, leading to an overestimate of the effects of ENSO on the zonal mean circulation.
7 schema:genre article
8 schema:inLanguage en
9 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
10 schema:isPartOf N472bd17b3d864139870c9aceca63da07
11 Nb46a449f73ae4df390cbbb406b765efc
12 sg:journal.1049631
13 schema:keywords ENSO
14 East
15 El Nino
16 Examination of ENSO
17 Ferrel cell
18 Hadley cell
19 Hadley circulation
20 NCAR reanalysis
21 NCAR reanalysis product
22 NCEP/NCAR reanalysis
23 NCEP/NCAR reanalysis products
24 Nino
25 area
26 biases
27 broad region
28 bulk
29 calculations
30 cells
31 changes
32 circulation
33 comparison
34 complete reanalysis estimate
35 consistent poleward limits
36 convergence
37 convergence area
38 data
39 data sources
40 dateline
41 differences
42 divergence
43 effect
44 effects of ENSO
45 equatorial convergence
46 equatorial mass divergence
47 estimates
48 examination
49 extent
50 half
51 hemisphere
52 indirect data sources
53 initialization process
54 interpolation
55 interpolation scheme
56 interpretation
57 large-scale areas
58 large-scale regions
59 latitudinal extent
60 less variability
61 limit
62 location
63 low-level equatorial convergence
64 lower half
65 magnitude
66 mass divergence
67 mean circulation
68 mean meridional circulation
69 meridional circulation
70 model
71 northern Hadley cell
72 number
73 numerical model
74 observations
75 oceanic regions
76 overestimate
77 polar cells
78 poleward limit
79 process
80 products
81 qualitative differences
82 quantitative comparison
83 reanalysis
84 reanalysis estimates
85 reanalysis products
86 region
87 relative difference
88 reliance
89 results
90 retrieval
91 sampling
92 satellite retrievals
93 scheme
94 season
95 ship data
96 shortcomings
97 significant interpolation
98 situ
99 situ calculation
100 situ data
101 situ estimates
102 source
103 southern Hadley cell
104 southern polar cell
105 sparse
106 sparse sampling
107 sparseness
108 specific shortcomings
109 stronger Hadley circulation
110 stronger northern Hadley cell
111 surface ship data
112 third estimate
113 troposphere
114 variability
115 weaker Ferrel cells
116 weaker southern Hadley cell
117 west
118 zonal mean circulation
119 schema:name The Hadley circulation: assessing NCEP/NCAR reanalysis and sparse in-situ estimates
120 schema:pagination 719-735
121 schema:productId N68841b7fb28342f58b7203e604416d1a
122 Nfa6e1a92632246348134769fe3702d76
123 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045622519
124 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050312
125 schema:sdDatePublished 2021-12-01T19:11
126 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
127 schema:sdPublisher Nb64da3323ff24a26960d469433dc3e6f
128 schema:url https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050312
129 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
130 sgo:sdDataset articles
131 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
132 N1c42c92225c545049f9c2b4fedb02102 rdf:first N51dfeeb1c16d411fa6ce88eb75ac3eda
133 rdf:rest Nf5f4b49e27f0403bb9d9a6b010ab898f
134 N38230ee1d2a945b38de15e00fe585708 rdf:first sg:person.01112400134.33
135 rdf:rest N1c42c92225c545049f9c2b4fedb02102
136 N472bd17b3d864139870c9aceca63da07 schema:volumeNumber 15
137 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
138 N51dfeeb1c16d411fa6ce88eb75ac3eda schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.36425.36
139 schema:familyName Shi
140 schema:givenName Zhixiong
141 rdf:type schema:Person
142 N68841b7fb28342f58b7203e604416d1a schema:name dimensions_id
143 schema:value pub.1045622519
144 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
145 Nb46a449f73ae4df390cbbb406b765efc schema:issueNumber 10
146 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
147 Nb64da3323ff24a26960d469433dc3e6f schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
148 rdf:type schema:Organization
149 Ned76d230a39c464db4c011053b43339d rdf:first sg:person.016330125101.24
150 rdf:rest rdf:nil
151 Nf5f4b49e27f0403bb9d9a6b010ab898f rdf:first sg:person.0610623062.47
152 rdf:rest Ned76d230a39c464db4c011053b43339d
153 Nfa6e1a92632246348134769fe3702d76 schema:name doi
154 schema:value 10.1007/s003820050312
155 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
156 anzsrc-for:04 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
157 schema:name Earth Sciences
158 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
159 anzsrc-for:0405 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
160 schema:name Oceanography
161 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
162 sg:journal.1049631 schema:issn 0930-7575
163 1432-0894
164 schema:name Climate Dynamics
165 schema:publisher Springer Nature
166 rdf:type schema:Periodical
167 sg:person.01112400134.33 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.36425.36
168 schema:familyName Waliser
169 schema:givenName D. E.
170 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01112400134.33
171 rdf:type schema:Person
172 sg:person.016330125101.24 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.16750.35
173 schema:familyName Oort
174 schema:givenName A. H.
175 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.016330125101.24
176 rdf:type schema:Person
177 sg:person.0610623062.47 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.16750.35
178 schema:familyName Lanzante
179 schema:givenName J. R.
180 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0610623062.47
181 rdf:type schema:Person
182 grid-institutes:grid.16750.35 schema:alternateName Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08542, USA, US
183 schema:name Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08542, USA, US
184 rdf:type schema:Organization
185 grid-institutes:grid.36425.36 schema:alternateName Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary Atmospheres, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5000, USA E-mail: waliser@terra.MSRC.Sunysb.EDU, US
186 schema:name Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary Atmospheres, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5000, USA E-mail: waliser@terra.MSRC.Sunysb.EDU, US
187 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...