Multi-fingerprint detection and attribution analysis of greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol and solar forced climate change View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle      Open Access: True


Article Info

DATE

1997-09

AUTHORS

G. C. Hegerl, K. Hasselmann, U. Cubasch, J. F. B. Mitchell, E. Roeckner, R. Voss, J. Waszkewitz

ABSTRACT

. A multi-fingerprint analysis is applied to the detection and attribution of anthropogenic climate change. While a single fingerprint is optimal for the detection of climate change, further tests of the statistical consistency of the detected climate change signal with model predictions for different candidate forcing mechanisms require the simultaneous application of several fingerprints. Model-predicted climate change signals are derived from three anthropogenic global warming simulations for the period 1880 to 2049 and two simulations forced by estimated changes in solar radiation from 1700 to 1992. In the first global warming simulation, the forcing is by greenhouse gas only, while in the remaining two simulations the direct influence of sulfate aerosols is also included. From the climate change signals of the greenhouse gas only and the average of the two greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol simulations, two optimized fingerprint patterns are derived by weighting the model-predicted climate change patterns towards low-noise directions. The optimized fingerprint patterns are then applied as a filter to the observed near-surface temperature trend patterns, yielding several detection variables. The space-time structure of natural climate variability needed to determine the optimal fingerprint pattern and the resultant signal-to-noise ratio of the detection variable is estimated from several multi-century control simulations with different CGCMs and from instrumental data over the last 136 y. Applying the combined greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol fingerprint in the same way as the greenhouse gas only fingerprint in a previous work, the recent 30-y trends (1966–1995) of annual mean near surface temperature are again found to represent a significant climate change at the 97.5% confidence level. However, using both the greenhouse gas and the combined forcing fingerprints in a two-pattern analysis, a substantially better agreement between observations and the climate model prediction is found for the combined forcing simulation. Anticipating that the influence of the aerosol forcing is strongest for longer term temperature trends in summer, application of the detection and attribution test to the latest observed 50-y trend pattern of summer temperature yielded statistical consistency with the greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol simulation with respect to both the pattern and amplitude of the signal. In contrast, the observations are inconsistent with the greenhouse-gas only climate change signal at a 95% confidence level for all estimates of climate variability. The observed trend 1943–1992 is furthermore inconsistent with a hypothesized solar radiation change alone at an estimated 90% confidence level. Thus, in contrast to the single pattern analysis, the two pattern analysis is able to discriminate between different forcing hypotheses in the observed climate change signal. The results are subject to uncertainties associated with the forcing history, which is poorly known for the solar and aerosol forcing, the possible omission of other important forcings, and inevitable model errors in the computation of the response to the forcing. Further uncertainties in the estimated significance levels arise from the use of model internal variability simulations and relatively short instrumental observations (after subtraction of an estimated greenhouse gas signal) to estimate the natural climate variability. The resulting confidence limits accordingly vary for different estimates using different variability data. Despite these uncertainties, however, we consider our results sufficiently robust to have some confidence in our finding that the observed climate change is consistent with a combined greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing, but inconsistent with greenhouse gas or solar forcing alone. More... »

PAGES

613-634

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s003820050186

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003820050186

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1008218600


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/04", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Earth Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0406", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Max-Planck-Institut f\u00fcr Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.450268.d", 
          "name": [
            "Max-Planck-Institut f\u00fcr Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Hegerl", 
        "givenName": "G. C.", 
        "id": "sg:person.015520633554.37", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015520633554.37"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Max-Planck-Institut f\u00fcr Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.450268.d", 
          "name": [
            "Max-Planck-Institut f\u00fcr Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Hasselmann", 
        "givenName": "K.", 
        "id": "sg:person.011507631147.31", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011507631147.31"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Max-Planck-Institut f\u00fcr Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.450268.d", 
          "name": [
            "Max-Planck-Institut f\u00fcr Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Cubasch", 
        "givenName": "U.", 
        "id": "sg:person.01207007331.96", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01207007331.96"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Max-Planck-Institut f\u00fcr Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.450268.d", 
          "name": [
            "Max-Planck-Institut f\u00fcr Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Mitchell", 
        "givenName": "J. F. B.", 
        "id": "sg:person.012141527247.99", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012141527247.99"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Max-Planck-Institut f\u00fcr Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.450268.d", 
          "name": [
            "Max-Planck-Institut f\u00fcr Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Roeckner", 
        "givenName": "E.", 
        "id": "sg:person.011102120341.28", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011102120341.28"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Max-Planck-Institut f\u00fcr Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.450268.d", 
          "name": [
            "Max-Planck-Institut f\u00fcr Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Voss", 
        "givenName": "R.", 
        "id": "sg:person.014244276466.52", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014244276466.52"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany, DE", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.424215.4", 
          "name": [
            "Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany, DE"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Waszkewitz", 
        "givenName": "J.", 
        "id": "sg:person.014405534652.30", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014405534652.30"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "1997-09", 
    "datePublishedReg": "1997-09-01", 
    "description": "Abstract.\u2002A multi-fingerprint analysis is applied to the detection and attribution of anthropogenic climate change. While a single fingerprint is optimal for the detection of climate change, further tests of the statistical consistency of the detected climate change signal with model predictions for different candidate forcing mechanisms require the simultaneous application of several fingerprints. Model-predicted climate change signals are derived from three anthropogenic global warming simulations for the period 1880 to 2049 and two simulations forced by estimated changes in solar radiation from 1700 to 1992. In the first global warming simulation, the forcing is by greenhouse gas only, while in the remaining two simulations the direct influence of sulfate aerosols is also included. From the climate change signals of the greenhouse gas only and the average of the two greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol simulations, two optimized fingerprint patterns are derived by weighting the model-predicted climate change patterns towards low-noise directions. The optimized fingerprint patterns are then applied as a filter to the observed near-surface temperature trend patterns, yielding several detection variables. The space-time structure of natural climate variability needed to determine the optimal fingerprint pattern and the resultant signal-to-noise ratio of the detection variable is estimated from several multi-century control simulations with different CGCMs and from instrumental data over the last 136\u2009y. Applying the combined greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol fingerprint in the same way as the greenhouse gas only fingerprint in a previous work, the recent 30-y trends (1966\u20131995) of annual mean near surface temperature are again found to represent a significant climate change at the 97.5% confidence level. However, using both the greenhouse gas and the combined forcing fingerprints in a two-pattern analysis, a substantially better agreement between observations and the climate model prediction is found for the combined forcing simulation. Anticipating that the influence of the aerosol forcing is strongest for longer term temperature trends in summer, application of the detection and attribution test to the latest observed 50-y trend pattern of summer temperature yielded statistical consistency with the greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol simulation with respect to both the pattern and amplitude of the signal. In contrast, the observations are inconsistent with the greenhouse-gas only climate change signal at a 95% confidence level for all estimates of climate variability. The observed trend 1943\u20131992 is furthermore inconsistent with a hypothesized solar radiation change alone at an estimated 90% confidence level. Thus, in contrast to the single pattern analysis, the two pattern analysis is able to discriminate between different forcing hypotheses in the observed climate change signal. The results are subject to uncertainties associated with the forcing history, which is poorly known for the solar and aerosol forcing, the possible omission of other important forcings, and inevitable model errors in the computation of the response to the forcing. Further uncertainties in the estimated significance levels arise from the use of model internal variability simulations and relatively short instrumental observations (after subtraction of an estimated greenhouse gas signal) to estimate the natural climate variability. The resulting confidence limits accordingly vary for different estimates using different variability data. Despite these uncertainties, however, we consider our results sufficiently robust to have some confidence in our finding that the observed climate change is consistent with a combined greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing, but inconsistent with greenhouse gas or solar forcing alone.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s003820050186", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1049631", 
        "issn": [
          "0930-7575", 
          "1432-0894"
        ], 
        "name": "Climate Dynamics", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "9", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "13"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "climate change signal", 
      "natural climate variability", 
      "global warming simulations", 
      "change signal", 
      "aerosol forcing", 
      "climate variability", 
      "climate change", 
      "greenhouse gas", 
      "warming simulations", 
      "aerosol simulations", 
      "trend patterns", 
      "long-term temperature trends", 
      "short instrumental observations", 
      "climate model predictions", 
      "temperature trend patterns", 
      "observed climate change", 
      "climate change patterns", 
      "significant climate change", 
      "anthropogenic climate change", 
      "solar radiation changes", 
      "detection variables", 
      "inevitable model errors", 
      "solar forcing", 
      "forcing simulations", 
      "important forcing", 
      "sulfate aerosols", 
      "instrumental observations", 
      "temperature trends", 
      "instrumental data", 
      "attribution analysis", 
      "surface temperature", 
      "model predictions", 
      "control simulation", 
      "aerosol fingerprints", 
      "forcing", 
      "summer temperatures", 
      "space-time structure", 
      "statistical consistency", 
      "model error", 
      "radiation changes", 
      "confidence level", 
      "solar radiation", 
      "further uncertainty", 
      "change patterns", 
      "aerosols", 
      "variability", 
      "different estimates", 
      "CGCMs", 
      "uncertainty", 
      "Attribution Test", 
      "single fingerprint", 
      "estimates", 
      "possible omission", 
      "summer", 
      "gas", 
      "direct influence", 
      "fingerprints", 
      "trends", 
      "patterns", 
      "changes", 
      "confidence limits", 
      "good agreement", 
      "simulations", 
      "temperature", 
      "prediction", 
      "variability data", 
      "data", 
      "influence", 
      "attribution", 
      "noise ratio", 
      "contrast", 
      "average", 
      "pattern analysis", 
      "amplitude", 
      "radiation", 
      "history", 
      "signals", 
      "analysis", 
      "previous work", 
      "consistency", 
      "further tests", 
      "direction", 
      "resultant signal", 
      "computation", 
      "ratio", 
      "agreement", 
      "significance level", 
      "error", 
      "variables", 
      "results", 
      "levels", 
      "confidence", 
      "applications", 
      "different candidates", 
      "same way", 
      "filter", 
      "hypothesis", 
      "respect", 
      "limit", 
      "observations", 
      "structure", 
      "response", 
      "simultaneous application", 
      "mechanism", 
      "work", 
      "use", 
      "detection", 
      "way", 
      "test", 
      "omission", 
      "candidates", 
      "findings", 
      "fingerprint patterns"
    ], 
    "name": "Multi-fingerprint detection and attribution analysis of greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol and solar forced climate change", 
    "pagination": "613-634", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1008218600"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/s003820050186"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050186", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1008218600"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-12-01T06:20", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20221201/entities/gbq_results/article/article_264.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050186"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s003820050186'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s003820050186'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s003820050186'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s003820050186'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

215 TRIPLES      20 PREDICATES      138 URIs      130 LITERALS      6 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/s003820050186 schema:about anzsrc-for:04
2 anzsrc-for:0406
3 schema:author N42aea147faee452dbdf31b50d1ff7b47
4 schema:datePublished 1997-09
5 schema:datePublishedReg 1997-09-01
6 schema:description Abstract. A multi-fingerprint analysis is applied to the detection and attribution of anthropogenic climate change. While a single fingerprint is optimal for the detection of climate change, further tests of the statistical consistency of the detected climate change signal with model predictions for different candidate forcing mechanisms require the simultaneous application of several fingerprints. Model-predicted climate change signals are derived from three anthropogenic global warming simulations for the period 1880 to 2049 and two simulations forced by estimated changes in solar radiation from 1700 to 1992. In the first global warming simulation, the forcing is by greenhouse gas only, while in the remaining two simulations the direct influence of sulfate aerosols is also included. From the climate change signals of the greenhouse gas only and the average of the two greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol simulations, two optimized fingerprint patterns are derived by weighting the model-predicted climate change patterns towards low-noise directions. The optimized fingerprint patterns are then applied as a filter to the observed near-surface temperature trend patterns, yielding several detection variables. The space-time structure of natural climate variability needed to determine the optimal fingerprint pattern and the resultant signal-to-noise ratio of the detection variable is estimated from several multi-century control simulations with different CGCMs and from instrumental data over the last 136 y. Applying the combined greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol fingerprint in the same way as the greenhouse gas only fingerprint in a previous work, the recent 30-y trends (1966–1995) of annual mean near surface temperature are again found to represent a significant climate change at the 97.5% confidence level. However, using both the greenhouse gas and the combined forcing fingerprints in a two-pattern analysis, a substantially better agreement between observations and the climate model prediction is found for the combined forcing simulation. Anticipating that the influence of the aerosol forcing is strongest for longer term temperature trends in summer, application of the detection and attribution test to the latest observed 50-y trend pattern of summer temperature yielded statistical consistency with the greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol simulation with respect to both the pattern and amplitude of the signal. In contrast, the observations are inconsistent with the greenhouse-gas only climate change signal at a 95% confidence level for all estimates of climate variability. The observed trend 1943–1992 is furthermore inconsistent with a hypothesized solar radiation change alone at an estimated 90% confidence level. Thus, in contrast to the single pattern analysis, the two pattern analysis is able to discriminate between different forcing hypotheses in the observed climate change signal. The results are subject to uncertainties associated with the forcing history, which is poorly known for the solar and aerosol forcing, the possible omission of other important forcings, and inevitable model errors in the computation of the response to the forcing. Further uncertainties in the estimated significance levels arise from the use of model internal variability simulations and relatively short instrumental observations (after subtraction of an estimated greenhouse gas signal) to estimate the natural climate variability. The resulting confidence limits accordingly vary for different estimates using different variability data. Despite these uncertainties, however, we consider our results sufficiently robust to have some confidence in our finding that the observed climate change is consistent with a combined greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing, but inconsistent with greenhouse gas or solar forcing alone.
7 schema:genre article
8 schema:isAccessibleForFree true
9 schema:isPartOf N27b7bcb67bb046609b0f7a44133cfa75
10 Nd34ac2d845b64e7c8ec0f70ec9f0b533
11 sg:journal.1049631
12 schema:keywords Attribution Test
13 CGCMs
14 aerosol fingerprints
15 aerosol forcing
16 aerosol simulations
17 aerosols
18 agreement
19 amplitude
20 analysis
21 anthropogenic climate change
22 applications
23 attribution
24 attribution analysis
25 average
26 candidates
27 change patterns
28 change signal
29 changes
30 climate change
31 climate change patterns
32 climate change signal
33 climate model predictions
34 climate variability
35 computation
36 confidence
37 confidence level
38 confidence limits
39 consistency
40 contrast
41 control simulation
42 data
43 detection
44 detection variables
45 different candidates
46 different estimates
47 direct influence
48 direction
49 error
50 estimates
51 filter
52 findings
53 fingerprint patterns
54 fingerprints
55 forcing
56 forcing simulations
57 further tests
58 further uncertainty
59 gas
60 global warming simulations
61 good agreement
62 greenhouse gas
63 history
64 hypothesis
65 important forcing
66 inevitable model errors
67 influence
68 instrumental data
69 instrumental observations
70 levels
71 limit
72 long-term temperature trends
73 mechanism
74 model error
75 model predictions
76 natural climate variability
77 noise ratio
78 observations
79 observed climate change
80 omission
81 pattern analysis
82 patterns
83 possible omission
84 prediction
85 previous work
86 radiation
87 radiation changes
88 ratio
89 respect
90 response
91 resultant signal
92 results
93 same way
94 short instrumental observations
95 signals
96 significance level
97 significant climate change
98 simulations
99 simultaneous application
100 single fingerprint
101 solar forcing
102 solar radiation
103 solar radiation changes
104 space-time structure
105 statistical consistency
106 structure
107 sulfate aerosols
108 summer
109 summer temperatures
110 surface temperature
111 temperature
112 temperature trend patterns
113 temperature trends
114 test
115 trend patterns
116 trends
117 uncertainty
118 use
119 variability
120 variability data
121 variables
122 warming simulations
123 way
124 work
125 schema:name Multi-fingerprint detection and attribution analysis of greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol and solar forced climate change
126 schema:pagination 613-634
127 schema:productId N6478e3365e164dc0a79fd11213aec864
128 Nb9af59fb248b4f4e9ff290783a0690cf
129 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1008218600
130 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050186
131 schema:sdDatePublished 2022-12-01T06:20
132 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
133 schema:sdPublisher N0a49750151d14273b290c5f1149b8d4d
134 schema:url https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050186
135 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
136 sgo:sdDataset articles
137 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
138 N0a49750151d14273b290c5f1149b8d4d schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
139 rdf:type schema:Organization
140 N1ac976a24ece4cfdae8007d922b679dc rdf:first sg:person.012141527247.99
141 rdf:rest N37efc11f288b4e26a54072a8bf98107d
142 N27b7bcb67bb046609b0f7a44133cfa75 schema:issueNumber 9
143 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
144 N37efc11f288b4e26a54072a8bf98107d rdf:first sg:person.011102120341.28
145 rdf:rest Nc84808ea24fd4f8d98ca4b61bfaf4252
146 N42aea147faee452dbdf31b50d1ff7b47 rdf:first sg:person.015520633554.37
147 rdf:rest N55caa3cebbcf45378938b9b89015c3db
148 N55caa3cebbcf45378938b9b89015c3db rdf:first sg:person.011507631147.31
149 rdf:rest Nccf78f7992e645248ddbcdf7c333ab8d
150 N6478e3365e164dc0a79fd11213aec864 schema:name doi
151 schema:value 10.1007/s003820050186
152 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
153 Nb9af59fb248b4f4e9ff290783a0690cf schema:name dimensions_id
154 schema:value pub.1008218600
155 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
156 Nc3ce1c8f534840a09cee7e84216ffc06 rdf:first sg:person.014405534652.30
157 rdf:rest rdf:nil
158 Nc84808ea24fd4f8d98ca4b61bfaf4252 rdf:first sg:person.014244276466.52
159 rdf:rest Nc3ce1c8f534840a09cee7e84216ffc06
160 Nccf78f7992e645248ddbcdf7c333ab8d rdf:first sg:person.01207007331.96
161 rdf:rest N1ac976a24ece4cfdae8007d922b679dc
162 Nd34ac2d845b64e7c8ec0f70ec9f0b533 schema:volumeNumber 13
163 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
164 anzsrc-for:04 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
165 schema:name Earth Sciences
166 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
167 anzsrc-for:0406 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
168 schema:name Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience
169 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
170 sg:journal.1049631 schema:issn 0930-7575
171 1432-0894
172 schema:name Climate Dynamics
173 schema:publisher Springer Nature
174 rdf:type schema:Periodical
175 sg:person.011102120341.28 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.450268.d
176 schema:familyName Roeckner
177 schema:givenName E.
178 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011102120341.28
179 rdf:type schema:Person
180 sg:person.011507631147.31 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.450268.d
181 schema:familyName Hasselmann
182 schema:givenName K.
183 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011507631147.31
184 rdf:type schema:Person
185 sg:person.01207007331.96 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.450268.d
186 schema:familyName Cubasch
187 schema:givenName U.
188 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01207007331.96
189 rdf:type schema:Person
190 sg:person.012141527247.99 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.450268.d
191 schema:familyName Mitchell
192 schema:givenName J. F. B.
193 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012141527247.99
194 rdf:type schema:Person
195 sg:person.014244276466.52 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.450268.d
196 schema:familyName Voss
197 schema:givenName R.
198 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014244276466.52
199 rdf:type schema:Person
200 sg:person.014405534652.30 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.424215.4
201 schema:familyName Waszkewitz
202 schema:givenName J.
203 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014405534652.30
204 rdf:type schema:Person
205 sg:person.015520633554.37 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.450268.d
206 schema:familyName Hegerl
207 schema:givenName G. C.
208 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015520633554.37
209 rdf:type schema:Person
210 grid-institutes:grid.424215.4 schema:alternateName Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany, DE
211 schema:name Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum, Hamburg, Germany, DE
212 rdf:type schema:Organization
213 grid-institutes:grid.450268.d schema:alternateName Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE
214 schema:name Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany, DE
215 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...