Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle Open Access: True
2010-04-09
AUTHORSBenjamin I. Cook, Richard Seager, Ron L. Miller
ABSTRACTWe use an early twentieth century (1908–1958) atmospheric reanalysis, based on assimilation of surface and sea level pressure observations, to contrast atmospheric circulation during two periods of persistent drought in North America: 1932–1939 (the ‘Dust Bowl’) and 1948–1957. Primary forcing for both droughts is believed to come from anomalous sea surface temperatures (SSTs): a warm Atlantic and a cool eastern tropical Pacific. For boreal winter (October–March) in the 1950s, a stationary wave pattern originating from the tropical Pacific is present, with positive centers over the north Pacific and north Atlantic ocean basins and a negative center positioned over northwest North America and the tropical/subtropical Pacific. This wave train is largely absent for the 1930s drought; boreal winter height anomalies are organized much more zonally, with positive heights extending across northern North America. For boreal summer (April–September) during the 1930s, a strong upper level ridge is centered over the Great Plains; this feature is absent during the 1950s and appears to be linked to a weakening of the Great Plains low-level jet (GPLLJ). Subsidence anomalies are co-located over the centers of each drought: in the central Great Plains for the 1930s and in a band extending from the southwest to the southeastern United States for the 1950s. The location and intensity of this subsidence during the 1948–1957 drought is a typical response to a cold eastern tropical Pacific, but for 1932–1939 deviates in terms of the expected intensity, location, and spatial extent. Overall, circulation anomalies during the 1950s drought appear consistent with the expected response to the observed SST forcing. This is not the case for the 1930s, implying some other causal factor may be needed to explain the Dust Bowl drought anomalies. In addition to SST forcing, the 1930s were also characterized by massive alterations to the land surface, including regional-scale devegetation from crop failures and intensive wind erosion and dust storms. Incorporation of these land surface factors into a general circulation model greatly improves the simulation of precipitation and subsidence anomalies during this drought, relative to simulations with SST forcing alone. Even with additional forcing from the land surface, however, the model still has difficulty reproducing some of the other circulation anomalies, including weakening of the GPLLJ and strengthening of the upper level ridge during AMJJAS. This may be due to either weaknesses in the model or uncertainties in the boundary condition estimates. Still, analysis of the circulation anomalies supports the conclusion of an earlier paper (Cook et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:4997, 2009), demonstrating that land degradation factors are consistent with the anomalous nature of the Dust Bowl drought. More... »
PAGES2339-2355
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1025817787
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/04",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Earth Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0401",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Atmospheric Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, 10025, New York, NY, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.419078.3",
"name": [
"Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 61 Route 9W, 10964, Palisades, NY, USA",
"NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, 10025, New York, NY, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Cook",
"givenName": "Benjamin I.",
"id": "sg:person.014707472507.72",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014707472507.72"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 61 Route 9W, 10964, Palisades, NY, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.473157.3",
"name": [
"Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 61 Route 9W, 10964, Palisades, NY, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Seager",
"givenName": "Richard",
"id": "sg:person.0664747644.09",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0664747644.09"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, 10025, New York, NY, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.419078.3",
"name": [
"NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, 10025, New York, NY, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Miller",
"givenName": "Ron L.",
"id": "sg:person.015566240467.46",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015566240467.46"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00382-007-0255-8",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1043104584",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0255-8"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1023/a:1015820616384",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052669234",
"https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015820616384"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/nature06921",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1026158887",
"https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06921"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00382-009-0551-6",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1020712407",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0551-6"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2010-04-09",
"datePublishedReg": "2010-04-09",
"description": "We use an early twentieth century (1908\u20131958) atmospheric reanalysis, based on assimilation of surface and sea level pressure observations, to contrast atmospheric circulation during two periods of persistent drought in North America: 1932\u20131939 (the \u2018Dust Bowl\u2019) and 1948\u20131957. Primary forcing for both droughts is believed to come from anomalous sea surface temperatures (SSTs): a warm Atlantic and a cool eastern tropical Pacific. For boreal winter (October\u2013March) in the 1950s, a stationary wave pattern originating from the tropical Pacific is present, with positive centers over the north Pacific and north Atlantic ocean basins and a negative center positioned over northwest North America and the tropical/subtropical Pacific. This wave train is largely absent for the 1930s drought; boreal winter height anomalies are organized much more zonally, with positive heights extending across northern North America. For boreal summer (April\u2013September) during the 1930s, a strong upper level ridge is centered over the Great Plains; this feature is absent during the 1950s and appears to be linked to a weakening of the Great Plains low-level jet (GPLLJ). Subsidence anomalies are co-located over the centers of each drought: in the central Great Plains for the 1930s and in a band extending from the southwest to the southeastern United States for the 1950s. The location and intensity of this subsidence during the 1948\u20131957 drought is a typical response to a cold eastern tropical Pacific, but for 1932\u20131939 deviates in terms of the expected intensity, location, and spatial extent. Overall, circulation anomalies during the 1950s drought appear consistent with the expected response to the observed SST forcing. This is not the case for the 1930s, implying some other causal factor may be needed to explain the Dust Bowl drought anomalies. In addition to SST forcing, the 1930s were also characterized by massive alterations to the land surface, including regional-scale devegetation from crop failures and intensive wind erosion and dust storms. Incorporation of these land surface factors into a general circulation model greatly improves the simulation of precipitation and subsidence anomalies during this drought, relative to simulations with SST forcing alone. Even with additional forcing from the land surface, however, the model still has difficulty reproducing some of the other circulation anomalies, including weakening of the GPLLJ and strengthening of the upper level ridge during AMJJAS. This may be due to either weaknesses in the model or uncertainties in the boundary condition estimates. Still, analysis of the circulation anomalies supports the conclusion of an earlier paper (Cook et\u00a0al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:4997, 2009), demonstrating that land degradation factors are consistent with the anomalous nature of the Dust Bowl drought.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"isFundedItemOf": [
{
"id": "sg:grant.3069631",
"type": "MonetaryGrant"
},
{
"id": "sg:grant.3099243",
"type": "MonetaryGrant"
}
],
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1049631",
"issn": [
"0930-7575",
"1432-0894"
],
"name": "Climate Dynamics",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "11-12",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "36"
}
],
"keywords": [
"Great Plains low-level jet",
"sea surface temperature",
"upper-level ridge",
"eastern tropical Pacific",
"circulation anomalies",
"tropical Pacific",
"subsidence anomalies",
"SST forcing",
"land surface",
"North Atlantic Ocean basin",
"anomalous sea surface temperature",
"sea level pressure observations",
"Great Plains",
"observed SST forcing",
"atmospheric circulation anomalies",
"North American drought",
"Atlantic Ocean basin",
"assimilation of surface",
"simulation of precipitation",
"Dust Bowl drought",
"land surface factors",
"general circulation model",
"low-level jet",
"intensive wind erosion",
"stationary wave pattern",
"northwest North America",
"northern North America",
"North America",
"central Great Plains",
"atmospheric reanalysis",
"atmospheric circulation",
"boreal winter",
"ocean basins",
"subtropical Pacific",
"boreal summer",
"warm Atlantic",
"circulation model",
"North Pacific",
"drought anomalies",
"dust storms",
"height anomalies",
"additional forcing",
"persistent drought",
"pressure observations",
"surface temperature",
"wave train",
"wind erosion",
"Pacific",
"positive center",
"negative center",
"forcing",
"spatial extent",
"southeastern United States",
"drought",
"anomalies",
"land degradation factors",
"anomalous nature",
"Plain",
"surface factors",
"ridge",
"crop failure",
"wave patterns",
"weakening",
"basin",
"America",
"subsidence",
"Atlantic",
"devegetation",
"storms",
"southwest",
"reanalysis",
"precipitation",
"erosion",
"winter",
"summer",
"massive alterations",
"assimilation",
"circulation",
"boundary conditions",
"location",
"surface",
"positive height",
"intensity",
"uncertainty",
"jet",
"United States",
"model",
"simulations",
"height",
"strengthening",
"period",
"center",
"temperature",
"causal factors",
"typical response",
"patterns",
"extent",
"alterations",
"conditions",
"features",
"train",
"earlier paper",
"nature",
"response",
"band",
"factors",
"analysis",
"deviates",
"incorporation",
"terms",
"state",
"addition",
"weakness",
"degradation factors",
"difficulties",
"paper",
"cases",
"conclusion",
"failure",
"observations"
],
"name": "Atmospheric circulation anomalies during two persistent north american droughts: 1932\u20131939 and 1948\u20131957",
"pagination": "2339-2355",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1025817787"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1025817787"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-06-01T22:10",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220601/entities/gbq_results/article/article_527.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
216 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
149 URIs
137 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:04 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0401 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | N7ec022fa2b474399add49571a819a028 |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/s00382-007-0255-8 |
5 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s00382-009-0551-6 |
6 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1023/a:1015820616384 |
7 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1038/nature06921 |
8 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2010-04-09 |
9 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2010-04-09 |
10 | ″ | schema:description | We use an early twentieth century (1908–1958) atmospheric reanalysis, based on assimilation of surface and sea level pressure observations, to contrast atmospheric circulation during two periods of persistent drought in North America: 1932–1939 (the ‘Dust Bowl’) and 1948–1957. Primary forcing for both droughts is believed to come from anomalous sea surface temperatures (SSTs): a warm Atlantic and a cool eastern tropical Pacific. For boreal winter (October–March) in the 1950s, a stationary wave pattern originating from the tropical Pacific is present, with positive centers over the north Pacific and north Atlantic ocean basins and a negative center positioned over northwest North America and the tropical/subtropical Pacific. This wave train is largely absent for the 1930s drought; boreal winter height anomalies are organized much more zonally, with positive heights extending across northern North America. For boreal summer (April–September) during the 1930s, a strong upper level ridge is centered over the Great Plains; this feature is absent during the 1950s and appears to be linked to a weakening of the Great Plains low-level jet (GPLLJ). Subsidence anomalies are co-located over the centers of each drought: in the central Great Plains for the 1930s and in a band extending from the southwest to the southeastern United States for the 1950s. The location and intensity of this subsidence during the 1948–1957 drought is a typical response to a cold eastern tropical Pacific, but for 1932–1939 deviates in terms of the expected intensity, location, and spatial extent. Overall, circulation anomalies during the 1950s drought appear consistent with the expected response to the observed SST forcing. This is not the case for the 1930s, implying some other causal factor may be needed to explain the Dust Bowl drought anomalies. In addition to SST forcing, the 1930s were also characterized by massive alterations to the land surface, including regional-scale devegetation from crop failures and intensive wind erosion and dust storms. Incorporation of these land surface factors into a general circulation model greatly improves the simulation of precipitation and subsidence anomalies during this drought, relative to simulations with SST forcing alone. Even with additional forcing from the land surface, however, the model still has difficulty reproducing some of the other circulation anomalies, including weakening of the GPLLJ and strengthening of the upper level ridge during AMJJAS. This may be due to either weaknesses in the model or uncertainties in the boundary condition estimates. Still, analysis of the circulation anomalies supports the conclusion of an earlier paper (Cook et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:4997, 2009), demonstrating that land degradation factors are consistent with the anomalous nature of the Dust Bowl drought. |
11 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
12 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
13 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | true |
14 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N12bb2469bb894a8f903891b69bf40779 |
15 | ″ | ″ | N56f9febb8d094538a4a38ad0a6dc39d4 |
16 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1049631 |
17 | ″ | schema:keywords | America |
18 | ″ | ″ | Atlantic |
19 | ″ | ″ | Atlantic Ocean basin |
20 | ″ | ″ | Dust Bowl drought |
21 | ″ | ″ | Great Plains |
22 | ″ | ″ | Great Plains low-level jet |
23 | ″ | ″ | North America |
24 | ″ | ″ | North American drought |
25 | ″ | ″ | North Atlantic Ocean basin |
26 | ″ | ″ | North Pacific |
27 | ″ | ″ | Pacific |
28 | ″ | ″ | Plain |
29 | ″ | ″ | SST forcing |
30 | ″ | ″ | United States |
31 | ″ | ″ | addition |
32 | ″ | ″ | additional forcing |
33 | ″ | ″ | alterations |
34 | ″ | ″ | analysis |
35 | ″ | ″ | anomalies |
36 | ″ | ″ | anomalous nature |
37 | ″ | ″ | anomalous sea surface temperature |
38 | ″ | ″ | assimilation |
39 | ″ | ″ | assimilation of surface |
40 | ″ | ″ | atmospheric circulation |
41 | ″ | ″ | atmospheric circulation anomalies |
42 | ″ | ″ | atmospheric reanalysis |
43 | ″ | ″ | band |
44 | ″ | ″ | basin |
45 | ″ | ″ | boreal summer |
46 | ″ | ″ | boreal winter |
47 | ″ | ″ | boundary conditions |
48 | ″ | ″ | cases |
49 | ″ | ″ | causal factors |
50 | ″ | ″ | center |
51 | ″ | ″ | central Great Plains |
52 | ″ | ″ | circulation |
53 | ″ | ″ | circulation anomalies |
54 | ″ | ″ | circulation model |
55 | ″ | ″ | conclusion |
56 | ″ | ″ | conditions |
57 | ″ | ″ | crop failure |
58 | ″ | ″ | degradation factors |
59 | ″ | ″ | devegetation |
60 | ″ | ″ | deviates |
61 | ″ | ″ | difficulties |
62 | ″ | ″ | drought |
63 | ″ | ″ | drought anomalies |
64 | ″ | ″ | dust storms |
65 | ″ | ″ | earlier paper |
66 | ″ | ″ | eastern tropical Pacific |
67 | ″ | ″ | erosion |
68 | ″ | ″ | extent |
69 | ″ | ″ | factors |
70 | ″ | ″ | failure |
71 | ″ | ″ | features |
72 | ″ | ″ | forcing |
73 | ″ | ″ | general circulation model |
74 | ″ | ″ | height |
75 | ″ | ″ | height anomalies |
76 | ″ | ″ | incorporation |
77 | ″ | ″ | intensity |
78 | ″ | ″ | intensive wind erosion |
79 | ″ | ″ | jet |
80 | ″ | ″ | land degradation factors |
81 | ″ | ″ | land surface |
82 | ″ | ″ | land surface factors |
83 | ″ | ″ | location |
84 | ″ | ″ | low-level jet |
85 | ″ | ″ | massive alterations |
86 | ″ | ″ | model |
87 | ″ | ″ | nature |
88 | ″ | ″ | negative center |
89 | ″ | ″ | northern North America |
90 | ″ | ″ | northwest North America |
91 | ″ | ″ | observations |
92 | ″ | ″ | observed SST forcing |
93 | ″ | ″ | ocean basins |
94 | ″ | ″ | paper |
95 | ″ | ″ | patterns |
96 | ″ | ″ | period |
97 | ″ | ″ | persistent drought |
98 | ″ | ″ | positive center |
99 | ″ | ″ | positive height |
100 | ″ | ″ | precipitation |
101 | ″ | ″ | pressure observations |
102 | ″ | ″ | reanalysis |
103 | ″ | ″ | response |
104 | ″ | ″ | ridge |
105 | ″ | ″ | sea level pressure observations |
106 | ″ | ″ | sea surface temperature |
107 | ″ | ″ | simulation of precipitation |
108 | ″ | ″ | simulations |
109 | ″ | ″ | southeastern United States |
110 | ″ | ″ | southwest |
111 | ″ | ″ | spatial extent |
112 | ″ | ″ | state |
113 | ″ | ″ | stationary wave pattern |
114 | ″ | ″ | storms |
115 | ″ | ″ | strengthening |
116 | ″ | ″ | subsidence |
117 | ″ | ″ | subsidence anomalies |
118 | ″ | ″ | subtropical Pacific |
119 | ″ | ″ | summer |
120 | ″ | ″ | surface |
121 | ″ | ″ | surface factors |
122 | ″ | ″ | surface temperature |
123 | ″ | ″ | temperature |
124 | ″ | ″ | terms |
125 | ″ | ″ | train |
126 | ″ | ″ | tropical Pacific |
127 | ″ | ″ | typical response |
128 | ″ | ″ | uncertainty |
129 | ″ | ″ | upper-level ridge |
130 | ″ | ″ | warm Atlantic |
131 | ″ | ″ | wave patterns |
132 | ″ | ″ | wave train |
133 | ″ | ″ | weakening |
134 | ″ | ″ | weakness |
135 | ″ | ″ | wind erosion |
136 | ″ | ″ | winter |
137 | ″ | schema:name | Atmospheric circulation anomalies during two persistent north american droughts: 1932–1939 and 1948–1957 |
138 | ″ | schema:pagination | 2339-2355 |
139 | ″ | schema:productId | N1f1747fc2698478d84da087fa40104ab |
140 | ″ | ″ | N81845698ddc94c90883a31b7484ff335 |
141 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1025817787 |
142 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1 |
143 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-06-01T22:10 |
144 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
145 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | N6efd0146cd5548c2a71422ee1fa3174a |
146 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1 |
147 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
148 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
149 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
150 | N12bb2469bb894a8f903891b69bf40779 | schema:issueNumber | 11-12 |
151 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
152 | N1f1747fc2698478d84da087fa40104ab | schema:name | dimensions_id |
153 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1025817787 |
154 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
155 | N480f7922b1854043b506af53a719c419 | rdf:first | sg:person.0664747644.09 |
156 | ″ | rdf:rest | N93dbaf09a5424362949e20d415a7b29c |
157 | N56f9febb8d094538a4a38ad0a6dc39d4 | schema:volumeNumber | 36 |
158 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
159 | N6efd0146cd5548c2a71422ee1fa3174a | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
160 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
161 | N7ec022fa2b474399add49571a819a028 | rdf:first | sg:person.014707472507.72 |
162 | ″ | rdf:rest | N480f7922b1854043b506af53a719c419 |
163 | N81845698ddc94c90883a31b7484ff335 | schema:name | doi |
164 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1 |
165 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
166 | N93dbaf09a5424362949e20d415a7b29c | rdf:first | sg:person.015566240467.46 |
167 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
168 | anzsrc-for:04 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
169 | ″ | schema:name | Earth Sciences |
170 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
171 | anzsrc-for:0401 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
172 | ″ | schema:name | Atmospheric Sciences |
173 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
174 | sg:grant.3069631 | http://pending.schema.org/fundedItem | sg:pub.10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1 |
175 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:MonetaryGrant |
176 | sg:grant.3099243 | http://pending.schema.org/fundedItem | sg:pub.10.1007/s00382-010-0807-1 |
177 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:MonetaryGrant |
178 | sg:journal.1049631 | schema:issn | 0930-7575 |
179 | ″ | ″ | 1432-0894 |
180 | ″ | schema:name | Climate Dynamics |
181 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
182 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
183 | sg:person.014707472507.72 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.419078.3 |
184 | ″ | schema:familyName | Cook |
185 | ″ | schema:givenName | Benjamin I. |
186 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014707472507.72 |
187 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
188 | sg:person.015566240467.46 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.419078.3 |
189 | ″ | schema:familyName | Miller |
190 | ″ | schema:givenName | Ron L. |
191 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015566240467.46 |
192 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
193 | sg:person.0664747644.09 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.473157.3 |
194 | ″ | schema:familyName | Seager |
195 | ″ | schema:givenName | Richard |
196 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0664747644.09 |
197 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
198 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00382-007-0255-8 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1043104584 |
199 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0255-8 |
200 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
201 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00382-009-0551-6 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1020712407 |
202 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0551-6 |
203 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
204 | sg:pub.10.1023/a:1015820616384 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052669234 |
205 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015820616384 |
206 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
207 | sg:pub.10.1038/nature06921 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1026158887 |
208 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06921 |
209 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
210 | grid-institutes:grid.419078.3 | schema:alternateName | NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, 10025, New York, NY, USA |
211 | ″ | schema:name | Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 61 Route 9W, 10964, Palisades, NY, USA |
212 | ″ | ″ | NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, 10025, New York, NY, USA |
213 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
214 | grid-institutes:grid.473157.3 | schema:alternateName | Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 61 Route 9W, 10964, Palisades, NY, USA |
215 | ″ | schema:name | Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 61 Route 9W, 10964, Palisades, NY, USA |
216 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |