Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle
2006-03-02
AUTHORSTara A. Forbis, Louis Provencher, Leonardo Frid, Gary Medlyn
ABSTRACTThis report describes a land management modeling effort that analyzed potential impacts of proposed actions under an updated Bureau of Land Management Resource Management Plan that will guide management for 20 years on 4.6 million hectares in the Great Basin ecoregion of the United States. State-and-transition models that included vegetation data, fire histories, and many parameters (i.e., rates of succession, fire return intervals, outcomes of management actions, and invasion rates of native and nonnative invasive species) were developed through workshops with scientific experts and range management specialists. Alternative restoration scenarios included continuation of current management, full fire suppression, wildfire use in designated fire use zones, wildfire use in resilient vegetation types only, restoration with a tenfold budget increase, no restoration treatments, and no livestock grazing. Under all the scenarios, cover of vegetation states with native perennial understory declined and was replaced by tree-invaded and weed-dominated states. The greatest differences among alternative management scenarios resulted from the use of fire as a tool to maintain native understory. Among restoration scenarios, only the scenario assuming a tenfold budget increase had a more desirable outcome than the current management scenario. Removal of livestock alone had little effect on vegetation resilience. Rather, active restoration was required. The predictive power of the model was limited by current understanding of Great Basin vegetation dynamics and data needs including statistically valid monitoring of restoration treatments, invasiveness and invasibility, and fire histories. The authors suggest that such computer models can be useful tools for systematic analysis of potential impacts in land use planning. However, for a modeling effort to be productive, the management situation must be conducive to open communication among land management agencies and partner entities, including nonprofit organizations. More... »
PAGES62-83
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1039608234
PUBMEDhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16514478
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/05",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Environmental Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/06",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Biological Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0501",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Ecological Applications",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0502",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Environmental Science and Management",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0602",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Ecology",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Climate",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Computer Simulation",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Conservation of Natural Resources",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Ecology",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Ecosystem",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Fires",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "Plant Development",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/",
"name": "United States",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, P.O. Box 150266, 89315, Ely, Nevada, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, P.O. Box 150266, 89315, Ely, Nevada, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Forbis",
"givenName": "Tara A.",
"id": "sg:person.0631450774.35",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0631450774.35"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, One E. First Street, Suite 1007, 89501, Reno, Nevada, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, One E. First Street, Suite 1007, 89501, Reno, Nevada, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Provencher",
"givenName": "Louis",
"id": "sg:person.015446337423.02",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015446337423.02"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "ESSA Technologies, 1765 West 8th Avenue, Suite 300, V6J 5C6, Vancouver, BC, Canada",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"ESSA Technologies, 1765 West 8th Avenue, Suite 300, V6J 5C6, Vancouver, BC, Canada"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Frid",
"givenName": "Leonardo",
"id": "sg:person.012733623151.45",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012733623151.45"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Bureau of Land Management, Ely Field Office, 702 North Industrial Way, HC 33, Box 33500, 89301, Ely, Nevada, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.462133.1",
"name": [
"Bureau of Land Management, Ely Field Office, 702 North Industrial Way, HC 33, Box 33500, 89301, Ely, Nevada, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Medlyn",
"givenName": "Gary",
"id": "sg:person.015527372031.14",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015527372031.14"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00267-004-0047-4",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1022370858",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0047-4"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf02856556",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1013480544",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02856556"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00324626",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010370481",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00324626"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-017-0307-9_5",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018822980",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0307-9_5"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-1-4612-2358-0",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007328813",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2358-0"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2006-03-02",
"datePublishedReg": "2006-03-02",
"description": "This report describes a land management modeling effort that analyzed potential impacts of proposed actions under an updated Bureau of Land Management Resource Management Plan that will guide management for 20 years on 4.6 million hectares in the Great Basin ecoregion of the United States. State-and-transition models that included vegetation data, fire histories, and many parameters (i.e., rates of succession, fire return intervals, outcomes of management actions, and invasion rates of native and nonnative invasive species) were developed through workshops with scientific experts and range management specialists. Alternative restoration scenarios included continuation of current management, full fire suppression, wildfire use in designated fire use zones, wildfire use in resilient vegetation types only, restoration with a tenfold budget increase, no restoration treatments, and no livestock grazing. Under all the scenarios, cover of vegetation states with native perennial understory declined and was replaced by tree-invaded and weed-dominated states. The greatest differences among alternative management scenarios resulted from the use of fire as a tool to maintain native understory. Among restoration scenarios, only the scenario assuming a tenfold budget increase had a more desirable outcome than the current management scenario. Removal of livestock alone had little effect on vegetation resilience. Rather, active restoration was required. The predictive power of the model was limited by current understanding of Great Basin vegetation dynamics and data needs including statistically valid monitoring of restoration treatments, invasiveness and invasibility, and fire histories. The authors suggest that such computer models can be useful tools for systematic analysis of potential impacts in land use planning. However, for a modeling effort to be productive, the management situation must be conducive to open communication among land management agencies and partner entities, including nonprofit organizations.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1086396",
"issn": [
"0364-152X",
"1432-1009"
],
"name": "Environmental Management",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "1",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "38"
}
],
"keywords": [
"restoration scenarios",
"restoration treatments",
"management scenarios",
"fire history",
"removal of livestock",
"Great Basin ecoregion",
"alternative restoration scenarios",
"land management planning",
"land management agencies",
"alternative management scenarios",
"current management scenario",
"full fire suppression",
"land use planning",
"resource management plans",
"use of fire",
"potential impact",
"active restoration",
"livestock grazing",
"native understory",
"vegetation resilience",
"vegetation data",
"vegetation states",
"vegetation types",
"vegetation dynamics",
"such computer models",
"use planning",
"use zones",
"ecological modeling",
"modeling efforts",
"fire suppression",
"management planning",
"management plan",
"management agencies",
"valid monitoring",
"management situations",
"understory",
"partner entities",
"data needs",
"restoration",
"scientific experts",
"current management",
"invasibility",
"ecoregions",
"grazing",
"transition model",
"scenarios",
"management specialists",
"cover",
"hectare",
"management",
"great differences",
"fire",
"predictive power",
"budget increases",
"livestock",
"impact",
"planning",
"resilience",
"useful tool",
"little effect",
"United States",
"efforts",
"zone",
"desirable outcomes",
"dynamics",
"monitoring",
"computer model",
"use",
"current understanding",
"plan",
"invasiveness",
"specialists",
"tool",
"agencies",
"Bureau",
"increase",
"history",
"removal",
"understanding",
"model",
"state",
"types",
"years",
"workshop",
"treatment",
"need",
"effect",
"differences",
"systematic analysis",
"data",
"modeling",
"suppression",
"action",
"analysis",
"situation",
"experts",
"nonprofit organizations",
"parameters",
"organization",
"continuation",
"report",
"entities",
"outcomes",
"authors",
"power",
"communication"
],
"name": "Great Basin Land Management Planning Using Ecological Modeling",
"pagination": "62-83",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1039608234"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2"
]
},
{
"name": "pubmed_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"16514478"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1039608234"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-10T09:56",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220509/entities/gbq_results/article/article_417.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
260 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
148 URIs
132 LITERALS
15 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2 | schema:about | N0a5c68fd2568441a8ab81b843b57f853 |
2 | ″ | ″ | N12f0f8e97f6847f3a961c9d16c411afb |
3 | ″ | ″ | N4798b50f67d044cca9d30c2927df5d17 |
4 | ″ | ″ | N54f092e234e5445a9067da10e3424e15 |
5 | ″ | ″ | N64e5fa23e1444f30bb34c1176be558bf |
6 | ″ | ″ | N9d4663a8307848efababa083c34bdfd6 |
7 | ″ | ″ | Nb27498a570704572a7856b97de652822 |
8 | ″ | ″ | Nbb535310d8054fc7ba2d9a89587df33f |
9 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:05 |
10 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0501 |
11 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0502 |
12 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:06 |
13 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0602 |
14 | ″ | schema:author | Nb102ddae9c934ba4827851532e4c34b0 |
15 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/978-1-4612-2358-0 |
16 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-017-0307-9_5 |
17 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00324626 |
18 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/bf02856556 |
19 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s00267-004-0047-4 |
20 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2006-03-02 |
21 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2006-03-02 |
22 | ″ | schema:description | This report describes a land management modeling effort that analyzed potential impacts of proposed actions under an updated Bureau of Land Management Resource Management Plan that will guide management for 20 years on 4.6 million hectares in the Great Basin ecoregion of the United States. State-and-transition models that included vegetation data, fire histories, and many parameters (i.e., rates of succession, fire return intervals, outcomes of management actions, and invasion rates of native and nonnative invasive species) were developed through workshops with scientific experts and range management specialists. Alternative restoration scenarios included continuation of current management, full fire suppression, wildfire use in designated fire use zones, wildfire use in resilient vegetation types only, restoration with a tenfold budget increase, no restoration treatments, and no livestock grazing. Under all the scenarios, cover of vegetation states with native perennial understory declined and was replaced by tree-invaded and weed-dominated states. The greatest differences among alternative management scenarios resulted from the use of fire as a tool to maintain native understory. Among restoration scenarios, only the scenario assuming a tenfold budget increase had a more desirable outcome than the current management scenario. Removal of livestock alone had little effect on vegetation resilience. Rather, active restoration was required. The predictive power of the model was limited by current understanding of Great Basin vegetation dynamics and data needs including statistically valid monitoring of restoration treatments, invasiveness and invasibility, and fire histories. The authors suggest that such computer models can be useful tools for systematic analysis of potential impacts in land use planning. However, for a modeling effort to be productive, the management situation must be conducive to open communication among land management agencies and partner entities, including nonprofit organizations. |
23 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
24 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
25 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
26 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N6fc6ff6b6ba04e47b4c0110cc380cfdc |
27 | ″ | ″ | N71b6c66341544abe98e18147eeaca7e5 |
28 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1086396 |
29 | ″ | schema:keywords | Bureau |
30 | ″ | ″ | Great Basin ecoregion |
31 | ″ | ″ | United States |
32 | ″ | ″ | action |
33 | ″ | ″ | active restoration |
34 | ″ | ″ | agencies |
35 | ″ | ″ | alternative management scenarios |
36 | ″ | ″ | alternative restoration scenarios |
37 | ″ | ″ | analysis |
38 | ″ | ″ | authors |
39 | ″ | ″ | budget increases |
40 | ″ | ″ | communication |
41 | ″ | ″ | computer model |
42 | ″ | ″ | continuation |
43 | ″ | ″ | cover |
44 | ″ | ″ | current management |
45 | ″ | ″ | current management scenario |
46 | ″ | ″ | current understanding |
47 | ″ | ″ | data |
48 | ″ | ″ | data needs |
49 | ″ | ″ | desirable outcomes |
50 | ″ | ″ | differences |
51 | ″ | ″ | dynamics |
52 | ″ | ″ | ecological modeling |
53 | ″ | ″ | ecoregions |
54 | ″ | ″ | effect |
55 | ″ | ″ | efforts |
56 | ″ | ″ | entities |
57 | ″ | ″ | experts |
58 | ″ | ″ | fire |
59 | ″ | ″ | fire history |
60 | ″ | ″ | fire suppression |
61 | ″ | ″ | full fire suppression |
62 | ″ | ″ | grazing |
63 | ″ | ″ | great differences |
64 | ″ | ″ | hectare |
65 | ″ | ″ | history |
66 | ″ | ″ | impact |
67 | ″ | ″ | increase |
68 | ″ | ″ | invasibility |
69 | ″ | ″ | invasiveness |
70 | ″ | ″ | land management agencies |
71 | ″ | ″ | land management planning |
72 | ″ | ″ | land use planning |
73 | ″ | ″ | little effect |
74 | ″ | ″ | livestock |
75 | ″ | ″ | livestock grazing |
76 | ″ | ″ | management |
77 | ″ | ″ | management agencies |
78 | ″ | ″ | management plan |
79 | ″ | ″ | management planning |
80 | ″ | ″ | management scenarios |
81 | ″ | ″ | management situations |
82 | ″ | ″ | management specialists |
83 | ″ | ″ | model |
84 | ″ | ″ | modeling |
85 | ″ | ″ | modeling efforts |
86 | ″ | ″ | monitoring |
87 | ″ | ″ | native understory |
88 | ″ | ″ | need |
89 | ″ | ″ | nonprofit organizations |
90 | ″ | ″ | organization |
91 | ″ | ″ | outcomes |
92 | ″ | ″ | parameters |
93 | ″ | ″ | partner entities |
94 | ″ | ″ | plan |
95 | ″ | ″ | planning |
96 | ″ | ″ | potential impact |
97 | ″ | ″ | power |
98 | ″ | ″ | predictive power |
99 | ″ | ″ | removal |
100 | ″ | ″ | removal of livestock |
101 | ″ | ″ | report |
102 | ″ | ″ | resilience |
103 | ″ | ″ | resource management plans |
104 | ″ | ″ | restoration |
105 | ″ | ″ | restoration scenarios |
106 | ″ | ″ | restoration treatments |
107 | ″ | ″ | scenarios |
108 | ″ | ″ | scientific experts |
109 | ″ | ″ | situation |
110 | ″ | ″ | specialists |
111 | ″ | ″ | state |
112 | ″ | ″ | such computer models |
113 | ″ | ″ | suppression |
114 | ″ | ″ | systematic analysis |
115 | ″ | ″ | tool |
116 | ″ | ″ | transition model |
117 | ″ | ″ | treatment |
118 | ″ | ″ | types |
119 | ″ | ″ | understanding |
120 | ″ | ″ | understory |
121 | ″ | ″ | use |
122 | ″ | ″ | use of fire |
123 | ″ | ″ | use planning |
124 | ″ | ″ | use zones |
125 | ″ | ″ | useful tool |
126 | ″ | ″ | valid monitoring |
127 | ″ | ″ | vegetation data |
128 | ″ | ″ | vegetation dynamics |
129 | ″ | ″ | vegetation resilience |
130 | ″ | ″ | vegetation states |
131 | ″ | ″ | vegetation types |
132 | ″ | ″ | workshop |
133 | ″ | ″ | years |
134 | ″ | ″ | zone |
135 | ″ | schema:name | Great Basin Land Management Planning Using Ecological Modeling |
136 | ″ | schema:pagination | 62-83 |
137 | ″ | schema:productId | N24418400014f4888a75338fa74054f79 |
138 | ″ | ″ | N44d5dda4958a4cdf9009516599ba4d70 |
139 | ″ | ″ | N8d82bf72bace405ca62aff7c50f96ecb |
140 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1039608234 |
141 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2 |
142 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-05-10T09:56 |
143 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
144 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | Nd83edb235dcb4c58bbc5ce6e7f3f0877 |
145 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2 |
146 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
147 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
148 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
149 | N0a5c68fd2568441a8ab81b843b57f853 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
150 | ″ | schema:name | United States |
151 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
152 | N12f0f8e97f6847f3a961c9d16c411afb | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
153 | ″ | schema:name | Conservation of Natural Resources |
154 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
155 | N24418400014f4888a75338fa74054f79 | schema:name | pubmed_id |
156 | ″ | schema:value | 16514478 |
157 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
158 | N44d5dda4958a4cdf9009516599ba4d70 | schema:name | doi |
159 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/s00267-005-0089-2 |
160 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
161 | N4798b50f67d044cca9d30c2927df5d17 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
162 | ″ | schema:name | Ecology |
163 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
164 | N54f092e234e5445a9067da10e3424e15 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
165 | ″ | schema:name | Fires |
166 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
167 | N5e9693ab5ce8464f86059c0648b04c30 | rdf:first | sg:person.015527372031.14 |
168 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
169 | N61d3d75798ed4be0b776cd78dd634e71 | rdf:first | sg:person.012733623151.45 |
170 | ″ | rdf:rest | N5e9693ab5ce8464f86059c0648b04c30 |
171 | N64e5fa23e1444f30bb34c1176be558bf | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
172 | ″ | schema:name | Climate |
173 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
174 | N6fc6ff6b6ba04e47b4c0110cc380cfdc | schema:issueNumber | 1 |
175 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
176 | N71b6c66341544abe98e18147eeaca7e5 | schema:volumeNumber | 38 |
177 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
178 | N88ef3f81d4d24129bd0de41adfcd53b2 | rdf:first | sg:person.015446337423.02 |
179 | ″ | rdf:rest | N61d3d75798ed4be0b776cd78dd634e71 |
180 | N8d82bf72bace405ca62aff7c50f96ecb | schema:name | dimensions_id |
181 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1039608234 |
182 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
183 | N9d4663a8307848efababa083c34bdfd6 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
184 | ″ | schema:name | Ecosystem |
185 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
186 | Nb102ddae9c934ba4827851532e4c34b0 | rdf:first | sg:person.0631450774.35 |
187 | ″ | rdf:rest | N88ef3f81d4d24129bd0de41adfcd53b2 |
188 | Nb27498a570704572a7856b97de652822 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
189 | ″ | schema:name | Computer Simulation |
190 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
191 | Nbb535310d8054fc7ba2d9a89587df33f | schema:inDefinedTermSet | https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/ |
192 | ″ | schema:name | Plant Development |
193 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
194 | Nd83edb235dcb4c58bbc5ce6e7f3f0877 | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
195 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
196 | anzsrc-for:05 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
197 | ″ | schema:name | Environmental Sciences |
198 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
199 | anzsrc-for:0501 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
200 | ″ | schema:name | Ecological Applications |
201 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
202 | anzsrc-for:0502 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
203 | ″ | schema:name | Environmental Science and Management |
204 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
205 | anzsrc-for:06 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
206 | ″ | schema:name | Biological Sciences |
207 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
208 | anzsrc-for:0602 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
209 | ″ | schema:name | Ecology |
210 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
211 | sg:journal.1086396 | schema:issn | 0364-152X |
212 | ″ | ″ | 1432-1009 |
213 | ″ | schema:name | Environmental Management |
214 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
215 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
216 | sg:person.012733623151.45 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
217 | ″ | schema:familyName | Frid |
218 | ″ | schema:givenName | Leonardo |
219 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.012733623151.45 |
220 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
221 | sg:person.015446337423.02 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
222 | ″ | schema:familyName | Provencher |
223 | ″ | schema:givenName | Louis |
224 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015446337423.02 |
225 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
226 | sg:person.015527372031.14 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.462133.1 |
227 | ″ | schema:familyName | Medlyn |
228 | ″ | schema:givenName | Gary |
229 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015527372031.14 |
230 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
231 | sg:person.0631450774.35 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
232 | ″ | schema:familyName | Forbis |
233 | ″ | schema:givenName | Tara A. |
234 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.0631450774.35 |
235 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
236 | sg:pub.10.1007/978-1-4612-2358-0 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007328813 |
237 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2358-0 |
238 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
239 | sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-017-0307-9_5 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1018822980 |
240 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0307-9_5 |
241 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
242 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00324626 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1010370481 |
243 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00324626 |
244 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
245 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf02856556 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1013480544 |
246 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02856556 |
247 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
248 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00267-004-0047-4 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1022370858 |
249 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0047-4 |
250 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
251 | grid-institutes:None | schema:alternateName | ESSA Technologies, 1765 West 8th Avenue, Suite 300, V6J 5C6, Vancouver, BC, Canada |
252 | ″ | ″ | The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, One E. First Street, Suite 1007, 89501, Reno, Nevada, USA |
253 | ″ | ″ | The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, P.O. Box 150266, 89315, Ely, Nevada, USA |
254 | ″ | schema:name | ESSA Technologies, 1765 West 8th Avenue, Suite 300, V6J 5C6, Vancouver, BC, Canada |
255 | ″ | ″ | The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, One E. First Street, Suite 1007, 89501, Reno, Nevada, USA |
256 | ″ | ″ | The Nature Conservancy of Nevada, P.O. Box 150266, 89315, Ely, Nevada, USA |
257 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
258 | grid-institutes:grid.462133.1 | schema:alternateName | Bureau of Land Management, Ely Field Office, 702 North Industrial Way, HC 33, Box 33500, 89301, Ely, Nevada, USA |
259 | ″ | schema:name | Bureau of Land Management, Ely Field Office, 702 North Industrial Way, HC 33, Box 33500, 89301, Ely, Nevada, USA |
260 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |