JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/05", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Environmental Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/06", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Biological Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/07", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "e-mail: tds5@cornell.edu, Tel.: +1-607-2544301 Fax: +1-607-2544308", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None", 
          "name": [
            "e-mail: tds5@cornell.edu, Tel.: +1-607-2544301 Fax: +1-607-2544308"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Seeley", 
        "givenName": "Thomas D.", 
        "id": "sg:person.011444372741.17", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011444372741.17"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Section of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, USA, US", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.5386.8", 
          "name": [
            "Section of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, USA, US"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Buhrman", 
        "givenName": "Susannah C.", 
        "id": "sg:person.015333102322.35", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015333102322.35"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "1999-01", 
    "datePublishedReg": "1999-01-01", 
    "description": "Abstract This study renews the analysis of honey bee swarms as decision-making units. We repeated Lindauer's observations of swarms choosing future home sites but used modern videorecording and bee-labelling techniques to produce a finer-grained description of the decision-making process than was possible 40 years ago. Our results both confirm Lindauer's findings and reveal several new features of the decision-making process. Viewing the process at the group level, we found: (1) the scout bees in a swarm find potential nest sites in all directions and at distances of up to several kilometers; (2) initially, the scouts advertise a dozen or more sites with their dances on the swarm, but eventually they advertise just one site; (3) within about an hour of the appearance of unanimity among the dancers, the swarm lifts off to fly to the chosen site; (4) there is a crescendo of dancing just before liftoff, and (5) the chosen site is not necessarily the one that is first advertised on the swarm. Viewing the process at the individual level, we found: (1) the dances of individual scout bees tend to taper off and eventually cease, so that many dancers drop out each day; (2) some scout bees switch their allegiance from one site to another, and (3) the principal means of consensus building among the dancing bees is for bees that dance initially for a non-chosen site to cease their dancing altogether, not to switch their dancing to the chosen site. We hypothesize that scout bees are programmed to gradually quit dancing and that this reduces the possibility of the decision-making process coming to a standstill with groups of unyielding dancers deadlocked over two or more sites. We point out that a swarm's overall strategy of decision making is a \u201cweighted additive strategy.\u201d This strategy is the most accurate but also the most demanding in terms of information processing, because it takes account of all of the information relevant to a decision problem. Despite being composed of small-brained bees, swarms are able to use the weighted additive strategy by distributing among many bees both the task of evaluating the alternative sites and the task of identifying the best of these sites.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s002650050536", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1085476", 
        "issn": [
          "0340-5443", 
          "1432-0762"
        ], 
        "name": "Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "1", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "45"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "potential nest sites", 
      "nest sites", 
      "honey bees", 
      "bees", 
      "dancing bee", 
      "scout bees", 
      "home site", 
      "honey bee swarm", 
      "more sites", 
      "sites", 
      "bee swarm", 
      "alternative sites", 
      "levels", 
      "process", 
      "dozens", 
      "strategies", 
      "individual level", 
      "swarm", 
      "findings", 
      "overall strategy", 
      "observations", 
      "scouts", 
      "analysis", 
      "Abstract", 
      "study", 
      "group level", 
      "distance", 
      "appearance", 
      "description", 
      "results", 
      "features", 
      "possibility", 
      "information", 
      "new features", 
      "kilometers", 
      "days", 
      "group", 
      "processing", 
      "units", 
      "videorecordings", 
      "one", 
      "years", 
      "information processing", 
      "hours", 
      "technique", 
      "direction", 
      "terms", 
      "dance", 
      "account", 
      "decisions", 
      "crescendo", 
      "dancing", 
      "standstill", 
      "additive strategy", 
      "decision-making process", 
      "problem", 
      "task", 
      "unanimity", 
      "dancers", 
      "buildings", 
      "liftoff", 
      "consensus building", 
      "decision making", 
      "making", 
      "group decision", 
      "decision problem", 
      "decision-making units", 
      "allegiance"
    ], 
    "name": "Group decision making in swarms of honey bees", 
    "pagination": "19-31", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1053160430"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/s002650050536"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050536", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1053160430"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T16:53", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_329.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050536"
  }
]

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

139 TRIPLES      20 PREDICATES      94 URIs      85 LITERALS      6 BLANK NODES