Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle Open Access: True
2021-09-14
AUTHORSMichael C. Adler, Datta V. Gaitonde
ABSTRACTShock/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions (STBLIs) are ubiquitous in high-speed flight and propulsion applications. Experimental and computational investigations of swept, three-dimensional (3-D) interactions, which exhibit quasi-conical mean-flow symmetry in the limit of infinite span, have demonstrated key differences in unsteadiness from their analogous, two-dimensional (2-D), spanwise-homogeneous counterparts. For swept interactions, represented by the swept–fin-on-plate and swept–compression–ramp-on-plate configurations, differences associated with the separated shear layers may be traced to the intermixing of 2-D (spanwise independent) and 3-D (spanwise dependent) scaling laws for the separated mean flow. This results in a broader spectrum of unsteadiness that includes relatively lower frequencies associated with the separated shear layers in 3-D interactions. However, lower frequency ranges associated with the global “breathing” of strongly separated 2-D interactions are significantly less prominent in these simple, swept 3-D interactions. A logical extension of 3-D interaction complexity is the compound interaction formed by the merging of two simple interactions. The first objective of this work is therefore to analyze the more complex picture of the dynamics of such interactions, by considering as an exemplar, wall-resolved simulations of the double-fin-on-plate configuration. We show that in the region of interaction merging, new flow scales, changes in separation topology, and the emergence of lower-frequency phenomena are observed, whereas the dynamics of the interaction near the fin leading edges are similar to those of the simple, swept interactions. The second objective is to evolve a unified understanding of the dynamics of STBLIs associated with complex configurations relevant to actual propulsion systems, which involve the coupling between multiple shock systems and multiple flow separation and attachment events. For this, we revisit the salient aspects of scaling phenomena in a manner that aids in assimilating the double-fin flow with simpler swept interactions. The emphasis is on the influence of the underlying structure of the separated flow on the dynamics. The distinct features of the compound interactions manifest in a centerline symmetry pattern that replaces the quasi-conical symmetry of simple interactions. The primary separation displays topological closure to reveal new length scales, associated unsteadiness bands, and secondary flow separation. More... »
PAGES303-326
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1141116530
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/09",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Engineering",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0915",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Interdisciplinary Engineering",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.168010.e",
"name": [
"Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Adler",
"givenName": "Michael C.",
"id": "sg:person.013215624563.21",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.013215624563.21"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Ohio State University, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.261331.4",
"name": [
"Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Ohio State University, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Gaitonde",
"givenName": "Datta V.",
"id": "sg:person.07425242313.25",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.07425242313.25"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00348-020-2924-x",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1125499190",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-2924-x"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00162-009-0103-z",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052891163",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-009-0103-z"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00348-013-1545-z",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1044444903",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1545-z"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00162-016-0397-6",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051284747",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-016-0397-6"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "2021-09-14",
"datePublishedReg": "2021-09-14",
"description": "Shock/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions (STBLIs) are ubiquitous in high-speed flight and propulsion applications. Experimental and computational investigations of swept, three-dimensional (3-D) interactions, which exhibit quasi-conical mean-flow symmetry in the limit of infinite span, have demonstrated key differences in unsteadiness from their analogous, two-dimensional (2-D), spanwise-homogeneous counterparts. For swept interactions, represented by the swept\u2013fin-on-plate and swept\u2013compression\u2013ramp-on-plate configurations, differences associated with the separated shear layers may be traced to the intermixing of 2-D (spanwise independent) and 3-D (spanwise dependent) scaling laws for the separated mean flow. This results in a broader spectrum of unsteadiness that includes relatively lower frequencies associated with the separated shear layers in 3-D interactions. However, lower frequency ranges associated with the global \u201cbreathing\u201d of strongly separated 2-D interactions are significantly less prominent in these simple, swept 3-D interactions. A logical extension of 3-D interaction complexity is the compound interaction formed by the merging of two simple interactions. The first objective of this work is therefore to analyze the more complex picture of the dynamics of such interactions, by considering as an exemplar, wall-resolved simulations of the double-fin-on-plate configuration. We show that in the region of interaction merging, new flow scales, changes in separation topology, and the emergence of lower-frequency phenomena are observed, whereas the dynamics of the interaction near the fin leading edges are similar to those of the simple, swept interactions. The second objective is to evolve a unified understanding of the dynamics of STBLIs associated with complex configurations relevant to actual propulsion systems, which involve the coupling between multiple shock systems and multiple flow separation and attachment events. For this, we revisit the salient aspects of scaling phenomena in a manner that aids in assimilating the double-fin flow with simpler swept interactions. The emphasis is on the influence of the underlying structure of the separated flow on the dynamics. The distinct features of the compound interactions manifest in a centerline symmetry pattern that replaces the quasi-conical symmetry of simple interactions. The primary separation displays topological closure to reveal new length scales, associated unsteadiness bands, and secondary flow separation.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1052938",
"issn": [
"0935-4964",
"1432-2250"
],
"name": "Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "2",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "36"
}
],
"keywords": [
"separated shear layer",
"shear layer",
"flow separation",
"layer interaction",
"plate configuration",
"wall-resolved simulations",
"actual propulsion systems",
"quasi-conical symmetry",
"secondary flow separation",
"high-speed flight",
"infinite span",
"propulsion applications",
"propulsion system",
"new length scale",
"low frequency range",
"multiple shock systems",
"shock/",
"low-frequency phenomena",
"topological closure",
"mean flow",
"flow scales",
"separation structure",
"shock system",
"three-dimensional interaction",
"frequency range",
"region of interaction",
"primary separation",
"length scales",
"symmetry",
"symmetry patterns",
"simple interactions",
"complex configurations",
"dynamics",
"unsteadiness",
"unified understanding",
"underlying structure",
"flow",
"computational investigation",
"layer",
"configuration",
"separation",
"low frequency",
"logical extension",
"topology",
"interaction complexity",
"intermixing",
"fins",
"simulations",
"phenomenon",
"first objective",
"plate",
"distinct features",
"structure",
"system",
"influence",
"extension",
"complexity",
"law",
"coupling",
"ramp",
"flight",
"second objective",
"edge",
"applications",
"merging",
"limit",
"range",
"attachment events",
"interaction",
"frequency",
"work",
"investigation",
"spectra",
"scale",
"compound interactions",
"band",
"key differences",
"objective",
"such interactions",
"span",
"counterparts",
"salient aspects",
"features",
"emphasis",
"picture",
"region",
"aspects",
"manner",
"changes",
"emergence",
"closure",
"differences",
"broad spectrum",
"understanding",
"patterns",
"events",
"complex picture",
"breathing"
],
"name": "Influence of separation structure on the dynamics of shock/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions",
"pagination": "303-326",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1141116530"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1141116530"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-20T07:37",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220519/entities/gbq_results/article/article_881.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
182 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
127 URIs
115 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y | schema:about | anzsrc-for:09 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0915 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | N93a1f6e2ae9e47a4a018dd34ab4c09e0 |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/s00162-009-0103-z |
5 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s00162-016-0397-6 |
6 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s00348-013-1545-z |
7 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/s00348-020-2924-x |
8 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 2021-09-14 |
9 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 2021-09-14 |
10 | ″ | schema:description | Shock/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions (STBLIs) are ubiquitous in high-speed flight and propulsion applications. Experimental and computational investigations of swept, three-dimensional (3-D) interactions, which exhibit quasi-conical mean-flow symmetry in the limit of infinite span, have demonstrated key differences in unsteadiness from their analogous, two-dimensional (2-D), spanwise-homogeneous counterparts. For swept interactions, represented by the swept–fin-on-plate and swept–compression–ramp-on-plate configurations, differences associated with the separated shear layers may be traced to the intermixing of 2-D (spanwise independent) and 3-D (spanwise dependent) scaling laws for the separated mean flow. This results in a broader spectrum of unsteadiness that includes relatively lower frequencies associated with the separated shear layers in 3-D interactions. However, lower frequency ranges associated with the global “breathing” of strongly separated 2-D interactions are significantly less prominent in these simple, swept 3-D interactions. A logical extension of 3-D interaction complexity is the compound interaction formed by the merging of two simple interactions. The first objective of this work is therefore to analyze the more complex picture of the dynamics of such interactions, by considering as an exemplar, wall-resolved simulations of the double-fin-on-plate configuration. We show that in the region of interaction merging, new flow scales, changes in separation topology, and the emergence of lower-frequency phenomena are observed, whereas the dynamics of the interaction near the fin leading edges are similar to those of the simple, swept interactions. The second objective is to evolve a unified understanding of the dynamics of STBLIs associated with complex configurations relevant to actual propulsion systems, which involve the coupling between multiple shock systems and multiple flow separation and attachment events. For this, we revisit the salient aspects of scaling phenomena in a manner that aids in assimilating the double-fin flow with simpler swept interactions. The emphasis is on the influence of the underlying structure of the separated flow on the dynamics. The distinct features of the compound interactions manifest in a centerline symmetry pattern that replaces the quasi-conical symmetry of simple interactions. The primary separation displays topological closure to reveal new length scales, associated unsteadiness bands, and secondary flow separation. |
11 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
12 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
13 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | true |
14 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N245fbb82286942e7999ff26d7498b586 |
15 | ″ | ″ | Ndef8ecac7369435185cb01c6936745e9 |
16 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1052938 |
17 | ″ | schema:keywords | actual propulsion systems |
18 | ″ | ″ | applications |
19 | ″ | ″ | aspects |
20 | ″ | ″ | attachment events |
21 | ″ | ″ | band |
22 | ″ | ″ | breathing |
23 | ″ | ″ | broad spectrum |
24 | ″ | ″ | changes |
25 | ″ | ″ | closure |
26 | ″ | ″ | complex configurations |
27 | ″ | ″ | complex picture |
28 | ″ | ″ | complexity |
29 | ″ | ″ | compound interactions |
30 | ″ | ″ | computational investigation |
31 | ″ | ″ | configuration |
32 | ″ | ″ | counterparts |
33 | ″ | ″ | coupling |
34 | ″ | ″ | differences |
35 | ″ | ″ | distinct features |
36 | ″ | ″ | dynamics |
37 | ″ | ″ | edge |
38 | ″ | ″ | emergence |
39 | ″ | ″ | emphasis |
40 | ″ | ″ | events |
41 | ″ | ″ | extension |
42 | ″ | ″ | features |
43 | ″ | ″ | fins |
44 | ″ | ″ | first objective |
45 | ″ | ″ | flight |
46 | ″ | ″ | flow |
47 | ″ | ″ | flow scales |
48 | ″ | ″ | flow separation |
49 | ″ | ″ | frequency |
50 | ″ | ″ | frequency range |
51 | ″ | ″ | high-speed flight |
52 | ″ | ″ | infinite span |
53 | ″ | ″ | influence |
54 | ″ | ″ | interaction |
55 | ″ | ″ | interaction complexity |
56 | ″ | ″ | intermixing |
57 | ″ | ″ | investigation |
58 | ″ | ″ | key differences |
59 | ″ | ″ | law |
60 | ″ | ″ | layer |
61 | ″ | ″ | layer interaction |
62 | ″ | ″ | length scales |
63 | ″ | ″ | limit |
64 | ″ | ″ | logical extension |
65 | ″ | ″ | low frequency |
66 | ″ | ″ | low frequency range |
67 | ″ | ″ | low-frequency phenomena |
68 | ″ | ″ | manner |
69 | ″ | ″ | mean flow |
70 | ″ | ″ | merging |
71 | ″ | ″ | multiple shock systems |
72 | ″ | ″ | new length scale |
73 | ″ | ″ | objective |
74 | ″ | ″ | patterns |
75 | ″ | ″ | phenomenon |
76 | ″ | ″ | picture |
77 | ″ | ″ | plate |
78 | ″ | ″ | plate configuration |
79 | ″ | ″ | primary separation |
80 | ″ | ″ | propulsion applications |
81 | ″ | ″ | propulsion system |
82 | ″ | ″ | quasi-conical symmetry |
83 | ″ | ″ | ramp |
84 | ″ | ″ | range |
85 | ″ | ″ | region |
86 | ″ | ″ | region of interaction |
87 | ″ | ″ | salient aspects |
88 | ″ | ″ | scale |
89 | ″ | ″ | second objective |
90 | ″ | ″ | secondary flow separation |
91 | ″ | ″ | separated shear layer |
92 | ″ | ″ | separation |
93 | ″ | ″ | separation structure |
94 | ″ | ″ | shear layer |
95 | ″ | ″ | shock system |
96 | ″ | ″ | shock/ |
97 | ″ | ″ | simple interactions |
98 | ″ | ″ | simulations |
99 | ″ | ″ | span |
100 | ″ | ″ | spectra |
101 | ″ | ″ | structure |
102 | ″ | ″ | such interactions |
103 | ″ | ″ | symmetry |
104 | ″ | ″ | symmetry patterns |
105 | ″ | ″ | system |
106 | ″ | ″ | three-dimensional interaction |
107 | ″ | ″ | topological closure |
108 | ″ | ″ | topology |
109 | ″ | ″ | underlying structure |
110 | ″ | ″ | understanding |
111 | ″ | ″ | unified understanding |
112 | ″ | ″ | unsteadiness |
113 | ″ | ″ | wall-resolved simulations |
114 | ″ | ″ | work |
115 | ″ | schema:name | Influence of separation structure on the dynamics of shock/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions |
116 | ″ | schema:pagination | 303-326 |
117 | ″ | schema:productId | Na69c0bd31a5f457eb0435a0024cd985b |
118 | ″ | ″ | Nd6ed8e34adac461991ba951cfcbae6a9 |
119 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1141116530 |
120 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y |
121 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-05-20T07:37 |
122 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
123 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | N177692b7fcc048b8ac0af6b47d427889 |
124 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y |
125 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
126 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
127 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
128 | N177692b7fcc048b8ac0af6b47d427889 | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
129 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
130 | N245fbb82286942e7999ff26d7498b586 | schema:volumeNumber | 36 |
131 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
132 | N4a2d80602e3943759671dc540aadf8e3 | rdf:first | sg:person.07425242313.25 |
133 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
134 | N93a1f6e2ae9e47a4a018dd34ab4c09e0 | rdf:first | sg:person.013215624563.21 |
135 | ″ | rdf:rest | N4a2d80602e3943759671dc540aadf8e3 |
136 | Na69c0bd31a5f457eb0435a0024cd985b | schema:name | doi |
137 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/s00162-021-00590-y |
138 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
139 | Nd6ed8e34adac461991ba951cfcbae6a9 | schema:name | dimensions_id |
140 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1141116530 |
141 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
142 | Ndef8ecac7369435185cb01c6936745e9 | schema:issueNumber | 2 |
143 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
144 | anzsrc-for:09 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
145 | ″ | schema:name | Engineering |
146 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
147 | anzsrc-for:0915 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
148 | ″ | schema:name | Interdisciplinary Engineering |
149 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
150 | sg:journal.1052938 | schema:issn | 0935-4964 |
151 | ″ | ″ | 1432-2250 |
152 | ″ | schema:name | Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics |
153 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
154 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
155 | sg:person.013215624563.21 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.168010.e |
156 | ″ | schema:familyName | Adler |
157 | ″ | schema:givenName | Michael C. |
158 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.013215624563.21 |
159 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
160 | sg:person.07425242313.25 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.261331.4 |
161 | ″ | schema:familyName | Gaitonde |
162 | ″ | schema:givenName | Datta V. |
163 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.07425242313.25 |
164 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
165 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00162-009-0103-z | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1052891163 |
166 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-009-0103-z |
167 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
168 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00162-016-0397-6 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1051284747 |
169 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-016-0397-6 |
170 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
171 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00348-013-1545-z | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1044444903 |
172 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1545-z |
173 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
174 | sg:pub.10.1007/s00348-020-2924-x | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1125499190 |
175 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-2924-x |
176 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
177 | grid-institutes:grid.168010.e | schema:alternateName | Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA |
178 | ″ | schema:name | Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA |
179 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
180 | grid-institutes:grid.261331.4 | schema:alternateName | Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Ohio State University, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA |
181 | ″ | schema:name | Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Ohio State University, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA |
182 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |