Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle
1997-11
AUTHORS ABSTRACTThirty one barley lines were used to investigate the agreement between three relationship measures: genetic similarities based on 681 AFLP-markers, coefficients of co-ancestry based on pedigree data, and generalised distance based on 25 morpological characters (morphological distance). Bootstrap analysis was used to estimate the accuracy of the correlation estimates. AFLP-based genetic similarities showed a poor-to-moderate correlation with the coefficients of co-ancestry within the core set of 25 European two-row spring barleys. Morphological distance was not significantly correlated with either genetic similarity or the coefficient of co-ancestry. The precision of all correlation-coefficient estimates, however, was low. The inclusion of two European winter barleys, two North American two-row spring barleys, and two North American six-row spring barleys in the AFLP-analysis resulted in a much stronger correlation between genetic similarity and the coefficient of co-ancestry. This suggests good opportunities for the use of AFLP-markers to assess genetic diversity by distinguishing between the major ecotypes of barley. Additionally, each of the eight primer combinations used in the AFLP-analysis was able to identify all 31 lines uniquely, showing the usefulness of AFLPs for cultivar identification. Because of the inaccuracy of the investigated relationship measures, resulting in low values of the correlation-coefficient estimates, prediction of the breeding behaviour of parent combinations may be improved by the use of a combination of relationship measures, thus decreasing the effect of their individual independent errors. More... »
PAGES1161-1168
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s001220050677
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001220050677
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1035535246
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/06",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Biological Sciences",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0604",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Genetics",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology, Department of Plant Breeding, Wageningen Agriculture University, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands Fax: + 31 317 48 34 57 E-mail: johan.schut@users.pv.wau.nl, NL",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology, Department of Plant Breeding, Wageningen Agriculture University, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands Fax: + 31 317 48 34 57 E-mail: johan.schut@users.pv.wau.nl, NL"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Schut",
"givenName": "J. W.",
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology, Department of Plant Breeding, Wageningen Agriculture University, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands Fax: + 31 317 48 34 57 E-mail: johan.schut@users.pv.wau.nl, NL",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology, Department of Plant Breeding, Wageningen Agriculture University, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands Fax: + 31 317 48 34 57 E-mail: johan.schut@users.pv.wau.nl, NL"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Qi",
"givenName": "X.",
"id": "sg:person.01012070553.20",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01012070553.20"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology, Department of Plant Breeding, Wageningen Agriculture University, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands Fax: + 31 317 48 34 57 E-mail: johan.schut@users.pv.wau.nl, NL",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology, Department of Plant Breeding, Wageningen Agriculture University, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands Fax: + 31 317 48 34 57 E-mail: johan.schut@users.pv.wau.nl, NL"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Stam",
"givenName": "P.",
"id": "sg:person.01030314254.54",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01030314254.54"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"datePublished": "1997-11",
"datePublishedReg": "1997-11-01",
"description": "Abstract\u2002Thirty one barley lines were used to investigate the agreement between three relationship measures: genetic similarities based on 681 AFLP-markers, coefficients of co-ancestry based on pedigree data, and generalised distance based on 25 morpological characters (morphological distance). Bootstrap analysis was used to estimate the accuracy of the correlation estimates. AFLP-based genetic similarities showed a poor-to-moderate correlation with the coefficients of co-ancestry within the core set of 25 European two-row spring barleys. Morphological distance was not significantly correlated with either genetic similarity or the coefficient of co-ancestry. The precision of all correlation-coefficient estimates, however, was low. The inclusion of two European winter barleys, two North American two-row spring barleys, and two North American six-row spring barleys in the AFLP-analysis resulted in a much stronger correlation between genetic similarity and the coefficient of co-ancestry. This suggests good opportunities for the use of AFLP-markers to assess genetic diversity by distinguishing between the major ecotypes of barley. Additionally, each of the eight primer combinations used in the AFLP-analysis was able to identify all 31 lines uniquely, showing the usefulness of AFLPs for cultivar identification. Because of the inaccuracy of the investigated relationship measures, resulting in low values of the correlation-coefficient estimates, prediction of the breeding behaviour of parent combinations may be improved by the use of a combination of relationship measures, thus decreasing the effect of their individual independent errors.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/s001220050677",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1135804",
"issn": [
"0040-5752",
"1432-2242"
],
"name": "Theoretical and Applied Genetics",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "7",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "95"
}
],
"keywords": [
"two-row spring barley",
"genetic similarity",
"AFLP markers",
"spring barley",
"six-row spring barley",
"barley lines",
"pedigree data",
"barley",
"correlation coefficient estimates",
"winter barley",
"AFLP analysis",
"genetic diversity",
"major ecotypes",
"primer combinations",
"usefulness of AFLPs",
"cultivar identification",
"breeding behavior",
"parent combinations",
"morphological traits",
"AFLP",
"core set",
"morphological distances",
"North American",
"good opportunity",
"ecotypes",
"lower values",
"traits",
"lines",
"measures",
"distance",
"character",
"bootstrap analysis",
"correlation",
"moderate correlation",
"estimates",
"strong correlation",
"opportunities",
"use",
"diversity",
"combination",
"identification",
"effect",
"markers",
"similarity",
"coefficient",
"data",
"analysis",
"set",
"precision",
"inclusion",
"usefulness",
"values",
"prediction",
"independent errors",
"association",
"agreement",
"relationship measures",
"generalised distance",
"accuracy",
"Americans",
"inaccuracy",
"behavior",
"error"
],
"name": "Association between relationship measures based on AFLP markers, pedigree data and morphological traits in barley",
"pagination": "1161-1168",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1035535246"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/s001220050677"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050677",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1035535246"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-05-10T09:46",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220509/entities/gbq_results/article/article_274.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050677"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as:Â json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s001220050677'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s001220050677'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s001220050677'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s001220050677'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
134 TRIPLES
21 PREDICATES
89 URIs
81 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/s001220050677 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:06 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0604 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | Ndf2f698bd5e145468f496a22b38ecfdf |
4 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 1997-11 |
5 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 1997-11-01 |
6 | ″ | schema:description | Abstract Thirty one barley lines were used to investigate the agreement between three relationship measures: genetic similarities based on 681 AFLP-markers, coefficients of co-ancestry based on pedigree data, and generalised distance based on 25 morpological characters (morphological distance). Bootstrap analysis was used to estimate the accuracy of the correlation estimates. AFLP-based genetic similarities showed a poor-to-moderate correlation with the coefficients of co-ancestry within the core set of 25 European two-row spring barleys. Morphological distance was not significantly correlated with either genetic similarity or the coefficient of co-ancestry. The precision of all correlation-coefficient estimates, however, was low. The inclusion of two European winter barleys, two North American two-row spring barleys, and two North American six-row spring barleys in the AFLP-analysis resulted in a much stronger correlation between genetic similarity and the coefficient of co-ancestry. This suggests good opportunities for the use of AFLP-markers to assess genetic diversity by distinguishing between the major ecotypes of barley. Additionally, each of the eight primer combinations used in the AFLP-analysis was able to identify all 31 lines uniquely, showing the usefulness of AFLPs for cultivar identification. Because of the inaccuracy of the investigated relationship measures, resulting in low values of the correlation-coefficient estimates, prediction of the breeding behaviour of parent combinations may be improved by the use of a combination of relationship measures, thus decreasing the effect of their individual independent errors. |
7 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
8 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
9 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
10 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | Nf3d67982c7bb4047a5126177b9c0601f |
11 | ″ | ″ | Nff6b21219e5d4054ab819c561525a2ae |
12 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1135804 |
13 | ″ | schema:keywords | AFLP |
14 | ″ | ″ | AFLP analysis |
15 | ″ | ″ | AFLP markers |
16 | ″ | ″ | Americans |
17 | ″ | ″ | North American |
18 | ″ | ″ | accuracy |
19 | ″ | ″ | agreement |
20 | ″ | ″ | analysis |
21 | ″ | ″ | association |
22 | ″ | ″ | barley |
23 | ″ | ″ | barley lines |
24 | ″ | ″ | behavior |
25 | ″ | ″ | bootstrap analysis |
26 | ″ | ″ | breeding behavior |
27 | ″ | ″ | character |
28 | ″ | ″ | coefficient |
29 | ″ | ″ | combination |
30 | ″ | ″ | core set |
31 | ″ | ″ | correlation |
32 | ″ | ″ | correlation coefficient estimates |
33 | ″ | ″ | cultivar identification |
34 | ″ | ″ | data |
35 | ″ | ″ | distance |
36 | ″ | ″ | diversity |
37 | ″ | ″ | ecotypes |
38 | ″ | ″ | effect |
39 | ″ | ″ | error |
40 | ″ | ″ | estimates |
41 | ″ | ″ | generalised distance |
42 | ″ | ″ | genetic diversity |
43 | ″ | ″ | genetic similarity |
44 | ″ | ″ | good opportunity |
45 | ″ | ″ | identification |
46 | ″ | ″ | inaccuracy |
47 | ″ | ″ | inclusion |
48 | ″ | ″ | independent errors |
49 | ″ | ″ | lines |
50 | ″ | ″ | lower values |
51 | ″ | ″ | major ecotypes |
52 | ″ | ″ | markers |
53 | ″ | ″ | measures |
54 | ″ | ″ | moderate correlation |
55 | ″ | ″ | morphological distances |
56 | ″ | ″ | morphological traits |
57 | ″ | ″ | opportunities |
58 | ″ | ″ | parent combinations |
59 | ″ | ″ | pedigree data |
60 | ″ | ″ | precision |
61 | ″ | ″ | prediction |
62 | ″ | ″ | primer combinations |
63 | ″ | ″ | relationship measures |
64 | ″ | ″ | set |
65 | ″ | ″ | similarity |
66 | ″ | ″ | six-row spring barley |
67 | ″ | ″ | spring barley |
68 | ″ | ″ | strong correlation |
69 | ″ | ″ | traits |
70 | ″ | ″ | two-row spring barley |
71 | ″ | ″ | use |
72 | ″ | ″ | usefulness |
73 | ″ | ″ | usefulness of AFLPs |
74 | ″ | ″ | values |
75 | ″ | ″ | winter barley |
76 | ″ | schema:name | Association between relationship measures based on AFLP markers, pedigree data and morphological traits in barley |
77 | ″ | schema:pagination | 1161-1168 |
78 | ″ | schema:productId | Nbffee6271aed43f1851412bb421f203d |
79 | ″ | ″ | Ne8465cf948c046c5b78c414c18c2c2e7 |
80 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1035535246 |
81 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050677 |
82 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-05-10T09:46 |
83 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
84 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | Nfe0cedf69fd441cb903c3b7475caba51 |
85 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050677 |
86 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
87 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
88 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
89 | N5f6dbc73df9a44adb4a3637a20723d39 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
90 | ″ | schema:familyName | Schut |
91 | ″ | schema:givenName | J. W. |
92 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
93 | N882774f8ecde4ed593edc9de0c25cfbc | rdf:first | sg:person.01030314254.54 |
94 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
95 | Nb6000ff4bddb4f48a2ac354915cdb593 | rdf:first | sg:person.01012070553.20 |
96 | ″ | rdf:rest | N882774f8ecde4ed593edc9de0c25cfbc |
97 | Nbffee6271aed43f1851412bb421f203d | schema:name | doi |
98 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/s001220050677 |
99 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
100 | Ndf2f698bd5e145468f496a22b38ecfdf | rdf:first | N5f6dbc73df9a44adb4a3637a20723d39 |
101 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nb6000ff4bddb4f48a2ac354915cdb593 |
102 | Ne8465cf948c046c5b78c414c18c2c2e7 | schema:name | dimensions_id |
103 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1035535246 |
104 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
105 | Nf3d67982c7bb4047a5126177b9c0601f | schema:volumeNumber | 95 |
106 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
107 | Nfe0cedf69fd441cb903c3b7475caba51 | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
108 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
109 | Nff6b21219e5d4054ab819c561525a2ae | schema:issueNumber | 7 |
110 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
111 | anzsrc-for:06 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
112 | ″ | schema:name | Biological Sciences |
113 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
114 | anzsrc-for:0604 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
115 | ″ | schema:name | Genetics |
116 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
117 | sg:journal.1135804 | schema:issn | 0040-5752 |
118 | ″ | ″ | 1432-2242 |
119 | ″ | schema:name | Theoretical and Applied Genetics |
120 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
121 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
122 | sg:person.01012070553.20 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
123 | ″ | schema:familyName | Qi |
124 | ″ | schema:givenName | X. |
125 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01012070553.20 |
126 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
127 | sg:person.01030314254.54 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
128 | ″ | schema:familyName | Stam |
129 | ″ | schema:givenName | P. |
130 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01030314254.54 |
131 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
132 | grid-institutes:None | schema:alternateName | C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology, Department of Plant Breeding, Wageningen Agriculture University, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands Fax: + 31 317 48 34 57 E-mail: johan.schut@users.pv.wau.nl, NL |
133 | ″ | schema:name | C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology, Department of Plant Breeding, Wageningen Agriculture University, P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands Fax: + 31 317 48 34 57 E-mail: johan.schut@users.pv.wau.nl, NL |
134 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |