Using technology assessment as the picture archiving and communication system spreads outside radiology to the enterprise View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle      Open Access: True


Article Info

DATE

2000-05

AUTHORS

Robert P. Maliff, Jason Launders

ABSTRACT

Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are being implemented within radiology departments, and many facilities are entering the next stage of PACS use by deploying PACS to departments outside of radiology and to other facilities located at a distance. Many PACS vendors and department administrators have based cost-justification analyses on the anticipated savings from expanding PACS to these areas. However, many of these cost-savings analyses can be highly suspect in their assumptions and findings. Technology assessment (TA) at the hospital/health system level is an organized, systematic approach to examining the efficacy of a technology in relation to the health system's mission and clinical needs. It can be an organized and unifying approach to aid in the distribution of limited capital resources. As extra-radiology PACS deployment is a costly endeavor, TA may be used to plan for PACS implementation throughout the enterprise. In many organizations, PACS is thought of as a radiology domain as its first uses were centered on this image-producing service. Now, as PACS technology spreads to other service areas, such as cardiology, dermatology, pathology, orthopedics, obstetrics, etc, the need to incorporate other viewpoints in a system-based PACS is necessary to avoid having independent PACS that may duplicate archives and may not communicate with each other. How to meet the diverse PACS needs of clinical services can be a challenging task; a TA program has been demonstrated to effectively handle the clinical needs, demands, and timeframes of PACS planning and support throughout hospitals and health systems. A hospital-based TA program can assist health care organizations to present PACS as a system-wide need and program rather than a radiology-based program gobbling up the capital budget. Submitting PACS to the TA review process can identify essential elements in planning and help avoid many of the pitfalls of PACS implementation and operations. Thorough cost and/or return on investment analyses, phasing decisions, workflow re-engineering, and outcomes assessment programs are a few of the issues that a TA program can address to help in the transition to a complete electronic image environment. The TA process includes clinician selection, evaluation criteria and their selection for technologies under review, a policy for review/authorization/denial, and measurement of expected outcomes. More... »

PAGES

114-116

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf03167639

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03167639

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001514469

PUBMED

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10847377


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1117", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Public Health and Health Services", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/11", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Medical and Health Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Cost Savings", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Feasibility Studies", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Hospital Shared Services", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Humans", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Radiology Information Systems", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "inDefinedTermSet": "https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/", 
        "name": "Technology Assessment, Biomedical", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "ECRI Institute", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.418699.b", 
          "name": [
            "Health Systems Group, ECRI, 5200 Butler Pike, 19462, Plymouth Meeting, PA", 
            "Health Devices Group, ECRI, 5200 Butler Pike, 19462, Plymouth Meeting, PA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Maliff", 
        "givenName": "Robert P.", 
        "id": "sg:person.01263524752.37", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01263524752.37"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }, 
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "ECRI Institute", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.418699.b", 
          "name": [
            "Health Systems Group, ECRI, 5200 Butler Pike, 19462, Plymouth Meeting, PA", 
            "Health Devices Group, ECRI, 5200 Butler Pike, 19462, Plymouth Meeting, PA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Launders", 
        "givenName": "Jason", 
        "id": "sg:person.01237102441.61", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01237102441.61"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "2000-05", 
    "datePublishedReg": "2000-05-01", 
    "description": "Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are being implemented within radiology departments, and many facilities are entering the next stage of PACS use by deploying PACS to departments outside of radiology and to other facilities located at a distance. Many PACS vendors and department administrators have based cost-justification analyses on the anticipated savings from expanding PACS to these areas. However, many of these cost-savings analyses can be highly suspect in their assumptions and findings. Technology assessment (TA) at the hospital/health system level is an organized, systematic approach to examining the efficacy of a technology in relation to the health system's mission and clinical needs. It can be an organized and unifying approach to aid in the distribution of limited capital resources. As extra-radiology PACS deployment is a costly endeavor, TA may be used to plan for PACS implementation throughout the enterprise. In many organizations, PACS is thought of as a radiology domain as its first uses were centered on this image-producing service. Now, as PACS technology spreads to other service areas, such as cardiology, dermatology, pathology, orthopedics, obstetrics, etc, the need to incorporate other viewpoints in a system-based PACS is necessary to avoid having independent PACS that may duplicate archives and may not communicate with each other. How to meet the diverse PACS needs of clinical services can be a challenging task; a TA program has been demonstrated to effectively handle the clinical needs, demands, and timeframes of PACS planning and support throughout hospitals and health systems. A hospital-based TA program can assist health care organizations to present PACS as a system-wide need and program rather than a radiology-based program gobbling up the capital budget. Submitting PACS to the TA review process can identify essential elements in planning and help avoid many of the pitfalls of PACS implementation and operations. Thorough cost and/or return on investment analyses, phasing decisions, workflow re-engineering, and outcomes assessment programs are a few of the issues that a TA program can address to help in the transition to a complete electronic image environment. The TA process includes clinician selection, evaluation criteria and their selection for technologies under review, a policy for review/authorization/denial, and measurement of expected outcomes.", 
    "genre": "research_article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf03167639", 
    "inLanguage": [
      "en"
    ], 
    "isAccessibleForFree": true, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1100894", 
        "issn": [
          "0897-1889", 
          "1618-727X"
        ], 
        "name": "Journal of Digital Imaging", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "Suppl 1", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "13"
      }
    ], 
    "name": "Using technology assessment as the picture archiving and communication system spreads outside radiology to the enterprise", 
    "pagination": "114-116", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "readcube_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "07367132769f77be6489a3a10b6de52151940b06088980dbd31ed19721dd5b83"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "pubmed_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10847377"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "nlm_unique_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "9100529"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/bf03167639"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1001514469"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03167639", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001514469"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-11T00:59", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000001_0000000264/records_8697_00000479.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03167639"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf03167639'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf03167639'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf03167639'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf03167639'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

101 TRIPLES      20 PREDICATES      35 URIs      27 LITERALS      15 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/bf03167639 schema:about N603b3dea41e6415c9278e70fd1c65890
2 N6fd70620d5e744bdab60a1821b1f8587
3 N853fab7173ed43b3ac10807623f50196
4 N8c8c92e57f564be494b070cc73d23b2d
5 N8fa6f9456a044cc18604cbdde7e3dbf6
6 N982783c2df9c4eac84150c0eee29ddad
7 anzsrc-for:11
8 anzsrc-for:1117
9 schema:author Nfc2ca12a9acb43bf9bee6c6452234ca0
10 schema:datePublished 2000-05
11 schema:datePublishedReg 2000-05-01
12 schema:description Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are being implemented within radiology departments, and many facilities are entering the next stage of PACS use by deploying PACS to departments outside of radiology and to other facilities located at a distance. Many PACS vendors and department administrators have based cost-justification analyses on the anticipated savings from expanding PACS to these areas. However, many of these cost-savings analyses can be highly suspect in their assumptions and findings. Technology assessment (TA) at the hospital/health system level is an organized, systematic approach to examining the efficacy of a technology in relation to the health system's mission and clinical needs. It can be an organized and unifying approach to aid in the distribution of limited capital resources. As extra-radiology PACS deployment is a costly endeavor, TA may be used to plan for PACS implementation throughout the enterprise. In many organizations, PACS is thought of as a radiology domain as its first uses were centered on this image-producing service. Now, as PACS technology spreads to other service areas, such as cardiology, dermatology, pathology, orthopedics, obstetrics, etc, the need to incorporate other viewpoints in a system-based PACS is necessary to avoid having independent PACS that may duplicate archives and may not communicate with each other. How to meet the diverse PACS needs of clinical services can be a challenging task; a TA program has been demonstrated to effectively handle the clinical needs, demands, and timeframes of PACS planning and support throughout hospitals and health systems. A hospital-based TA program can assist health care organizations to present PACS as a system-wide need and program rather than a radiology-based program gobbling up the capital budget. Submitting PACS to the TA review process can identify essential elements in planning and help avoid many of the pitfalls of PACS implementation and operations. Thorough cost and/or return on investment analyses, phasing decisions, workflow re-engineering, and outcomes assessment programs are a few of the issues that a TA program can address to help in the transition to a complete electronic image environment. The TA process includes clinician selection, evaluation criteria and their selection for technologies under review, a policy for review/authorization/denial, and measurement of expected outcomes.
13 schema:genre research_article
14 schema:inLanguage en
15 schema:isAccessibleForFree true
16 schema:isPartOf N5a9d3fc3650444329b7d64ba200c6934
17 N9b7c9bb3e00f40298fdbb7de97769f4c
18 sg:journal.1100894
19 schema:name Using technology assessment as the picture archiving and communication system spreads outside radiology to the enterprise
20 schema:pagination 114-116
21 schema:productId N08b8b153e29341b4a568864c88df0449
22 N19d454e821f648e29f1c5a600728911d
23 N9118401de5fa48a093948829971bd01d
24 N9ee3359443154177b4cec380808a457a
25 Ne428787cbc4c4ac794ae9b9f2b18b907
26 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1001514469
27 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03167639
28 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-11T00:59
29 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
30 schema:sdPublisher N5f55303e67b44eb480b632f14d26e4c2
31 schema:url http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03167639
32 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
33 sgo:sdDataset articles
34 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
35 N08b8b153e29341b4a568864c88df0449 schema:name readcube_id
36 schema:value 07367132769f77be6489a3a10b6de52151940b06088980dbd31ed19721dd5b83
37 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
38 N19d454e821f648e29f1c5a600728911d schema:name pubmed_id
39 schema:value 10847377
40 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
41 N5a9d3fc3650444329b7d64ba200c6934 schema:volumeNumber 13
42 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
43 N5f55303e67b44eb480b632f14d26e4c2 schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
44 rdf:type schema:Organization
45 N603b3dea41e6415c9278e70fd1c65890 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
46 schema:name Humans
47 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
48 N6fd70620d5e744bdab60a1821b1f8587 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
49 schema:name Technology Assessment, Biomedical
50 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
51 N853fab7173ed43b3ac10807623f50196 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
52 schema:name Cost Savings
53 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
54 N8c8c92e57f564be494b070cc73d23b2d schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
55 schema:name Radiology Information Systems
56 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
57 N8fa6f9456a044cc18604cbdde7e3dbf6 schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
58 schema:name Hospital Shared Services
59 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
60 N9118401de5fa48a093948829971bd01d schema:name doi
61 schema:value 10.1007/bf03167639
62 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
63 N982783c2df9c4eac84150c0eee29ddad schema:inDefinedTermSet https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/
64 schema:name Feasibility Studies
65 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
66 N9b7c9bb3e00f40298fdbb7de97769f4c schema:issueNumber Suppl 1
67 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
68 N9ee3359443154177b4cec380808a457a schema:name dimensions_id
69 schema:value pub.1001514469
70 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
71 Nb4b87abed5fd4973a1e08012b9964c91 rdf:first sg:person.01237102441.61
72 rdf:rest rdf:nil
73 Ne428787cbc4c4ac794ae9b9f2b18b907 schema:name nlm_unique_id
74 schema:value 9100529
75 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
76 Nfc2ca12a9acb43bf9bee6c6452234ca0 rdf:first sg:person.01263524752.37
77 rdf:rest Nb4b87abed5fd4973a1e08012b9964c91
78 anzsrc-for:11 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
79 schema:name Medical and Health Sciences
80 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
81 anzsrc-for:1117 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
82 schema:name Public Health and Health Services
83 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
84 sg:journal.1100894 schema:issn 0897-1889
85 1618-727X
86 schema:name Journal of Digital Imaging
87 rdf:type schema:Periodical
88 sg:person.01237102441.61 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.418699.b
89 schema:familyName Launders
90 schema:givenName Jason
91 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01237102441.61
92 rdf:type schema:Person
93 sg:person.01263524752.37 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.418699.b
94 schema:familyName Maliff
95 schema:givenName Robert P.
96 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01263524752.37
97 rdf:type schema:Person
98 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.418699.b schema:alternateName ECRI Institute
99 schema:name Health Devices Group, ECRI, 5200 Butler Pike, 19462, Plymouth Meeting, PA
100 Health Systems Group, ECRI, 5200 Butler Pike, 19462, Plymouth Meeting, PA
101 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...