Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

1995-09

AUTHORS

Caroline Whitbeck

ABSTRACT

In this paper I outline an “agent-centered” approach to learning ethics. The approach is “agent-centered” in that its central aim is to prepare students toact wisely and responsibly when faced with moral problems. The methods characteristic of this approach are suitable for integrating material on professional and research ethics into technical courses, as well as for free-standing ethics courses. The analogy I draw between ethical problems and design problems clarifies the character of ethical problems as they are experienced by those who must respond to them. It exposes the mistake, common in ethics teaching, of misrepresenting moral problems as multiple-choice problems, especially in the form of ‘dilemmas’, that is, a forced choice between two unacceptable alternatives. Furthermore, I clarify the importance for responsible practice of recognizing any ambiguity in the problem situation. To foster in students the skills they need, teaching examples should preserve the open-ended, multiply-constrained, and ambiguous character of problem situations as experienced by the agent. I give guidelines for constructing open-ended scenarios that present moral problems much as an agent would experience them — guidelines which strongly influenced the construction of ‘cases’ in the latest edition of “On Being a Scientist” — and I discuss how to present historical cases and cases from the instructor’s own experience to best foster agent-centered learning. More... »

PAGES

299-308

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02628805

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02628805

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045947669


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/2203", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Philosophy", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/22", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Philosophy and Religious Studies", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Massachusetts Institute of Technology", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.116068.8", 
          "name": [
            "the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rm. 3-137C, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Whitbeck", 
        "givenName": "Caroline", 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "1995-09", 
    "datePublishedReg": "1995-09-01", 
    "description": "In this paper I outline an \u201cagent-centered\u201d approach to learning ethics. The approach is \u201cagent-centered\u201d in that its central aim is to prepare students toact wisely and responsibly when faced with moral problems. The methods characteristic of this approach are suitable for integrating material on professional and research ethics into technical courses, as well as for free-standing ethics courses. The analogy I draw between ethical problems and design problems clarifies the character of ethical problems as they are experienced by those who must respond to them. It exposes the mistake, common in ethics teaching, of misrepresenting moral problems as multiple-choice problems, especially in the form of \u2018dilemmas\u2019, that is, a forced choice between two unacceptable alternatives. Furthermore, I clarify the importance for responsible practice of recognizing any ambiguity in the problem situation. To foster in students the skills they need, teaching examples should preserve the open-ended, multiply-constrained, and ambiguous character of problem situations as experienced by the agent. I give guidelines for constructing open-ended scenarios that present moral problems much as an agent would experience them \u2014 guidelines which strongly influenced the construction of \u2018cases\u2019 in the latest edition of \u201cOn Being a Scientist\u201d \u2014 and I discuss how to present historical cases and cases from the instructor\u2019s own experience to best foster agent-centered learning.", 
    "genre": "research_article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf02628805", 
    "inLanguage": [
      "en"
    ], 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1114745", 
        "issn": [
          "1353-3452", 
          "1471-5546"
        ], 
        "name": "Science and Engineering Ethics", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "3", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "1"
      }
    ], 
    "name": "Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems", 
    "pagination": "299-308", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "readcube_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "dade61d407a69ed776b84bef13315177385ec9644b375a5be4645aa22d226aae"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/bf02628805"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1045947669"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02628805", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045947669"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-10T16:41", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000001_0000000264/records_8669_00000507.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2FBF02628805"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02628805'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02628805'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02628805'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02628805'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

60 TRIPLES      20 PREDICATES      27 URIs      19 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/bf02628805 schema:about anzsrc-for:22
2 anzsrc-for:2203
3 schema:author N618f5e56550c4253951c45aa17ac3342
4 schema:datePublished 1995-09
5 schema:datePublishedReg 1995-09-01
6 schema:description In this paper I outline an “agent-centered” approach to learning ethics. The approach is “agent-centered” in that its central aim is to prepare students toact wisely and responsibly when faced with moral problems. The methods characteristic of this approach are suitable for integrating material on professional and research ethics into technical courses, as well as for free-standing ethics courses. The analogy I draw between ethical problems and design problems clarifies the character of ethical problems as they are experienced by those who must respond to them. It exposes the mistake, common in ethics teaching, of misrepresenting moral problems as multiple-choice problems, especially in the form of ‘dilemmas’, that is, a forced choice between two unacceptable alternatives. Furthermore, I clarify the importance for responsible practice of recognizing any ambiguity in the problem situation. To foster in students the skills they need, teaching examples should preserve the open-ended, multiply-constrained, and ambiguous character of problem situations as experienced by the agent. I give guidelines for constructing open-ended scenarios that present moral problems much as an agent would experience them — guidelines which strongly influenced the construction of ‘cases’ in the latest edition of “On Being a Scientist” — and I discuss how to present historical cases and cases from the instructor’s own experience to best foster agent-centered learning.
7 schema:genre research_article
8 schema:inLanguage en
9 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
10 schema:isPartOf N1bc9905eb19449d5881b2f10737e7fdf
11 Na6ace33a1ba74ae0a23454883af877f6
12 sg:journal.1114745
13 schema:name Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems
14 schema:pagination 299-308
15 schema:productId N3552eee771d64f268d39cf4f7a743278
16 N65cd0295eafd40398befc03c8fb62553
17 N916eed384975491bbb87c5cce2c0f105
18 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045947669
19 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02628805
20 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-10T16:41
21 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
22 schema:sdPublisher N9f93ea9ccc544d08902ff25abad5ab7e
23 schema:url http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2FBF02628805
24 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
25 sgo:sdDataset articles
26 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
27 N14ef9ff9a29d4ee19e599899273d73b2 schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.116068.8
28 schema:familyName Whitbeck
29 schema:givenName Caroline
30 rdf:type schema:Person
31 N1bc9905eb19449d5881b2f10737e7fdf schema:volumeNumber 1
32 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
33 N3552eee771d64f268d39cf4f7a743278 schema:name dimensions_id
34 schema:value pub.1045947669
35 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
36 N618f5e56550c4253951c45aa17ac3342 rdf:first N14ef9ff9a29d4ee19e599899273d73b2
37 rdf:rest rdf:nil
38 N65cd0295eafd40398befc03c8fb62553 schema:name readcube_id
39 schema:value dade61d407a69ed776b84bef13315177385ec9644b375a5be4645aa22d226aae
40 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
41 N916eed384975491bbb87c5cce2c0f105 schema:name doi
42 schema:value 10.1007/bf02628805
43 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
44 N9f93ea9ccc544d08902ff25abad5ab7e schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
45 rdf:type schema:Organization
46 Na6ace33a1ba74ae0a23454883af877f6 schema:issueNumber 3
47 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
48 anzsrc-for:22 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
49 schema:name Philosophy and Religious Studies
50 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
51 anzsrc-for:2203 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
52 schema:name Philosophy
53 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
54 sg:journal.1114745 schema:issn 1353-3452
55 1471-5546
56 schema:name Science and Engineering Ethics
57 rdf:type schema:Periodical
58 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.116068.8 schema:alternateName Massachusetts Institute of Technology
59 schema:name the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rm. 3-137C, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA
60 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...