Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

1995-09

AUTHORS

Caroline Whitbeck

ABSTRACT

In this paper I outline an “agent-centered” approach to learning ethics. The approach is “agent-centered” in that its central aim is to prepare students toact wisely and responsibly when faced with moral problems. The methods characteristic of this approach are suitable for integrating material on professional and research ethics into technical courses, as well as for free-standing ethics courses. The analogy I draw between ethical problems and design problems clarifies the character of ethical problems as they are experienced by those who must respond to them. It exposes the mistake, common in ethics teaching, of misrepresenting moral problems as multiple-choice problems, especially in the form of ‘dilemmas’, that is, a forced choice between two unacceptable alternatives. Furthermore, I clarify the importance for responsible practice of recognizing any ambiguity in the problem situation. To foster in students the skills they need, teaching examples should preserve the open-ended, multiply-constrained, and ambiguous character of problem situations as experienced by the agent. I give guidelines for constructing open-ended scenarios that present moral problems much as an agent would experience them — guidelines which strongly influenced the construction of ‘cases’ in the latest edition of “On Being a Scientist” — and I discuss how to present historical cases and cases from the instructor’s own experience to best foster agent-centered learning. More... »

PAGES

299-308

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02628805

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02628805

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045947669


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/2203", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Philosophy", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/22", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Philosophy and Religious Studies", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Massachusetts Institute of Technology", 
          "id": "https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.116068.8", 
          "name": [
            "the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rm. 3-137C, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "Whitbeck", 
        "givenName": "Caroline", 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "1995-09", 
    "datePublishedReg": "1995-09-01", 
    "description": "In this paper I outline an \u201cagent-centered\u201d approach to learning ethics. The approach is \u201cagent-centered\u201d in that its central aim is to prepare students toact wisely and responsibly when faced with moral problems. The methods characteristic of this approach are suitable for integrating material on professional and research ethics into technical courses, as well as for free-standing ethics courses. The analogy I draw between ethical problems and design problems clarifies the character of ethical problems as they are experienced by those who must respond to them. It exposes the mistake, common in ethics teaching, of misrepresenting moral problems as multiple-choice problems, especially in the form of \u2018dilemmas\u2019, that is, a forced choice between two unacceptable alternatives. Furthermore, I clarify the importance for responsible practice of recognizing any ambiguity in the problem situation. To foster in students the skills they need, teaching examples should preserve the open-ended, multiply-constrained, and ambiguous character of problem situations as experienced by the agent. I give guidelines for constructing open-ended scenarios that present moral problems much as an agent would experience them \u2014 guidelines which strongly influenced the construction of \u2018cases\u2019 in the latest edition of \u201cOn Being a Scientist\u201d \u2014 and I discuss how to present historical cases and cases from the instructor\u2019s own experience to best foster agent-centered learning.", 
    "genre": "research_article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf02628805", 
    "inLanguage": [
      "en"
    ], 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1114745", 
        "issn": [
          "1353-3452", 
          "1471-5546"
        ], 
        "name": "Science and Engineering Ethics", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "3", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "1"
      }
    ], 
    "name": "Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems", 
    "pagination": "299-308", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "readcube_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "dade61d407a69ed776b84bef13315177385ec9644b375a5be4645aa22d226aae"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/bf02628805"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1045947669"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02628805", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045947669"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2019-04-10T16:41", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-uberresearch-data-dimensions-target-20181106-alternative/cleanup/v134/2549eaecd7973599484d7c17b260dba0a4ecb94b/merge/v9/a6c9fde33151104705d4d7ff012ea9563521a3ce/jats-lookup/v90/0000000001_0000000264/records_8669_00000507.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2FBF02628805"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02628805'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02628805'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02628805'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02628805'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

60 TRIPLES      20 PREDICATES      27 URIs      19 LITERALS      7 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/bf02628805 schema:about anzsrc-for:22
2 anzsrc-for:2203
3 schema:author N05fec79993804613aa5330c26f99e77f
4 schema:datePublished 1995-09
5 schema:datePublishedReg 1995-09-01
6 schema:description In this paper I outline an “agent-centered” approach to learning ethics. The approach is “agent-centered” in that its central aim is to prepare students toact wisely and responsibly when faced with moral problems. The methods characteristic of this approach are suitable for integrating material on professional and research ethics into technical courses, as well as for free-standing ethics courses. The analogy I draw between ethical problems and design problems clarifies the character of ethical problems as they are experienced by those who must respond to them. It exposes the mistake, common in ethics teaching, of misrepresenting moral problems as multiple-choice problems, especially in the form of ‘dilemmas’, that is, a forced choice between two unacceptable alternatives. Furthermore, I clarify the importance for responsible practice of recognizing any ambiguity in the problem situation. To foster in students the skills they need, teaching examples should preserve the open-ended, multiply-constrained, and ambiguous character of problem situations as experienced by the agent. I give guidelines for constructing open-ended scenarios that present moral problems much as an agent would experience them — guidelines which strongly influenced the construction of ‘cases’ in the latest edition of “On Being a Scientist” — and I discuss how to present historical cases and cases from the instructor’s own experience to best foster agent-centered learning.
7 schema:genre research_article
8 schema:inLanguage en
9 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
10 schema:isPartOf N13adc8bbaa7b4fdf993d90683bcfa8a8
11 N4e279a55f3f2484abb24c453a361a5ae
12 sg:journal.1114745
13 schema:name Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems
14 schema:pagination 299-308
15 schema:productId N10f7dd519e864ae08883509f09fbc3cf
16 N23ca058919d54a37983ccf94fd71be8f
17 Nab57b49605b84cd5ac7ebc344d1ad155
18 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045947669
19 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02628805
20 schema:sdDatePublished 2019-04-10T16:41
21 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
22 schema:sdPublisher N3b34ed54c9a34f2ea2e8c27aba980b3e
23 schema:url http://link.springer.com/10.1007%2FBF02628805
24 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
25 sgo:sdDataset articles
26 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
27 N05fec79993804613aa5330c26f99e77f rdf:first N600c803aaf4245bd905db3ee0414da2b
28 rdf:rest rdf:nil
29 N10f7dd519e864ae08883509f09fbc3cf schema:name readcube_id
30 schema:value dade61d407a69ed776b84bef13315177385ec9644b375a5be4645aa22d226aae
31 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
32 N13adc8bbaa7b4fdf993d90683bcfa8a8 schema:volumeNumber 1
33 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
34 N23ca058919d54a37983ccf94fd71be8f schema:name doi
35 schema:value 10.1007/bf02628805
36 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
37 N3b34ed54c9a34f2ea2e8c27aba980b3e schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
38 rdf:type schema:Organization
39 N4e279a55f3f2484abb24c453a361a5ae schema:issueNumber 3
40 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
41 N600c803aaf4245bd905db3ee0414da2b schema:affiliation https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.116068.8
42 schema:familyName Whitbeck
43 schema:givenName Caroline
44 rdf:type schema:Person
45 Nab57b49605b84cd5ac7ebc344d1ad155 schema:name dimensions_id
46 schema:value pub.1045947669
47 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
48 anzsrc-for:22 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
49 schema:name Philosophy and Religious Studies
50 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
51 anzsrc-for:2203 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
52 schema:name Philosophy
53 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
54 sg:journal.1114745 schema:issn 1353-3452
55 1471-5546
56 schema:name Science and Engineering Ethics
57 rdf:type schema:Periodical
58 https://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.116068.8 schema:alternateName Massachusetts Institute of Technology
59 schema:name the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rm. 3-137C, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA
60 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...