Representations of the Natural System in the Nineteenth century View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

1991-04

AUTHORS

Robert J. O'Hara

ABSTRACT

‘The Natural System’ is the abstract notion of the order in living diversity. The richness and complexity of this notion is revealed by the diversity of representations of the Natural System drawn by ornithologists in the Nineteenth Century. These representations varied in overall form from stars, to circles, to maps, to evolutionary trees and cross-sections through trees. They differed in their depiction of affinity, analogy, continuity, directionality, symmetry, reticulation and branching, evolution, and morphological convergence and divergence. Some representations were two-dimensional, and some were three-dimensional; n-dimensional representations were discussed but never illustrated. The study of diagrammatic representations of the Natural System is made difficult by the frequent failure of authors to discuss them in their texts, and by the consequent problem of distinguishing features which carried meaning from arbitrary features and printing conventions which did not. Many of the systematics controversies of the last thirty years have their roots in the conceptual problems which surrounded the Natural System in the late 1800s, problems which were left unresolved when interest in higher-level systematics declined at the turn of this century. More... »

PAGES

255-274

Identifiers

URI

http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02426840

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02426840

DIMENSIONS

https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1042218972


Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

[
  {
    "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
    "about": [
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/06", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Biological Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/17", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Psychology and Cognitive Sciences", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/22", 
        "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
        "name": "Philosophy and Religious Studies", 
        "type": "DefinedTerm"
      }
    ], 
    "author": [
      {
        "affiliation": {
          "alternateName": "Division of Birds, National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, 20560, Washington, D.C., USA", 
          "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.453560.1", 
          "name": [
            "Division of Birds, National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, 20560, Washington, D.C., USA"
          ], 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "familyName": "O'Hara", 
        "givenName": "Robert J.", 
        "id": "sg:person.01122064347.40", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01122064347.40"
        ], 
        "type": "Person"
      }
    ], 
    "citation": [
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf01661700", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045982028", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01661700"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }, 
      {
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf03031745", 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1047369209", 
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03031745"
        ], 
        "type": "CreativeWork"
      }
    ], 
    "datePublished": "1991-04", 
    "datePublishedReg": "1991-04-01", 
    "description": "Abstract\u2018The Natural System\u2019 is the abstract notion of the order in living diversity. The richness and complexity of this notion is revealed by the diversity of representations of the Natural System drawn by ornithologists in the Nineteenth Century. These representations varied in overall form from stars, to circles, to maps, to evolutionary trees and cross-sections through trees. They differed in their depiction of affinity, analogy, continuity, directionality, symmetry, reticulation and branching, evolution, and morphological convergence and divergence. Some representations were two-dimensional, and some were three-dimensional; n-dimensional representations were discussed but never illustrated. The study of diagrammatic representations of the Natural System is made difficult by the frequent failure of authors to discuss them in their texts, and by the consequent problem of distinguishing features which carried meaning from arbitrary features and printing conventions which did not. Many of the systematics controversies of the last thirty years have their roots in the conceptual problems which surrounded the Natural System in the late 1800s, problems which were left unresolved when interest in higher-level systematics declined at the turn of this century.", 
    "genre": "article", 
    "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf02426840", 
    "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
    "isPartOf": [
      {
        "id": "sg:journal.1096349", 
        "issn": [
          "0169-3867", 
          "1572-8404"
        ], 
        "name": "Biology & Philosophy", 
        "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
        "type": "Periodical"
      }, 
      {
        "issueNumber": "2", 
        "type": "PublicationIssue"
      }, 
      {
        "type": "PublicationVolume", 
        "volumeNumber": "6"
      }
    ], 
    "keywords": [
      "nineteenth century", 
      "diversity of representations", 
      "abstract notion", 
      "century", 
      "arbitrary features", 
      "representation", 
      "late 1800s", 
      "notion", 
      "text", 
      "depiction", 
      "meaning", 
      "conceptual problems", 
      "Convention", 
      "overall form", 
      "circle", 
      "diversity", 
      "authors", 
      "continuity", 
      "diagrammatic representation", 
      "controversy", 
      "ornithologists", 
      "turn", 
      "form", 
      "analogy", 
      "interest", 
      "features", 
      "complexity", 
      "richness", 
      "directionality", 
      "roots", 
      "problem", 
      "order", 
      "stars", 
      "convergence", 
      "study", 
      "divergence", 
      "frequent failure", 
      "years", 
      "reticulation", 
      "system", 
      "evolution", 
      "maps", 
      "dimensional representation", 
      "consequent problems", 
      "natural systems", 
      "trees", 
      "affinity", 
      "failure", 
      "evolutionary tree", 
      "systematics", 
      "symmetry", 
      "branching", 
      "higher-level systematics", 
      "morphological convergence", 
      "systematic controversy"
    ], 
    "name": "Representations of the Natural System in the Nineteenth century", 
    "pagination": "255-274", 
    "productId": [
      {
        "name": "dimensions_id", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "pub.1042218972"
        ]
      }, 
      {
        "name": "doi", 
        "type": "PropertyValue", 
        "value": [
          "10.1007/bf02426840"
        ]
      }
    ], 
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02426840", 
      "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1042218972"
    ], 
    "sdDataset": "articles", 
    "sdDatePublished": "2022-12-01T06:20", 
    "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
    "sdPublisher": {
      "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
      "type": "Organization"
    }, 
    "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20221201/entities/gbq_results/article/article_244.jsonl", 
    "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02426840"
  }
]
 

Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02426840'

N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02426840'

Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02426840'

RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf02426840'


 

This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

124 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      83 URIs      72 LITERALS      6 BLANK NODES

Subject Predicate Object
1 sg:pub.10.1007/bf02426840 schema:about anzsrc-for:06
2 anzsrc-for:17
3 anzsrc-for:22
4 schema:author N823edb8c3fcc4ed8a57139840fec590c
5 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1007/bf01661700
6 sg:pub.10.1007/bf03031745
7 schema:datePublished 1991-04
8 schema:datePublishedReg 1991-04-01
9 schema:description Abstract‘The Natural System’ is the abstract notion of the order in living diversity. The richness and complexity of this notion is revealed by the diversity of representations of the Natural System drawn by ornithologists in the Nineteenth Century. These representations varied in overall form from stars, to circles, to maps, to evolutionary trees and cross-sections through trees. They differed in their depiction of affinity, analogy, continuity, directionality, symmetry, reticulation and branching, evolution, and morphological convergence and divergence. Some representations were two-dimensional, and some were three-dimensional; n-dimensional representations were discussed but never illustrated. The study of diagrammatic representations of the Natural System is made difficult by the frequent failure of authors to discuss them in their texts, and by the consequent problem of distinguishing features which carried meaning from arbitrary features and printing conventions which did not. Many of the systematics controversies of the last thirty years have their roots in the conceptual problems which surrounded the Natural System in the late 1800s, problems which were left unresolved when interest in higher-level systematics declined at the turn of this century.
10 schema:genre article
11 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
12 schema:isPartOf N6416418a3d924fc3af39214b94222454
13 Nbc898b6732ad4c7e81de4eb838c27dc4
14 sg:journal.1096349
15 schema:keywords Convention
16 abstract notion
17 affinity
18 analogy
19 arbitrary features
20 authors
21 branching
22 century
23 circle
24 complexity
25 conceptual problems
26 consequent problems
27 continuity
28 controversy
29 convergence
30 depiction
31 diagrammatic representation
32 dimensional representation
33 directionality
34 divergence
35 diversity
36 diversity of representations
37 evolution
38 evolutionary tree
39 failure
40 features
41 form
42 frequent failure
43 higher-level systematics
44 interest
45 late 1800s
46 maps
47 meaning
48 morphological convergence
49 natural systems
50 nineteenth century
51 notion
52 order
53 ornithologists
54 overall form
55 problem
56 representation
57 reticulation
58 richness
59 roots
60 stars
61 study
62 symmetry
63 system
64 systematic controversy
65 systematics
66 text
67 trees
68 turn
69 years
70 schema:name Representations of the Natural System in the Nineteenth century
71 schema:pagination 255-274
72 schema:productId N1626e6878dca4a1fb8ff5888477142ff
73 N9138280e179d46a1b1aba68150cc11cf
74 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1042218972
75 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02426840
76 schema:sdDatePublished 2022-12-01T06:20
77 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
78 schema:sdPublisher Nae97b3ffc06541998b8a6620dfb5e66e
79 schema:url https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02426840
80 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
81 sgo:sdDataset articles
82 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
83 N1626e6878dca4a1fb8ff5888477142ff schema:name doi
84 schema:value 10.1007/bf02426840
85 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
86 N6416418a3d924fc3af39214b94222454 schema:volumeNumber 6
87 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
88 N823edb8c3fcc4ed8a57139840fec590c rdf:first sg:person.01122064347.40
89 rdf:rest rdf:nil
90 N9138280e179d46a1b1aba68150cc11cf schema:name dimensions_id
91 schema:value pub.1042218972
92 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
93 Nae97b3ffc06541998b8a6620dfb5e66e schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
94 rdf:type schema:Organization
95 Nbc898b6732ad4c7e81de4eb838c27dc4 schema:issueNumber 2
96 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
97 anzsrc-for:06 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
98 schema:name Biological Sciences
99 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
100 anzsrc-for:17 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
101 schema:name Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
102 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
103 anzsrc-for:22 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
104 schema:name Philosophy and Religious Studies
105 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
106 sg:journal.1096349 schema:issn 0169-3867
107 1572-8404
108 schema:name Biology & Philosophy
109 schema:publisher Springer Nature
110 rdf:type schema:Periodical
111 sg:person.01122064347.40 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.453560.1
112 schema:familyName O'Hara
113 schema:givenName Robert J.
114 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01122064347.40
115 rdf:type schema:Person
116 sg:pub.10.1007/bf01661700 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045982028
117 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01661700
118 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
119 sg:pub.10.1007/bf03031745 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1047369209
120 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03031745
121 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
122 grid-institutes:grid.453560.1 schema:alternateName Division of Birds, National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, 20560, Washington, D.C., USA
123 schema:name Division of Birds, National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, 20560, Washington, D.C., USA
124 rdf:type schema:Organization
 




Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


...