Quasi-steady flight to quasi-steady flight transition for abort landing in a windshear: Trajectory optimization and guidance View Full Text


Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle     


Article Info

DATE

1988-08

AUTHORS

A. Miele, T. Wang, W. W. Melvin

ABSTRACT

This paper is concerned with the optimal transition and the near-optimum guidance of an aircraft from quasi-steady flight to quasi-steady flight in a windshear. The abort landing problem is considered with reference to flight in a vertical plane. In addition to the horizontal shear, the presence of a downdraft is considered.It is assumed that a transition from descending flight to ascending flight is desired; that the initial state corresponds to quasi-steady flight with absolute path inclination of −3.0 deg; and that the final path inclination corresponds to quasi-steady steepest climb. Also, it is assumed that, as soon as the shear is detected, the power setting is increased at a constant time rate until maximum power setting is reached; afterward, the power setting is held constant. Hence, the only control is the angle of attack. Inequality constraints are imposed on both the angle of attack and its time derivative.First, trajectory optimization is considered. The optimal transition problem is formulated as a Chebyshev problem of optimal control: the performance index being minimized is the peak value of the modulus of the difference between the instantaneous altitude and a reference value, assumed constant. By suitable transformations, the Chebyshev problem is converted into a Bolza problem. Then, the Bolza problem is solved employing the dual sequential gradient-restoration algorithm (DSGRA) for optimal control problems.Two types of optimal trajectories are studied, depending on the conditions desired at the final point. Type 1 is concerned with gamma recovery (recovery of the value of the relative path inclination corresponding to quasi-steady steepest climb). Type 2 is concerned with quasi-steady flight recovery (recovery of the values of the relative path inclination, the relative velocity, and the relative angle of attack corresponding to quasi-steady steepest climb). Both the Type 1 trajectory and the Type 2 trajectory include three branches: descending flight, nearly horizontal flight, and ascending flight. Also, for both the Type 1 trajectory and the Type 2 trajectory, descending flight takes place in the shear portion of the trajectory; horizontal flight takes place partly in the shear portion and partly in the aftershear portion of the trajectory; and ascending flight takes place in the aftershear portion of the trajectory. While the Type 1 trajectory and the Type 2 trajectory are nearly the same in the shear portion, they diverge to a considerable degree in the aftershear portion of the trajectory.Next, trajectory guidance is considered. Two guidance schemes are developed so as to achieve near-optimum transition from quasi-steady descending flight to quasi-steady ascending flight: acceleration guidance (based on the relative acceleration) and gamma guidance (based on the absolute path inclination).The guidance schemes for quasi-steady flight recovery in abort landing include two parts in sequence: shear guidance and aftershear guidance. The shear guidance is based on the result that the shear portion of the trajectory depends only mildly on the boundary conditions. Therefore, any of the guidance schemes already developed for Type 1 trajectories can be employed for Type 2 trajectories (descent guidance followed by recovery guidance). The aftershear guidance is based on the result that the aftershear portion of the trajectory depends strongly on the boundary conditions; therefore, the guidance schemes developed for Type 1 trajectories cannot be employed for Type 2 trajectories. For Type 2 trajectories, the aftershear guidance includes level flight guidance followed by ascent guidance. The level flight guidance is designed to achieve almost complete velocity recovery; the ascent guidance is designed to achieve the desired final quasi-steady state.The numerical results show that the guidance schemes for quasi-steady flight recovery yield a transition from quasi-steady flight to quasi-steady flight which is close to that of the optimal trajectory, allows the aircraft to achieve the final quasi-steady state, and has good stability properties. More... »

PAGES

165-207

References to SciGraph publications

  • 1986-07. Guidance strategies for near-optimum take-off performance in a windshear in JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
  • 1978-11. Sequential gradient-restoration algorithm for optimal control problems with general boundary conditions in JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
  • 1987-08. Quasi-steady flight to quasi-steady flight transition in a windshear: Trajectory optimization and guidance in JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
  • 1986-04. Optimal take-off trajectories in the presence of windshear in JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
  • 1987-05. Maximum survival capability of an aircraft in a severe windshear in JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
  • Identifiers

    URI

    http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00939681

    DOI

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00939681

    DIMENSIONS

    https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1036302239


    Indexing Status Check whether this publication has been indexed by Scopus and Web Of Science using the SN Indexing Status Tool
    Incoming Citations Browse incoming citations for this publication using opencitations.net

    JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.

    TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT

    [
      {
        "@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json", 
        "about": [
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/01", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Mathematical Sciences", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0103", 
            "inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/", 
            "name": "Numerical and Computational Mathematics", 
            "type": "DefinedTerm"
          }
        ], 
        "author": [
          {
            "affiliation": {
              "alternateName": "Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas", 
              "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.21940.3e", 
              "name": [
                "Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas"
              ], 
              "type": "Organization"
            }, 
            "familyName": "Miele", 
            "givenName": "A.", 
            "id": "sg:person.015552732657.49", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015552732657.49"
            ], 
            "type": "Person"
          }, 
          {
            "affiliation": {
              "alternateName": "Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas", 
              "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.21940.3e", 
              "name": [
                "Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas"
              ], 
              "type": "Organization"
            }, 
            "familyName": "Wang", 
            "givenName": "T.", 
            "id": "sg:person.014414570607.44", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014414570607.44"
            ], 
            "type": "Person"
          }, 
          {
            "affiliation": {
              "alternateName": "Airworthiness and Performance Committee, Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), Washington, D.C.", 
              "id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None", 
              "name": [
                "Delta Airlines, Atlanta, Georgia", 
                "Airworthiness and Performance Committee, Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), Washington, D.C."
              ], 
              "type": "Organization"
            }, 
            "familyName": "Melvin", 
            "givenName": "W. W.", 
            "id": "sg:person.011027201155.13", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011027201155.13"
            ], 
            "type": "Person"
          }
        ], 
        "citation": [
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00938475", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1005655216", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00938475"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939214", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1049857998", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939214"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939432", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1036244035", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939432"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00933463", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007322541", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00933463"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }, 
          {
            "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939246", 
            "sameAs": [
              "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1016081985", 
              "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939246"
            ], 
            "type": "CreativeWork"
          }
        ], 
        "datePublished": "1988-08", 
        "datePublishedReg": "1988-08-01", 
        "description": "This paper is concerned with the optimal transition and the near-optimum guidance of an aircraft from quasi-steady flight to quasi-steady flight in a windshear. The abort landing problem is considered with reference to flight in a vertical plane. In addition to the horizontal shear, the presence of a downdraft is considered.It is assumed that a transition from descending flight to ascending flight is desired; that the initial state corresponds to quasi-steady flight with absolute path inclination of \u22123.0 deg; and that the final path inclination corresponds to quasi-steady steepest climb. Also, it is assumed that, as soon as the shear is detected, the power setting is increased at a constant time rate until maximum power setting is reached; afterward, the power setting is held constant. Hence, the only control is the angle of attack. Inequality constraints are imposed on both the angle of attack and its time derivative.First, trajectory optimization is considered. The optimal transition problem is formulated as a Chebyshev problem of optimal control: the performance index being minimized is the peak value of the modulus of the difference between the instantaneous altitude and a reference value, assumed constant. By suitable transformations, the Chebyshev problem is converted into a Bolza problem. Then, the Bolza problem is solved employing the dual sequential gradient-restoration algorithm (DSGRA) for optimal control problems.Two types of optimal trajectories are studied, depending on the conditions desired at the final point. Type 1 is concerned with gamma recovery (recovery of the value of the relative path inclination corresponding to quasi-steady steepest climb). Type 2 is concerned with quasi-steady flight recovery (recovery of the values of the relative path inclination, the relative velocity, and the relative angle of attack corresponding to quasi-steady steepest climb). Both the Type 1 trajectory and the Type 2 trajectory include three branches: descending flight, nearly horizontal flight, and ascending flight. Also, for both the Type 1 trajectory and the Type 2 trajectory, descending flight takes place in the shear portion of the trajectory; horizontal flight takes place partly in the shear portion and partly in the aftershear portion of the trajectory; and ascending flight takes place in the aftershear portion of the trajectory. While the Type 1 trajectory and the Type 2 trajectory are nearly the same in the shear portion, they diverge to a considerable degree in the aftershear portion of the trajectory.Next, trajectory guidance is considered. Two guidance schemes are developed so as to achieve near-optimum transition from quasi-steady descending flight to quasi-steady ascending flight: acceleration guidance (based on the relative acceleration) and gamma guidance (based on the absolute path inclination).The guidance schemes for quasi-steady flight recovery in abort landing include two parts in sequence: shear guidance and aftershear guidance. The shear guidance is based on the result that the shear portion of the trajectory depends only mildly on the boundary conditions. Therefore, any of the guidance schemes already developed for Type 1 trajectories can be employed for Type 2 trajectories (descent guidance followed by recovery guidance). The aftershear guidance is based on the result that the aftershear portion of the trajectory depends strongly on the boundary conditions; therefore, the guidance schemes developed for Type 1 trajectories cannot be employed for Type 2 trajectories. For Type 2 trajectories, the aftershear guidance includes level flight guidance followed by ascent guidance. The level flight guidance is designed to achieve almost complete velocity recovery; the ascent guidance is designed to achieve the desired final quasi-steady state.The numerical results show that the guidance schemes for quasi-steady flight recovery yield a transition from quasi-steady flight to quasi-steady flight which is close to that of the optimal trajectory, allows the aircraft to achieve the final quasi-steady state, and has good stability properties.", 
        "genre": "article", 
        "id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939681", 
        "isAccessibleForFree": false, 
        "isPartOf": [
          {
            "id": "sg:journal.1044187", 
            "issn": [
              "0022-3239", 
              "1573-2878"
            ], 
            "name": "Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications", 
            "publisher": "Springer Nature", 
            "type": "Periodical"
          }, 
          {
            "issueNumber": "2", 
            "type": "PublicationIssue"
          }, 
          {
            "type": "PublicationVolume", 
            "volumeNumber": "58"
          }
        ], 
        "keywords": [
          "dual sequential gradient-restoration algorithm", 
          "quasi-steady flight", 
          "Bolza problem", 
          "Chebyshev problem", 
          "guidance scheme", 
          "trajectory optimization", 
          "optimal trajectories", 
          "abort landing", 
          "ascent guidance", 
          "optimal control problem", 
          "sequential gradient-restoration algorithm", 
          "good stability properties", 
          "shear portion", 
          "boundary conditions", 
          "angle of attack", 
          "abort landing problem", 
          "gradient-restoration algorithm", 
          "absolute path inclination", 
          "quasi-steady state", 
          "constant time rate", 
          "flight recovery", 
          "optimal control", 
          "control problem", 
          "inequality constraints", 
          "time derivative", 
          "suitable transformation", 
          "optimum guidance", 
          "stability properties", 
          "landing problem", 
          "numerical results", 
          "path inclination", 
          "transition problem", 
          "performance index", 
          "horizontal flight", 
          "flight guidance", 
          "state corresponds", 
          "maximum power setting", 
          "final quasi-steady state", 
          "scheme", 
          "time rate", 
          "trajectory guidance", 
          "final point", 
          "trajectories", 
          "optimization", 
          "problem", 
          "windshear", 
          "optimal transition", 
          "velocity recovery", 
          "vertical plane", 
          "transition", 
          "only control", 
          "horizontal shear", 
          "corresponds", 
          "algorithm", 
          "constraints", 
          "optimum transitions", 
          "angle", 
          "shear", 
          "ascending flight", 
          "aircraft", 
          "flight", 
          "plane", 
          "state", 
          "conditions", 
          "results", 
          "flight transition", 
          "properties", 
          "point", 
          "control", 
          "peak value", 
          "reference values", 
          "branches", 
          "transformation", 
          "values", 
          "derivatives", 
          "power settings", 
          "inclination", 
          "modulus", 
          "landing", 
          "reference", 
          "altitude", 
          "degree", 
          "sequence", 
          "setting", 
          "attacks", 
          "types", 
          "place", 
          "guidance", 
          "part", 
          "climb", 
          "considerable degree", 
          "presence", 
          "downdrafts", 
          "addition", 
          "portion", 
          "deg", 
          "index", 
          "rate", 
          "differences", 
          "recovery", 
          "yield", 
          "instantaneous altitude", 
          "recovery yield", 
          "type 1", 
          "type 2", 
          "paper"
        ], 
        "name": "Quasi-steady flight to quasi-steady flight transition for abort landing in a windshear: Trajectory optimization and guidance", 
        "pagination": "165-207", 
        "productId": [
          {
            "name": "dimensions_id", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "pub.1036302239"
            ]
          }, 
          {
            "name": "doi", 
            "type": "PropertyValue", 
            "value": [
              "10.1007/bf00939681"
            ]
          }
        ], 
        "sameAs": [
          "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939681", 
          "https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1036302239"
        ], 
        "sdDataset": "articles", 
        "sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T16:50", 
        "sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/", 
        "sdPublisher": {
          "name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project", 
          "type": "Organization"
        }, 
        "sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_193.jsonl", 
        "type": "ScholarlyArticle", 
        "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939681"
      }
    ]
     

    Download the RDF metadata as:  json-ld nt turtle xml License info

    HOW TO GET THIS DATA PROGRAMMATICALLY:

    JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00939681'

    N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00939681'

    Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.

    curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00939681'

    RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.

    curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00939681'


     

    This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.

    201 TRIPLES      21 PREDICATES      136 URIs      123 LITERALS      6 BLANK NODES

    Subject Predicate Object
    1 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939681 schema:about anzsrc-for:01
    2 anzsrc-for:0103
    3 schema:author N5bc8a426ca964edc988fbae32dc5584d
    4 schema:citation sg:pub.10.1007/bf00933463
    5 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00938475
    6 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939214
    7 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939246
    8 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939432
    9 schema:datePublished 1988-08
    10 schema:datePublishedReg 1988-08-01
    11 schema:description This paper is concerned with the optimal transition and the near-optimum guidance of an aircraft from quasi-steady flight to quasi-steady flight in a windshear. The abort landing problem is considered with reference to flight in a vertical plane. In addition to the horizontal shear, the presence of a downdraft is considered.It is assumed that a transition from descending flight to ascending flight is desired; that the initial state corresponds to quasi-steady flight with absolute path inclination of −3.0 deg; and that the final path inclination corresponds to quasi-steady steepest climb. Also, it is assumed that, as soon as the shear is detected, the power setting is increased at a constant time rate until maximum power setting is reached; afterward, the power setting is held constant. Hence, the only control is the angle of attack. Inequality constraints are imposed on both the angle of attack and its time derivative.First, trajectory optimization is considered. The optimal transition problem is formulated as a Chebyshev problem of optimal control: the performance index being minimized is the peak value of the modulus of the difference between the instantaneous altitude and a reference value, assumed constant. By suitable transformations, the Chebyshev problem is converted into a Bolza problem. Then, the Bolza problem is solved employing the dual sequential gradient-restoration algorithm (DSGRA) for optimal control problems.Two types of optimal trajectories are studied, depending on the conditions desired at the final point. Type 1 is concerned with gamma recovery (recovery of the value of the relative path inclination corresponding to quasi-steady steepest climb). Type 2 is concerned with quasi-steady flight recovery (recovery of the values of the relative path inclination, the relative velocity, and the relative angle of attack corresponding to quasi-steady steepest climb). Both the Type 1 trajectory and the Type 2 trajectory include three branches: descending flight, nearly horizontal flight, and ascending flight. Also, for both the Type 1 trajectory and the Type 2 trajectory, descending flight takes place in the shear portion of the trajectory; horizontal flight takes place partly in the shear portion and partly in the aftershear portion of the trajectory; and ascending flight takes place in the aftershear portion of the trajectory. While the Type 1 trajectory and the Type 2 trajectory are nearly the same in the shear portion, they diverge to a considerable degree in the aftershear portion of the trajectory.Next, trajectory guidance is considered. Two guidance schemes are developed so as to achieve near-optimum transition from quasi-steady descending flight to quasi-steady ascending flight: acceleration guidance (based on the relative acceleration) and gamma guidance (based on the absolute path inclination).The guidance schemes for quasi-steady flight recovery in abort landing include two parts in sequence: shear guidance and aftershear guidance. The shear guidance is based on the result that the shear portion of the trajectory depends only mildly on the boundary conditions. Therefore, any of the guidance schemes already developed for Type 1 trajectories can be employed for Type 2 trajectories (descent guidance followed by recovery guidance). The aftershear guidance is based on the result that the aftershear portion of the trajectory depends strongly on the boundary conditions; therefore, the guidance schemes developed for Type 1 trajectories cannot be employed for Type 2 trajectories. For Type 2 trajectories, the aftershear guidance includes level flight guidance followed by ascent guidance. The level flight guidance is designed to achieve almost complete velocity recovery; the ascent guidance is designed to achieve the desired final quasi-steady state.The numerical results show that the guidance schemes for quasi-steady flight recovery yield a transition from quasi-steady flight to quasi-steady flight which is close to that of the optimal trajectory, allows the aircraft to achieve the final quasi-steady state, and has good stability properties.
    12 schema:genre article
    13 schema:isAccessibleForFree false
    14 schema:isPartOf N3b4df5c964964160befb80b767389455
    15 N40817cc18802459f99bceeaf20f76dde
    16 sg:journal.1044187
    17 schema:keywords Bolza problem
    18 Chebyshev problem
    19 abort landing
    20 abort landing problem
    21 absolute path inclination
    22 addition
    23 aircraft
    24 algorithm
    25 altitude
    26 angle
    27 angle of attack
    28 ascending flight
    29 ascent guidance
    30 attacks
    31 boundary conditions
    32 branches
    33 climb
    34 conditions
    35 considerable degree
    36 constant time rate
    37 constraints
    38 control
    39 control problem
    40 corresponds
    41 deg
    42 degree
    43 derivatives
    44 differences
    45 downdrafts
    46 dual sequential gradient-restoration algorithm
    47 final point
    48 final quasi-steady state
    49 flight
    50 flight guidance
    51 flight recovery
    52 flight transition
    53 good stability properties
    54 gradient-restoration algorithm
    55 guidance
    56 guidance scheme
    57 horizontal flight
    58 horizontal shear
    59 inclination
    60 index
    61 inequality constraints
    62 instantaneous altitude
    63 landing
    64 landing problem
    65 maximum power setting
    66 modulus
    67 numerical results
    68 only control
    69 optimal control
    70 optimal control problem
    71 optimal trajectories
    72 optimal transition
    73 optimization
    74 optimum guidance
    75 optimum transitions
    76 paper
    77 part
    78 path inclination
    79 peak value
    80 performance index
    81 place
    82 plane
    83 point
    84 portion
    85 power settings
    86 presence
    87 problem
    88 properties
    89 quasi-steady flight
    90 quasi-steady state
    91 rate
    92 recovery
    93 recovery yield
    94 reference
    95 reference values
    96 results
    97 scheme
    98 sequence
    99 sequential gradient-restoration algorithm
    100 setting
    101 shear
    102 shear portion
    103 stability properties
    104 state
    105 state corresponds
    106 suitable transformation
    107 time derivative
    108 time rate
    109 trajectories
    110 trajectory guidance
    111 trajectory optimization
    112 transformation
    113 transition
    114 transition problem
    115 type 1
    116 type 2
    117 types
    118 values
    119 velocity recovery
    120 vertical plane
    121 windshear
    122 yield
    123 schema:name Quasi-steady flight to quasi-steady flight transition for abort landing in a windshear: Trajectory optimization and guidance
    124 schema:pagination 165-207
    125 schema:productId Nab9a92d97ef9419596e0b1edffe8002c
    126 Ncbf99f48b1464fa2bb9a7dae04ca419f
    127 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1036302239
    128 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939681
    129 schema:sdDatePublished 2022-08-04T16:50
    130 schema:sdLicense https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/
    131 schema:sdPublisher N949c21be14484cef9fec81ebf1c6e5de
    132 schema:url https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939681
    133 sgo:license sg:explorer/license/
    134 sgo:sdDataset articles
    135 rdf:type schema:ScholarlyArticle
    136 N0346940f514e47a3807110497acf0261 rdf:first sg:person.011027201155.13
    137 rdf:rest rdf:nil
    138 N3b4df5c964964160befb80b767389455 schema:issueNumber 2
    139 rdf:type schema:PublicationIssue
    140 N40817cc18802459f99bceeaf20f76dde schema:volumeNumber 58
    141 rdf:type schema:PublicationVolume
    142 N4cc078e2d9404471889b6c635ef1adfd rdf:first sg:person.014414570607.44
    143 rdf:rest N0346940f514e47a3807110497acf0261
    144 N5bc8a426ca964edc988fbae32dc5584d rdf:first sg:person.015552732657.49
    145 rdf:rest N4cc078e2d9404471889b6c635ef1adfd
    146 N949c21be14484cef9fec81ebf1c6e5de schema:name Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project
    147 rdf:type schema:Organization
    148 Nab9a92d97ef9419596e0b1edffe8002c schema:name doi
    149 schema:value 10.1007/bf00939681
    150 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    151 Ncbf99f48b1464fa2bb9a7dae04ca419f schema:name dimensions_id
    152 schema:value pub.1036302239
    153 rdf:type schema:PropertyValue
    154 anzsrc-for:01 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    155 schema:name Mathematical Sciences
    156 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    157 anzsrc-for:0103 schema:inDefinedTermSet anzsrc-for:
    158 schema:name Numerical and Computational Mathematics
    159 rdf:type schema:DefinedTerm
    160 sg:journal.1044187 schema:issn 0022-3239
    161 1573-2878
    162 schema:name Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
    163 schema:publisher Springer Nature
    164 rdf:type schema:Periodical
    165 sg:person.011027201155.13 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:None
    166 schema:familyName Melvin
    167 schema:givenName W. W.
    168 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011027201155.13
    169 rdf:type schema:Person
    170 sg:person.014414570607.44 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.21940.3e
    171 schema:familyName Wang
    172 schema:givenName T.
    173 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014414570607.44
    174 rdf:type schema:Person
    175 sg:person.015552732657.49 schema:affiliation grid-institutes:grid.21940.3e
    176 schema:familyName Miele
    177 schema:givenName A.
    178 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015552732657.49
    179 rdf:type schema:Person
    180 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00933463 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007322541
    181 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00933463
    182 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    183 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00938475 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1005655216
    184 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00938475
    185 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    186 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939214 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1049857998
    187 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939214
    188 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    189 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939246 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1016081985
    190 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939246
    191 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    192 sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939432 schema:sameAs https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1036244035
    193 https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939432
    194 rdf:type schema:CreativeWork
    195 grid-institutes:None schema:alternateName Airworthiness and Performance Committee, Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), Washington, D.C.
    196 schema:name Airworthiness and Performance Committee, Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), Washington, D.C.
    197 Delta Airlines, Atlanta, Georgia
    198 rdf:type schema:Organization
    199 grid-institutes:grid.21940.3e schema:alternateName Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas
    200 schema:name Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas
    201 rdf:type schema:Organization
     




    Preview window. Press ESC to close (or click here)


    ...