Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle
1987-11
AUTHORSA. Miele, T. Wang, C. Y. Tzeng, W. W. Melvin
ABSTRACTThis paper is concerned with optimal flight trajectories in the presence of windshear. The abort landing problem is considered with reference to flight in a vertical plane. It is assumed that, upon sensing that the airplane is in a windshear, the pilot increases the power setting at a constant time rate until maximum power setting is reached; afterward, the power setting is held constant. Hence, the only control is the angle of attack. Inequality constraints are imposed on both the angle of attack and its time derivative.The performance index being minimized is the peak value of the altitude drop. The resulting optimization problem is a minimax problem or Chebyshev problem of optimal control, which can be converted into a Bolza problem through suitable transformations. The Bolza problem is then solved employing the dual sequential gradient-restoration algorithm (DSGRA) for optimal control problems. Numerical results are obtained for several combinations of windshear intensities, initial altitudes, and power setting rates.For strong-to-severe windshears, the following conclusions are reached: (i) the optimal trajectory includes three branches: a descending flight branch, followed by a nearly horizontal flight branch, followed by an ascending flight branch after the aircraft has passed through the shear region; (ii) along an optimal trajectory, the point of minimum velocity is reached at about the time when the shear ends; (iii) the peak altitude drop depends on the windshear intensity, the initial altitude, and the power setting rate; it increases as the windshear intensity increases and the initial altitude increases; and it decreases as the power setting rate increases; (iv) the peak altitude drop of the optimal abort landing trajectory is less than the peak altitude drop of comparison trajectories, for example, the constant pitch guidance trajectory and the maximum angle of attack guidance trajectory; (v) the survival capability of the optimal abort landing trajectory in a severe windshear is superior to that of comparison trajectories, for example, the constant pitch guidance trajectory and the maximum angle of attack guidance trajectory. More... »
PAGES165-202
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00939080
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00939080
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045790261
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/09",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Engineering",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/0906",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Electrical and Electronic Engineering",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.21940.3e",
"name": [
"Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Miele",
"givenName": "A.",
"id": "sg:person.015552732657.49",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015552732657.49"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.21940.3e",
"name": [
"Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Wang",
"givenName": "T.",
"id": "sg:person.014414570607.44",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014414570607.44"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.21940.3e",
"name": [
"Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Tzeng",
"givenName": "C. Y.",
"id": "sg:person.014727077257.24",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014727077257.24"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Airworthiness and Performance Committee, Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), Washington, DC",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"Delta Airlines, Atlanta, Georgia",
"Airworthiness and Performance Committee, Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), Washington, DC"
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Melvin",
"givenName": "W. W.",
"id": "sg:person.011027201155.13",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011027201155.13"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939214",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1049857998",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939214"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939432",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1036244035",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939432"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00938475",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1005655216",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00938475"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939246",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1016081985",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939246"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00933463",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007322541",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00933463"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "1987-11",
"datePublishedReg": "1987-11-01",
"description": "This paper is concerned with optimal flight trajectories in the presence of windshear. The abort landing problem is considered with reference to flight in a vertical plane. It is assumed that, upon sensing that the airplane is in a windshear, the pilot increases the power setting at a constant time rate until maximum power setting is reached; afterward, the power setting is held constant. Hence, the only control is the angle of attack. Inequality constraints are imposed on both the angle of attack and its time derivative.The performance index being minimized is the peak value of the altitude drop. The resulting optimization problem is a minimax problem or Chebyshev problem of optimal control, which can be converted into a Bolza problem through suitable transformations. The Bolza problem is then solved employing the dual sequential gradient-restoration algorithm (DSGRA) for optimal control problems. Numerical results are obtained for several combinations of windshear intensities, initial altitudes, and power setting rates.For strong-to-severe windshears, the following conclusions are reached: (i) the optimal trajectory includes three branches: a descending flight branch, followed by a nearly horizontal flight branch, followed by an ascending flight branch after the aircraft has passed through the shear region; (ii) along an optimal trajectory, the point of minimum velocity is reached at about the time when the shear ends; (iii) the peak altitude drop depends on the windshear intensity, the initial altitude, and the power setting rate; it increases as the windshear intensity increases and the initial altitude increases; and it decreases as the power setting rate increases; (iv) the peak altitude drop of the optimal abort landing trajectory is less than the peak altitude drop of comparison trajectories, for example, the constant pitch guidance trajectory and the maximum angle of attack guidance trajectory; (v) the survival capability of the optimal abort landing trajectory in a severe windshear is superior to that of comparison trajectories, for example, the constant pitch guidance trajectory and the maximum angle of attack guidance trajectory.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939080",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1044187",
"issn": [
"0022-3239",
"1573-2878"
],
"name": "Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "2",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "55"
}
],
"keywords": [
"peak altitude drop",
"dual sequential gradient-restoration algorithm",
"presence of windshear",
"Bolza problem",
"severe windshear",
"windshear intensities",
"optimal trajectories",
"optimal control problem",
"altitude drop",
"sequential gradient-restoration algorithm",
"angle of attack",
"abort landing problem",
"gradient-restoration algorithm",
"optimal flight trajectories",
"attack guidance",
"constant time rate",
"optimal control",
"Chebyshev problem",
"control problem",
"inequality constraints",
"minimax problem",
"optimization problem",
"suitable transformation",
"time derivative",
"initial altitude",
"landing problem",
"numerical results",
"landing trajectories",
"performance index",
"power settings",
"windshear",
"maximum power setting",
"shear region",
"flight trajectory",
"time rate",
"maximum angle",
"trajectories",
"problem",
"minimum velocity",
"vertical plane",
"rate increases",
"peak value",
"drop",
"only control",
"angle",
"branches",
"algorithm",
"constraints",
"aircraft",
"velocity",
"power",
"altitude increases",
"intensity increases",
"plane",
"airplane",
"point",
"flight",
"altitude",
"setting rate",
"capability",
"control",
"transformation",
"increase",
"derivatives",
"rate",
"example",
"intensity",
"guidance",
"results",
"values",
"pilot",
"reference",
"time",
"combination",
"presence",
"attacks",
"setting",
"region",
"abort",
"index",
"survival capability",
"conclusion",
"paper"
],
"name": "Optimal abort landing trajectories in the presence of windshear",
"pagination": "165-202",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1045790261"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/bf00939080"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939080",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045790261"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-08-04T16:50",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220804/entities/gbq_results/article/article_204.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939080"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00939080'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00939080'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00939080'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00939080'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
185 TRIPLES
21 PREDICATES
113 URIs
100 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939080 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:09 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:0906 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | N9f2e66bd8878457fa6ee3ab4f0d8231a |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00933463 |
5 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00938475 |
6 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939214 |
7 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939246 |
8 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939432 |
9 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 1987-11 |
10 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 1987-11-01 |
11 | ″ | schema:description | This paper is concerned with optimal flight trajectories in the presence of windshear. The abort landing problem is considered with reference to flight in a vertical plane. It is assumed that, upon sensing that the airplane is in a windshear, the pilot increases the power setting at a constant time rate until maximum power setting is reached; afterward, the power setting is held constant. Hence, the only control is the angle of attack. Inequality constraints are imposed on both the angle of attack and its time derivative.The performance index being minimized is the peak value of the altitude drop. The resulting optimization problem is a minimax problem or Chebyshev problem of optimal control, which can be converted into a Bolza problem through suitable transformations. The Bolza problem is then solved employing the dual sequential gradient-restoration algorithm (DSGRA) for optimal control problems. Numerical results are obtained for several combinations of windshear intensities, initial altitudes, and power setting rates.For strong-to-severe windshears, the following conclusions are reached: (i) the optimal trajectory includes three branches: a descending flight branch, followed by a nearly horizontal flight branch, followed by an ascending flight branch after the aircraft has passed through the shear region; (ii) along an optimal trajectory, the point of minimum velocity is reached at about the time when the shear ends; (iii) the peak altitude drop depends on the windshear intensity, the initial altitude, and the power setting rate; it increases as the windshear intensity increases and the initial altitude increases; and it decreases as the power setting rate increases; (iv) the peak altitude drop of the optimal abort landing trajectory is less than the peak altitude drop of comparison trajectories, for example, the constant pitch guidance trajectory and the maximum angle of attack guidance trajectory; (v) the survival capability of the optimal abort landing trajectory in a severe windshear is superior to that of comparison trajectories, for example, the constant pitch guidance trajectory and the maximum angle of attack guidance trajectory. |
12 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
13 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
14 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N6efee1d742a7468aafd93837f9301ecc |
15 | ″ | ″ | N9fe94001bd5f4fe0bd3f2abc52b562d6 |
16 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1044187 |
17 | ″ | schema:keywords | Bolza problem |
18 | ″ | ″ | Chebyshev problem |
19 | ″ | ″ | abort |
20 | ″ | ″ | abort landing problem |
21 | ″ | ″ | aircraft |
22 | ″ | ″ | airplane |
23 | ″ | ″ | algorithm |
24 | ″ | ″ | altitude |
25 | ″ | ″ | altitude drop |
26 | ″ | ″ | altitude increases |
27 | ″ | ″ | angle |
28 | ″ | ″ | angle of attack |
29 | ″ | ″ | attack guidance |
30 | ″ | ″ | attacks |
31 | ″ | ″ | branches |
32 | ″ | ″ | capability |
33 | ″ | ″ | combination |
34 | ″ | ″ | conclusion |
35 | ″ | ″ | constant time rate |
36 | ″ | ″ | constraints |
37 | ″ | ″ | control |
38 | ″ | ″ | control problem |
39 | ″ | ″ | derivatives |
40 | ″ | ″ | drop |
41 | ″ | ″ | dual sequential gradient-restoration algorithm |
42 | ″ | ″ | example |
43 | ″ | ″ | flight |
44 | ″ | ″ | flight trajectory |
45 | ″ | ″ | gradient-restoration algorithm |
46 | ″ | ″ | guidance |
47 | ″ | ″ | increase |
48 | ″ | ″ | index |
49 | ″ | ″ | inequality constraints |
50 | ″ | ″ | initial altitude |
51 | ″ | ″ | intensity |
52 | ″ | ″ | intensity increases |
53 | ″ | ″ | landing problem |
54 | ″ | ″ | landing trajectories |
55 | ″ | ″ | maximum angle |
56 | ″ | ″ | maximum power setting |
57 | ″ | ″ | minimax problem |
58 | ″ | ″ | minimum velocity |
59 | ″ | ″ | numerical results |
60 | ″ | ″ | only control |
61 | ″ | ″ | optimal control |
62 | ″ | ″ | optimal control problem |
63 | ″ | ″ | optimal flight trajectories |
64 | ″ | ″ | optimal trajectories |
65 | ″ | ″ | optimization problem |
66 | ″ | ″ | paper |
67 | ″ | ″ | peak altitude drop |
68 | ″ | ″ | peak value |
69 | ″ | ″ | performance index |
70 | ″ | ″ | pilot |
71 | ″ | ″ | plane |
72 | ″ | ″ | point |
73 | ″ | ″ | power |
74 | ″ | ″ | power settings |
75 | ″ | ″ | presence |
76 | ″ | ″ | presence of windshear |
77 | ″ | ″ | problem |
78 | ″ | ″ | rate |
79 | ″ | ″ | rate increases |
80 | ″ | ″ | reference |
81 | ″ | ″ | region |
82 | ″ | ″ | results |
83 | ″ | ″ | sequential gradient-restoration algorithm |
84 | ″ | ″ | setting |
85 | ″ | ″ | setting rate |
86 | ″ | ″ | severe windshear |
87 | ″ | ″ | shear region |
88 | ″ | ″ | suitable transformation |
89 | ″ | ″ | survival capability |
90 | ″ | ″ | time |
91 | ″ | ″ | time derivative |
92 | ″ | ″ | time rate |
93 | ″ | ″ | trajectories |
94 | ″ | ″ | transformation |
95 | ″ | ″ | values |
96 | ″ | ″ | velocity |
97 | ″ | ″ | vertical plane |
98 | ″ | ″ | windshear |
99 | ″ | ″ | windshear intensities |
100 | ″ | schema:name | Optimal abort landing trajectories in the presence of windshear |
101 | ″ | schema:pagination | 165-202 |
102 | ″ | schema:productId | N3cec5ee94c9f47008a056e9ab0cea0c4 |
103 | ″ | ″ | N89cc9b92daef4b8e9758a337521f41e2 |
104 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1045790261 |
105 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939080 |
106 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-08-04T16:50 |
107 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
108 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | Nd5de3e096f1640b1bb6373431712b3c0 |
109 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939080 |
110 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
111 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
112 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
113 | N3cec5ee94c9f47008a056e9ab0cea0c4 | schema:name | dimensions_id |
114 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1045790261 |
115 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
116 | N4e5ae8cb2720449b8a819203bfa11e9c | rdf:first | sg:person.014414570607.44 |
117 | ″ | rdf:rest | N6318778a8a34437e933d322076da4d13 |
118 | N6318778a8a34437e933d322076da4d13 | rdf:first | sg:person.014727077257.24 |
119 | ″ | rdf:rest | Nc549f20c4e084d97ab02c630ee2ca5d7 |
120 | N6efee1d742a7468aafd93837f9301ecc | schema:issueNumber | 2 |
121 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
122 | N89cc9b92daef4b8e9758a337521f41e2 | schema:name | doi |
123 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/bf00939080 |
124 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
125 | N9f2e66bd8878457fa6ee3ab4f0d8231a | rdf:first | sg:person.015552732657.49 |
126 | ″ | rdf:rest | N4e5ae8cb2720449b8a819203bfa11e9c |
127 | N9fe94001bd5f4fe0bd3f2abc52b562d6 | schema:volumeNumber | 55 |
128 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
129 | Nc549f20c4e084d97ab02c630ee2ca5d7 | rdf:first | sg:person.011027201155.13 |
130 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
131 | Nd5de3e096f1640b1bb6373431712b3c0 | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
132 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
133 | anzsrc-for:09 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
134 | ″ | schema:name | Engineering |
135 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
136 | anzsrc-for:0906 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
137 | ″ | schema:name | Electrical and Electronic Engineering |
138 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
139 | sg:journal.1044187 | schema:issn | 0022-3239 |
140 | ″ | ″ | 1573-2878 |
141 | ″ | schema:name | Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications |
142 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
143 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
144 | sg:person.011027201155.13 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
145 | ″ | schema:familyName | Melvin |
146 | ″ | schema:givenName | W. W. |
147 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.011027201155.13 |
148 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
149 | sg:person.014414570607.44 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.21940.3e |
150 | ″ | schema:familyName | Wang |
151 | ″ | schema:givenName | T. |
152 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014414570607.44 |
153 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
154 | sg:person.014727077257.24 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.21940.3e |
155 | ″ | schema:familyName | Tzeng |
156 | ″ | schema:givenName | C. Y. |
157 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014727077257.24 |
158 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
159 | sg:person.015552732657.49 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.21940.3e |
160 | ″ | schema:familyName | Miele |
161 | ″ | schema:givenName | A. |
162 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015552732657.49 |
163 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
164 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00933463 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1007322541 |
165 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00933463 |
166 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
167 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00938475 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1005655216 |
168 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00938475 |
169 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
170 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939214 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1049857998 |
171 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939214 |
172 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
173 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939246 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1016081985 |
174 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939246 |
175 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
176 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00939432 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1036244035 |
177 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939432 |
178 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
179 | grid-institutes:None | schema:alternateName | Airworthiness and Performance Committee, Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), Washington, DC |
180 | ″ | schema:name | Airworthiness and Performance Committee, Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), Washington, DC |
181 | ″ | ″ | Delta Airlines, Atlanta, Georgia |
182 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
183 | grid-institutes:grid.21940.3e | schema:alternateName | Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas |
184 | ″ | schema:name | Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University, Houston, Texas |
185 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |