Ontology type: schema:ScholarlyArticle
1996-06
AUTHORSRobert J. Lempert, Michael E. Schlesinger, Steve C. Bankes
ABSTRACTMost quantitative studies of climate-change policy attempt to predict the greenhouse-gas reduction plan that will have the optimum balance of long-term costs and benefits. We find that the large uncertainties associated with the climate-change problem can make the policy prescriptions of this traditional approach unreliable. In this study, we construct a large uncertainty space that includes the possibility of large and/or abrupt climate changes and/or of technology breakthroughs that radically reduce projected abatement costs. We use computational experiments on a linked system of climate and economic models to compare the performance of a simple adaptive strategy - one that can make midcourse corrections based on observations of the climate and economic systems - and two commonly advocated ‘best-estimate’ policies based on different expectations about the longterm consequences of climate change. We find that the ‘Do-a-Little’ and ‘Emissions-Stabilization’ best-estimate policies perform well in the respective regions of the uncertainty space where their estimates are valid, but can fail severely in those regions where their estimates are wrong. In contrast, the adaptive strategy can make midcourse corrections and avoid significant errors. While its success is no surprise, the adaptive-strategy approach provides an analytic framework to examine important policy and research issues that will likely arise as society adapts to climate change, which cannot be easily addressed in studies using best-estimate approaches. More... »
PAGES235-274
http://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00140248
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00140248
DIMENSIONShttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1025061398
JSON-LD is the canonical representation for SciGraph data.
TIP: You can open this SciGraph record using an external JSON-LD service: JSON-LD Playground Google SDTT
[
{
"@context": "https://springernature.github.io/scigraph/jsonld/sgcontext.json",
"about": [
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/14",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Economics",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
},
{
"id": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/1402",
"inDefinedTermSet": "http://purl.org/au-research/vocabulary/anzsrc-for/2008/",
"name": "Applied Economics",
"type": "DefinedTerm"
}
],
"author": [
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "RAND, 1700 Main St., 90407, Santa Monica, CA, U.S.A.",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.34474.30",
"name": [
"RAND, 1700 Main St., 90407, Santa Monica, CA, U.S.A."
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Lempert",
"givenName": "Robert J.",
"id": "sg:person.01214111434.56",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01214111434.56"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of IllinoisUrbana-Champaign, 105 South Gregory Ave., 61801, Urbana, IL, U.S.A.",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/None",
"name": [
"Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of IllinoisUrbana-Champaign, 105 South Gregory Ave., 61801, Urbana, IL, U.S.A."
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Schlesinger",
"givenName": "Michael E.",
"id": "sg:person.015755327722.56",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015755327722.56"
],
"type": "Person"
},
{
"affiliation": {
"alternateName": "RAND, 1700 Main St., 90407, Santa Monica, CA, U.S.A.",
"id": "http://www.grid.ac/institutes/grid.34474.30",
"name": [
"RAND, 1700 Main St., 90407, Santa Monica, CA, U.S.A."
],
"type": "Organization"
},
"familyName": "Bankes",
"givenName": "Steve C.",
"id": "sg:person.014006402517.94",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014006402517.94"
],
"type": "Person"
}
],
"citation": [
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-009-0691-4",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1012750287",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0691-4"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf01054491",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1040451933",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01054491"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/350219a0",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1011203009",
"https://doi.org/10.1038/350219a0"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/357315a0",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1011758178",
"https://doi.org/10.1038/357315a0"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf01094402",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1006954065",
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01094402"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
},
{
"id": "sg:pub.10.1038/scientificamerican0990-64",
"sameAs": [
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1056600963",
"https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0990-64"
],
"type": "CreativeWork"
}
],
"datePublished": "1996-06",
"datePublishedReg": "1996-06-01",
"description": "Most quantitative studies of climate-change policy attempt to predict the greenhouse-gas reduction plan that will have the optimum balance of long-term costs and benefits. We find that the large uncertainties associated with the climate-change problem can make the policy prescriptions of this traditional approach unreliable. In this study, we construct a large uncertainty space that includes the possibility of large and/or abrupt climate changes and/or of technology breakthroughs that radically reduce projected abatement costs. We use computational experiments on a linked system of climate and economic models to compare the performance of a simple adaptive strategy - one that can make midcourse corrections based on observations of the climate and economic systems - and two commonly advocated \u2018best-estimate\u2019 policies based on different expectations about the longterm consequences of climate change. We find that the \u2018Do-a-Little\u2019 and \u2018Emissions-Stabilization\u2019 best-estimate policies perform well in the respective regions of the uncertainty space where their estimates are valid, but can fail severely in those regions where their estimates are wrong. In contrast, the adaptive strategy can make midcourse corrections and avoid significant errors. While its success is no surprise, the adaptive-strategy approach provides an analytic framework to examine important policy and research issues that will likely arise as society adapts to climate change, which cannot be easily addressed in studies using best-estimate approaches.",
"genre": "article",
"id": "sg:pub.10.1007/bf00140248",
"inLanguage": "en",
"isAccessibleForFree": false,
"isPartOf": [
{
"id": "sg:journal.1028211",
"issn": [
"0165-0009",
"1573-1480"
],
"name": "Climatic Change",
"publisher": "Springer Nature",
"type": "Periodical"
},
{
"issueNumber": "2",
"type": "PublicationIssue"
},
{
"type": "PublicationVolume",
"volumeNumber": "33"
}
],
"keywords": [
"system of climate",
"long-term costs",
"economic model",
"policy prescriptions",
"abatement costs",
"economic system",
"midcourse corrections",
"policy attempts",
"important policy",
"climate change problem",
"policy",
"climate change",
"cost",
"different expectations",
"reduction plan",
"respective regions",
"uncertainty space",
"analytic framework",
"longterm consequences",
"best estimate approach",
"estimates",
"benefits",
"traditional approaches",
"technology breakthroughs",
"uncertainty",
"surprise",
"expectations",
"research issues",
"framework",
"strategies",
"computational experiments",
"approach",
"changes",
"society",
"issues",
"plan",
"model",
"consequences",
"balance",
"optimum balance",
"quantitative study",
"adaptive strategies",
"success",
"attempt",
"large uncertainties",
"climate",
"region",
"study",
"problem",
"abrupt climate change",
"performance",
"prescription",
"possibility",
"system",
"error",
"contrast",
"breakthrough",
"significant errors",
"space",
"experiments",
"observations",
"correction"
],
"name": "When we don't know the costs or the benefits: Adaptive strategies for abating climate change",
"pagination": "235-274",
"productId": [
{
"name": "dimensions_id",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"pub.1025061398"
]
},
{
"name": "doi",
"type": "PropertyValue",
"value": [
"10.1007/bf00140248"
]
}
],
"sameAs": [
"https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00140248",
"https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1025061398"
],
"sdDataset": "articles",
"sdDatePublished": "2022-06-01T22:02",
"sdLicense": "https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/",
"sdPublisher": {
"name": "Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project",
"type": "Organization"
},
"sdSource": "s3://com-springernature-scigraph/baseset/20220601/entities/gbq_results/article/article_276.jsonl",
"type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00140248"
}
]
Download the RDF metadata as: json-ld nt turtle xml License info
JSON-LD is a popular format for linked data which is fully compatible with JSON.
curl -H 'Accept: application/ld+json' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00140248'
N-Triples is a line-based linked data format ideal for batch operations.
curl -H 'Accept: application/n-triples' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00140248'
Turtle is a human-readable linked data format.
curl -H 'Accept: text/turtle' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00140248'
RDF/XML is a standard XML format for linked data.
curl -H 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' 'https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/bf00140248'
This table displays all metadata directly associated to this object as RDF triples.
161 TRIPLES
22 PREDICATES
94 URIs
80 LITERALS
6 BLANK NODES
Subject | Predicate | Object | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf00140248 | schema:about | anzsrc-for:14 |
2 | ″ | ″ | anzsrc-for:1402 |
3 | ″ | schema:author | Nd946f55b23b94375a0a2f333925b1591 |
4 | ″ | schema:citation | sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-009-0691-4 |
5 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/bf01054491 |
6 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1007/bf01094402 |
7 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1038/350219a0 |
8 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1038/357315a0 |
9 | ″ | ″ | sg:pub.10.1038/scientificamerican0990-64 |
10 | ″ | schema:datePublished | 1996-06 |
11 | ″ | schema:datePublishedReg | 1996-06-01 |
12 | ″ | schema:description | Most quantitative studies of climate-change policy attempt to predict the greenhouse-gas reduction plan that will have the optimum balance of long-term costs and benefits. We find that the large uncertainties associated with the climate-change problem can make the policy prescriptions of this traditional approach unreliable. In this study, we construct a large uncertainty space that includes the possibility of large and/or abrupt climate changes and/or of technology breakthroughs that radically reduce projected abatement costs. We use computational experiments on a linked system of climate and economic models to compare the performance of a simple adaptive strategy - one that can make midcourse corrections based on observations of the climate and economic systems - and two commonly advocated ‘best-estimate’ policies based on different expectations about the longterm consequences of climate change. We find that the ‘Do-a-Little’ and ‘Emissions-Stabilization’ best-estimate policies perform well in the respective regions of the uncertainty space where their estimates are valid, but can fail severely in those regions where their estimates are wrong. In contrast, the adaptive strategy can make midcourse corrections and avoid significant errors. While its success is no surprise, the adaptive-strategy approach provides an analytic framework to examine important policy and research issues that will likely arise as society adapts to climate change, which cannot be easily addressed in studies using best-estimate approaches. |
13 | ″ | schema:genre | article |
14 | ″ | schema:inLanguage | en |
15 | ″ | schema:isAccessibleForFree | false |
16 | ″ | schema:isPartOf | N335416bac38c4232945cc594549713e0 |
17 | ″ | ″ | N59496f3c163342d09bdef3eb8f3894b6 |
18 | ″ | ″ | sg:journal.1028211 |
19 | ″ | schema:keywords | abatement costs |
20 | ″ | ″ | abrupt climate change |
21 | ″ | ″ | adaptive strategies |
22 | ″ | ″ | analytic framework |
23 | ″ | ″ | approach |
24 | ″ | ″ | attempt |
25 | ″ | ″ | balance |
26 | ″ | ″ | benefits |
27 | ″ | ″ | best estimate approach |
28 | ″ | ″ | breakthrough |
29 | ″ | ″ | changes |
30 | ″ | ″ | climate |
31 | ″ | ″ | climate change |
32 | ″ | ″ | climate change problem |
33 | ″ | ″ | computational experiments |
34 | ″ | ″ | consequences |
35 | ″ | ″ | contrast |
36 | ″ | ″ | correction |
37 | ″ | ″ | cost |
38 | ″ | ″ | different expectations |
39 | ″ | ″ | economic model |
40 | ″ | ″ | economic system |
41 | ″ | ″ | error |
42 | ″ | ″ | estimates |
43 | ″ | ″ | expectations |
44 | ″ | ″ | experiments |
45 | ″ | ″ | framework |
46 | ″ | ″ | important policy |
47 | ″ | ″ | issues |
48 | ″ | ″ | large uncertainties |
49 | ″ | ″ | long-term costs |
50 | ″ | ″ | longterm consequences |
51 | ″ | ″ | midcourse corrections |
52 | ″ | ″ | model |
53 | ″ | ″ | observations |
54 | ″ | ″ | optimum balance |
55 | ″ | ″ | performance |
56 | ″ | ″ | plan |
57 | ″ | ″ | policy |
58 | ″ | ″ | policy attempts |
59 | ″ | ″ | policy prescriptions |
60 | ″ | ″ | possibility |
61 | ″ | ″ | prescription |
62 | ″ | ″ | problem |
63 | ″ | ″ | quantitative study |
64 | ″ | ″ | reduction plan |
65 | ″ | ″ | region |
66 | ″ | ″ | research issues |
67 | ″ | ″ | respective regions |
68 | ″ | ″ | significant errors |
69 | ″ | ″ | society |
70 | ″ | ″ | space |
71 | ″ | ″ | strategies |
72 | ″ | ″ | study |
73 | ″ | ″ | success |
74 | ″ | ″ | surprise |
75 | ″ | ″ | system |
76 | ″ | ″ | system of climate |
77 | ″ | ″ | technology breakthroughs |
78 | ″ | ″ | traditional approaches |
79 | ″ | ″ | uncertainty |
80 | ″ | ″ | uncertainty space |
81 | ″ | schema:name | When we don't know the costs or the benefits: Adaptive strategies for abating climate change |
82 | ″ | schema:pagination | 235-274 |
83 | ″ | schema:productId | N4b998c5850474f1c8eee86bad361bcb9 |
84 | ″ | ″ | Na3cca6d45ab74f6f888fdda05376ff32 |
85 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1025061398 |
86 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00140248 |
87 | ″ | schema:sdDatePublished | 2022-06-01T22:02 |
88 | ″ | schema:sdLicense | https://scigraph.springernature.com/explorer/license/ |
89 | ″ | schema:sdPublisher | N00f9549dc5464f148f5bb93d3b624c97 |
90 | ″ | schema:url | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00140248 |
91 | ″ | sgo:license | sg:explorer/license/ |
92 | ″ | sgo:sdDataset | articles |
93 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:ScholarlyArticle |
94 | N00f9549dc5464f148f5bb93d3b624c97 | schema:name | Springer Nature - SN SciGraph project |
95 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
96 | N17b1ee0ad8044e2588df45145d22bed2 | rdf:first | sg:person.015755327722.56 |
97 | ″ | rdf:rest | N587e6edd16be444586f8795bc9535696 |
98 | N335416bac38c4232945cc594549713e0 | schema:volumeNumber | 33 |
99 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationVolume |
100 | N4b998c5850474f1c8eee86bad361bcb9 | schema:name | doi |
101 | ″ | schema:value | 10.1007/bf00140248 |
102 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
103 | N587e6edd16be444586f8795bc9535696 | rdf:first | sg:person.014006402517.94 |
104 | ″ | rdf:rest | rdf:nil |
105 | N59496f3c163342d09bdef3eb8f3894b6 | schema:issueNumber | 2 |
106 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PublicationIssue |
107 | Na3cca6d45ab74f6f888fdda05376ff32 | schema:name | dimensions_id |
108 | ″ | schema:value | pub.1025061398 |
109 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:PropertyValue |
110 | Nd946f55b23b94375a0a2f333925b1591 | rdf:first | sg:person.01214111434.56 |
111 | ″ | rdf:rest | N17b1ee0ad8044e2588df45145d22bed2 |
112 | anzsrc-for:14 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
113 | ″ | schema:name | Economics |
114 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
115 | anzsrc-for:1402 | schema:inDefinedTermSet | anzsrc-for: |
116 | ″ | schema:name | Applied Economics |
117 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:DefinedTerm |
118 | sg:journal.1028211 | schema:issn | 0165-0009 |
119 | ″ | ″ | 1573-1480 |
120 | ″ | schema:name | Climatic Change |
121 | ″ | schema:publisher | Springer Nature |
122 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Periodical |
123 | sg:person.01214111434.56 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.34474.30 |
124 | ″ | schema:familyName | Lempert |
125 | ″ | schema:givenName | Robert J. |
126 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.01214111434.56 |
127 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
128 | sg:person.014006402517.94 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:grid.34474.30 |
129 | ″ | schema:familyName | Bankes |
130 | ″ | schema:givenName | Steve C. |
131 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.014006402517.94 |
132 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
133 | sg:person.015755327722.56 | schema:affiliation | grid-institutes:None |
134 | ″ | schema:familyName | Schlesinger |
135 | ″ | schema:givenName | Michael E. |
136 | ″ | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?and_facet_researcher=ur.015755327722.56 |
137 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Person |
138 | sg:pub.10.1007/978-94-009-0691-4 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1012750287 |
139 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0691-4 |
140 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
141 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf01054491 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1040451933 |
142 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01054491 |
143 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
144 | sg:pub.10.1007/bf01094402 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1006954065 |
145 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01094402 |
146 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
147 | sg:pub.10.1038/350219a0 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1011203009 |
148 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1038/350219a0 |
149 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
150 | sg:pub.10.1038/357315a0 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1011758178 |
151 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1038/357315a0 |
152 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
153 | sg:pub.10.1038/scientificamerican0990-64 | schema:sameAs | https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1056600963 |
154 | ″ | ″ | https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0990-64 |
155 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:CreativeWork |
156 | grid-institutes:None | schema:alternateName | Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of IllinoisUrbana-Champaign, 105 South Gregory Ave., 61801, Urbana, IL, U.S.A. |
157 | ″ | schema:name | Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of IllinoisUrbana-Champaign, 105 South Gregory Ave., 61801, Urbana, IL, U.S.A. |
158 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |
159 | grid-institutes:grid.34474.30 | schema:alternateName | RAND, 1700 Main St., 90407, Santa Monica, CA, U.S.A. |
160 | ″ | schema:name | RAND, 1700 Main St., 90407, Santa Monica, CA, U.S.A. |
161 | ″ | rdf:type | schema:Organization |